The case against having kids

They can hurt your career, your marriage, your social life, your bank book. Why bother?

by Anne Kingston on Friday, July 24, 2009 12:20pm - 654 Comments

The case against having kidsElaine Lui was 29 years old and had been married for a year when she and her husband, Jacek Szenowicz, decided that they didn’t want children. “Before that, we didn’t give it a lot of thought,” says the Vancouver-based eTalk reporter who writes the popular celebrity gossip blog LaineyGossip.com. “It was just an assumption, ‘You get married, you have kids.’ ” Front-line exposure to a close relative’s three young children and the work they required provided a wake-up call, Lui says. “That killed it for us. We just looked at each other and said, ‘We don’t want them.’ ”

In the ensuing six years, the couple has been barraged with reasons why they should change their minds, from “Your life will have no value if you don’t” to “You’ll be so lonely when you get old” to Lui’s favourite: “Don’t you want to know what your children would look like?” “Any baby we’d have would be of mixed race,” she says. “So everyone says, ‘Oh, it would be so gorgeous!’ ” She laughs. “And I’m like, ‘Wow, that’s really going to make me want to change my whole life.’ ” It’s a life the couple enjoys: they work together on her website (he handles the business side), golf together, engage in community volunteer work, and dote on their dog, Marcus.

As baby refuseniks, Lui and Szenowicz belong to a tiny but growing minority challenging the final frontier of reproductive freedom: the right to say no to children without being labelled social misfits or selfish for something they don’t want.

“Are you planning to have children?” is a question Statistics Canada has asked since 1990. In 2006, 17.1 per cent of women aged 30 to 34 said “no,” as did 18.3 per cent of men in the same category. The U.S. National Center of Health Statistics reports that the number of American women of childbearing age who define themselves as “child-free” rose sharply in the past generation: 6.2 per cent of women in 2002 between the ages of 15 and 44 reported that they don’t expect to have children in their lifetime, up from 4.9 per cent in 1982.

Still, in a pro-natalist culture that celebrates the “yummy mummy,” and obsessively monitors baby bumps and the mini Jolie-Pitt entourage in magazines, saying “I don’t want kids” is akin to “There’s a bomb on the plane.” In the past, those who chose not to have children did so quietly, observes Toronto-based poet Molly Peacock, whose 1998 memoir Paradise, Piece by Piece was acclaimed a breakthrough for its candid recounting of her decision not to have children. “It has been an intense and underground conversation,” Peacock says, noting many childless women contacted her to say, “At last, someone is talking about what I’ve been living silently.”

Increasingly, though, the childless by choice are vocal about it. Laura and Vincent Ciaccio are spokespeople for No Kidding!, a social club for non-parents founded in Vancouver in 1984 that now boasts more than 40 chapters in five countries. Laura, a 31-year-old attorney in New York City, refers to children as a “calling,” one that she and Vincent, a Ph.D. candidate in social psychology at Rutgers University, have decided isn’t for them. “I didn’t want to make such a major lifestyle change just because it was something society expected of me,” she says. “Children should be something people have because they really want them.”

Speaking up on the subject can elicit a smackdown. Last February, the 37-year-old British journalist Polly Vernon wrote a defiant column in the Guardian enumerating the reasons she didn’t want children: “I’m appalled by the idea,” she wrote. “Both instinctually (‘Euuuw! You think I should do what to my body?’) and intellectually (‘And also to my career, my finances, my lifestyle and my independence?’).” The response was terrifying, she reports: “Emails and letters arrived, condemning me, expressing disgust. I was denounced as bitter, selfish, un-sisterly, unnatural, evil. I’m now routinely referred to as ‘baby-hating journalist Polly Vernon.’ ”

Lui, who observes celebrity for a living, rejects what she sees as a pernicious retrograde swing back to the ’50s in which motherhood was celebrated as women’s highest calling. She points to actress Jennifer Garner remaining relevant in the celebrity press simply by being photographed with her two young daughters, and to Tori Spelling reclaiming her reputation after breaking up her current husband’s marriage by churning out bestsellers about motherhood. “Motherhood is the ultimate whitewash,” she says. “Steal someone’s husband, or be a drug addict, then become a mother and you’re redeemed.”

Bookmark and Share
  • guis

    is that what you tell yourself god I'm glad I didn't have kids cause it would have killed my sex life…really….. that because you have kids the spontaneity , fun , your body, your marrige, your money.. is gone forever….this is what you tell yourself…it's really sad that your husband had three kids by the time he was 26 and hated every minute of it….cause he had no part in the making of those kids right…and he might have felt that his kids ruined his life …but not all of us feel that way…growing up I didn't want kids…but I'm grateful that I made the choice to have them…..

  • guis

    …… Is having kids work ….sure but I'm not a lazy person ….as for having kids because we didn't know what it would be like …I can honestly say that I knew what it would be like and I'm an only child …infact I thought it would alot harder then it is…..those who can't find happiness in what they have never will that's a fact of life… as for the whole ….if you don't want kids or didn't and don't have them good for you that was your choice…however don't foster your veiw of what you think having children is on those who do or hope to have them…you honestly think that all parents feel the way your husbands does towards the kids they have…then your fooling yourself…..

  • Jennifer

    Parenting is a challenge but those who believe that the world would be better off if people didn't have kids are ignorant to their biological destiny. At the end of the day we are just another species on the planet and our survival depends on our ability to procreate. Maybe a world without crying babies, whining toddlers and insolent teenagers seems like a good idea, but in the end we wouldn't be here for much longer. The selfish people are those who are too short sighted to see the long term impact of ceasing to give birth.

  • Coryc

    Is nobody disturbed by the fact that less educated somebody is, the more likely they are to have kids? Basically, dumb people are breeding faster than smart people. If you thought the average person was stupid before, wait a generation or two.

    But women who have their careers stall because of kids, it's because your employer wants your soul. If you have kids, you can't commit to the company like they want you to.

  • Robin

    I chose to be childfree when I was sixteen. Because of my choice I have been able to live and travel all over the world and I was able to retire at 55 which has given me even more freedom.

    I have close friends with children and have been more or less an uncle to them and the kids have been a joy, but watching the parents struggle to house, feed and care for their kids is painful.

    All of them love their kids but only about half would have kids if they could do it over. Having children is a huge financial and emotional challenge and it is not something to do lightly.

  • Julie Rivero

    Thank you for your article! The last line "Why did we fight so hard for the right to make this choice, only to have it not respected when we do?" is exactly how I have felt for many many years! Why must we celebrate other people's choice to have children (think of the endless parade of baby showers, children's birthday parties and thousands of dollars we spend celebrating their choice to procreate), and no one celebrates our choice not to – they condemn us! How unfair!

  • TheCat

    The reasons people choose to have or to not have kids is dependant on the individual and is a varied as there are personatlities and may be selfish or may be highly unselfish. I know parents who are VERY selfish and immature, I also know people who choose not to have kids who are very unselfish personalities and if they had choosen to be parents would be excellent parents because they make decisions based on wise choices. If a parent finds themselves lacking rest and chooses to take some time to themselves away from there kids in order to feel rejuvenated is that selfish or just making a wise decision based on good parenting? Obviously, in order to be a good parent one needs rest……..so in other words on needs to be "selfish" in order to be a good parent.

  • The Cat

    A lot of people feel a need to have children, is it that they want someone to carry on there genes, someone to look after them in their old age or to keep them from being lonely, is it a need to be busy, is it a need to feel a part of you in your arms and to look into their little faces and know that they are totally and utterly dependant on you, is it a need to feel wanted and needed as a parent by societies standards, or is it to keep society from viewing you as selfish or unimportant? On deciding to be a parent, you need to ask yourself is being a parent the only way to be a important and contributing part of society? AND is this the very best way for ME to be the best that I can be for myself and for society based on my individual circumstances? And is your decision based on a want and not a need. The decision itself has to be a "selfish" one otherwise it is not an honest one and is not best for society or YOU. If you are having kids because you feel the need and yet you don't truly have the financial ability to take care of them. Ask yourself, is that selfish? How many people do you know that struggle every day with finances because they have children to feed?

  • The Cat

    "It is one of the most beautiful compensations in life……..that no man can sincerely try to help another without helping himself"-Ralph Waldo Emerson
    When you raise children you reape the benefits, little smiling faces looking up to you, someone to look after you in your old age, someone to be there so you don't feel lonely, someone to give you a sence of purpose and belonging. Is the reason we don't call that selfish because of the dirty diapers, the midnight feedings, the crying babies and the lifetime commitment that go along with that?

  • Choice

    I think that making the choice to not have children is a mature and RESPONSIBLE way to approach conception. I am a proud mother of 3 beautiful children, and I made the choice to become a mother. I understood what the sacrafices would be, the hard work it would require, the financial and emotional strains it would have on my marriage. Raising kids is not easy, it's not for everyone, and it IS a choice. I think for an adult to to recognize in themselves that "it's just not for them" makes perfect sense. We're talking about children here, you can take a "reactive" approach to being a parent! You can bring a child into the world and then decide "well this just isn't working out" or "boy this was a mistake". No, you have to be proactive, and that means fully understanding yourself as an individual and understanding your partner and the relationship you have. Just as I had the right to want children, so do others to chose not to. I'm a social worker, in my line of work I see hundreds of women each year that have made the decision to NOT have children…only they made that decision too late and their children suffer.

  • Totiki

    I wish those who belittled the lives of those who choose not to have children, saying their life has no value or that they don't know "true love" (my personal experience…) would stop and think: what if that person was your own grown-up child?? Whether or not you'll have grandchildren is not a decision that will be even remotely within your perview…Would you try to pressure them into having kids against their will, try to make them feel like crap about themselves? Don't think so. (Certainly hope not) I wish you'd treat strangers with the same level of respect and humility.

  • totiki

    (continued) A marriage, a house, the decision to parent doesn't make you "more" of a parent than a step parent, foster parent or someone who is forced to raise their fifteen-year younger sibling…and the parent of a biological child or a child adopted as a baby doesn't know what it's like to be a step- or foster parent either, so it goes both ways.

  • Robert

    I was refered to this article by a friend of mine and I enjoyed every single page of the article. Although single you can label me as a childless person by choice for every argument used in this article. Now I wonder if one can pick up the glove and do research in the filed of "who will stay single by choice and why choosing to stay single by choice?"

  • totiki

    Do you remember where you read the post? *just curious*

  • Mary Music

    Cutting to the very quick; I am a nurse in a long-term care facility. I have seen more unhappiness inflicted by children of the elderly than can be mentioned in a "comment." Dozens and hundreds of neglected, aged parents—their money (literally) stolen by their children ,and forced onto Medicare charity rolls, non-existent visits by "caring" relatives, and absolute neglect. After years of sacrifice, this is their reward for their loyalty; better child-free and independent in heart/spirit rather than chained to a proven fact that adult children rarely bother with their parents. My experience is not an anomoly; I represent several agencies for the elderly—-the problem is endemic in modern America!

  • Sarah

    If I had a dollar for every time I'm asked, "Do you have children?" (I am 39 and married to my husband for 13 years.) I would have been able to send one child to college by now. I don't know that we will have children. We haven't necessarily chose NOT to have children. We just haven't decided to have them yet. There are days when I would LOVE to have children, but given my health history with clinical depression/anxiety/thyroid disease…I'm not sure I want to breed or incubate sans the necessary drugs required to keep me on a relatively even keel. My husband is engaged in the never-ending pursuit of a Ph.D. and keeps saying, "That's my baby." I've gotten soooo tired of being asked that eternal question that I know one of these days I'm going to end up biting someone's head off, and that really would not be helpful. People don't know how to respond, it seems, when you say that you do not have children. As the author here says, either they assume you "can't" have children and so don't want to get too personal (ha! too late!) OR they assume that you have some deep dislike for children and must be completely self-centered.It's a no win situation when confronted with this question.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Nizumi25 Nizumi25

    I've been asked "How will you know if you never try?'' This isn't a pair of shoes we're talking about!

    I count myself lucky that the one thing I have always known about myself – well, at least from the age of 13 – is that I did not want children. I didn't even like babysitting – I'd rather do garden work to earn extra pocket money. And that stands firm to this day, 30 years later.

    I don't worry about not leaving a legacy behind me – having seen some of the "legacies" out there, I think the world will continue turning just fine without mine.

  • butterfly03

    I think having kid's is great. If you have money put aside for them. If you can barely take care of yourself, then it's a stupid idea. I don't believe in abortion but everyone has there reason's for it. I want kid's someday but I want to wait till i'm financially stable and kid provide a good life for my children. I want to be able to live my life first before having kid's so that I don't feel that I've been robbed of my life. If I do get pregneant though I will have the child cause I don't believe in abortion. That being inside of you will alway's be apart of you and you should'nt think of killing it because of your own selfish reason's. Otherwise it should be on terms phycological that you would'nt be able to raise the baby.

  • Jane

    I'm glad that these people are standing up for their decisions. But I don't appreciate the pointing fingers back at parents calling parenthood the ultimate selfishness. I think both options are selfish and unselfish in their own ways and each will suprise the deciders with unexpected feelings and circumstances.

    I am currently unmarried and childLESS. Someday I hope to raise my own brood. When I feel I've done the majority of what I wanted to in my career, and when I've met the right person. But parenthood is a calling for me, and I want to be around for it. I had a tricky childhood, but it doesn't stain my hopes for having my own family, whether adopted or biological.

  • Bruce Howard

    Knew I should be child-free at 20, vasectomy at 27.
    Running out of resources required for life on Earth is not evidence of overpopulation; it's the beginning of depopulation. Overpopulation was our problem fifty years ago when we knew a solution and had a choice. Depopulation is the rotten fruit of unwarranted pride.

  • http://www.dhgate-alibaba.com Alibaba.com

    This could help young parents to train upcoming children of modern era

  • http://electronicsexpo.blogspot.com/ coolest gadgets

    Some parents treat their kids with force on all aspects, but by nature not all kids could be handle with angriness, we have to deal every kid accordingly, we have to act kidish to handle some kids :) !!

  • http://electronicsexpo.blogspot.com/ coolest gadgets

    No, I don't think we are nearly as free as we should be, in terms of government intervention in our private lives. Now, if you're taking philosophy, that's an entirely different kettle of fish.

    At any rate, while I understand the appeal of 'choosing' the right people to breed and eliminating the undesireables, I'm pretty sure we agree that the actions of the Nazis during WWII was wrong, so, why is it ok in this case?

  • smarty

    but not having kids will lead our race to extinction. did anyone think of that? having kids is beautiful. there is alot of sacrifices but its worth it. what if your kids become rich? come on. be smarter than that

    • smarter

      I don't think we really have to worry about that at this point with the earths population having more than tripled since world war 2 ended while simultaneously the average life expectancy has nearly doubled. those numbers are even more outlandish in developing nations. this author isn't advocating no kids for anyone, she is simply supporting peoples right to have a choice without breeders looking down their noses and making alarmist statements like "not having kids will lead our race to extinction". your kids could also become drug addicted criminals, then would all the sacrifice be worth it? until they grow up you can't possibly know. i also find it ironic that you are telling others to be smarter but you have totally failed to support your argument with any facts or actual knowledge.

      • Ensii

        "Breeders" sounds derogatory, just like "parasites" and calling someone "childless" like it's a disease. Having and not having children are both chances you have to be willing to take. Both have room for potential regret.

  • Cadence

    Whether you have kids or not is your choice, because it will your life that will be impacted the most. Friends, family or acquaintances won't have to live with them everyday, and won't miss something that they won't experience.
    That aside, just because you made your choice, it doesn't mean you should force your ideas on others. So what if a couple doesn't want children? They may lack the time or resources to take care of something they don't want. But that doesn't give them the right to call children parasites or diseases to their friends that do want children. On the other hand, if a couple does want children and are smitten with them, it doesn't mean that all their friends feel the same way.

From Macleans