<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will someone leak something from the Conservative Party campaign training conference already?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliticsasUsual</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148297</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliticsasUsual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148297</guid>
		<description>Very little ... but then WK has very few friends in the CPC these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very little &#8230; but then WK has very few friends in the CPC these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliticsasUsual</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148296</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliticsasUsual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148296</guid>
		<description>Well maybe the other guys don&#039;t get new recruits ... but apparently the Conservatives do and they need to be trained ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well maybe the other guys don&#039;t get new recruits &#8230; but apparently the Conservatives do and they need to be trained &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harbles</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148295</link>
		<dc:creator>Harbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148295</guid>
		<description>W.K. has a&lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.warrenkinsella.com\/comments.php\?y=09&amp;amp\;m=07&amp;amp\;entry=entry090728-132406&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;  little intel &lt;/a&gt; from the &#039;event&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W.K. has a<a href="http:\/\/www.warrenkinsella.com\/comments.php\?y=09&#038;amp\;m=07&#038;amp\;entry=entry090728-132406" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">  little intel </a> from the &#039;event&#039;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M_A_N</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148294</link>
		<dc:creator>M_A_N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148294</guid>
		<description>MEMO
Subject: Agenda for Conservative MP election prep training
Here is your new training manual, with a small addition from past training manuals.

CHAPTER 1:

Shut up.

CHAPTER 2:

See Chapter 1.

Congratulations on completing your training.
The Conservative Party of Canada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MEMO<br />
Subject: Agenda for Conservative MP election prep training<br />
Here is your new training manual, with a small addition from past training manuals.</p>
<p>CHAPTER 1:</p>
<p>Shut up.</p>
<p>CHAPTER 2:</p>
<p>See Chapter 1.</p>
<p>Congratulations on completing your training.<br />
The Conservative Party of Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wascally_Wabbit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148293</link>
		<dc:creator>Wascally_Wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148293</guid>
		<description>Oh - the joy of playing these investigatory games and finding all the dark and slithery things under the rocks...
My recent favourite was that of Helena Geurgis sending a monumental amount of flyers into the former riding of hubby Rahim Jaffer to add a little sparkle to his chances - only to find that the CPC was quite firm - they didn&#039;t want old Rahim to run again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh &#8211; the joy of playing these investigatory games and finding all the dark and slithery things under the rocks&#8230;<br />
My recent favourite was that of Helena Geurgis sending a monumental amount of flyers into the former riding of hubby Rahim Jaffer to add a little sparkle to his chances &#8211; only to find that the CPC was quite firm &#8211; they didn&#039;t want old Rahim to run again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wascally_Wabbit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148292</link>
		<dc:creator>Wascally_Wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148292</guid>
		<description>Kind of like the Policy Platform - actually!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of like the Policy Platform &#8211; actually!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wascally_Wabbit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148291</link>
		<dc:creator>Wascally_Wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148291</guid>
		<description>The Globe and Hill Times got leaks Kady - that at least establishes that the event happened...

Now as for the Liberal&#039;s training session - we kept it so close to our vests - that even you didn&#039;t get a sniff.....

Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Globe and Hill Times got leaks Kady &#8211; that at least establishes that the event happened&#8230;</p>
<p>Now as for the Liberal&#039;s training session &#8211; we kept it so close to our vests &#8211; that even you didn&#039;t get a sniff&#8230;..</p>
<p>Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harbles</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148290</link>
		<dc:creator>Harbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148290</guid>
		<description>Have the dwarves got a website?
Is there a help group (link)where this phenomenon has been discussed that you might suggest?

Update,
Asked and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/03/27/memo-to-doug-finley-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; answered&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
The gist of the program is all MPs can send flyers to 10 per cent of constituents in their own or any riding, with various rules applying on the number and timing. Postage is free and the only stipulation is the return addressee must be an MP and not, for example, the Conservative Research Group, the team within Conservative headquarters in Ottawa that tabulates lists of suggested ridings for its MPs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have the dwarves got a website?<br />
Is there a help group (link)where this phenomenon has been discussed that you might suggest?</p>
<p>Update,<br />
Asked and <a href="http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/03/27/memo-to-doug-finley-3/" rel="nofollow"> answered</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
The gist of the program is all MPs can send flyers to 10 per cent of constituents in their own or any riding, with various rules applying on the number and timing. Postage is free and the only stipulation is the return addressee must be an MP and not, for example, the Conservative Research Group, the team within Conservative headquarters in Ottawa that tabulates lists of suggested ridings for its MPs.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harbles</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148286</link>
		<dc:creator>Harbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148286</guid>
		<description>I have a question about this flyer I received in the mail asking &lt;blockquote&gt; Michael Ignatieff&#039;s actual &quot;True Patriot Love&quot; Includes...&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt; yada yada. Is this the, what was the term...15 center?
I live in Mississauga south but the sender is one Mr Ben Lobb(Huron Bruce) , MP with no mention of party affiliation on the document but a very small and totally illegible  symbol that looks like a divided maple leaf in a circle in the bottom corner(update probably &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conservative.ca/media/20080902-Banner-ProductSafety-e.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; product of Canada&lt;/a&gt; logo).
Mr Lobb&#039;s webpage has no mention of his party affiliation except for pictures of Stephen Harper prominently displayed so I assume he wasn&#039;t NDP.
Are we(taxpayers) paying for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about this flyer I received in the mail asking<br />
<blockquote> Michael Ignatieff&#39;s actual &quot;True Patriot Love&quot; Includes&#8230;&quot; </p></blockquote>
<p> yada yada. Is this the, what was the term&#8230;15 center?<br />
I live in Mississauga south but the sender is one Mr Ben Lobb(Huron Bruce) , MP with no mention of party affiliation on the document but a very small and totally illegible  symbol that looks like a divided maple leaf in a circle in the bottom corner(update probably <a href="http://www.conservative.ca/media/20080902-Banner-ProductSafety-e.jpg" rel="nofollow"> product of Canada</a> logo).<br />
Mr Lobb&#39;s webpage has no mention of his party affiliation except for pictures of Stephen Harper prominently displayed so I assume he wasn&#39;t NDP.<br />
Are we(taxpayers) paying for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed_Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed_Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148289</guid>
		<description>- and of giving a politician 10 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- and of giving a politician 10 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148288</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148288</guid>
		<description>Crap on the doorstep is the natural result of teaching pigs to fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap on the doorstep is the natural result of teaching pigs to fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed_Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148287</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed_Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148287</guid>
		<description>No. That particular pamplet is published by dwarves in Middle Earth and delivered by flying pigs, to random doorsteps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. That particular pamplet is published by dwarves in Middle Earth and delivered by flying pigs, to random doorsteps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uncool</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148285</link>
		<dc:creator>uncool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148285</guid>
		<description>Uh well... to be fair, they *are* in government right now. So no - they don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh well&#8230; to be fair, they *are* in government right now. So no &#8211; they don&#039;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgifford2@cogeco.ca</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148284</link>
		<dc:creator>sgifford2@cogeco.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148284</guid>
		<description>Kady - this calls for &quot;bar&quot; work - booze and loose lips.

Maybe there&#039;s nothing to tell.  Each get their PM approved talking points booklet, instructions not to speak unless spoken to by the PM, memorize the rhetoric, memorize how to hate Liberals, look down on the NDP and ignore the Green Party.  And, make sure one gets a photo-op with PM and praise him frequently.

Class over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kady &#8211; this calls for &quot;bar&quot; work &#8211; booze and loose lips.</p>
<p>Maybe there&#039;s nothing to tell.  Each get their PM approved talking points booklet, instructions not to speak unless spoken to by the PM, memorize the rhetoric, memorize how to hate Liberals, look down on the NDP and ignore the Green Party.  And, make sure one gets a photo-op with PM and praise him frequently.</p>
<p>Class over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: civil servant</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148283</link>
		<dc:creator>civil servant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148283</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that part of their training?  That would be a great investigative report: how well does each party&#039;s Hapless 22 year-old DCIHENTO (Deer-Caught-In-Headlights-Eyed Newbie To Ottawa) stack up in a scrumstorm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#039;t that part of their training?  That would be a great investigative report: how well does each party&#039;s Hapless 22 year-old DCIHENTO (Deer-Caught-In-Headlights-Eyed Newbie To Ottawa) stack up in a scrumstorm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an online reader</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148282</link>
		<dc:creator>an online reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148282</guid>
		<description>A new crop of trained seals ? Why not just let our real Representive Government onto the ballot ?

The Hill Times, July 27, 2009
PMO shuffles top-ranking Cabinet staffers
Cabinet ministers&#039; chiefs of staff to hold a retreat at Wilson House to prepare for drama-filled Parliamentary session.
By Abbas Rana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new crop of trained seals ? Why not just let our real Representive Government onto the ballot ?</p>
<p>The Hill Times, July 27, 2009<br />
PMO shuffles top-ranking Cabinet staffers<br />
Cabinet ministers&#039; chiefs of staff to hold a retreat at Wilson House to prepare for drama-filled Parliamentary session.<br />
By Abbas Rana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148281</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148281</guid>
		<description>After three elections in four years, they still need training?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After three elections in four years, they still need training?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KadyITQ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148280</link>
		<dc:creator>KadyITQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148280</guid>
		<description>It depends on the context, really. Usually, it comes down to whether the public interest would be served by covering the event, even if it required the reporter to, for instance, join the Conservative Party and claim to be interested in either running in the next election, or serving as a campaign manager, possibly under an assumed name, depending on how recognizeable they might be to the gatekeepers. I&#039;m not sure if this particular event requires attendees to sign a non-disclosure agreement, but it very well might, which would be another consideration. Given that it&#039;s probably just a lot of CIMS hype and other internal stuff, I&#039;m not sure if that would justify an infiltration attempt. (Trying to get people to leak the good stuff, though, is always fair game.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on the context, really. Usually, it comes down to whether the public interest would be served by covering the event, even if it required the reporter to, for instance, join the Conservative Party and claim to be interested in either running in the next election, or serving as a campaign manager, possibly under an assumed name, depending on how recognizeable they might be to the gatekeepers. I&#039;m not sure if this particular event requires attendees to sign a non-disclosure agreement, but it very well might, which would be another consideration. Given that it&#039;s probably just a lot of CIMS hype and other internal stuff, I&#039;m not sure if that would justify an infiltration attempt. (Trying to get people to leak the good stuff, though, is always fair game.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148279</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148279</guid>
		<description>Duh. Hang out at the Starbucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh. Hang out at the Starbucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McClelland</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148278</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McClelland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148278</guid>
		<description>Is undercover reporting actually unethical? I&#039;ve seen it done on more than one occasion and there wasn&#039;t any concerns about the info being obtained through deceptive means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is undercover reporting actually unethical? I&#039;ve seen it done on more than one occasion and there wasn&#039;t any concerns about the info being obtained through deceptive means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolyon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148277</link>
		<dc:creator>jolyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148277</guid>
		<description>Thank you for taking questions seriously, not snarky. I was curious to know what reporters do to get info nowadays. Buttonholing pols and their minions has a long, noble history and should happen much more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking questions seriously, not snarky. I was curious to know what reporters do to get info nowadays. Buttonholing pols and their minions has a long, noble history and should happen much more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KadyITQ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148276</link>
		<dc:creator>KadyITQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148276</guid>
		<description>Not at all, and no offence meant -- I just had in mind a deer-caught-in-headlights-eyed newbie to Ottawa suddenly caught in the centre of a scrumstorm. (In fact, I had actually written &quot;newbie&quot; in my original text, but accidentally deleted it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all, and no offence meant &#8212; I just had in mind a deer-caught-in-headlights-eyed newbie to Ottawa suddenly caught in the centre of a scrumstorm. (In fact, I had actually written &quot;newbie&quot; in my original text, but accidentally deleted it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terren</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148275</link>
		<dc:creator>Terren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148275</guid>
		<description>&#039;&#039;22 year old hapless attendee&#039;&#039;.  Something against 22 year olds? Personally I think 22 is a fetching age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#039;&#039;22 year old hapless attendee&#039;&#039;.  Something against 22 year olds? Personally I think 22 is a fetching age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KadyITQ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148274</link>
		<dc:creator>KadyITQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148274</guid>
		<description>The conventional method would be to call up the party and interview the organizer, or spokesperson, as well as doing one&#039;s best to elicit information from MPs, ministers, staffers and party operatives -- but not, say, hanging around the foyer waiting to scrum whatever 22 year old hapless attendee might unwittingly come within range of your camera, microphone or notebook. Not, of course, to imply that there&#039;s anything wrong with the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conventional method would be to call up the party and interview the organizer, or spokesperson, as well as doing one&#039;s best to elicit information from MPs, ministers, staffers and party operatives &#8212; but not, say, hanging around the foyer waiting to scrum whatever 22 year old hapless attendee might unwittingly come within range of your camera, microphone or notebook. Not, of course, to imply that there&#039;s anything wrong with the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigh</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148273</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148273</guid>
		<description>tigress</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tigress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KadyITQ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148272</link>
		<dc:creator>KadyITQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148272</guid>
		<description>My guess would be that the logistical challenges -- and ethical concerns -- surrounding any attempt to gain access through deception or misrepresentation would greatly outweigh legitimate public interest in this case. This isn&#039;t exactly the Bilderberger conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess would be that the logistical challenges &#8212; and ethical concerns &#8212; surrounding any attempt to gain access through deception or misrepresentation would greatly outweigh legitimate public interest in this case. This isn&#039;t exactly the Bilderberger conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolyon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148271</link>
		<dc:creator>jolyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148271</guid>
		<description>Kady  What are the &#039;conventional methods&#039; if not &#039;buttonholing unwary participants&#039;? Are reporters hoping the info will just happen to fall in their laps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kady  What are the &#039;conventional methods&#039; if not &#039;buttonholing unwary participants&#039;? Are reporters hoping the info will just happen to fall in their laps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolyon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148270</link>
		<dc:creator>jolyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148270</guid>
		<description>Kady  What are the &#039;conventional methods&#039; if not &#039;buttonholing unwary participants&#039;? Are reporters hoping the info will just happen to fall in their laps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kady  What are the &#039;conventional methods&#039; if not &#039;buttonholing unwary participants&#039;? Are reporters hoping the info will just happen to fall in their laps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McClelland</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148269</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McClelland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148269</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt&#8217;s lament over the long line at the Starbucks.&lt;/i&gt;

Hey, Starbucks Conservatives.

So why didn&#039;t any of the media organizations send someone in undercover?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt&rsquo;s lament over the long line at the Starbucks.</i></p>
<p>Hey, Starbucks Conservatives.</p>
<p>So why didn&#039;t any of the media organizations send someone in undercover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigcitylib</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148268</link>
		<dc:creator>bigcitylib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148268</guid>
		<description>I hear one session is entitled &quot;Social Networking and The Devil&#039;s Measure: Facebook and the Repeal of the Metric System&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear one session is entitled &quot;Social Networking and The Devil&#039;s Measure: Facebook and the Repeal of the Metric System&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed_Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed_Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148267</guid>
		<description>... and the tiger, lithely and stealthily works her way through the tall grasses, awaiting the opportunity to pounce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and the tiger, lithely and stealthily works her way through the tall grasses, awaiting the opportunity to pounce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed_Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/27/will-someone-leak-something-from-the-conservative-party-campaign-training-conference-already/comment-page-1/#comment-148266</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed_Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72921#comment-148266</guid>
		<description>... and the tiger, lithely and stealthy works her way through the tall grasses, awaiting the opportunity to pounce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and the tiger, lithely and stealthy works her way through the tall grasses, awaiting the opportunity to pounce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

