An ocean of poison

B.C.’s majestic killer whales are dying as their ocean home surrenders to the stress of pollution, global warming and carbonic acid

by Nancy Macdonald on Thursday, August 6, 2009 9:30am - 9 Comments

An ocean of poison Eight hours on a zodiac inflatable boat on the Juan de Fuca Strait off the coast of B.C., and Dr. Peter Ross has yet to spot a killer whale. At this time of year, the animals are hardly elusive. They return to the waters between Vancouver Island and Washington state every summer to hunt big, fat chinook salmon, which make up 60 per cent of their diet. In July, Victoria’s whale tour operators—which send out a new boat every hour—claim a 93 per cent success rate. Spotting a pod is “pretty much a guarantee,” says Ross, a crew-cut, fortysomething marine mammal toxicologist with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. But B.C.’s 85 southern resident killer whales have not been seen in three days, and it’s putting some people on edge.

Last year, seven southern residents disappeared, the biggest recorded one-year loss in a decade. (They’re called residents because they come back here every summer for the chinook.) In some cases, scientists had noted a condition known as “peanut head,” a dip in the blubber below the blowhole, indicating probable starvation. The die-off coincided with a low year for chinook returns on B.C.’s south coast, and Ross believes the southern residents are going hungry again this summer. Led by the matriarchs, the oldest females, who retain a corporate memory of area fishing grounds, he figures the whales have left their summer stomping grounds to hunt chinook elsewhere—wasting needed energy in the chase.

Runing dry seriesThe killer whale is a powerful messenger. In the Pacific Northwest, where it has near-mythical status, it swims at the top of the marine food web, acting as a key indicator of the health of the ocean below. In southern B.C., its message has been grim lately, and there are signs it will get worse. Scientists have long been concerned about the combined threat of pollution, global warming and overfishing, but now they say the oceans are facing a terrifying new threat that will affect the entire marine food chain: the water is slowly but surely becoming more acidic.

More than 80 per cent of the heat generated by climate change and a third of all carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere winds up in the ocean. That carbon dioxide—a whopping 118 billion tons—is not innocuous, as scientists once thought. When it dissolves in briny seawater, it produces an acidic molecule known as carbonic acid (the same substance used in soft drinks). Seawater pH is now between eight and 8.3 in most areas, 30 per cent lower than in pre-industrial times. If trends continue, the ocean’s pH will fall by 0.3 by the year 2100—a 130 per cent increase in acidity. Dubbed “the other CO2 problem,” researchers are just beginning to grapple with what it will mean for marine communities.

In 1998, before the issue had hit even the scientific radar, oceanographer Joanie Kleypas was at a Boston conference with top U.S. biologists. With access to early experimental data, she was doing “back-of-envelope” carbon calculations relating to ocean pH when, “all of a sudden,” she realized the math was spelling a potential marine disaster. She was so shocked by the magnitude of the problem that she ran from the boardroom and threw up in a nearby bathroom. The geological record is “terrifying,” she says from her Boulder, Colo., office at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. The last time the ocean’s pH changed anywhere nearly as rapidly was 55 million years ago in an event oceanographers call the “Palaeocene-Eocene thermal maximum,” or PETM, and there was a mass extinction of calcareous organisms. Now “we seem on track to do in about 300 years what PETM did over 3,000 years,” says Debby Ianson, a climate modeller with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

While sea grasses and jellyfish will thrive in a more acidic environment, marine organisms with calcium carbonate shells likely will not. Indeed, shells and mollusks start to dissolve within 48 hours in seawater as acidic as the oceans are projected to be by the end of the century. So does coral—which is already suffering the impacts of global warming, local pollution, overfishing and habitat destruction. Battered by so many stressors, coral reefs, which are home to 25 per cent of all marine life, will almost certainly disappear, robbing fish of the crevasses and critical refuge from the awaiting “wall of mouths,” says Simon Fraser University biologist Nick Dulvy. Some 20 per cent of all coral reefs have already been destroyed, including a full 80 per cent of all Caribbean reefs, while another 50 per cent teeter on the brink.

Coral, with its calcium carbonate skeleton, may seem an obvious victim, but there have been some surprises. Squid—which have no shell—have trouble swimming when pH is artificially lowered in the lab. Clownfish, immortalized in the film Finding Nemo, become disoriented and have difficulty finding their anemone, according to a five-month-old study in the journal of the U.S. National Academy of Science. Other data suggests certain marine species may show sensitivity to acidification at the larval stage.

It’s early days yet, but the acidification process is hap­pen­ing 10 times faster than previously believed, according to the latest science. And a controversial study, sampling chemical water properties from B.C.’s Queen Charlotte Islands down to Baja California, showed that the pH in some places had already deteriorated to levels not anticipated until the end of the century, says Ianson, the coastal study’s lone Canadian. Another study, published three months ago in Nature, suggests that southern ocean planktonic organisms called foraminifera are already showing thinner shells.

Bookmark and Share
  • Jan

    It seems that there is too much concern about a change which takes place naturally and has been taken place ever since Creation. The claim that scientists can determine what took place 55 million years ago is very questionable.

  • Eddie

    Here in Victoria, BC, our household waste is delivered directly to the ocean, with no treatment but screening the lumps. What goes through our drains into the Pacific Ocean becomes fish food, including latex paint residue, Draino, cleaning and other chemicals, etc. Residents of this geographic area should be stopped from dumping untreated waste directly into the ocean, some of which must be toxic, and probably a significant factor in the general decline of healthy seafood stocks. Many countries fish international waters nearby Vancouver Island. I am wondering why the international community does not strenuously object to Victoria's lack of waste treatment?

  • Roroma

    The "household waste" to which you refer, Eddie, includes raw, untreated sewage from your household toilets. I have been disgusted by this practice for years. Luckily, Victoria is finally going to do something about it and will install wastewater treatment plants within the next few years. I wonder what impact this practice has had on the local marine life? With sewage comes pharmaceuticals, which adds to the soup of toxic chemicals that routinely get put down the drain.

  • http://www.price-of-braces.com/ Bill Douglas

    It sure would be nice if the writer of this very fine and informative article provided some hint of what we should to do. Who's taking this problem on? Who should we write to? Who should we donate to? Each snowflake in an avalanche pleads 'not guilty.' Let's not let this get out of hand.
    Bill Douglas,
    http://www.price-of-braces.com/

  • Eddie

    In July 2006, the BC gov't directed the Capital Regional District (CRD) to provide options and a fixed schedule for sewage treatment. Three years later, a June 2, 2009 media release indicated the CRD had “selected a refined distributed wastewater management strategy” at an estimated cost of $1.2 billion, “but costs could be lowered by phasing in treatment plants over the next 15 years.” Daily, weakened sea life must navigate and digest the massive quantities of artificial cleaners, detergents, latex paints, hair dyes, perm solutions, medications and other chemicals we “dispose of” in the sea. Unluckily, delaying completion until 2024 will save dollars. You call this foot-dragging "doing something about it"?

  • http://DRReese.com/ Dr Reese Halter

    Unfortunately it's not just the ocean life that is dying… we are missing more than 50 billion honeybees. Five billion pounds of pesticides and herbicides are used annually on the globe — Please do not use these toxins in your yard. Dr Reese Halter's latest book is the Incomparable Honey Bee http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6w-Z7XlnHI

  • greg

    It now appears that there is a bumper crop of baby killer whales this year. Poison ocean indeed!

  • http://www.order-salmon.com/ J. Roger Sherman

    Global warming is also threatening salmon because of ocean acidification. The more CO2 that is absorbed into the ocean the more acidic it gets. An acidic ocean impacts salmon because it dissolves the shells of microscopic plankton creatures called coccolithophores and the foraminifera which is the food source for salmon, mackerel and cod. See http://www.order-salmon.com/salmon-global-warming…

  • http://www.inventorinsights.com/Green_Inventions_by_Green_Inventors_Green2Gold.html Green Inventor

    What can you do to stop global warming? Write, phone and email:

    Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction… http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction… http://epw.senate.gov/
    410 Dirksen Senate Office Bldg.
    Washington, DC 20510-6175
    202-224-8832

    Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
    See http://globalwarming.house.gov/ http://globalwarming.house.gov/contact
    B243 Longworth House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515
    202-225-4012
    Fax: 202-225-4092 http://globalwarming.house.gov/about?id=0002

    …and feel free to send a special thank you Valentine to the folks at Koch who are providing the paychecks for "global deniers." Between 2005 and 2008, the Kansas-based conglomerate spent nearly $25 million to fund "organizations of the global warming denial machine.

    Charles Koch, CEO
    Koch Industries
    111 E. 37th St. North
    Wichita, KS 67220-3203, United States
    Phone: 316-828-5500
    Fax: 316-828-5739 http://www.kochind.com

From Macleans