<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Michael Ignatieff is hard to find these days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marta</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152069</link>
		<dc:creator>marta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152069</guid>
		<description>Paul is the most fence sitter  Media Myth  in Our times..   yes we would expect more from him....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul is the most fence sitter  Media Myth  in Our times..   yes we would expect more from him&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canuckistanian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-2/#comment-152068</link>
		<dc:creator>Canuckistanian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152068</guid>
		<description>so much venom for such a light-hearted column.  lighten up people.  time to get some sun on your jaundiced dermis&#039;s methinks.  well done, o&#039; rumpled and lovable one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so much venom for such a light-hearted column.  lighten up people.  time to get some sun on your jaundiced dermis&#039;s methinks.  well done, o&#039; rumpled and lovable one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canuckistanian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152067</link>
		<dc:creator>Canuckistanian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152067</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well, Harper doesn&#039;t need more Canadians to trust him or respect him. He just needs them to vote for him.&quot;

very true...just ask gordon campbell ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Well, Harper doesn&#039;t need more Canadians to trust him or respect him. He just needs them to vote for him.&quot;</p>
<p>very true&#8230;just ask gordon campbell ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredder99</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152066</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredder99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152066</guid>
		<description>When you are doing all these photo ops, shouldn&#039;t someone be taking the photos?  Fat lot of good it does to be promoting yourself when nobody&#039;s watching.

The grassroots find Ignatieff irritating and creepy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you are doing all these photo ops, shouldn&#039;t someone be taking the photos?  Fat lot of good it does to be promoting yourself when nobody&#039;s watching.</p>
<p>The grassroots find Ignatieff irritating and creepy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilie K</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-2/#comment-152065</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilie K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152065</guid>
		<description>I am so glad that I did not renew my Macleans!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so glad that I did not renew my Macleans!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilie K</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-2/#comment-152064</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilie K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152064</guid>
		<description>And I use to respect Paul Wells as a journalist. What a rube I am to think that Wells had any integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I use to respect Paul Wells as a journalist. What a rube I am to think that Wells had any integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilie K</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152063</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilie K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152063</guid>
		<description>Oh my god!!! Now it all makes sense why MacLeans and all its staff keep on writing babble about the Liberals and in their eyes, Harper and his gang can&#039;t do anything wrong. Macleans is sucking on Harper&#039;s teat and has their head shove up his arse to the tine of almost $3 million!!!! BAWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god!!! Now it all makes sense why MacLeans and all its staff keep on writing babble about the Liberals and in their eyes, Harper and his gang can&#039;t do anything wrong. Macleans is sucking on Harper&#039;s teat and has their head shove up his arse to the tine of almost $3 million!!!! BAWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredder99</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152062</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredder99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152062</guid>
		<description>This is one way he can avoid saying something stupid, or looking weak.  Shut up and hide!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one way he can avoid saying something stupid, or looking weak.  Shut up and hide!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152061</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152061</guid>
		<description>The NDP need a name which better reflects who they are. They attempt to skew history by attempting to redefine Canadian history, especially Lester B. Pearson. They have little conscience regarding stealing an election from the Canadian public which required a pact with the Bloc who in effect have achieved sovereignty association. When it comes to voting on key issues, there&#039;s nothing democratic about them. All caucus members were told by jack to vote in favor of gay marriage. They have an alliance with the Canadian Islamic Congress and ran islamists during the last election. is this the reason why they are so animately opposed to our presence in Afghanistan?

I&#039;m sorry for wishing this but when the next election arrives, I&#039;d like to see this pathetic excuses for a Canadian party crushed beyond recognition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NDP need a name which better reflects who they are. They attempt to skew history by attempting to redefine Canadian history, especially Lester B. Pearson. They have little conscience regarding stealing an election from the Canadian public which required a pact with the Bloc who in effect have achieved sovereignty association. When it comes to voting on key issues, there&#039;s nothing democratic about them. All caucus members were told by jack to vote in favor of gay marriage. They have an alliance with the Canadian Islamic Congress and ran islamists during the last election. is this the reason why they are so animately opposed to our presence in Afghanistan?</p>
<p>I&#039;m sorry for wishing this but when the next election arrives, I&#039;d like to see this pathetic excuses for a Canadian party crushed beyond recognition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inkless</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152060</link>
		<dc:creator>Inkless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152060</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid it still surprises me that people still think pre-writ periods are dead times for politics. The Liberals have lost two elections in a row before they \&quot;began.\&quot; Anyone for three?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m afraid it still surprises me that people still think pre-writ periods are dead times for politics. The Liberals have lost two elections in a row before they \&#8221;began.\&#8221; Anyone for three?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152059</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152059</guid>
		<description>I agree, numbers like that don&#039;t go away if you ignore them.

But we&#039;re not in an election campaign right now.  I expect the Liberals will have something to say about the failure to roll out stimulus funds, the failure to make a serious attempt at EI reform during a season of high unemployment, the social-conservative heebie-jeebies over the funding of gay pride events, and other public issues.  (medical isotopes? anti-immigrant grandstanding?)

Right now, I don&#039;t think Canadians are tuned in.  But when the election campaign begins, there will be a receptive audience for such concerns.   The numbers you cite can&#039;t be ignored, but they aren&#039;t chiselled in stone, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, numbers like that don&#8217;t go away if you ignore them.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;re not in an election campaign right now.  I expect the Liberals will have something to say about the failure to roll out stimulus funds, the failure to make a serious attempt at EI reform during a season of high unemployment, the social-conservative heebie-jeebies over the funding of gay pride events, and other public issues.  (medical isotopes? anti-immigrant grandstanding?)</p>
<p>Right now, I don&#8217;t think Canadians are tuned in.  But when the election campaign begins, there will be a receptive audience for such concerns.   The numbers you cite can&#8217;t be ignored, but they aren&#8217;t chiselled in stone, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andr&#233;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152058</link>
		<dc:creator>Andr&#233;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152058</guid>
		<description>I think that assertion was made up long before the Ekos poll. I think it was made when the Parliament was still in function and scandals and dissent were appearing left and right. It did seem at that time that Harper was losing control of his party members. It just makes the results of this poll sound weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that assertion was made up long before the Ekos poll. I think it was made when the Parliament was still in function and scandals and dissent were appearing left and right. It did seem at that time that Harper was losing control of his party members. It just makes the results of this poll sound weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberta Athest</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152057</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberta Athest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152057</guid>
		<description>Shut it jack, we musn&#039;t let the extremists think otherwise:

[youtube HLNhPMQnWu4&amp;feature=related &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4&amp;feature=related&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4&amp;fe...&lt;/a&gt; youtube]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shut it jack, we musn&#039;t let the extremists think otherwise:</p>
<p>[youtube HLNhPMQnWu4&amp;feature=related <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4&amp;feature=related" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4&#038;fe...</a> youtube]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crit_Reasoning</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152056</link>
		<dc:creator>Crit_Reasoning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 05:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152056</guid>
		<description>Nicely done, Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done, Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilCP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152055</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 04:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152055</guid>
		<description>If those truly are the best two scenarios for the Liberals they are in for some tough sledding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If those truly are the best two scenarios for the Liberals they are in for some tough sledding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerekPearce</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152054</link>
		<dc:creator>DerekPearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152054</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know that Prince was in2 hanging out on the Maclean&#039;s comment boards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#039;t know that Prince was in2 hanging out on the Maclean&#039;s comment boards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerekPearce</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152053</link>
		<dc:creator>DerekPearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152053</guid>
		<description>I laughed out loud at the  &quot;vest of baby blue which pitiless moths devoured&quot; --great job Jack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I laughed out loud at the  &quot;vest of baby blue which pitiless moths devoured&quot; &#8211;great job Jack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biff</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152052</link>
		<dc:creator>biff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152052</guid>
		<description>The reality is that if Iggy exhibited strength and leadership, instead of faux bluster, equivocation and headline following at a time when Canadians still thought Canada was on the wrong economic track, his party may have had a chance at the helm.

A small one yes, but a chance nonetheless.  Now they have no real prospect of winning with the economy on the mend and at a faster pace than our friends to the South.

Perhaps the Liberals got the leader they paid for.  (In democratic terms they paid nothing as he was appointed by a small cabal who apparantly thought they knew better than the ignorant masses at the party base).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reality is that if Iggy exhibited strength and leadership, instead of faux bluster, equivocation and headline following at a time when Canadians still thought Canada was on the wrong economic track, his party may have had a chance at the helm.</p>
<p>A small one yes, but a chance nonetheless.  Now they have no real prospect of winning with the economy on the mend and at a faster pace than our friends to the South.</p>
<p>Perhaps the Liberals got the leader they paid for.  (In democratic terms they paid nothing as he was appointed by a small cabal who apparantly thought they knew better than the ignorant masses at the party base).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152051</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 22:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152051</guid>
		<description>No, the CCF (NDP&#039;s predecessor) was, like most social democracy parties, at daggers drawn with the Communists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the CCF (NDP&#039;s predecessor) was, like most social democracy parties, at daggers drawn with the Communists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152050</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152050</guid>
		<description>so are you saying that Harper surrounded himself with amateurs to lead this country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so are you saying that Harper surrounded himself with amateurs to lead this country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152049</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152049</guid>
		<description>So then (can) you explain how Stephen Harper was ELECTED to run this country? I thought he was elected as a MP for Calgary-Southwest and elected by CP members as their leader.

Im not an expert on polling but I would imagine it might not necessarily mean much when comparing the right/wrong track question across countries, as that Americans are different from Canadians and have different perceptions of government in general. I would be curious to see how the right/wrong track question tracks over time to Canadians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then (can) you explain how Stephen Harper was ELECTED to run this country? I thought he was elected as a MP for Calgary-Southwest and elected by CP members as their leader.</p>
<p>Im not an expert on polling but I would imagine it might not necessarily mean much when comparing the right/wrong track question across countries, as that Americans are different from Canadians and have different perceptions of government in general. I would be curious to see how the right/wrong track question tracks over time to Canadians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152048</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 18:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152048</guid>
		<description>Thanks, jwl!  Ask and ye shall receive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, jwl!  Ask and ye shall receive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YYZ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152043</link>
		<dc:creator>YYZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152043</guid>
		<description>In politics, patience is only something you tell others to have.

It would be silly of Michael Ignatieff to force an election over EI. He will be crucified on it (9 weeks of work for 52 weeks of pay!) The communications machine is already moving.

The Liberals need to wait until they have something legitimate to object to.

I can see them winning election on one of two things (or a combination of both):

(1)  If stimulus spending went disproportionately to Conservative riding

(2)  If they prove that only a small fraction of stimuls spending has been spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In politics, patience is only something you tell others to have.</p>
<p>It would be silly of Michael Ignatieff to force an election over EI. He will be crucified on it (9 weeks of work for 52 weeks of pay!) The communications machine is already moving.</p>
<p>The Liberals need to wait until they have something legitimate to object to.</p>
<p>I can see them winning election on one of two things (or a combination of both):</p>
<p>(1)  If stimulus spending went disproportionately to Conservative riding</p>
<p>(2)  If they prove that only a small fraction of stimuls spending has been spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbt</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152047</link>
		<dc:creator>sbt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152047</guid>
		<description>They&#039;d win on neither of those two things. The first is standard pork-barelling that everyone knows everyone does (and why would people in Conservative ridings vote against it?) and the second would be cheered given it means the deficit will be smaller. The Liberals best shot at winning is having the recession drag on and on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#039;d win on neither of those two things. The first is standard pork-barelling that everyone knows everyone does (and why would people in Conservative ridings vote against it?) and the second would be cheered given it means the deficit will be smaller. The Liberals best shot at winning is having the recession drag on and on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152046</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152046</guid>
		<description>Thn New Democratic party was once the Communist Party of Canada was it not? why don&#039;t they just go back to a name more fitting of their beliefs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thn New Democratic party was once the Communist Party of Canada was it not? why don&#039;t they just go back to a name more fitting of their beliefs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolyon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152045</link>
		<dc:creator>jolyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152045</guid>
		<description>Wonderful. I enjoyed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful. I enjoyed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YYZ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152044</link>
		<dc:creator>YYZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152044</guid>
		<description>That is such an unbelievably shallow comment .

It doesn&#039;t surprise me that sharing your thoughts publicly more frequently is Murphy&#039;s idea of working hard.

I look forward for a time when an editor at the Globe and Mail has the balls to edit its columnists work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is such an unbelievably shallow comment .</p>
<p>It doesn&#039;t surprise me that sharing your thoughts publicly more frequently is Murphy&#039;s idea of working hard.</p>
<p>I look forward for a time when an editor at the Globe and Mail has the balls to edit its columnists work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YYZ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152042</link>
		<dc:creator>YYZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152042</guid>
		<description>I for one am thrilled not to have these guys on the front page everyday.  Insiders have been critical of Ignatieff....but maybe he&#039;s taking a lesson from Stephen Harper and actually waiting until the election.  The need for photo opps and fish frying all summer long is highly overrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am thrilled not to have these guys on the front page everyday.  Insiders have been critical of Ignatieff&#8230;.but maybe he&#039;s taking a lesson from Stephen Harper and actually waiting until the election.  The need for photo opps and fish frying all summer long is highly overrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YYZ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152041</link>
		<dc:creator>YYZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152041</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I&#039;m hoping for CG.  And we will need it to get out if this deficit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s what I&#039;m hoping for CG.  And we will need it to get out if this deficit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarrid</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152040</link>
		<dc:creator>jarrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152040</guid>
		<description>Rex Murphy in today&#039;s Globe makes the point about the mistaken Liberal strategy:

&quot;There is something, however, in the Liberals&#039; approach that suggests that, maybe from their long habit of being in power, they expect it will be theirs again simply by default. Maybe that&#039;s why Mr. Ignatieff has had, in terms of visibility and profile, so relaxed and ruminative a summer. Maybe he or his party don&#039;t think much work is required, that they also win who only sit and wait. This is an error.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex Murphy in today&#039;s Globe makes the point about the mistaken Liberal strategy:</p>
<p>&quot;There is something, however, in the Liberals&#039; approach that suggests that, maybe from their long habit of being in power, they expect it will be theirs again simply by default. Maybe that&#039;s why Mr. Ignatieff has had, in terms of visibility and profile, so relaxed and ruminative a summer. Maybe he or his party don&#039;t think much work is required, that they also win who only sit and wait. This is an error.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g. edwards</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152039</link>
		<dc:creator>g. edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152039</guid>
		<description>i don!t know who i will vote for in the next election.  both liberals &amp;conservatives have pissed away billions- graft at the worst level.   the ndp party have not  been elected at the federal level and i am sure they are just a capable of pissing away our money.  so what is left to vote for  ???????????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don!t know who i will vote for in the next election.  both liberals &amp;conservatives have pissed away billions- graft at the worst level.   the ndp party have not  been elected at the federal level and i am sure they are just a capable of pissing away our money.  so what is left to vote for  ???????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152038</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152038</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t see him because no Canadian should have to work more than 360 hours, anywhere in this country to qualify for PM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#039;t see him because no Canadian should have to work more than 360 hours, anywhere in this country to qualify for PM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152037</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152037</guid>
		<description>&quot;Someone is going to write a Tragedy about Harper&#039;s government one day because he has squandered so much, for so little return.&quot;

&lt;i&gt;Ahem.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Wouters&lt;/b&gt;
Another morn I greet, another road
Whereof the destination I know not,
Save that, though every flinty step be hard,
At last a gracious God will show the way.
But come, who&#039;s this?  Hail, Giorno, and well met!

&lt;b&gt;Giorno&lt;/b&gt;
All hail, good Clerk.  But what&#039;s your bulky file?

&lt;b&gt;Wouters&lt;/b&gt;
Herein are written all the subtle schemes
For bettering the fate of Canada,
For laws, reform, in short for legacy,
Which presently I&#039;ll show to the PM.

&lt;b&gt;Giorno&lt;/b&gt;
Alas! to speak to one that hears you not
Or play charades before a man born blind
Would be as futile as this earnest wish.

&lt;b&gt;Wouters&lt;/b&gt;
Come, come, what dire news of woe is this?

&lt;b&gt;Giorno&lt;/b&gt;
The man whom lately pundits reverenced,
Whose bright agenda, like a heav&#039;n-sent flame,
Once lit the hearts of all from sea to sea,
Hath lately stumbled into that deep slough
Which wiser men than we have named Despond.

&lt;b&gt;Wouters&lt;/b&gt;
Doth he lament yet for that sweater-vest
Of baby blue which pitiless moths devoured?

&lt;b&gt;Giorno&lt;/b&gt;
For that, and for his hockey book, for all
His garden&#039;s fruit that withered in the frost.

&lt;b&gt;Wouters&lt;/b&gt;
Speak not in riddles, nor in metaphor.

&lt;b&gt;Giorno&lt;/b&gt;
In times like this a man circumlocutes.

&lt;b&gt;Wouters&lt;/b&gt;
But wherefore moths, and frost, and hockey book?
And whither his polit&#039;cal capital?
Say not some thief, some Baird, some Polli&#232;vre,
Hath filched what Harper&#039;s patient hoard accrued? . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Someone is going to write a Tragedy about Harper&#039;s government one day because he has squandered so much, for so little return.&quot;</p>
<p><i>Ahem.</i></p>
<p><b>Wouters</b><br />
Another morn I greet, another road<br />
Whereof the destination I know not,<br />
Save that, though every flinty step be hard,<br />
At last a gracious God will show the way.<br />
But come, who&#039;s this?  Hail, Giorno, and well met!</p>
<p><b>Giorno</b><br />
All hail, good Clerk.  But what&#039;s your bulky file?</p>
<p><b>Wouters</b><br />
Herein are written all the subtle schemes<br />
For bettering the fate of Canada,<br />
For laws, reform, in short for legacy,<br />
Which presently I&#039;ll show to the PM.</p>
<p><b>Giorno</b><br />
Alas! to speak to one that hears you not<br />
Or play charades before a man born blind<br />
Would be as futile as this earnest wish.</p>
<p><b>Wouters</b><br />
Come, come, what dire news of woe is this?</p>
<p><b>Giorno</b><br />
The man whom lately pundits reverenced,<br />
Whose bright agenda, like a heav&#039;n-sent flame,<br />
Once lit the hearts of all from sea to sea,<br />
Hath lately stumbled into that deep slough<br />
Which wiser men than we have named Despond.</p>
<p><b>Wouters</b><br />
Doth he lament yet for that sweater-vest<br />
Of baby blue which pitiless moths devoured?</p>
<p><b>Giorno</b><br />
For that, and for his hockey book, for all<br />
His garden&#039;s fruit that withered in the frost.</p>
<p><b>Wouters</b><br />
Speak not in riddles, nor in metaphor.</p>
<p><b>Giorno</b><br />
In times like this a man circumlocutes.</p>
<p><b>Wouters</b><br />
But wherefore moths, and frost, and hockey book?<br />
And whither his polit&#039;cal capital?<br />
Say not some thief, some Baird, some Polli&egrave;vre,<br />
Hath filched what Harper&#039;s patient hoard accrued? . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152036</link>
		<dc:creator>bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152036</guid>
		<description>your right Crit,a typical Liberal line.If they cant talk intelligently they make up stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your right Crit,a typical Liberal line.If they cant talk intelligently they make up stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152035</link>
		<dc:creator>bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152035</guid>
		<description>Appleseed your a Liberal with idiot Liberal comments.Let the MSM make up the lies.You wish PM Harpers popularity would fall,but no as usual it,s the stupid Liberals who go down again.Keep up the lies though and the newspapers might give you a job writing fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appleseed your a Liberal with idiot Liberal comments.Let the MSM make up the lies.You wish PM Harpers popularity would fall,but no as usual it,s the stupid Liberals who go down again.Keep up the lies though and the newspapers might give you a job writing fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wml</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152034</link>
		<dc:creator>wml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152034</guid>
		<description>What the hell are we supposed to comment on? About six different topics and half of the article devoted to &quot;New&quot;.
 Affable and loving hmmmm. How about we  call you.... late for dinner! Seriously this article is unbecoming a man your talents.  Try it again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell are we supposed to comment on? About six different topics and half of the article devoted to &quot;New&quot;.<br />
 Affable and loving hmmmm. How about we  call you&#8230;. late for dinner! Seriously this article is unbecoming a man your talents.  Try it again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152033</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152033</guid>
		<description>RE- N D P remnaming. NO point 2 it-- unless they would finally call themselves what they are-- &quot;union party&quot;. they will never see the light--unless they realize U can&#039;t just cater 2 one type of peoples-- as long as they let the unions run their agenda-- they are cooked!!! Would never vote 4 that ideology--anyhow--doesn&#039;t work-- has been proven all over the world. As 4 Iggy--he&#039;ll cook his own goose-- as nobody knows what he is talking about-- or stands 4--Needs 2 come down 2 earth--speak 2 the people in terms --understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE- N D P remnaming. NO point 2 it&#8211; unless they would finally call themselves what they are&#8211; &quot;union party&quot;. they will never see the light&#8211;unless they realize U can&#039;t just cater 2 one type of peoples&#8211; as long as they let the unions run their agenda&#8211; they are cooked!!! Would never vote 4 that ideology&#8211;anyhow&#8211;doesn&#039;t work&#8211; has been proven all over the world. As 4 Iggy&#8211;he&#039;ll cook his own goose&#8211; as nobody knows what he is talking about&#8211; or stands 4&#8211;Needs 2 come down 2 earth&#8211;speak 2 the people in terms &#8211;understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose21</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152032</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152032</guid>
		<description>Your accusations regarding Harper and his government are nothing but outdated and unsubstantiated cliches.  You have taken your own prejudices against Conservatives and erroneously pretend this reflects Canadian views -- wrong, wrong.   Harper has the respect of many Canadians, he is not anti-gay and the secrecy thing at this point is just silly.  You need to update your thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your accusations regarding Harper and his government are nothing but outdated and unsubstantiated cliches.  You have taken your own prejudices against Conservatives and erroneously pretend this reflects Canadian views &#8212; wrong, wrong.   Harper has the respect of many Canadians, he is not anti-gay and the secrecy thing at this point is just silly.  You need to update your thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarrid</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152031</link>
		<dc:creator>jarrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152031</guid>
		<description>The Ekos poll is just one poll, but if a few more come in that reflect similar numbers on these questions, I just don&#039;t see the LIberals pulling the plug this fall, unless those late summer mornings start giving Iggy the nostalgia for Haaaaaavard - pulling the plug would be the surefire way to get there.

Those &quot;right direction&quot; numbers have to be sobering, if not depressing to the Liberal brass.  This ain&#039;t quite fallin&#039; in their lap like they though it would last January.  The passive, playing possom Liberal tactics will have to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ekos poll is just one poll, but if a few more come in that reflect similar numbers on these questions, I just don&#039;t see the LIberals pulling the plug this fall, unless those late summer mornings start giving Iggy the nostalgia for Haaaaaavard &#8211; pulling the plug would be the surefire way to get there.</p>
<p>Those &quot;right direction&quot; numbers have to be sobering, if not depressing to the Liberal brass.  This ain&#039;t quite fallin&#039; in their lap like they though it would last January.  The passive, playing possom Liberal tactics will have to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152030</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152030</guid>
		<description>Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike514</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike514</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152029</guid>
		<description>What about other politicians that have gone into hiding? Pauline Marois comes to mind. I think the PQ was left reeling when they lost the last by-election. It seems to have spooked them, and considering how quickly the PQ turns on its leaders, I can&#039;t blame Marois for staying out of the limelight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about other politicians that have gone into hiding? Pauline Marois comes to mind. I think the PQ was left reeling when they lost the last by-election. It seems to have spooked them, and considering how quickly the PQ turns on its leaders, I can&#039;t blame Marois for staying out of the limelight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveV</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152028</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152028</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  Just to address the ignoring angle, I&#039;ve already noted the uptick for the government and what it might mean:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://farnwide.blogspot.com/2009/07/something-to-watch.html#links&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://farnwide.blogspot.com/2009/07/something-to...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  Just to address the ignoring angle, I&#039;ve already noted the uptick for the government and what it might mean:</p>
<p><a href="http://farnwide.blogspot.com/2009/07/something-to-watch.html#links" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://farnwide.blogspot.com/2009/07/something-to&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-151992</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-151992</guid>
		<description>Any leader of the official opposition potentially heading into a fall election who runs to Europe to make a speech to his buddies has his priorities screwed up and shows he is politically naive. This is compounded by the fact he is a relatively new leader and is not well known to Canadians other than through the Conservative truth ads. It also adds to the impression that he is an elitist who could care less about getting to know the country during the summer break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any leader of the official opposition potentially heading into a fall election who runs to Europe to make a speech to his buddies has his priorities screwed up and shows he is politically naive. This is compounded by the fact he is a relatively new leader and is not well known to Canadians other than through the Conservative truth ads. It also adds to the impression that he is an elitist who could care less about getting to know the country during the summer break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152027</link>
		<dc:creator>wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152027</guid>
		<description>And successfully unite the left?  You wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And successfully unite the left?  You wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/why-michael-ignatieff-is-hard-to-find-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-152026</link>
		<dc:creator>wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74324#comment-152026</guid>
		<description>So then YOU explain why Stephen Harper was ELECTED to run this country Robert, if your rant is true.

And explain too why 54% of Canadians think this country, AND the Government running it, are headed in the RIGHT direction.

Seems to me it is YOU who are offside with most Canadians, not Harper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then YOU explain why Stephen Harper was ELECTED to run this country Robert, if your rant is true.</p>
<p>And explain too why 54% of Canadians think this country, AND the Government running it, are headed in the RIGHT direction.</p>
<p>Seems to me it is YOU who are offside with most Canadians, not Harper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

