The life of the party

Post-recession, post- Obama win, the NDP reimagines its future

by Aaron Wherry on Thursday, August 13, 2009 2:30pm - 8 Comments

Though perhaps not quite to the revolutionary standards of Douglas, there might still be something for a party that still celebrates forcing change on Paul Martin’s budget in 2005 and embraced a coalition last winter. “I do think that we’re into a period where people are saying competition in politics has turned into a bad thing that doesn’t produce better results,” Anderson says. “So when they look at politicians now, they really do like those who appear to be tackling problems from an angle of: ‘how can we develop good ideas that can help lots of people?’ ”

Such talk speaks to Paul Dewar’s stated motivations. Dewar, son of Marion Dewar, the late mayor of Ottawa and a former NDP MP herself, is a notable example in a party of insistent, eager parliamentarians. Though not without the traditional indignation of his party, he is talkative, hopeful, and apparently quite taken with the post-Obama belief in openness and participation. His, he says, is the party of ideas. His, he believes, could be the party of something new, especially now, less than a year removed from an election that saw less than 60 per cent of eligible voters cast a ballot. “I think the breakthrough will come when we’ve figured out how to engage with the 40 or more per cent of Canadians who don’t engage in politics,” he says, “and when Canadians look to us as not only the party of opposition and proposition but also a party that is going to really change how their voice is reflected in Ottawa.”

Such is the belief for which all the preparation continues.

Bookmark and Share
  • joe in ottawa

    NDP= Epic Failure : )

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    Good piece Wherry. Excellent perspective.

    That line from Nicholson is idiotic. He's turning down honest advice from the NDP because he dislikes their politics? Particularly after the government has just agreed to something originally championed by an NDP MP.

    While I disagree with just about everything the NDP stands for, I admire them for standing for those things without flinching. I'd take a principled leftist over a mealy-mouthed panderer (see: the Liberal Party of Canada in totis, and some elements of the Conservative Party of Canada) any day.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    Good piece Wherry. Excellent perspective.

    That line from Nicholson is idiotic. He's turning down honest advice from the NDP because he dislikes their politics? Such open-minded zeal for the common good! Particularly after the government has just agreed to something originally championed by an NDP MP.

    While I disagree with just about everything the NDP stands for, I admire them for standing for those things without flinching. I'd take a principled leftist over a mealy-mouthed panderer (see: the Liberal Party of Canada in totis, and some elements of the Conservative Party of Canada) any day.

  • http://ages.ca Chris Brown

    The NDP will once again be the party of social justice when it acknowledges its contribution to the daily killing of a dozen or more Canadians with sensitivities in health care and acts to protect the children and other vulnerable persons it is helping, provincially and federally, to get killed.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/NL_Expatriate NL_Expatriate

    Just another CAT in our systemically flawed Tyranny of the majority (Mouseland) democracy Where the only representation is by population and a vision for the majority of the members of the federation Provinces is sadly lacking in all of the PROXY parties of the Upper Lower canada majority.

  • abofavrage

    You’ve got to start with the foundation and you build, brick-by-brick, block-by-block.”

    FYI Jack the blocks go in the ground first and the bricks up top…no wonder your political house is so unstable.

  • http://www.infowars.com/ info

    NDP+LIBERALS =FAILURE

    • Ole Gorky

      Wow, that's brilliant! You've expressed the thought-level of kindergarten, but with the mathematical complexity of grade 2.

From Macleans