Inside the human guinea pig capital of North America

In Quebec’s quest to please Big Pharma, has it become more industry cheerleader than watchdog?

by Martin Patriquin on Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:00am - 5 Comments

Overseeing trials is certainly a challenge, one often made more difficult by the volunteers themselves. During a recent visit to an Algorithme clinical trial, Maclean’s found several participants who drank alcohol and took prescription medication when both are explicitly forbidden during the testing period. Many of these participants, some who were decades-long veterans of the trade, were well versed in what the company tested for—and what it didn’t. “You learn how to say ‘no,’ ” says Anthony (not his real name), referring to Algorithme’s questionnaires over consumption of alcohol and drugs.

Anthony spent the downtime between his confinement and return visits celebrating a birthday. He was worried more about the ensuing hangover than about getting nabbed by Algorithme’s tests, which would have meant forgoing most of his $1,400 paycheque. He knows from experience that the company wouldn’t test for the booze swishing around his system. Other testers in the study were taking prescription medication—even though, like alcohol, doing so might affect Algorithme’s study results. “Nobody tests for anything except for illegal drugs, and that’s only when you first get here,” Anthony says. “Other than that, you can do what you want.”

Algorithme’s Louis Caillé defends the integrity of his firm’s research, saying people like Anthony are the exception to the rule. “We have rules to follow but we can’t enforce all the time,” he concedes. “We don’t do follow-up tests [for alcohol or drugs].”

Others still blame the media. After all, “no one died,” says Jack Corman, president of IRB Services, the independent review board contracted to review Anapharm’s testing for the ill-fated 2005 study. “There is an agenda to do harm to Anapharm and us,” Corman says without elaborating. “I think Health Canada could have done better [but] I think we did everything we could.” The clinical testing industry as a whole, Corman says, has been unfairly tarnished as a result of the TB outbreak—which he is loathe to even call an outbreak. Tales of outbreaks and half-drunk volunteers are media concoctions, Corman says, designed to blemish what is a made-in-Canada success story. “We have highly trained, highly qualified, highly ethical scientists and physicians who conduct world-class research in this country. The industry is a success for Canada, and for Montreal.”

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SisyphusThis SisyphusThis

    Oh, why do they even bother. It's so much more simple …..

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/health/research…

  • http://nomoremedicines.com Cleaves M Bennett MD

    Calling LDL cholesterol “bad” and HDL cholesterol “good” is the most successful marketing strategy in history. To this day, execs in marketing at Pfizer, Merck and others must shake their heads in wonder at our collective naiveté. We all bought into it, even the doctors. You never see or hear the word “cholesterol” mentioned anywhere without the modifier “good” or “bad” in front of it. Changing the law to allow Direct to Consumer ads for drugs on TV was a bad idea. It happened because Big Pharma owns the US Congress. Those ads are expensive. Those ads work! (I call Big Pharma the Somali pirates of the HealthCare industry.)
    That marketing strategy has paid off big time. You convince the public they have a bunch of bad stuff in their blood and all they have to do is take this pill…. Well, the rest is history. Annual profits for statins are in the billions of dollars

  • cleargreen

    So some of the richest multinational corps on the planet also enjoy massive tax breaks and subsidies for testing their products, thanks a lot Ottawa.
    I seem to recall a story a few years ago regarding one of these "highly trained, highly qualified, highly ethical scientists and physicians" as per the Corman quote in the article. They were speaking out about negative data being suppressed, skewed results published, and inadequate testing. I cannot remember the brave lady doctors name, I can see her potentially career ending cry for help was put to good use by our politicians.
    The patent life of these drugs was also doubled a few years ago in order to enable these money making machines to double the time they were able to hold citizens hostage to their profit margins and deny competition.
    Perhaps it is time for a law that allows us to hold these under-performing politicians liable for not acting in the best interests of the citizens? Sorry… a fantasy I know, but I am old enough to remember when politicians actually used to at least pretend they represented the people that voted them into office… shame on every single one of you.

    • MCBellecourt

      Well said, cleargreen. I, too, am old enough to remember when politicians were at least somewhat accountable. I write this from B.C., and what we are seeing in this province is the polar opposite to accountability on all fronts, including and especially health care. The only upside from it is that people living in other provinces who haven't yet swung as far to the right as B.C. has, can observe and learn from the resulting damage, which, if allowed to continue, may be irrepairable.

  • irb member

    who is keeping track of all the different drugs being given to these subjects as they move from one trial to another? More variables are being put into play by promotiong this kind of "Volunteer participation".

From Macleans