Do you notice anything shrivelling?

We’ve never had more personal sexual liberty. And less freedom of almost every other kind.

by Mark Steyn on Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:20am - 305 Comments

Do you notice anything shrivelling?The other day CTV reported the astonishing statistic that in the whole of Canada there are just 33 sperm donors. That seems awfully low for a nation of 30 million people. Three sperm donors per province plus one per territory? Surely we can do better than that. All hands on deck!

Ah, but it’s not as simple as that. Apparently, the 2004 Assisted Human Reproduction Act makes it illegal to pay donors for sperm. I mean, it wasn’t even the usual Canadian Wheat Board-type racket whereby you’d only be able to sell your seed to the Canadian Sperm Board at a price agreed upon by representatives of the federal-provincial Semen Commissions. Instead, they just nixed the whole deal, and, once Johnny Canuck found out he wasn’t going to be remunerated, virtually the entire supply dried up.

As a result, this once proud Dominion now has to import sperm. According to CTV, 80 per cent of Canadian women who conceive through donor sperm are getting it from the United States, mainly from men in Georgia and northern Florida. Canada’s future is now in American hands.

You know how it is: you wait ages for a good sperm story and then they all come at once. It seems there’s also a shortage of the stuff in Sweden. But, in contrast to Canada, this is caused not by government intervention in supply but by a surge in demand, from Swedish lesbian couples anxious to conceive. Inga and Britta had been trying for a child for ages but nothing seemed to work. Then it occurred to them this might be because they’re both women. So they headed off to the sperm clinic, whereupon the Sapphic demand ran into the problem of male inability to satisfy it. There appear to be higher than usual levels of non-functioning sperm.

Don’t worry, I’m not being Swedophobic in mocking the watery emissions of Nordic manhood. It’s a widespread problem: “Concern As Sperm Count Falls By A Third In UK Men” (the Daily Mail, 2004). Don’t ask me why: I’d blame Tony Blair’s cozying up to Bush were it not for “Sperm Count Drops 25 Per Cent In Younger Men” (the Independent, 1996), so maybe it was John Major pulling out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. Still, even for a demographic doom-monger such as myself, you could hardly ask for a more poignant fin de civilisation image than a stampede of broody lesbians stymied only by defective semen, like some strange dystopian collaboration between Robert Heinlein and Russ Meyer set in a world divided into muff divers and duff donors.

I wouldn’t want to overly extrapolate from two minor news items, and I’d be quite happy to do cheap lesbo-seminal gags to the foot of the page, but the thought does occur that a visitor from the day before yesterday—say, the mid-20th century—would be befuddled by the problems we face in the dawn of the new millennium. The other day the Toronto Star, ever on the cutting edge in the hunt for new bigotries, turned in a fascinating report on the problems of air travel and . . . Go on, take a wild guess. Racial profiling? Ha! You piker! We’re talking about gender profiling—in the sense that most of these squaresville Homeland Security types think there are men and there are women and that’s pretty much it. As a result, many pre-operative transsexuals run into difficulties south of the border or when flying trans Atlantically, and that’s before the introduction of “Whole Body Imaging” scanners where you may show up naked on the security screen packing a few too many extras. “Travelling for transpeople is always fraught with uncertainty,” Ontario lawyer Nicole Nussbaum told the Star. “The current system doesn’t match up with transpeople’s lives.”

Of course, no “system” could. I see that what I quaintly thought of as the Toronto Gay Pride Parade was officially billed this year as a parade to celebrate “the LGBTTIQQ2S communities.”

LGBTTIQQ2S? Oh, come on. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual, Transgendered, Intersexual, Queer, Questioning and 2-Spirited. Where ya bin? 2-Spirited doesn’t mean too spirited, as in Anne of Green Gables, but is supposedly some First Nations thing. Anyway, you can see why the “current system” of airport security has a hard time keeping up. Any day now, they’ll introduce Intergendered and Transspirited, and by the time Mayor Miller has stumbled through the acronym in his official proclamation, the parade’ll be over. So, when a Bigendering person shows up at the frontier, don’t be surprised if the border guard comes over all 2-Questioning. Travel, explains the Star’s Julia Steinecke, is “complicated for those who live in the grey area between genders.”

Bookmark and Share
  • John D

    I'll take LGBTTIQQ2S over the zombie Steyn drum-beaters (ZSDB) any day

  • http://toby.bartels.name/ Toby Bartels

    Interesting.

    According to the headline, the point of the article is that, despite the unprecedented sexual freedom we have now, many of our other freedoms are being eroded (a point with which I fervently agree). But according to the text and the comments, the point of the article is that LGBetc people are weird and wrong, and there’s really no reason that governments should accomodate them. Oh sure, there are a few vague references to other lost freedoms, but that’s clearly not the point.

    So it looks like the writer and his fans are just another group of people who believe in freedom, with one exception, and it’s mostly the exception that matters to them. And when everybody is for freedom with one exception, then the inevitable result will be no freedom at all.

    Freedom! Even for weird people! No exceptions!

  • http://www.wakepedia.blogspot.com Wakefield Tolbert

    Last good word from me about all this, in the form of three warnings for ya:

    –Turkey basters..

    –Ultimate outsourcing..

    –Spend some time with the Missus, if that's your style….

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/AladdinSane AladdinSane

    My, the LGBTTIQQ2S community exhibits a serious lack of humor! It seems to me no matter which way you swing, this would strike you as one hilarious take on the matter of freedom lost!

    Nice work, Mark, absolutely made my morning.

  • Dave S

    Mark, that was a GREAT column. You've hit the nail on the head buddy. You and Macleans should stand up, and then take a bow. You've got my support 100%!! Go Mark Go!

  • ibn

    Too funny! And very well written.

  • Richard Helfrich

    This practice, of using Georgia cracker and Florida fish-head donated sperm to Canadian women may soon result in claims from the offspring of such reproductive activities to American citizenship by virtue of the hands-on activities of the American father. More work for immigration lawyers?

  • Luipaard

    I can see your point, Mark; but the problems seem to be coming from Big Government interfering and the desire of various sub-populations for Big Government to interfere. As for the social…issues that you so CHARMINGLY commented on….

    I don't believe that your intention was to be hateful and hurtful; all the same, I don't like the way you commented on transgendered peoples. It's ridiculous, of course it is; but it is the result of no boundaries being established and citizens that like pushing the envelope.

    I'm sorry for being so incoherent. In simpler words, I appreciate the aim of the article, but I can't get around the snideness and ridicule.

  • http://www.beethovenwasblack.com flyingcow

    The inmates are not only patronizing
    the Star Wars' bar–
    the inmates are RUNNING the damn place……

  • John Eldap

    This is one the best, most hilarious, insightful and, yes, satirical articles I've ever read in Maclean's. Classic Mark Steyn! I'm renewing my subscription and ordering subscriptions for all my friends!

  • shel

    hah. Steyn. shocking and outraging Canadian pantywaists yet again…

    we need more iconoclasts. no one is precious. suck it up.

  • Pasternak

    I guess Steve missed the photo. The gentlemen, women, whatever.. on display, hardly look like they're fighting for any serious 'level of awareness'. If they don't take themselves seriously, how can you seriously expect society to?

  • Tom Henry

    Another HILARIOUS column. Mark, you are the best!

  • http://www.ryantremblay.com Ryan Tremblay

    this column is outright offensive to my community. I cannot believe that an established, accredited publication such as Macleans would publish this!

    I am canceling my subscription, as well as my family's subscriptions and all of my friends.

    Hopefully, this article will be removed from the site as soon as possible.

  • http://twitter.com/matthewcutler @matthewcutler

    I don't know about removal, Ryan – I've never been big on censorship. Besides, this article only goes to prove how backwards and poorly informed Mr. Steyn is.

    Doc, I don't know if wrong is the word I'd use, but definitely disappointing. I would have expected that we'd reached a point as a community where we could discuss these issues without resorting to attacks on people and their identities. Mark's entire argument regarding reproductive material is lost in paragraphs of insults and childish remarks.

    It's just not what I expect from a publication like Maclean's, is all.

  • Paul

    . . . thus pithily illustrating Mark's point. Well done, Ryan.

  • Bob S

    Ryan

    OK, you don't like what Steyn says. This site gives you the opportunity to explain why the article "is offensive to my (your) community" – why not do so, rather than holler "Ouch, ooh. It hurts!" and then go on to (a) display your ability to control what your family and friends read and (b) your desire to control what the rest of us outside of that control should be reading.

    This is a discussion forum for all views. Contribute to it, rather than attempt to stifle those contributions.

  • Richard Finch

    How do you go about cancelling your family and friends' subscriptions?

  • http://www.drivenunderground.wordpress.com Chris

    You are going to cancel your family's subscriptions and the subscriptions of all your friends? Typical liberal tyrant…and cry-baby.

  • WFB

    As Bill Buckley said "Cancel your own goddam subscirption"!

  • beef

    In our enlightened era, you may be free to pretend you are whatever gender blend you feel like today, but I insist on my right not to buy into your fantasy. The insistence of the gender-confused community for the government to require other people to treat their delusions as reality is handing control of the asylum to the insane. Must I also swear my belief in the veracity of every homeless guy's story of serial alien anal-probing? WTF is going on?

    You chose an alternative life style; deal with the consequences. You are entitled to tolerance, not approval.

    Also, if this article is pulled, I will cancel the subscriptions of all Canadians.

  • PocoLoco

    Wow, Ryan. You must be an incredibly powerful leader in your "community"; what with being able to cancel your own, your family's and all of your friends subscriptions by simple fiat! All hail Ryan the fabulous!!

  • Synova

    I thought this comment was satire. I mean… my subscription and all of my family's… like a family has multiples of the same publication and then I'm going to cancel all of my friend's subscriptions, too?

    I realize that it's hard to tell, but I thought it was a joke.

  • http://www.rata.ca Russell Barth

    file an Ontario Human Rights Complaint. It won't cost you a dime, and it will cost Mark and this paper a canoe-ful of money and time and bad press.
    Seriously. Even if you lose, you still win.

  • Rob – Coeur d'Alene

    Spoken like a true leftist authoritarian Ryan! Nice of you to make decisions for your family and all of your friends – because, you know, they're not as enlightened and smart as you! Cancel away Asshat!

  • ProcessSlave

    Oh well … I found the article so spot on, so side-splittingly funny, that it reminded me of what I've been missing since my subscription lapsed. I think I'd better renew to maintain Maclean's status quo!

  • Doc

    So you, like so many others, don't know if 'wrong' is the word you'd use to describe Mark's hilarity. Well, let's see if we can get a little clarity: would it be 'wrong' to fly a crowded passenger jet into a skyscraper on purpose? How about to pull a baby halfway out of his mother, stab him in the skull and pull him the rest of the way out, dead?

  • czekmark

    My reply to humourless remarks is "yawn" . Come back after you grow a pair.

  • http://gapingwhole.wordpress.com/ Em.

    I agree, it's one thing to use mockery in order say something worthwhile, but here it seems like it's done just for kicks.

  • http://fullyoffset.blogspot.com Jon

    I assume you've been living in a cave….
    with your fingers stuffed in your ears….
    and your eyes closed.

    Is this the first time you've ever read Steyn in MacLean's?

  • ProcessSlave

    Hey, what are the chances that Matthew has nary a word to say against the advocates and proponents of Sharia Law for Canada, UK etc, which would see his LGBT friends thrown from tall buildings, stoned to death, have their parts amputated etc.

    What about it Matthew … are you as angry and incensed at the Islamo Fascist, Cultural Jihadists … are you, huh?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    I must say I am somewhat disturbed to learn that we are using American sperm. What ever happened to those old Canadian virtues, like generosity, priapism, and quality control?

  • http://www.wakepedia.blogspot.com Wakefield Tolbert

    *LOL*

    Much is imported these days.

    Hondas and BMWs of some varieties and models are now made in Ohio, and Kobe beef is American, while what we thought was genuine GM parts can be found made by some coolies in the Orient.

    Watch for Canucks with some drawn out vowels and a certain predilection for banjos and farm animals, and the cycle will be complete, Jack.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

    Hey, don't make fun of priapism – it's a rare but legitimate medical problem. It's not easy to be a priapism sufferer. In fact, you could say it's always hard.

  • Reggiano

    "So, when a Bigendering person shows up…" Wait. A. Minute. Isn't this phrase discriminatory against a person with, you, know, a "big end"? Someone phone HRC-911.

  • an American

    why, whose offspring did you think YOU were?

  • HP3

    I was laughing aloud for most of the article. Steyn is the man.

  • http://www.wakepedia.blogspot.com Wakefield Tolbert

    More likely this person was offended for being simply called to the mat.

    ____________________________

    **knock knock**

    Who is it? Is someone there????

    "Dear Canadians, Americans, and Eurosocialist glop sloppers who used to have higher sperm counts.

    This is your conscience calling: Liberal ideals about sex and freedom and how the twain are not necessarily cousins, are coming home to roost on your back porch…."

  • Bob S

    Richard

    Richard
    I dunno. I suspect he doesn't have that ability but the fact that he is prepared to display his desire to do so indicates a very illiberal mindset. And I thought I was a "conservative". Hah!

    Ryan

    Anything to contribute?

  • Ms. George

    Facebook: it is a wonderful medium for all sorts of drivel…

  • http://www.wakepedia.blogspot.com Wakefield Tolbert

    Yes indeed:

    The Liberal Motif: He dosen't like it, so therefore they can't have it.

  • Rachacha

    Yep, everytime someone exposes my ridiculous fantasy as such, I pout. And then I cancel the subscriptions of all my friends. Tell us – do they know you did that? Actually no, because it is a stupid empty threat. If you can't stand what you are, too bad. You wil never force the world into your mold.

  • Montjoie

    Luc D. is spot on. The cry "For shame" is now directed at a writer by people who don't know where to put their genitals, or whether they're actually theirs, or if they even want them or someone else's. And what the hell is "First Nations?"

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Seriously, I worry. Indeed I warned against the jus primae noctis clause of NAFTA, but did anybody listen? Now we're at Alien Ressurrection (Newt Gingrich Collector's Edition). Woe unto you, people of Canada, for ye did not lend an ear!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    I'm somewhat mollified.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    …or that you're REALLY happy to see, well, anyone…

  • http://www.jonathannewton.net/ JonnyN

    *chuckle*

  • http://www.wakepedia.blogspot.com Wakefield Tolbert

    primae noctis indeed! lol

    Yes, the lordship class's sexual rights to the maidens of the countryside….

    (The last I heard of that phrase was Edward Longshanks character in Braveheart)

    Well, you could always do a good Mel Gibson shout-out in a Scottish kilt, slap on some war paint, and face down Parliament and declare:

    "they may take our wives, laddies, but they will NEVER take, our FREEDOOOOM"

    Then you guys up there will have to hire Sigourney Weaver to machine gun all the exploding bellies of uninvited or (unwarranted and and accounted-for) incubating alien (or at least trans-bordered) pregnancies.

  • Glen

    Family values. Social etiquette. Liberty. Three things that are shrivelling up in today's western societies. Mark, your writing, as always, is a treat to read.

  • Ceeger

    Quote: "80 per cent of Canadian women who conceive through donor sperm are getting it from the United States, mainly from men in Georgia and northern Florida."
    Well, given the number of snowbirds we send south each winter, the odds are good most of these classy lassies are getting a good dose of Canadiana in any case.
    That would explain the sudden rash of French-speaking fat kids with a pathological need to wear ill-fitting Speedos.

  • http://www.wakepedia.blogspot.com Wakefield Tolbert

    …all the foregoing reminds me: Maybe THAT was what that lawyer from Texas was referring to when he mentioned "turgid" babble…hmm.

  • Earnest Canuck

    Peace, order and good government are the *ancien canadien* virtues you're really referring to, Mr Mitchell; and real (i.e., private) sexual freedom and real (i.e., uncoerced) charitableness were once a subset, or result, of this beautifully modest national aspiration of ours.

    But then came the metastatic growth of Dominion's governments (including the invention of a whole new tier of Indian satrapies), and the vast strongarming that came along with it. Now the sexual freedoms of others are jammed down your craw; and if you don't wish to cough up tax money for 1000 moronic Pride phallusfests (for example), you get jailed PDQYH8HBWPSIAC*, as being selfish.

    (*Formerly PDQ for 'Pretty Damn Quick', this acronym has been, by order of the Toronto, Quebec and federal Ministries of Total Inclusivity**, amended to read as follows: 'Pretty Damn Quick You Hateful Hating Bigot Who Probably Self-Identifies As Canadian'.)

    Deplorable trend, of course, with loony but lucrative reproductive tech being just one unnerving aspect of it; yet I'm surprised neither Steyn nor you fellow commenters have mentioned Margaret Somerville, the powerful bio-ethicist who, in Canada, stands athwart this historical tendency. Somerville's not yelling "Stop" like an American, but has stopped much of it nonetheless. I think the influence of her steely, uncompromising, family-first strictures — most of which this ideological conservative approves of — is the actual, unintended cause of the sperm situation to which Steyn pegs this piece… if so, well oops. Happy to be proved wrong, here's her Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Somerville

    – Cheers,
    Earnest Canuck.

    ** With seconding applause from Matthew Coon Come, Thomson Highway and Jordin Tootoo***.

    ***Although Mr Tootoo would like it known that despite his name he is in fact strictly 1-spirited, ie he digs chicks.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Lord_Bob Lord Bob

    Frankly, I thought the comment was a deliberately over-the-top joke. It was pretty much all there: the hysterical exaggeration that is the meat and potatoes of satire.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Kentercat Kentercat

    I remember thinking basically the same thing on my visit to Paris in 1999. You can raise the taxes, create a police state of traffic cops, and all the other restrictions of socialist Europe, but you will still have the majority of people think how FREE they are if they can see full nudity on a billboard.

  • Cy

    Really a fantastic article. As a libertarian I am constantly horrified how the left seems to think that abortion and gay rights are the only freedoms that matter while economic liberty and the right to self defense are quaint and unnecessary. Thanks Mark for expressing my thoughts in such a clear manner.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Heh, until recently I would have replied indignantly, but I've discovered that I am, in fact, 1/32nd American. Nobody's perfect, I suppose.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/capnskip capnskip

    Way to go, Mark. enjoyed you on "Rush", today!

  • ProcessSlave

    There are lots of facts & stats in the article, Hamid … go back and read it.

    Hey, are you a Muslim? What would you like to see done with the LGBT agenda? With the people themselves?

From Macleans