<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your family is being watched 24-7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marquee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164190</link>
		<dc:creator>Marquee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164190</guid>
		<description>Cheers for the info. It was a good read.

Thanks &amp; Regards,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.odonovanmarquees.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marquee Hire Tipperary&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for the info. It was a good read.</p>
<p>Thanks &amp; Regards,<br />
<a href="http://www.odonovanmarquees.com" rel="nofollow">Marquee Hire Tipperary</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holiday Rentals</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164189</link>
		<dc:creator>Holiday Rentals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164189</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one thing to increase the amount of CCTV camera&#039;s around in a city, town or village. But to start monitoring homes would just be perhaps in breach of human rights. Granted in various instances it would prove useful in protecting our society against terrorist activity etc but at the same time you would be invading people&#039;s rights to privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s one thing to increase the amount of CCTV camera&#039;s around in a city, town or village. But to start monitoring homes would just be perhaps in breach of human rights. Granted in various instances it would prove useful in protecting our society against terrorist activity etc but at the same time you would be invading people&#039;s rights to privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamant</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164188</link>
		<dc:creator>adamant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164188</guid>
		<description>The solution is not CCTV, but CCSR, that is to say, Closed Circuit Sniper Rifles,  Instead of capturing video of offending thugs, they can simply shoot the miscreants and be done with it,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution is not CCTV, but CCSR, that is to say, Closed Circuit Sniper Rifles,  Instead of capturing video of offending thugs, they can simply shoot the miscreants and be done with it,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antivigilante</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164187</link>
		<dc:creator>Antivigilante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164187</guid>
		<description>Try checking your math. There&#039;s 300 million here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try checking your math. There&#039;s 300 million here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntiVigilante</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164186</link>
		<dc:creator>AntiVigilante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164186</guid>
		<description>Who let you out of grade school? Shill.

You&#039;re not only letting the lesser of two evils convince you to bend over for the worst evil behind the curtain, but you are projecting a false confusion (&quot;which I do no fully understand&quot;) in the hopes that your fellow citizens will assimilate your poit of view by pseudo-cynical defeatism. BULL:. You understand it perfectly: The hooliganism is:

1. A reaction to the state
2. So many that they form a crowd
3. All the roving barnacles that attach to crowds
4. The result of naming crimes which do not exist
5. Pointy teen repellents on entryways to buildings? ARE YOU PEOPLE FUDGIN&#039; SERIOUS?

A message of good will from rapidly relaunching US of A. Ain&#039;t no revolution coming (maybe a cold war on the New World Order), just an in your face blistering Renaissance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who let you out of grade school? Shill.</p>
<p>You&#039;re not only letting the lesser of two evils convince you to bend over for the worst evil behind the curtain, but you are projecting a false confusion (&quot;which I do no fully understand&quot;) in the hopes that your fellow citizens will assimilate your poit of view by pseudo-cynical defeatism. BULL:. You understand it perfectly: The hooliganism is:</p>
<p>1. A reaction to the state<br />
2. So many that they form a crowd<br />
3. All the roving barnacles that attach to crowds<br />
4. The result of naming crimes which do not exist<br />
5. Pointy teen repellents on entryways to buildings? ARE YOU PEOPLE FUDGIN&#039; SERIOUS?</p>
<p>A message of good will from rapidly relaunching US of A. Ain&#039;t no revolution coming (maybe a cold war on the New World Order), just an in your face blistering Renaissance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korious</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164185</link>
		<dc:creator>Korious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164185</guid>
		<description>Take to the streets and smash the cameras in mass.Everyone get gas mask and padded clothing.Storm the CCTV and destroy it ..KIll your state representatives now especially Tony Blair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take to the streets and smash the cameras in mass.Everyone get gas mask and padded clothing.Storm the CCTV and destroy it ..KIll your state representatives now especially Tony Blair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Svejk</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164184</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Svejk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164184</guid>
		<description>Yes, whip them. Whip them all into submission. Let the energizing, cool, refreshing wind of insecurity and fear breathe life into the feckless, lazy proletariate. Let the miraculous, god-glorifying power of greed and capitalism shake all the dirty scum from their parasitic lethargy. Let them whimper respectfully under their masters&#039; boots, obedient in the knowledge that the game is already won and that all the unregulated markets have become monopolies to a single, glorious corporation that owns everything. Then we&#039;ll have true freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, whip them. Whip them all into submission. Let the energizing, cool, refreshing wind of insecurity and fear breathe life into the feckless, lazy proletariate. Let the miraculous, god-glorifying power of greed and capitalism shake all the dirty scum from their parasitic lethargy. Let them whimper respectfully under their masters&#039; boots, obedient in the knowledge that the game is already won and that all the unregulated markets have become monopolies to a single, glorious corporation that owns everything. Then we&#039;ll have true freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Svejk</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164183</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Svejk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164183</guid>
		<description>As much I hate the cameras, I think the health and freedom of the press is far more important and the rise of monopolistic news corporations (Fox, anyone?) is a far more &quot;orwellian&quot; threat to liberty. The cameras are simply a small part of an authoritarian and paranoid culture that is flourishing in the UK and the United States. An over-zealous security guard or a cop with the Patriot Act on his side is far more dangerous than any camera, and the job of the media should be intelligent and critical, rather than whipping up a climate of insecurity and fear.

And, at least with security cameras there is such a thing as security by obscurity. It&#039;s only when we have a zealous nutcase behind it and a culture that supports angry, right-wing scapegoating of outsiders and dirty poor people that we have a real problem. And don&#039;t forget that, for all the squeaking of the right, the comfy, middle classes in the UK are the ones that wanted the &quot;security&quot; of the cameras in the first as much as any government agency.

And now that the street thugs wear hoodies, they figure it was all a government plot to watch them buying their copy of the Daily Mail or to catch them when they mumble &quot;paki&quot; as they leave the corner shop.

If you think cameras are the problem, you&#039;re missing the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much I hate the cameras, I think the health and freedom of the press is far more important and the rise of monopolistic news corporations (Fox, anyone?) is a far more &quot;orwellian&quot; threat to liberty. The cameras are simply a small part of an authoritarian and paranoid culture that is flourishing in the UK and the United States. An over-zealous security guard or a cop with the Patriot Act on his side is far more dangerous than any camera, and the job of the media should be intelligent and critical, rather than whipping up a climate of insecurity and fear.</p>
<p>And, at least with security cameras there is such a thing as security by obscurity. It&#039;s only when we have a zealous nutcase behind it and a culture that supports angry, right-wing scapegoating of outsiders and dirty poor people that we have a real problem. And don&#039;t forget that, for all the squeaking of the right, the comfy, middle classes in the UK are the ones that wanted the &quot;security&quot; of the cameras in the first as much as any government agency.</p>
<p>And now that the street thugs wear hoodies, they figure it was all a government plot to watch them buying their copy of the Daily Mail or to catch them when they mumble &quot;paki&quot; as they leave the corner shop.</p>
<p>If you think cameras are the problem, you&#039;re missing the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164182</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164182</guid>
		<description>This is awful. How can people have freedom and privacy when they are constantly monitered? And cameras inside the home is just plain AWFUL. Nevertheless I would have fun with that. I would mock their cameras and make a fool out of myself. Hell I&#039;d act like a terrorist or a deviant. They wanna moniter ME? They&#039;re in for a show. But I&#039;m still glad I&#039;m Canadian. Britian is quite possibly the last place I want to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awful. How can people have freedom and privacy when they are constantly monitered? And cameras inside the home is just plain AWFUL. Nevertheless I would have fun with that. I would mock their cameras and make a fool out of myself. Hell I&#039;d act like a terrorist or a deviant. They wanna moniter ME? They&#039;re in for a show. But I&#039;m still glad I&#039;m Canadian. Britian is quite possibly the last place I want to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164181</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164181</guid>
		<description>&quot;Broon&quot; has to call an election by next June!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Broon&quot; has to call an election by next June!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164180</guid>
		<description>then of course there is the government of the state of Oregon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then of course there is the government of the state of Oregon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164179</guid>
		<description>Yes that is why I am here.  Endeavouring to show you the error of your ways.  But you won&#039;t learn we (ie  USA) know best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes that is why I am here.  Endeavouring to show you the error of your ways.  But you won&#039;t learn we (ie  USA) know best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164178</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164178</guid>
		<description>Land of farce eh.  Remember the Minisitry of Funny Walks from Monty Python probably late sixties.  Have you ever had any dealings with the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, &quot;you&#039;re doing a heck of a job, Brownie&quot; etc,   They are farcical.

 Amazing foresight from the &quot;Brits&quot;.  Just like George Orwell.  Floyd, have you any examples of American foresight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Land of farce eh.  Remember the Minisitry of Funny Walks from Monty Python probably late sixties.  Have you ever had any dealings with the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, &quot;you&#039;re doing a heck of a job, Brownie&quot; etc,   They are farcical.</p>
<p> Amazing foresight from the &quot;Brits&quot;.  Just like George Orwell.  Floyd, have you any examples of American foresight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164177</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164177</guid>
		<description>see my post above!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see my post above!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164176</guid>
		<description>DPT, I do not think he was being an apologist.  He was being his usual sane, honest, incisive, knowlegeable, self.
I know you are not used to being around people like that probably because of your political affiliations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DPT, I do not think he was being an apologist.  He was being his usual sane, honest, incisive, knowlegeable, self.<br />
I know you are not used to being around people like that probably because of your political affiliations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164175</guid>
		<description>The &quot;voice&quot; can be that of a constable or a security guard prole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &quot;voice&quot; can be that of a constable or a security guard prole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164174</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy, here is my description of Republican &quot;long torture&quot;.   Having to read and listen to Republican drivel on the excesses of the British NHS, Obama death panels, pulling the plug on grandma, socialist school speeches from the chosen one, bitter complaints about the excessive number of Obama WH czars half of whom were appointed by Bush or previous administrations etc etc.  One difference; Winston could not turn the rat torture off when he felt like it.  I can turn off the Republican torture whenever I feel like.  I must admit I can only endure about a minute at a time.

Your WH Rep administration  of the last 8 years accelerated the cc camera love affair here and in the USA occupied territories..  What do you think was being used in Abu Graib to take all these torture pictures?  See my posts elswhere on this thread on this subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy, here is my description of Republican &quot;long torture&quot;.   Having to read and listen to Republican drivel on the excesses of the British NHS, Obama death panels, pulling the plug on grandma, socialist school speeches from the chosen one, bitter complaints about the excessive number of Obama WH czars half of whom were appointed by Bush or previous administrations etc etc.  One difference; Winston could not turn the rat torture off when he felt like it.  I can turn off the Republican torture whenever I feel like.  I must admit I can only endure about a minute at a time.</p>
<p>Your WH Rep administration  of the last 8 years accelerated the cc camera love affair here and in the USA occupied territories..  What do you think was being used in Abu Graib to take all these torture pictures?  See my posts elswhere on this thread on this subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164173</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164173</guid>
		<description>No surprises so far -  right.  But all the nitpicking and Britbashing about the NHS that goes on on this website consistently fails to recognise one factor.  Its their NHS and they like it,  Reminds me of a conversation I overheard in a Scottish pub in August 1997 when Scottish devolution was still being discussed.  This was between an Englishman and a Scotsman.  I think they were about to hold a referendum.  Engishman &quot;You Scots don&#039;t have any experience running your own Parliament, you are going to make all kinds of mistakes&quot;  The answer Scotsman &quot;Away wi&#039; ye, ye daft Sassenach numpty, at least they&#039;ll be Scottish mistakes&quot;  Something pertaining to the human condition here, I am sure Jack Mitchell or one of the other (few) sensible people on this page can make a comment on that.

Since then the Scottish devolution has been so successful that Cornwall, Devon, the north-east, the Lake district are all thinking of doing it.  I heard a few years ago that Texas was going to split off from the USA.  These Texans are not as stupid as their representative in the WH until January 19 2009  would have you believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprises so far &#8211;  right.  But all the nitpicking and Britbashing about the NHS that goes on on this website consistently fails to recognise one factor.  Its their NHS and they like it,  Reminds me of a conversation I overheard in a Scottish pub in August 1997 when Scottish devolution was still being discussed.  This was between an Englishman and a Scotsman.  I think they were about to hold a referendum.  Engishman &quot;You Scots don&#039;t have any experience running your own Parliament, you are going to make all kinds of mistakes&quot;  The answer Scotsman &quot;Away wi&#039; ye, ye daft Sassenach numpty, at least they&#039;ll be Scottish mistakes&quot;  Something pertaining to the human condition here, I am sure Jack Mitchell or one of the other (few) sensible people on this page can make a comment on that.</p>
<p>Since then the Scottish devolution has been so successful that Cornwall, Devon, the north-east, the Lake district are all thinking of doing it.  I heard a few years ago that Texas was going to split off from the USA.  These Texans are not as stupid as their representative in the WH until January 19 2009  would have you believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164172</guid>
		<description>Hi kbb it&#039;s me again.  Now I realize what the little red underlined clue is there for in your box.  I thought it was something for the clueless Republican wack-jobs to remind them what day it was.

I see that Co-payment means something different in the UK to the US in a health care context.  Two nations divided by a common language!  Yes the NHS sometimes denies treatment through bureaucratic ineptitude and stupidity and some times people die as a result.  Yes, my family advises me that the NHS situation forces people into a private system because the NHS has insufficient money etc.  Yes, people who have health insurance in the UK as an employment benefit tend to use it when they are sick.  All of which happens in the good old USA in a slightly different manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi kbb it&#039;s me again.  Now I realize what the little red underlined clue is there for in your box.  I thought it was something for the clueless Republican wack-jobs to remind them what day it was.</p>
<p>I see that Co-payment means something different in the UK to the US in a health care context.  Two nations divided by a common language!  Yes the NHS sometimes denies treatment through bureaucratic ineptitude and stupidity and some times people die as a result.  Yes, my family advises me that the NHS situation forces people into a private system because the NHS has insufficient money etc.  Yes, people who have health insurance in the UK as an employment benefit tend to use it when they are sick.  All of which happens in the good old USA in a slightly different manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164171</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164171</guid>
		<description>Jack you are &#039;way too serious, and reasonable and correct.  You must feel like a  Leper in a Middle East bazaar when you are on these pages,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack you are &#039;way too serious, and reasonable and correct.  You must feel like a  Leper in a Middle East bazaar when you are on these pages,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164170</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164170</guid>
		<description>Example 2

The other bunch&#039;s example is from yesterday.  Obama&#039;s plan to save your money for your retirement  if you live in the USA,  Savings bonds.  He will deduct the money from your salary before you receive it, so it is not taxed and he will invest (spend) his?/your? tax money and the balance of your money in US savings bonds.  All this while we are in a huge  deficit which he says he will reduce.  So he will take it away from you before you get it, invest it at a paltry interest rate, and give you an IOU for it to be repaid in the future at an amount reduced by inflation contributed by the future taxpayers,  Perfect.  Its a form of taxation that probably does not appear in the books as National debt.  So he is reducing the National Debt by sleight of hand.  This is a somewhat more benevolent nanny (she said she would give it back to you) We are the government and we know what is best for you,  This is because you are too stupid to save your own money, for your own retirement.  So it is in your best interests.   This bunch starts with a capital D, but you already figured that by a process of elimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Example 2</p>
<p>The other bunch&#039;s example is from yesterday.  Obama&#039;s plan to save your money for your retirement  if you live in the USA,  Savings bonds.  He will deduct the money from your salary before you receive it, so it is not taxed and he will invest (spend) his?/your? tax money and the balance of your money in US savings bonds.  All this while we are in a huge  deficit which he says he will reduce.  So he will take it away from you before you get it, invest it at a paltry interest rate, and give you an IOU for it to be repaid in the future at an amount reduced by inflation contributed by the future taxpayers,  Perfect.  Its a form of taxation that probably does not appear in the books as National debt.  So he is reducing the National Debt by sleight of hand.  This is a somewhat more benevolent nanny (she said she would give it back to you) We are the government and we know what is best for you,  This is because you are too stupid to save your own money, for your own retirement.  So it is in your best interests.   This bunch starts with a capital D, but you already figured that by a process of elimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164169</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164169</guid>
		<description>Yes Margo, but the nanny state is here right under your nose in the good old USA, assuming you live there.  So stop picking on Britain exclusively.  This is the first of two current examples:-.

We are going to stay in Iraq.  We are doing this to protect the homeland.  We need to kill the Al Quiada there or they will come here.  Pay for it?  Well we  don&#039;t have any money but the taxes on increased wealth from lowering taxes on the rich will pay for it.  &quot;How do you know that?&quot;  &quot;It always works.&quot;  Look at what Reagen did by lowering taxes. &quot;In other words, we are the government and we know best.  We will spend your money (or your heirs money) protecting you.  This is in your best interests.  This a somewhat strict nanny.   Guess which bunch that is?  Starts with a capital R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Margo, but the nanny state is here right under your nose in the good old USA, assuming you live there.  So stop picking on Britain exclusively.  This is the first of two current examples:-.</p>
<p>We are going to stay in Iraq.  We are doing this to protect the homeland.  We need to kill the Al Quiada there or they will come here.  Pay for it?  Well we  don&#039;t have any money but the taxes on increased wealth from lowering taxes on the rich will pay for it.  &quot;How do you know that?&quot;  &quot;It always works.&quot;  Look at what Reagen did by lowering taxes. &quot;In other words, we are the government and we know best.  We will spend your money (or your heirs money) protecting you.  This is in your best interests.  This a somewhat strict nanny.   Guess which bunch that is?  Starts with a capital R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164168</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164168</guid>
		<description>Linda, great definition of the &quot;chavs&quot; in england and the &quot;numpties&quot; in Scotland,  As you say a percentage are upright, not parentally challenged, law abiding, hard working young citizens, the rest are chavs or numpties.  But the latter percentage seems to be increasing.   They are great people when given a challenge.  For instance the numpties fighting alongside their American brothers in Afganistan/Iraq are doing great work.  Most of them make it through &quot;boot camp&quot; after the military has exorcised numpty thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda, great definition of the &quot;chavs&quot; in england and the &quot;numpties&quot; in Scotland,  As you say a percentage are upright, not parentally challenged, law abiding, hard working young citizens, the rest are chavs or numpties.  But the latter percentage seems to be increasing.   They are great people when given a challenge.  For instance the numpties fighting alongside their American brothers in Afganistan/Iraq are doing great work.  Most of them make it through &quot;boot camp&quot; after the military has exorcised numpty thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164163</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s not awful. It&#039;s either light verse (often on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/08/the-trouble-with-economists/#IDComment33618652&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;political subjects&lt;/a&gt; here at Maclean&#039;s) or English-language Homeric epic. AtheistCon is just your average philistine and has no idea what poetry is awful and what isn&#039;t -- he just knows that&#039;s a cheap adjective he can throw out (though who would take AtheistCon as a judge of anything, least of all poetry, beats me). Also, I&#039;ve never received a government grant in my life; another all-purpose philistine &lt;i&gt;mot&lt;/i&gt;. May I say that I made an honest effort to engage with Steyn&#039;s thesis in my comments above and below? Shows what you get for an act of good faith around here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#39;s not awful. It&#39;s either light verse (often on <a href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/08/the-trouble-with-economists/#IDComment33618652" rel="nofollow">political subjects</a> here at Maclean&#39;s) or English-language Homeric epic. AtheistCon is just your average philistine and has no idea what poetry is awful and what isn&#39;t &#8212; he just knows that&#39;s a cheap adjective he can throw out (though who would take AtheistCon as a judge of anything, least of all poetry, beats me). Also, I&#39;ve never received a government grant in my life; another all-purpose philistine <i>mot</i>. May I say that I made an honest effort to engage with Steyn&#39;s thesis in my comments above and below? Shows what you get for an act of good faith around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164167</guid>
		<description>Just a little ahead of the curve is right on the money.   Did you hear about the Scotsman who received a letter from the local police with a picture of him in his car showing him exceeding a speed limit and asking him to pay a 100 pound fine.  So he sent back a picture of a 100 pound banknote.  The police sent him back a picture of a pair of handcuffs.  So then he decided he would pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little ahead of the curve is right on the money.   Did you hear about the Scotsman who received a letter from the local police with a picture of him in his car showing him exceeding a speed limit and asking him to pay a 100 pound fine.  So he sent back a picture of a 100 pound banknote.  The police sent him back a picture of a pair of handcuffs.  So then he decided he would pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164166</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164166</guid>
		<description>Good analysis.  Just a little ahead of the curve.  If the British or the Americans had enough policeman (I jest) unless you mean the new Truth Polce they could get really creative.  Instead of having notices saying &quot;pick up your dog&#039;s poo&quot; and leaving it to individuals to decide whether to ignore the law/ordnance/notice or not,  They could watch the whole disgusting event on the telescreen, identify the culprits owner and arrest him as soon as it takes the police car to get there.  It&#039;s all for our own good,  They are doing it with cameras in Scotland and the rest of the UK already.  You can photographed if you are caught running traffic lights or exceeding speed limits.

I lived in Chicago until three years ago.  About the time I left Chicago they were installing the first six sets of cameras at intersections.  But word from Mayor Daley was that they wereonly experimental and would only be installed at the historically most accident prone intersections.  Right.  If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis.  Just a little ahead of the curve.  If the British or the Americans had enough policeman (I jest) unless you mean the new Truth Polce they could get really creative.  Instead of having notices saying &quot;pick up your dog&#039;s poo&quot; and leaving it to individuals to decide whether to ignore the law/ordnance/notice or not,  They could watch the whole disgusting event on the telescreen, identify the culprits owner and arrest him as soon as it takes the police car to get there.  It&#039;s all for our own good,  They are doing it with cameras in Scotland and the rest of the UK already.  You can photographed if you are caught running traffic lights or exceeding speed limits.</p>
<p>I lived in Chicago until three years ago.  About the time I left Chicago they were installing the first six sets of cameras at intersections.  But word from Mayor Daley was that they wereonly experimental and would only be installed at the historically most accident prone intersections.  Right.  If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigola</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164165</link>
		<dc:creator>craigola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164165</guid>
		<description>Very strange, all the tsking and tut-tutting about Great Britain here. There are surveillance cameras, both publicly and privately operated, in areas of my city, just like there are in yours. Remember that cool footage of the 747 landing in the Hudson River? Surveillance camera. In the absence of planes landing in the river, what would that camera be recording? Stuff. Mostly nothing, but maybe you if you pass in front of it, or the thousands of others just like it, silently monitoring all manner of public and private property, for any reason anyone can offer, good or bad. They don&#039;t seem to trigger much debate, but when they trigger any, you&#039;re guaranteed to be scolded that &quot;if you&#039;re not doing anything wrong, you&#039;ve got nothing to worry about.&quot;
Well, they&#039;re already in place, right? And they already serve a useful purpose, or so someone official enough to decide to place them must believe, right? Well, if we&#039;re as far down that road as we are already, how hard is it to imagine their use slowly but surely being expanded to include all sorts of other purposes, like monitoring sex offenders, or maybe parolees, or maybe convicted criminals, or maybe even accused criminals in special cases, to ensure public safety, for their and their families&#039; protection, as a cost-cutting measure, or whatever?
Is Great Britain a tragedy, or is it just a little ahead of the curve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very strange, all the tsking and tut-tutting about Great Britain here. There are surveillance cameras, both publicly and privately operated, in areas of my city, just like there are in yours. Remember that cool footage of the 747 landing in the Hudson River? Surveillance camera. In the absence of planes landing in the river, what would that camera be recording? Stuff. Mostly nothing, but maybe you if you pass in front of it, or the thousands of others just like it, silently monitoring all manner of public and private property, for any reason anyone can offer, good or bad. They don&#039;t seem to trigger much debate, but when they trigger any, you&#039;re guaranteed to be scolded that &quot;if you&#039;re not doing anything wrong, you&#039;ve got nothing to worry about.&quot;<br />
Well, they&#039;re already in place, right? And they already serve a useful purpose, or so someone official enough to decide to place them must believe, right? Well, if we&#039;re as far down that road as we are already, how hard is it to imagine their use slowly but surely being expanded to include all sorts of other purposes, like monitoring sex offenders, or maybe parolees, or maybe convicted criminals, or maybe even accused criminals in special cases, to ensure public safety, for their and their families&#039; protection, as a cost-cutting measure, or whatever?<br />
Is Great Britain a tragedy, or is it just a little ahead of the curve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164164</guid>
		<description>I have a question.  What happens on this site when the title for the UK 24/7 cc camera thread disappears off the bottom of the home page.  I can see them advancing down the page each day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question.  What happens on this site when the title for the UK 24/7 cc camera thread disappears off the bottom of the home page.  I can see them advancing down the page each day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164162</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s not awful.  It&#039;s either light verse (often on political subjects here at Maclean&#039;s) or English-language Homeric epic.  AtheistCon is just your average philistine and has no idea what poetry is awful and what isn&#039;t -- he just knows that&#039;s a cheap adjective he can throw out.  Anyway, if you want a poem, give me a subject and I&#039;ll see what I can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#039;s not awful.  It&#039;s either light verse (often on political subjects here at Maclean&#039;s) or English-language Homeric epic.  AtheistCon is just your average philistine and has no idea what poetry is awful and what isn&#039;t &#8212; he just knows that&#039;s a cheap adjective he can throw out.  Anyway, if you want a poem, give me a subject and I&#039;ll see what I can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aramkr</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164161</link>
		<dc:creator>aramkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164161</guid>
		<description>Whether that particular detail is true or not does not really diminish the point ,does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether that particular detail is true or not does not really diminish the point ,does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164160</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164160</guid>
		<description>just before Desert Storm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just before Desert Storm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164159</guid>
		<description>It used to be called ending world hunger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be called ending world hunger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164158</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164158</guid>
		<description>I got news for whoever asked for them to be installed,  He&#039;s not coming back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got news for whoever asked for them to be installed,  He&#039;s not coming back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164157</guid>
		<description>Have you crossed the border into Canada recently?  They photograph your vehicle and you.  The ask you odd (sometimes) questions that are recorded and they are entered into a data base.  This all started after 9/11.  I became suspicious about this when I was asked the same odd question by a prole in the little box over a period of three years.  A Homeland Security employee whom I know confirmed the  existence of a database.  They are trying to see if you give the same answer every time.  If you change your answer its off to Guantanamo Bay with you.

This was all done by a Republican government in the last 8 years so you can&#039;t blame the Dems for this one,  They are increasingly in extensive use in convenience stores and banks and stores.  Criminals. who are mostly stupid, sometimes forget to wear there facemasks,  Criminals committing minor crimes come from the general US population.  We are on our way.  Be not afraid my children,  I must listen to Hannity this week I have forgotten the exact words he uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you crossed the border into Canada recently?  They photograph your vehicle and you.  The ask you odd (sometimes) questions that are recorded and they are entered into a data base.  This all started after 9/11.  I became suspicious about this when I was asked the same odd question by a prole in the little box over a period of three years.  A Homeland Security employee whom I know confirmed the  existence of a database.  They are trying to see if you give the same answer every time.  If you change your answer its off to Guantanamo Bay with you.</p>
<p>This was all done by a Republican government in the last 8 years so you can&#039;t blame the Dems for this one,  They are increasingly in extensive use in convenience stores and banks and stores.  Criminals. who are mostly stupid, sometimes forget to wear there facemasks,  Criminals committing minor crimes come from the general US population.  We are on our way.  Be not afraid my children,  I must listen to Hannity this week I have forgotten the exact words he uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164156</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164156</guid>
		<description>Well I have been on here for two days and nobody has got it yet.  Marc must be on vacation.  Let me try an make it simple for you Americans,  The cc camera installations started after the IRA (Irish Republican Army) started bombing in the streets of London England,  Some time after 1969,  Like all new technology there is an up-side and a down-side.  People liked them so much their use has expanded.  The Republican drivel on here about nanny governments installing millions of cameras is a half-truth - which the extreme right wing nut-jobs on this page are trying to make into a whole truth by distorting the half truth,.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I have been on here for two days and nobody has got it yet.  Marc must be on vacation.  Let me try an make it simple for you Americans,  The cc camera installations started after the IRA (Irish Republican Army) started bombing in the streets of London England,  Some time after 1969,  Like all new technology there is an up-side and a down-side.  People liked them so much their use has expanded.  The Republican drivel on here about nanny governments installing millions of cameras is a half-truth &#8211; which the extreme right wing nut-jobs on this page are trying to make into a whole truth by distorting the half truth,.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164155</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164155</guid>
		<description>No posts so far today.  Maybe the people who reside on the websites of extreme political views take a holiday on  labor day.

For those of you who want to learn, a minority i know. you can find the definitions of &quot;chav&quot; (to my surprize it made it already) &quot;numpties&quot; and the &quot;great unwashed&quot;.  Try Wkipedia and the Urban Dictionary,  Of course we have &quot;proles&quot; from George Orwell (amazing foresight).  Lastly an amazing statement in one of those sources:-

Corporations fear the day that the great unwashed will throw of the shackles of consumerism and ever increasing debt and focus on more imporant endeavours such as their health, family and friends.

All to be taken with a pinch of salt and a measure of humor.  Like Hannity says &quot;Do not be afraid, my child

Have you seen the women crying on CNN this morning &quot;I don&#039;t want the President brainwashing my child on Tuesday&quot;  (not said - That&#039;s my job, how dare he move in)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No posts so far today.  Maybe the people who reside on the websites of extreme political views take a holiday on  labor day.</p>
<p>For those of you who want to learn, a minority i know. you can find the definitions of &quot;chav&quot; (to my surprize it made it already) &quot;numpties&quot; and the &quot;great unwashed&quot;.  Try Wkipedia and the Urban Dictionary,  Of course we have &quot;proles&quot; from George Orwell (amazing foresight).  Lastly an amazing statement in one of those sources:-</p>
<p>Corporations fear the day that the great unwashed will throw of the shackles of consumerism and ever increasing debt and focus on more imporant endeavours such as their health, family and friends.</p>
<p>All to be taken with a pinch of salt and a measure of humor.  Like Hannity says &quot;Do not be afraid, my child</p>
<p>Have you seen the women crying on CNN this morning &quot;I don&#039;t want the President brainwashing my child on Tuesday&quot;  (not said &#8211; That&#039;s my job, how dare he move in)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164154</guid>
		<description>So your prediction may be true.  However, I did not see any numpties or chavs in Oregon.  I don&#039;t think they like Republicans in that State either.  I still think you should stop talking about socialist governments and start talking about nanny governments as your fearless website master does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So your prediction may be true.  However, I did not see any numpties or chavs in Oregon.  I don&#039;t think they like Republicans in that State either.  I still think you should stop talking about socialist governments and start talking about nanny governments as your fearless website master does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164153</guid>
		<description>The nanny government word usage is already here in the USA.  I have just remembered.  I was in Oregon in July and went to purchase gas.  Just as I went to put the gas pump in the tank a youth in an orange work jacket snatched it from me.  He told me he had to pump the gas as it was an Oregon State law.  I asked him why the law was introduced.  It was obviously not one of Obama&#039;s new green jobs.   That would be too fast to put in place even for him.  It was also one of these bad oil company jobs.  The answer I received was &quot;That&#039;s our nanny state government for you&quot;  The youth in the orange jacket asked if I would like to know more examples of what the nanny state government  had done.  He must have noticed my deer-in-the-headlights expression.  I informed no thanks and I that had emigrated from a beautiful but misguided country (Scotland for those who jumped into the middle of this thread) to get away from nanny government actions and already knew what they could get up to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nanny government word usage is already here in the USA.  I have just remembered.  I was in Oregon in July and went to purchase gas.  Just as I went to put the gas pump in the tank a youth in an orange work jacket snatched it from me.  He told me he had to pump the gas as it was an Oregon State law.  I asked him why the law was introduced.  It was obviously not one of Obama&#039;s new green jobs.   That would be too fast to put in place even for him.  It was also one of these bad oil company jobs.  The answer I received was &quot;That&#039;s our nanny state government for you&quot;  The youth in the orange jacket asked if I would like to know more examples of what the nanny state government  had done.  He must have noticed my deer-in-the-headlights expression.  I informed no thanks and I that had emigrated from a beautiful but misguided country (Scotland for those who jumped into the middle of this thread) to get away from nanny government actions and already knew what they could get up to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164152</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164152</guid>
		<description>I note your very pessimistic forecast for the US.  I am more optimistic than you but I may have stuff to learn I am a new citizen.  The US population is very stupid I grant (you amd me excepted) but they will never allow nationalization of the steel industry etc.  The US people have a strong heritage of conservatism (small c) and will hopefully not be so asleep at the wheel that they allow the government to become too nannyish with welfare etc.  The British people dpenly talk about their nanny government.  You should use the same term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note your very pessimistic forecast for the US.  I am more optimistic than you but I may have stuff to learn I am a new citizen.  The US population is very stupid I grant (you amd me excepted) but they will never allow nationalization of the steel industry etc.  The US people have a strong heritage of conservatism (small c) and will hopefully not be so asleep at the wheel that they allow the government to become too nannyish with welfare etc.  The British people dpenly talk about their nanny government.  You should use the same term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164151</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164151</guid>
		<description>You think it is going to take Obama that long?  Look at the rate at which he has started!

You have redefined Socialism for your own purposes.  No wonder the US population is scared of the word Socialism.  Socialism is government ownership of the means of production for the people.  The Labour government nationilized the UK Steel Industry, the Coal mining Industry, Gas, electricity  etc etc.  Then when they realized it was a disaster economically they changed it all back again.  What a mess!  If you said Maggie was too busy doing her thing to notice that she should have been exorcising the remnants of the &quot;for the people&quot; bit that Labour got finished. you would b more correctI thought Republicans and Conservatives (note the Large C) had economics in their genes.  She did come over here to hold George W Bush&#039;s hand when she thought he was going &quot;wobbly&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think it is going to take Obama that long?  Look at the rate at which he has started!</p>
<p>You have redefined Socialism for your own purposes.  No wonder the US population is scared of the word Socialism.  Socialism is government ownership of the means of production for the people.  The Labour government nationilized the UK Steel Industry, the Coal mining Industry, Gas, electricity  etc etc.  Then when they realized it was a disaster economically they changed it all back again.  What a mess!  If you said Maggie was too busy doing her thing to notice that she should have been exorcising the remnants of the &quot;for the people&quot; bit that Labour got finished. you would b more correctI thought Republicans and Conservatives (note the Large C) had economics in their genes.  She did come over here to hold George W Bush&#039;s hand when she thought he was going &quot;wobbly&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164150</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164150</guid>
		<description>You mean as opposed to the last most recent lot of fascists.  They were not real?  I thought so more than a few times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean as opposed to the last most recent lot of fascists.  They were not real?  I thought so more than a few times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-2/#comment-164149</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164149</guid>
		<description>The black father, in his home with his family, was the absolute bedrock against which the government could never succeed, get rid of him and the rest is easy. In te US they have done that spectacularly well, first by demonising the father as some sort of racist, child abusing, wife beating drunk and bully as the popular media and higher education conspired to do and then encourage his children to either get pregnant or get someone else&#039;s child pregnant. Provide crap schools that the children will want to drop out of but give them benefits that mean they can be paid by the state to have more children while living in state controlled housing.

It&#039;s terrible in the USA.  Not enough room to re-edit everything you said.  Then to correct this they had welfare reform which must have worked well because it does not get mentioned on the state controlled media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The black father, in his home with his family, was the absolute bedrock against which the government could never succeed, get rid of him and the rest is easy. In te US they have done that spectacularly well, first by demonising the father as some sort of racist, child abusing, wife beating drunk and bully as the popular media and higher education conspired to do and then encourage his children to either get pregnant or get someone else&#039;s child pregnant. Provide crap schools that the children will want to drop out of but give them benefits that mean they can be paid by the state to have more children while living in state controlled housing.</p>
<p>It&#039;s terrible in the USA.  Not enough room to re-edit everything you said.  Then to correct this they had welfare reform which must have worked well because it does not get mentioned on the state controlled media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164148</guid>
		<description>Well as you know the Parliamentary system allows the Prime Minister to call a general election whenever he decides.  Obviously the PM will only do that when he thinks he has a good chance of winning.  So if he gets it wrong with the current bunch, then Labour (I notice your British Spelling) will be out.  Pity the Republic system has the politicians on a rigid fixed timetable.  It is like a referendum each time.  Of course you do not want to be like Italy where they do it about once a month.  But if Bush had called an election and got it wrong, like so much of what he did, then we would not have to suffer him for the whole eight years.  And the new bunch would have been in faster making things better much sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as you know the Parliamentary system allows the Prime Minister to call a general election whenever he decides.  Obviously the PM will only do that when he thinks he has a good chance of winning.  So if he gets it wrong with the current bunch, then Labour (I notice your British Spelling) will be out.  Pity the Republic system has the politicians on a rigid fixed timetable.  It is like a referendum each time.  Of course you do not want to be like Italy where they do it about once a month.  But if Bush had called an election and got it wrong, like so much of what he did, then we would not have to suffer him for the whole eight years.  And the new bunch would have been in faster making things better much sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164147</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164147</guid>
		<description>You have these people here in the USA.  The term working class has different meanings on different sides of the pond.  I have not heard a term for these unfortunate people here in the USA other than &quot;Republicans.&quot; which is the closest i can get.  You have to feel sorry for them, they are partly victims partly their own fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have these people here in the USA.  The term working class has different meanings on different sides of the pond.  I have not heard a term for these unfortunate people here in the USA other than &quot;Republicans.&quot; which is the closest i can get.  You have to feel sorry for them, they are partly victims partly their own fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/comment-page-1/#comment-164146</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77775#comment-164146</guid>
		<description>The term chav is correct and is new to me.  I just heard it from my sister in London on the phone during a discussion about  a stupid girl friend my nephew had brought home.  But she was not a &quot;chav&quot; I was told.  But they are not exclusively working class indigenous Britons although some of them are.  It is a term to describe the mass of working class people who have no consideration for anyone else, can&#039;t think, believe everything they see on the internet and on television, are a product of a declining educational system, had no parental input as they were raised etc etc.  I had a good friend in Scotland who is a teacher and was my best man.  Years ago he used to talk about &quot;the great unwashed&quot;,  The modern term in Scotland in &quot;numpty&quot;  You guys ought to pay for this right-up-to-date information about the UK in this thread.  I bet Mark Steyn gets paid for starting the thread on the UK cc cameras and he knows nothing about that..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term chav is correct and is new to me.  I just heard it from my sister in London on the phone during a discussion about  a stupid girl friend my nephew had brought home.  But she was not a &quot;chav&quot; I was told.  But they are not exclusively working class indigenous Britons although some of them are.  It is a term to describe the mass of working class people who have no consideration for anyone else, can&#039;t think, believe everything they see on the internet and on television, are a product of a declining educational system, had no parental input as they were raised etc etc.  I had a good friend in Scotland who is a teacher and was my best man.  Years ago he used to talk about &quot;the great unwashed&quot;,  The modern term in Scotland in &quot;numpty&quot;  You guys ought to pay for this right-up-to-date information about the UK in this thread.  I bet Mark Steyn gets paid for starting the thread on the UK cc cameras and he knows nothing about that..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

