You’re teaching our kids WHAT?

The latest buzzword in high school sex ed class is ‘pleasure’—not everyone is pleased

by Lianne George on Tuesday, September 8, 2009 9:00pm - 82 Comments

You’re teaching our kids WHAT?Good For Her, a woman-focused sex shop in downtown Toronto, is not your average erotic emporium, if only because it serves tea. Tucked away in a cozy converted Victorian, the store features all of the usual adult fare—vibrators, lubricants, flavoured condoms, X-rated books and DVDs—but what’s notably different is the tone of the place, inspired, it would seem, by someone’s zany, free-spirited aunt. Guided by a philosophy of inclusive, non-threatening, pleasure-focused sex education, Good For Her has become well-known for its great-sex workshops, which it offers in-store, on university campuses, and at bridal showers and private parties. The message is always the same: your body is a gift, people. Explore it. Take care of it. Enjoy it.

About a year and a half ago, Good For Her’s founder, Carlyle Jansen, started getting phone calls from an unlikely market niche: local high school teachers, asking if she would come by their classes and talk to the kids about sex. The fact is, the majority of public school teachers are never explicitly trained to teach sexual education. In many cases, it’s the rookies—perhaps trained in math or gym—who get stuck with it. “Sometimes they’d call because they don’t know enough about it themselves,” Jansen says. “Or they’re uncomfortable.” Teachers can find it unpleasant to make the leap from geometry to sexting. “They feel like they have to then talk to the kids the next day and have an ongoing relationship,” she says, “so it’s easier to bring someone in from outside.”

And so, happy to oblige, Jansen and some of her colleagues visited the Toronto classrooms and tried to get a feel for what students knew, what they didn’t know, and moreover, what they wanted to know. The more workshops they conducted—she guesses they’ve done 12 to 15 so far—the more convinced they became that high school students are navigating a huge information gap, and that in many schools, the current sex ed curriculum is woefully inadequate. “Kids are taught to death about all the bad things that can happen to them if they have sex,” she says. “They’ve said, ‘We’ve heard about sexually transmitted infections, we know you can get pregnant, but we want to know about pleasure and we want to know about healthy relationships.’ ”

In her workshops, Jansen urges teens to ask about anything and everything, from masturbation, gender identity and same-sex feelings to sex toys (which they keep on hand in case the subject comes up), why people like oral sex, and why that particular act should go both ways. She encourages them to role play in order to learn how to broach difficult conversations. For instance, how do you raise the subject of condoms in the heat of the moment? And what do you do if a boy says he won’t wear one? To help illustrate the “pleasure centres” portion of the lesson, Jansen and her colleagues bring in visual aids from the store, including a plush pink vulva puppet. “People laugh. They can’t believe it,” she says. “But they don’t know what a vulva looks like. Adult women don’t know what a vulva looks like.” To describe the male anatomy, they bring a dildo. “We usually bring one that is silver-coloured and we say, ‘This is the head of the penis. This is the shaft. These are the sensitive parts.’ ”

Soon, even more teens will be able to take part in the Good for Her version of sex ed. Jansen has helped launch the Sexual Health Education Pleasure Project (SHEPP)—a non-profit organization devoted to providing free, pleasure-based sex ed workshops for youth in schools and community groups in Toronto. Visitors to SHEPP’s newly minted website, Shepptoronto.com, will note that parts of the lesson plan sound more like the table of contents of Cosmopolitan than anything a high-schooler might traditionally learn in class: “The art of dating—in person, online and texting”; “Negotiating what you want—in and out of the bedroom”; “Pleasure centres and anatomy basics (what feels good, what doesn’t, and where to find it)”; and “Cool, safe, and hot sex.” The goal, Jansen assures, is not to urge kids to get out there and do it, but to present them with facts and choices so they can make informed personal decisions.

Now say you’re the parent of a 14-year-old, and your kid comes home one day and tells you that the owner of a sex shop came into her classroom, dildo in hand, and talked to the kids about ways to make their love lives “hot and sexy.” Are you going to breathe a sigh of relief that someone else is telling your kid this stuff, or is your inner Bill O’Reilly going to surface? Maybe you’ll want to know what, pray tell, was wrong with the old euphemistic puberty puns and plastic pelvises?

Like it or not, Jansen isn’t the only person pushing for more “pleasure” in sex ed. The fact is, while parents were looking the other way, and many do prefer to look the other way, a substantial shift has been unfolding in the world of sexual education. The old model of simply mapping out basic anatomy and issuing warnings about diseases is giving way—not only in pockets of Canada, but also in the U.S. and abroad—to a pleasure-focused brand of sex education, which emphasizes the healthy and fun sides of sex. Its growing network of proponents sees pleasure-focused sex ed as an urgent necessity in an age of sexting, Internet porn, and Disney heroines-gone-wild. It’s not about advocating sex, they say. Rather, it’s the belief that radical openness will demystify sex and help give teens the confidence to make smarter choices. “What we have found is, if you talk about how to prevent STIs, youth tune you out,” says Jansen. “If you talk about how things work and what are the different options, they pay attention. There are safer-sex messages implicit in what we say, but it’s within a package that’s more interesting to them.”

Recently, Oprah Winfrey drew attention to the subject when her show’s resident sexpert, Dr. Laura Berman—a staunch pleasure proponent—introduced her audience to the idea of “cradle to grave” sex education. By Grade 2, she said, kids should know the truth about where babies come from. By Grade 5, masturbation, orgasm and the mechanics of sex should be covered, and by Grade 6, kids should know about “safer-sex” options. Perhaps most controversially, Berman told the audience of aghast moms that when their daughters hit 15 or 16, they might want to consider buying them a clitoral vibrator to teach them the joys of exploring their own bodies. The rationale, she says, is that it’s an opportunity to boost self-esteem: “You’re teaching them about pleasuring themselves and taking the reins of their own sexuality so that they don’t ever have to depend on any teenage boy to do it for them.” (As outrageous a birthday gift as it may seem, some parents are listening. In recent years, Jensen has started to notice more mothers coming into Good For Her with their daughters, ages 13 to 16, for precisely this purpose.)

In the U.S., a Washington-based non-profit called the Coalition for Positive Sexuality provides information, resources and an online forum to teens, advising them that access to candid sex information is their right. Its “Just Say Yes” campaign says, “we’re tired of people telling us what we can and can’t do. There’s no preaching. No moralizing. Just the facts.” In addition to all the standard safer-sex information, CPS’s website offers suggestions for safe and fun ways teens can “get off.” The idea being that if you want to steer kids away from the riskiest types of behaviours, you have to provide them with fun, creative alternatives. (Among its suggestions: “suck, kiss, touch, bite, fondle, nibble, squeeze, and lick” and “look at sexy pictures and videos.” The list gets more explicit from there.) One of CPS’s promotional posters features three teenage girls whispering to each other, one of whom is holding an open binder filled with little plastic bottles. “The secret to great sex . . .” the tag line reads: “water-based lube!”

Bookmark and Share
  • gnat_colt

    Sex becomes pleasurable when you are in a mature and loving relationship because that's when you are comfortable with yourself, your partner and your sexuality. You are able to discuss your likes and dislikes and are having sex for the right reasons… not because of peer pressure or are under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

  • Go Colts

    Umm, how about teaching children not to engage in sex until they are married? There's a novel idea!

    • Craig O

      Because even the kids who do buy that idea are likely to have sex before marriage anyway, especially with the average age of marriage rising quite steadily? Abstinence is like communism – great on paper, terrible in practice.

  • common sense

    Hedonism period. We live in a sex saturated society. Since the inception of sex education in schools, the STI rate amoung teens and young adults has risen 500% and teen pregnancy and abortion, depending on what report you get your statistics from has more than tripled. The proof is in the pudding. Has sex ed worked? Absolutely not.

    • http://www.sexloveintelligence.com Julia Saunders

      this is a completely ridiculous and very inaccurate statement. Check your stats "common sense" and have a bigger look around at what is working and not working regarding the connections between sex ed and teens STI rates and pregnancy.

      Bear in mind, readers, that statistics are skewed but more importantly, evidence is being gathered more and more so there is more information about more people.

      Sex Ed is very helpful, if done comprehensively and in line with recommended guidelines such as what is provided for by the Federal Government of Canada. If Sex Ed is done well, it works. http://www.sexloveintelligence.com

  • http://www.sexloveintelligence.com Julia Saunders

    Sex Ed is very helpful, if done comprehensively and in line with recommended guidelines such as what is provided for by the Federal Government of Canada. If Sex Ed is done well, it works. http://www.sexloveintelligence.com

  • Cougar Mama

    How is emphasizing the pleasures of sex going to make teens not want to have sex? Their hormones are already fired up at the thought of it; showing them erotica can only add fuel to the fire. I am scratching my head at this one. Every teen knows that sex feels good; that is why it is so hard NOT to engage in it. And why stop at one partner when having multiples can only be so much more pleasurable?

    This kind of sex education is a sure-fire method of spreading HIV into the general population to the point where it will be hard to control, just as in Africa. Then what fun and pleasure we'll have then, trying to contain the damage.

    • thatonegirl

      Here's the thing: as other commenters have pointed out, teens are GOING to have sex, no matter how much adults scream and cry and bitch and threaten to ground them. Period. Paragraph.

      Then, without any source for reliable information, what kind of scenarios are teens going to get into? Girls–whose pleasure is NOT widely covered except as a sort of thumbs-up to virulent male watchers–will not know themselves, what makes them feel good, and will not understand when they are being taken advantage of. Meanwhile, boys, who are told that there is a certain picture of masculinity that they must fulfill to be a real man will imitate what they've seen in pornography, in the media, and what they've been told by equally uninformed peers.

      Kids won't know what to say when a partner refuses to use a condom, or get an HIV test. They won't understand when they're in an abusive relationship. And they sure as hell won't understand when their sex life is completely abysmal, and misinformed teens will go on to become utterly miserable adults. The lesser of two evils, by far, is the pleasure option.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Tbayteen Tbayteen

    Reading some of your responses, I realized just how little adults know about us. OMFG! Why not ask a teenagers opinion? God forbid! I know in my class one girl has admitted, no, bragged about having sex. Now your probably thinking that its not as bad as you thought, well I am in grade 8. 13 years old people. We're all going to hear about the pleasures of sex anyways so why not having parents know just how much kids know? In my class some kids are embarrassed to be virgins. That's right some 13 year old's are embarrassed to be virgins. So why not have someone teach us how to roll on a condom? It would be safer. If your thinking that your kid has never considered having sex, than your an idiot. Every kid has thought about it and considered sex. So why not have someone teach the pleasures of sex? We're going to find out anyways.

  • red apple

    I think this article is just being realistic; its trying to keep up with the fact that kids and teens are already very sexualized. the importance being stressed is safety, responsibility and that the experience should be pleasurable and not demeaning. Its unrealistic to tell people not to do something they're gonna do anyway we might as well give them the tools and information to use rather than scrutiny.

  • http://www.oceanfront-hotels.net/ Christa

    As a teenager in high school myself, i do indeed believe that sexual education should be a mandatory course in health or physical education classes. As someone who does not believe in sex before marriage, i know that others do, and many of my friends are not virgins, and i know some girls in my school are either pregnant, or have had an abortion. If they knew better and were educated more clearly, it could help prevent this. We were not offered sex-ed up until this year and I do know some girls who have stopped being sexual active with their boyfriends because now they know the cold hard facts. So all in all, i do think that sexual education should be in all school across america.

    • bob

      Thanks Christa. You are right. Nevertheless, this article is not about the present sex ed program, or wether or not it should be in schools at all. It is about taking it to the next level: that is, teaching what some might consider the art of perversion – and it being mandatory.

  • Lauryn. B

    I thought this was a great article, and really touched on a lot of good points. Giving teenagers all of the information would allow them to make informed and educated decisions. Sex is a serious matter, and complicates life whether it is being had or not. There are consequences to both the action, and abstaining from sex on a relationship. Whether being sexually active is appropriate for a teenager or not should be treated as a case by case scenario. Not everyone is the same, and it is impossible to generalize everybody into the same category. What works for one person does not always go for another. Regardless, teenagers are entitled and have the write to ALL of the information. It is a serious subject affecting them and their bodies. It is irresponsible of adults to keep them from becoming sexually aware, how else are they suppose to become mature and responsibl adults?

  • mh4e

    So, just so we have things right, we are not allowed to sing "Silent Night" in our schools but we can teach kids "why people like oral sex, and why that particular act should go both ways."

    Hmmmmmm…… no one finds this……..wrong?

    • Thatonegirl

      Not a bit. Your religion is yours. Sex is a culture-wide phenomenon.

      • bob

        Not a bit. Sex as taught in schools counters many family's cultures.

  • ns2

    i applaud this article. i'm a nursing student and am using this article for one of my assignments. i too believe a change needs to be made, because I don't remember learning anything about the female orgasm in my highschool or public school sex ed classes. lets not forget that no one is abolishing the idea of teaching about STDs or about unplanned pregnancies, they are simply updating the old material, and showing the whole picture. Knowlege is power, and the more kids know, the better they can protect themselves, not just from STDs and unwanted pregnancies, but from abusive relationships and dangerous situations as well.

    • bob

      Well, I managed to protect my daughter from STDs as well as abusive relationships by explaining the whole picture too, just in the context of maturity, waiting, and moderation – That's right, moderation. Not a bad thing to teach kids. Better yet, why not teach teen girls, in particular, to just say NO to everyone so that they can avoid becoming victims of peer pressure and exploitation throughout their teen years. Then maybe they can just have fun being young, and not having to worry about all the expectations and responsibilities that come with having sex (ya, expectations, as in "you did it once, so why not again/with me/all the time/…) Poor kids, can't just learn what needs to be learned and avoid all the other (uh, more private and adult, they'll learn it later anyway) stuff that goes with it now even if they wanted to.

  • kyle

    "Grossman believes sex education in North America has become so “steeped in liberal ideology” that it has created a reckless atmosphere of sexual permissiveness among youth"

    Because we all know liberal ideology is really just porn.

From Macleans