Why we don’t need another election

Canadians would be better served by a little less conversation and a lot more action

by The Editors on Friday, September 11, 2009 2:00pm - 49 Comments

It might be argued that the tough economic climate has created a demand for an election giving voters a choice between the distinct economic visions of the leading parties. Unfortunately, there is no sharp differentiation between Liberals and Conservatives on the economy, especially considering that Ignatieff supported Harper’s 2009 budget, which is now being implemented. Next year’s budget promises to be a more appropriate battleground. By then we will have real evidence on the success or failure of current policies, and with any luck the Liberals will have developed an alternative economic program. At that point it would be possible to have a proper debate on each party’s plan to unwind the $50-billion deficit (as projected by the parliamentary budget officer), among other issues.

Meanwhile, another election would only delay the legislative schedule and put key government promises at risk. The Conservatives have gone to great lengths to portray themselves as tough on crime. It would seem disingenuous to deliberately leave so much business in this area unfinished. Among the bills that would be swept aside by a fall election are pressing reforms to the sex offender registry plus important modernization of police monitoring of criminal electronic communications.

Finally, if Harper once again engineers an early election for himself, he’ll be making a further mockery of his own fixed election date legislation.

For Ignatieff, his leadership of the Liberal party is still only nine months old. Whatever advantages he sees to an early election, most Canadians are still unsure about who he is and where he’s heading. Recently released Liberal ads suggest he wants to reach out to India and China. That’s fine for a start, but hardly comprehensive.

EI is one of the few areas in which Ignatieff has drawn a bright line between himself and the Tories on a substantive issue. But his argument that a year’s worth of benefits should be available after just 360 hours of work seems facile and wholly unworkable. Canadians need a lot more substance on a much broader range of topics before they can pass judgment on the Ignatieff Liberals.

Besides, it’s the fall: summer holidays are over, the kids are back at school, everyone else is back at work. Why should government be any different? Elections may be good things, but Canada doesn’t need to make it an annual event. Back to work, Ottawa.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/freshlysqueezed freshlysqueezed

    Wow. Never thought I'd read such an obviously biased article from the editors? How's that for objectivity. Try this for a story you depressingly out-to-lunch writers……. The cons track record is abysmal and the fact that the economy is recovering by no help from them, but of course they will take credit for it should be cause for alarm bells. Instead you write a piece about how things are better left as they are???? ARE YOU SERIOUS?

  • http://straittohell.blogspot.com That Guy

    Sigh. Where was all of the vitriol and outrage from Macleans when Harper called an election that violated his own laws? Apparently, what is good for the goose is not good for the gander.

    • je suis incompetent

      If you read the constitution properly, you'll see that the governor general calls the elections, not the PM. You would also find out that the constitution trumps any legislation that is not a constitutional amendment itself.

  • John

    Somewhere between the Harper haters and the Iggy haters and the idealogues and the zealots, is the majority of Canadians whose political philosophy is pragmatic and who simply want to see Parliament work. I suspect that they do not want another election and want to see the parties work together for the country's benefit. Harper is our Prime Minister–live with it. Ignatieff is the leader of the opposition and may, in the future, become Prime Minister–live with it. Alternatively, you have the zoo to the south of us. We really should be thankful

    • delford t louis

      john all well intended comments…no doubt you are a gem of a citizen! here in the gutters of keyboards amidst sprawling essays on inane topics…. people try to express what ever in a political sense…. at the end of the day all comments matter regardless…freedoms, remember? middle of the road is wise in real life, but in this foray one has to present the reader with ignorance, bias, passion,criticism, opinions, no one is above the other and is extreme fun!…oh! also it is wise to put your ego aside when you post…forget the 'I' or the result is you will become extremely frustrated when all you receive is one thumbs down and the next guy gets 300 thumbs up! who cares..

  • delford t louis

    another way of saying…gimme that whip with the steel ends…. i need to whip myself daily till another election is announced…i need to be in pain cause i deserve it so i will whip myself till it bleeds running blood!

From Macleans