Ablonczy/Pride: And in the second least surprising political news of the day …

by kadyomalley on Sunday, September 13, 2009 3:56pm - 20 Comments

Canadian Press reveals that, as widely suspected if tersely denied, Industry Minister Tony Clement may, indeed, have dethroned erstwhile marquee event program czarina Diane Ablonczy just days after her decision to fund Pride Toronto raised the ire of Charles McVety’s anti-sex parade brigade:

.[...]Darren Cunningham, Clement’s spokesman, said at the time that the program was simply entering a second phase that would be managed by the senior minister.

But documents obtained by The Canadian Press under Access to Information legislation raise questions about that line.

“This is to formally advise Minister Clement has revoked delegation of authority for the Marquee festivals program,” Clement’s chief of staff, Bill King, wrote to senior bureaucrats on June 29.

“All files, projects, correspondence and communications are now to be managed, approved and signed off by Minister Clement instead of Minister Ablonczy.”

King’s letter was sent just two weeks after Ablonczy announced $400,000 for Toronto Pride – followed by a Tory caucus meeting where some MPs expressed dismay that the gay and lesbian festival had received tourism stimulus funds.

A set of handwritten minutes from a departmental “team meeting” dated the same day notes that “Minister Clement 1/8is 3/8 now signing events,” and that Marquee “activities 1/8are 3/8 being scrutinized.” Other subsequent notes have been blanked out, citing government confidentiality.

Applicants to the program are subject to a rigorous set of criteria, based on the number of domestic and international tourists they expect to attract and the size of their budgets.

Cunningham maintains it was always envisioned that Clement would take the file over from Ablonczy after a prescribed period of time. He said the memo from King was simply a routine document to signal the transfer of fiduciary responsibility.

“We never looked at it as anything other than the program moving back over,” said Cunningham, adding it was an unfortunate coincidence that it happened after the Toronto Pride funding announcement.

Industry Canada did not provide any documents through Access to Information that indicated the pre-planned transfer of responsibility. An official notice of revocation of authority is generally communicated through senior bureaucrats charged with a department’s finances, rather than by a political staffer such as Clement’s chief of staff.

June 29th was, of course, exactly one week after McVety issued his clarion call to supporters.  Just five days later, PMO sent out a caucus-wide ‘Info Alert’ in response to what it somewhat described as  an “increasing number of constituent communications related to the Marquee Tourism Events Program,” and noted that the program was now being handled by Clement, who would be reviewing “the entire program” to ensure that it was providing “genuine stimulus to the economy.”

The following Monday, according to the documents obtained by Canadian Press, departmental officials were informed that Clement had “revoked delegation of authority” from Ablonczy. A few weeks later, Montreal’s Divers/Cite festival learned that its funding request had been rejected, despite the fact that organizers had been told that it had met all the criteria under the program, and had been sent to Clement’s office for “final approval.”

If all that is simply a coincidence, as the minister’s office maintains that it was, it really is a remarkable one.

Bookmark and Share
  • nonpartisan
    • http://intensedebate.com/people/KadyITQ KadyITQ

      Not quite sure what that has to do with this post, and actually, the apology came out yesterday, didn't it? So it wouldn't count as *today's* news. If you'd like to discuss it, though, there's an offtopic but interesting subthread ongoing in the comments here, so if you wanted to discuss it, that would seem like a great place to post your thoughts.

    • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/KadyITQ KadyITQ

      Not quite sure what that has to do with this post, and actually, the apology came out yesterday, didn't it? So it wouldn't count as *today's* news. If you'd like to discuss it, though, there's an offtopic but interesting subthread ongoing in the comments here that would seem like a great place to post your thoughts.

      • nopartisan

        Sorry Kady, then surely this must be the second least…
        http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009…
        I just thought your pick for "least surprising" fell somewhere between 3rd and 5th:
        Layton election avoidance, Fry stupidity, Ignatieff's new forestry ads, Ablonczy/Pride, Elton John wants to adopt Ukrainian boy

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/KadyITQ KadyITQ

          I think I'm going to stick with my list, but as always, you are free to make your own — and I see you have, so there we go. The system works!

          • Dave

            KadyITQ and nopartisan: making Maclean's blog comment forums work for Canadians.

  • http://twitter.com/KennChaplin @KennChaplin

    Charles McVety needs his tax-exempt status yanked.

    • some thoughts

      You mean it hasnt been yet?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

    What has Ablonczy had to say about the whole thing (if anything)? She's my MP, and I'm sorely tempted to ask her if she feels that the "transfer of fiduciary responsibility" was related to the pride funding / McVety brouhaha. Cunningham's version seems fishy.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/DerekPearce DerekPearce

      She's (can't blame her) a good team player and would never admit to a constituent that this is the reason for the "transfer." I feel bad for her actually. She was doing her job in good faith and got sideswiped by the crazy base.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

        I'm definitely not happy with all this. Ablonczy didn't deserve this shoddy treatment from the likes of Tony Clement (if the inferences established by the CP article are true).

        • Jenn

          Why don't you ask her, Crit? At least ASK her, then form conclusions based on what she says or doesn't say. I'm interested in what she says, too, but she isn't my MP.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/KadyITQ KadyITQ

            I very much doubt she's allowed to answer questions about this from constituents with anything other than the talking points provided by PMO, but it can't hurt to try.

          • Jenn

            Agreed, but I'm kind of hoping she'd repeat the talking points in such a fashion that Crit would be able to tell she's repeating talking points handed to her by PMO, if you see what I mean, rather than giving her own answer. That would say it all.

        • E.B.

          I feel your pain. However, unless you have been totally blinded to the reality of what it is like to be a Tory MP, you understand that they are not allowed to say anything. Harper and the PMO forbid it.

  • http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com bigcitylib

    …and none of this would have seen the light of day but for little ole me. Which begs the question: do I deserve one order of Canada, or two? Or how about matching Senate seats for me and the wife, when Iggy becomes king?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/KadyITQ KadyITQ

    Yes, it really deserves to be said again: well spotted, BCL! Although really, it was a bit of a team effort by you and Brad Trost — after all, if he hadn't given the interview, would we have even noticed when Ablonczy's name disappeared from those press releases? You may have to let him borrow the snowflake on occasion.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/AJR79 AJR79

    It is indeed a shame that this woman is thrown under the bus for the likes of Charles McVety.

  • Rob H

    I was one of the first 500 people to join Reform and did so because of my respect for Ablonczy. Diane was a loyal Manning supporter who understood what Manning and Reform was really about, which was not right wing at all but about individual responsibility and individual rights. Unlike Harper who is a back stabbing prick going back to the days he was with Manning. He has all the old Tory hacks from the old PC party and is trying to out Liberal the Liberals. Didn't work before, won't now.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

    I hate to defend him, but I suspect Clements is just carrying out orders. I suspect the path was McVety->PMO->Industry.

From Macleans