Car vs. Bike

How the lives of two men were destroyed by a cruel twist of fate

by Jonathon Gatehouse and Charlie Gillis on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:08am - 30 Comments

090914_brayntToronto’s “Mink Mile” was designed for gawking. A two-block stretch of Bloor Street West populated with the kind of high-end retailers—Cartier, Prada, Chanel, Tiffany—whose imposing prices strictly limit the hoi polloi to window shopping. Close to several luxury hotels and fine restaurants, it’s a favoured hunting ground for paparazzi when the film festival rolls into town. But since the night of Aug. 31, a new and far grimier attraction has emerged—a grey Canada Post mail collection box. Bouquets of cheap flowers surround its battered legs. Scrawled courier slips and handwritten Post-it notes cover the sides and top. Expressions of sympathy and anger at the violent death of Darcy Allan Sheppard, a 33-year-old bike courier. “R.I.P. A helluva way to die,” reads one. “Heaven’s got lots of bike lanes,” says another.

The incident, an all-too-common big-city dispute between a cyclist and a motorist that somehow escalated into a confrontation that saw Sheppard clinging to the car as it bashed him against trees, lampposts and finally the mailbox, before he fell into the road and was run over, was shocking enough. But the fact that the driver was Ontario’s former attorney general, Michael Bryant, makes it all the harder to comprehend. The 43-year-old, touted as a rising political star and perhaps future premier, has been charged with criminal negligence and dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death, and faces a maximum penalty of life in prison. And the question of whether the pillar of the community is guilty of an unconscionable act of road rage, or himself a victim of violent attack at the hands of the cyclist, is the debate consuming the city, sparking angry, traffic-blocking protests by bike advocates, incredulous cocktail party chatter, and an all-out media frenzy.

Only fate—or a fertile literary imagination—could have brought such a disparate pair together. A troubled young man who lived on society’s margins crossing paths with a striving power broker on a patch of Canada’s richest real estate. Two very different stories, one tragic result, and an ending that has yet to be written.

“He came out of nowhere.”

That time-worn recollection has been applied to many an ill-fated cyclist, and if Michael Bryant uttered it the night of Aug. 31, he could hardly have spoken truer words. Allan Sheppard was a living epitome of Canada’s invisible underclass, a rootless man with little in the way of family, bouncing between cities, struggling against his own weaknesses to gain control of his world. Friends spoke of him turning things around. But the night he died fit all too well into the broader pattern of his history: he had drunk his way out of his girlfriend’s good graces. Then, on his way out her door, he’d had a run-in with the police, creating a scene that ended with the cops ordering him in not so many words to move along.

The exchange has become of a peg of sorts for those trying to come to terms with Sheppard’s death. One neighbour said Sheppard was so drunk he’d fallen off his bike just before the two officers arrived at the scene. In several media interviews, Sheppard’s girlfriend, Misty Bailey, said she implored the officers to drive him back to an apartment he’d rented after moving out of her place a few weeks earlier. “He was definitely drunk,” the 30-year-old told Maclean’s. “I’ve seen lots of times when they were willing to take someone somewhere. So why not go that extra mile?”

Yet Sheppard’s record with law enforcement officials suggests he might have been just as pleased to take himself away. With 61 outstanding arrest warrants in his home province of Alberta, he would hardly have considered a ride across town with two cops an attractive option. The police, for their part, judged him sober enough to ride—and their own switchboard too busy for them to waste time ferrying home drunks. “We’re Toronto police, not Toronto taxi,” snapped Sgt. Tim Burrows, a traffic officer, in one interview.

Whatever the explanation for how he wound up on the road, Sheppard’s state at that point—alone, probably drunk and almost certainly unhappy—was sadly emblematic of his life. A Metis from the Edmonton area, he was the child of an alcoholic mother and was quickly placed in foster care. As a preschooler, he was adopted by a family only to find himself back in foster care a few years later, say friends. A charismatic youth with a quick wit and a piercing gaze, he had no trouble making friends and, later, attracting girls. But drug and alcohol addiction dogged him all the way, and responsibility was never his forte. By the time he met Bailey, Sheppard had fathered four children he never supported and whose mothers he contacted only sporadically.

That trail of personal destruction has made him a difficult figure for some people to mourn. Trudy Schlender, the great-grandmother of Sheppard’s youngest child, admits she “didn’t shed any tears” when she heard of his demise. Yet her granddaughter Jodie, whom Schlender had raised herself, still harbours fond memories of him, noting that he’d called her last May to ask about his son. It was the first time he’d expressed interest in the child, she said, adding: “I’d never intended for us to lose touch.”

The two had met in 2002 while Jodie was waitressing at a bar in the mountain town of Hinton, Alta., where Sheppard was working as a disc jockey. They struck up a relationship but soon became heavy drug users, Jodie acknowledges, travelling often to Edmonton to supply their habits, and later hitchhiking across the country to Toronto. “We kind of just lived every day for every day,” she says. A few months on, in May 2004, Jodie came back to Hinton broke and six months pregnant. “We sent her the ticket to get out of there, and I’m glad we did,” says Trudy, 70. “She came home with nothing more than a pair of socks and underwear and the clothes on her back. I don’t have a good word to say about him.”

It was during their time in Alberta that Sheppard allegedly struck upon a scheme to raise money, stealing cheques that he made out to himself and then cashed. The Alberta warrants for fraud and property crimes related mainly to this scam. Evidently, they were not serious enough for authorities in that province to have him sent home (warrants for minor offences are typically enforceable only within the area where they occurred; if police want a suspect sent from another province, they have to pick up the tab for travel).

Bookmark and Share
  • sandy mac

    I can just about guess the outcome of this. And it's not going to be the same outcome that you or I would have. Why? Because we couldn't afford to hire top notch lawyers and a fargin spin doctors!

  • Paul

    "…a court may well find his reaction proportional…"

    Really? He was in a car, even if he was attacked, how can his reaction be considered "proportional"?

    Something ain't right here….

    • John D

      I'm a cyclist and I can understand how it might have been warranted. Think about it – you're in a convertible with the top down and your wife is in the car. Some crazy drunk guy attacks you and starts slugging you. What are you going to do? You could get out and fight, or you could drive off. If you drive off and the guy attaches himself to the car, what do you do? Slow down so he can climb in? All these decisions had to made in the blink of an eye.

      I'm not saying that's how it went down, in fact it's probably not. But it's not as simple as bike vs car.

  • observer

    The video clearly shows that the courier was hit and even before he had a chance to approach the car, it backed up and tore out!

    Bryant looks very guilty as this point. Also, friends tell me he is more like 5"5".

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/beta1 beta1

      I'm not sure if we saw the same footage. At least the Youtube link provided by the other posters show Sheppard making a turn from Bryant's left side and making a right turn (cutting him off). Then rising from the colision and going towards the car. Bryant backs off but only goes forward after Sheppard charges against the car.

      The ironic thing while I watched the video footage was the comment that showed on the last few seconds saying that there was a memorial fund for Darcy's children. According to the editorial "Sheppard had fathered four children he never supported" and now there's a fund as if the children are suffering for the loss of their father?

  • Allan

    I agree with "observer". Reading many of the articles available makes me believe that precious few of the authors have bothered to view the easily-found security footage that clearly shows the car striking Sheppard from behind, knocking him fully to the ground, and then (the car) attempting to drive away from the prostate Sheppard, who only manages to get up from his hands and knees and lunge for the car, as it attempts to leave the scene of the accident.

    • John D

      Well, now I'm sheepish. I made my comment above without seeing that footage too. Sorry Paul and Allan!

  • Meaghan

    http://www.youtube.com/user/honestedits

    Here's hoping karma catches up to Brytler soon.

  • Rita

    The footage at the link in the above comment combined the eyewitness accounts here
    http://www.youtube.com/user/bryantwatch leave me wondering why there have not been additional charges laid……
    Thank God for YouTube is all I can say.

  • Erin

    Did the authors of this email even watch the surveillance video now circulating on Youtube? It clearly shows that Bryant didn't merely "clip Sheppard's tire," but knocked him over and pushed him several feet before reversing and trying to speed away in a cowardly example of hit and run. It looks like Bryant's hiring of Navigator has indeed paid dividends since there are far too many articles like this popping up that attack Sheppard's character as though the fact that he had outstanding warrants in Edmonton meant he deserved to get run over by a car.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SamDavies SamDavies

    The internet is a dangerous tool for those who hope to pay their way out of trouble.
    Traditional media spews out the spin – Navigator is apparently worth the money they are payed!
    Youtube shows the video footage of what actually happened.
    Woowzers….

  • scf

    Sheppard’s state at that point—alone, probably drunk and almost certainly unhappy

    That statement is not fair. There is no evidence he was drunk at the time, especially considering the police thought he was fine to ride home. Why are you taking shots at someone who cannot defend himself?
    Not only that, the available videos show no erratic behaviour on his bike at all, he pulled in front of Bryant's care smoothly, only to be rammed from behind by Bryant.

  • Donna

    MacLeans sure put a spin on against Bryant because he has money and a future ahead of him and the cyclist didn't. The version I heard is that the cyclist grabbed Bryant's wheel and Bryant had no control

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/craigola craigola

      And Bryant sure put a spin on against the cyclist, eh? Made damn sure there was no way he would have a future.
      Incidentally, the video is available – linked to above, in fact – for watching, in case you care enough to be minimally informed before you opine.

    • Hugo

      No control? Of the gas or brake pedal either?

  • Jess

    It's really frustrating to read all of these comments about "the video" that is available on youtube.
    a)Most of it isn't clear enough to really distinguish what happened,
    b) The "narrative" as to what happens in the video is biased
    I won't pass any judgement on either party until everything has been analyzed and determined by the people that are meant to do so.
    Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but its unfair to be biased either way when its impossible to know what really happened.

    The article is correct in saying that, regardless of the judgement in court, the real court is public opinion. It just scares me that even if Bryant is not guilty, people will still hold him in a lower regard.

    • Meaghan

      So, it's okay that he holds responsible dog owners to a lower regard, because of the way their dog looks like? Karma's a bitch.

    • Allan

      Why be frustrated? It is better than reading some of the unsubstaniated opinion that passes for jornalism (I am thinking more of certain newspapers than MacLeans here…) There is also plain video with no narrative available – that's what I saw. Yes, typical of many security videos it is not that clear, but watching several times I was able to distinguish a fair amount of info. YMMV

  • Tru

    I feel sorry for cyclist Sheppard and his family, but I also think we have to see the circumstances mr. Brayant was at the time, a small man in size, well dressed, celebrating his wedding anversary, a wife in his side totally unprepared for a fight, what can he do, when he is confronted with this kind situation.

    I can tell you first hand experience, confrontation with cyclist is very dangerous, a friend of mine got off his car trying to settle similar problem with cyclist, the response was very violent, he got biten, and his bone was broken, still didn't fully recover from that injury by cyclist man about 8 years ago around Yonge and Dundas area, he was hospitalized for about 9 months.
    The story is very sad, as scary as it looks for any one who is not ready to take on a fight if it gets physical with Allen, I will say, mr Brayant has no option but to run away for his soul, any thing in between will be destroied.

    • Tim

      You do have some points Tru, but from watching the video over and over again, it really is hard to see it any other way than Bryant ramming Sheppard while Sheppard was stopped at a light, then backing up and trying to speed off. Sure after that happened, what you are saying could possible, but if my interpretation is correct, then Bryant was still the aggressor who violently attacked Sheppard.

      If someone attacked me like that and tried to flee the scene, similar to how you justify Bryants actions, it make just as much sense to try to grab at the car to stop a criminal from fleeing the scene.

  • Tim

    I just watched this video again a few times to make sure I wasn't out of line with my comment to Tru…and I really have to say to the authors of this article and the people suggesting that Bryant was justified in what he did…please watch the video [youtube lTQ69STzhf0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTQ69STzhf0 youtube]

    From my viewing it seems that Bryant drove at Sheppard when Sheppard was stopped in front of Bryant's car, when Sheppard didn't jump out of the way, Bryant stopped, then started again immediately and rammed Sheppard, then even before Sheppard was able to stand up, Bryant was backing up to escape. It seems the only chance Sheppard had to stop him, was as Bryant was already speeding away reaching out and grabbing at the car. Bryant was already moving quickly, it amazes me that Sheppard could even have grabbed on to the car, let alone, slammed his backpack into the hood of the car, then grabbed Bryant or the wheel of the car. It doesn't look like he would have had a chance to do anything more than to barely grab hold of the car speeding away.

    Can someone really watch the video and suggest some other sequence of events?

    • Tru

      I understand your point Tim, I watched the video, but let us wait and see all the facts srounding this case before conclusion, to some it look like Sheppard is cutting off Bryant at the front, it means there is more into the story, may be it didn't start at that point as a video shows.

      • Tim

        I agree we should wait for the facts, but similar to your post, I'm basing it on my interpretation of what is currently suggested about what happened that night…who knows maybe Bryant was drunk and maybe he had fought with his wife or that wasn't his wife in his car, confrontations with people in cars can be very dangerous, many, many cyclists and pedestrians have been hurt or killed by reckless or down right aggressive people driving cars.

        As for Sheppard cutting off Bryant, agreed it does look like that is what happened, it doesn't justify Sheppards death, nor does it even justify Bryant driving at Sheppard, then when Sheppard doesn't jump out of the way, ramming Sheppard as seems to be shown in the video. Cutting someone off doesn't equate with violently threatening someone, even if a few rude words were exchanged, from the video there was no physical interaction until after Bryant rammed Sheppard.

      • Tim

        The other thing about your comment Tru is that you are assuming Bryant was confronted with an angry or violent cyclist. There is nothing in the video or from eye witness confirms that and as I said, it really does seem like there was no physical interaction until Bryant struck Sheppard with his car.

        We really do need to wait to find out what happened and hear the context, but your are really assuming that Bryant was confronted with some kind of situation that made him feel threatened….to me it looks like Bryant was confronted with a situation that frustrated him, but was non-threatening, so I suppose that is what I am assuming, just a different perspected from you.

        • Tru

          You know Tim, some how people tend to take sides, no matter how it happend, the video doesn't realy provide enough to say exactly what took place between them, we don't know when and how it was started. we know only how it ended. Getting to conclusion based on that video clip, it just bothers me, we are talking about another life here, I find it very difficult to judge a good man, that was found at wrong place in wrong time and put himself in this situation. So, I will say just wait, there will be more information available soon….

  • MediaisaDowner

    Most people know that Macleans has been heading into the chasm of media crap for a decade. Sad really.

  • Scunny

    Astounding spin in this article, too. Did Navigator help with the research? Or are you folks just that out of touch?

    Obviously the "journalists'" life experiences mirror Mr. Bryant's more than Mr. Sheppard's.

    Still, which is the a more compelling Canadian reality, the contrived lifelong privilege of the ex-attorney-general or the gauntlet of a life that Mr. Sheppard was forced to run until he was scraped from the side of Mr. Bryant's over-powerful automobile, the way one might try to rid oneself of something unwanted on the sole of one's shoe.

    Interviewing the grandmother of a spurned former teenaged girlfriend – now there is an unbiased commentator that can shed light on the recent slaying, eh?

    The latest surveillance video released is incredibly damning for Mr. Bryant. Too bad the Macleans crew seems to view this and other evidence/testimony as refracted through their own windshields. Such obvious bias shows them to be completely out of touch with the real world that we in the more grounded, non-polluting, sustainable world of urban mobility are faced with every day. Perhaps you folks are unaware that all three levels of our government encourage responsible Canadians to practice active transportation methods but do little to protect those vulnerable citizens who follow said advice. Instead of calling for the speedier implementation of long-promised infrastructure changes that might better protect such Canadians, the mainstream media vilifies the VICTIM of this tragedy as the author of his own demise.

    In falling through the cracks in an uncaring system since childhood, Mr Sheppard seems to have been let down for years by one of the world's most affluent yet irresponsible nations. Is it any surprise then, that a magazine that considers itself the voice of that nation steps up the assault after his death.

    Unconscionable blather!!!

  • Gordon James

    We live in very interesting times. During the first week of September this incident occurred where there was a confrontation between an upper class member of society and someone who was from the lower class in which the latter got killed. Then a week later, Michael Moore announces his new timely movie "Capitalism: A Love Story" with the theme "Capitalism Is Evil". The majority of people are just starting to wake up to the abuses being heaped upon them by the ruling plutocracy.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Brucie Brucie

    Fortunately for the former Ontario Liberal Attorney General of Ontario,he will be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a Court of Law.
    That`s a right that should be accorded to ALL Ontario Citizens.
    Unfortunately the former Liberal Cabinet Minister stripped that same right from thousands of Ontario Citizens when he proposed and his Gov`t enacted "reverse onus" Legislation.

    It`s obvious that Michael "ticking time bomb" Bryant blatantly lied in order to convince the Public of the need for his "Pit Bull" Ban Legislation.
    http://www.ontla.on.ca/committee-proceedings/tran…

    Will he tell the truth about this incident when under oath?
    I don`t know.
    If you can stand in front of the Media,cameras and microphones and lie in order to pass Legislation,I imagine such a person would also be capable of lying to save his own butt even when under oath.

    I hope he will man up and tell the truth.
    If convicted he at least will someday walk out of Prison.

    ………R.I.P Mr Sheppard.

  • tronald

    Wow what a dishonest piece of journalism. The video clearly shows the sequence of events described here to be not entirely accurate. Bryant is already driving away in an obvious case of hit and run before Sheppard even gets up from the concrete, after being struck down in an incident that was a little more serious than Bryant having "clipped Sheppard's rear tire." Plowing into the back end of Sheppard's bicycle (obviously deliberately in this video), getting pushed the length of a car, and getting thrown to the concrete as a result of it, is already a criminal act. It seems very unfair of the writers of this article to conclude that "Bryant may well receive exoneration in a criminal court of law." For the sake of justice I certainly hope not.

From Macleans