What will they run on now?

Stimulus spending didn’t exactly spark the recovery, writes John Geddes, leaving the Harper government in a bit of a bind

by John Geddes on Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:40pm - 5 Comments

Polls suggest Ignatieff might have little choice but to ask voters to look to the future, since they show little sign of being inclined to punish Harper for the hardships of the present. Recent polls show the Liberals at best running about even with the Tories; some have them well behind. Early this week, a Strategic Counsel poll put the Liberals five points back, at 30 per cent of national support, compared to the Conservatives’ 35 per cent. If that edge holds up, Harper will be in a strong position when it comes to bargaining with the NDP or Bloc Québécois for the support in the House he’d need to thwart the expected Liberal bid to defeat his government this month or next.

That the governing party appears to be enjoying a polling lead is remarkable at a time when the latest unemployment figures show joblessness at a 10-year high of 8.7 per cent. Then again, those new unemployment numbers also show that the economy created more jobs than it shed in August. The private sector added 49,200 employees, after 11 straight months of subtracting workers. When it comes to perceptions of the economy, everything is relative: Canadians who were warned to brace for a depression might well shrug off Drummond’s “garden-variety deep recession.” Which leaves politicians who were only a few months ago planning for a recession-driven election plotting unexpected strategies for a far less predictable campaign.

Bookmark and Share
  • CitizenTom

    One can always count on Macleans to publish the Liberal party view of things.

  • Landy

    Duh!!! They will run on their effective record of achievements. And win.

  • POLITICS RULE

    Yes I agree

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    A well-crafted [platform] can sometimes set the agenda, the way Stephen Harper managed to do in his last two campaigns with easy-to-understand pledges aimed at middle-income voters.

    Did you follow the same last federal election I did? That Conservative "platform" was the flimsiest piece of nothing I had ever seen. Not that there is anything wrong with that, necessarily. "We have a limited platform because we truly believe in limited government" would have been beautiful. But they spelled out how wonderfully interventionist they wanted to be and then had so little to say. And the whole thing got pitched a few months later (yeah, yeah, minority government, commie-treasonous gun-to-the-head, etc., etc.). But the Tories will have richly earned credibility trouble the next time 'round.

  • Evalina

    Can we then predict a liberal victory in the next election?

From Macleans