<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dislike Obama? You must be racist.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177138</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177138</guid>
		<description>Great post thanks. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.resurrectingthechamp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Best Fitness Programs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post thanks. <a href="http://www.resurrectingthechamp.com/" rel="nofollow">Best Fitness Programs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuaveDave</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177137</link>
		<dc:creator>SuaveDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177137</guid>
		<description>&quot;...he are doing&quot;?  (sic)

Brix, U R an IDIOT... oh wait, &quot;support Obama&quot;?  Sorry, U R a GENIUS.

&quot;President Obama&#8217;s approval ratings have jumped substantially, crossing the magic halfway threshold to 54 percent, up from 48 percent in late September, while the portion of respondents who disapprove of the president dropped to 40 percent, the lowest disapproval rating in a NEWSWEEK Poll since February 2010.&quot;  NEWSWEEK Poll 10-22-10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&#8230;he are doing&quot;?  (sic)</p>
<p>Brix, U R an IDIOT&#8230; oh wait, &quot;support Obama&quot;?  Sorry, U R a GENIUS.</p>
<p>&quot;President Obama&rsquo;s approval ratings have jumped substantially, crossing the magic halfway threshold to 54 percent, up from 48 percent in late September, while the portion of respondents who disapprove of the president dropped to 40 percent, the lowest disapproval rating in a NEWSWEEK Poll since February 2010.&quot;  NEWSWEEK Poll 10-22-10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brix</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177136</link>
		<dc:creator>Brix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177136</guid>
		<description>I myself would support Obama, I think those things he are doing have meaningful desires and would benefit all of us. visit me @ &lt;a html=&quot;http://www.van-insurance-cheap.co.uk/&quot;&gt;van insurance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself would support Obama, I think those things he are doing have meaningful desires and would benefit all of us. visit me @ &lt;a html=&quot;<a href="http://www.van-insurance-cheap.co.uk/&quot;&gt;van" rel="nofollow">http://www.van-insurance-cheap.co.uk/&quot;&gt;van</a> insurance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orlando</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177135</link>
		<dc:creator>Orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 16:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177135</guid>
		<description>Agreed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177134</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177134</guid>
		<description>Janeane Garofalo presenting as an intellectual who would be frightened by those poor white trash tea partier rebels. If they didn&#039;t know who she was (a never has-been starlet), just by her appearance, she would terrify the socks off most of these people. Combination librarian, biker-chick with a touch of native american (hip jewelry). What is she? Someone without a movie career who&#039;ll say anything to get attention. Wearing dorky glasses won&#039;t make you intelligent. Are those tatooes real or the lick-on and wash off kind.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janeane Garofalo presenting as an intellectual who would be frightened by those poor white trash tea partier rebels. If they didn&#039;t know who she was (a never has-been starlet), just by her appearance, she would terrify the socks off most of these people. Combination librarian, biker-chick with a touch of native american (hip jewelry). What is she? Someone without a movie career who&#039;ll say anything to get attention. Wearing dorky glasses won&#039;t make you intelligent. Are those tatooes real or the lick-on and wash off kind.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHH</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177133</link>
		<dc:creator>DHH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177133</guid>
		<description>Ehm - Steyn isn&#039;t Jewish, but thanks for trying to participate in the debate. You tried with all your might, Failiot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehm &#8211; Steyn isn&#039;t Jewish, but thanks for trying to participate in the debate. You tried with all your might, Failiot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177132</link>
		<dc:creator>Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177132</guid>
		<description>Another right wing Jewish immigrant looking to divide America.
Put Steyn, right next to Orly Tatz, &amp; Rupert Murdoch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another right wing Jewish immigrant looking to divide America.<br />
Put Steyn, right next to Orly Tatz, &amp; Rupert Murdoch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177131</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177131</guid>
		<description>And what made you think, with his background, behavior, and associates, that he was a healer? Goes to a church and listens to hate-filled rants, has a friend who says he wished he had set off more bombs, and the guy refused to show anything as proof of who he was, but arrogantly expected us to take his word for it. Made those narcissitic speeches about &quot;I&quot; &quot;I &quot;I&quot; and married a woman ashamed of her country.

Oh, yeh-came off as a real Ghandi, didn&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what made you think, with his background, behavior, and associates, that he was a healer? Goes to a church and listens to hate-filled rants, has a friend who says he wished he had set off more bombs, and the guy refused to show anything as proof of who he was, but arrogantly expected us to take his word for it. Made those narcissitic speeches about &quot;I&quot; &quot;I &quot;I&quot; and married a woman ashamed of her country.</p>
<p>Oh, yeh-came off as a real Ghandi, didn&#039;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vladdy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177130</link>
		<dc:creator>vladdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177130</guid>
		<description>We who want to see his papers see this as a character issue. Thinks he&#039;s above others&#039; rules, doesn&#039;t have to descend to our level, reasons to believe he lies, hides things, etc. We&#039;re the same people as those who want to see his transcripts. Gonna tell me that&#039;s from a feeling he&#039;s &quot;not one of us&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We who want to see his papers see this as a character issue. Thinks he&#039;s above others&#039; rules, doesn&#039;t have to descend to our level, reasons to believe he lies, hides things, etc. We&#039;re the same people as those who want to see his transcripts. Gonna tell me that&#039;s from a feeling he&#039;s &quot;not one of us&quot;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vladdy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177129</link>
		<dc:creator>vladdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177129</guid>
		<description>bizarre logic. So if 10 out-of-shape people don&#039;t like football, you&#039;d be afraid to join them, even if you were in shape and just not a sports person? If 10 allergic people don&#039;t like cats, you&#039;d be afraid to be put into that category with them? Is this getting thru? Just because a person with a problem doesn&#039;t like something doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;d be LIKE them if you had the same dislikes. Your reason for it might be totally different, just like most people&#039;s objections to BO are character and policy-driven, not color-based.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bizarre logic. So if 10 out-of-shape people don&#039;t like football, you&#039;d be afraid to join them, even if you were in shape and just not a sports person? If 10 allergic people don&#039;t like cats, you&#039;d be afraid to be put into that category with them? Is this getting thru? Just because a person with a problem doesn&#039;t like something doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;d be LIKE them if you had the same dislikes. Your reason for it might be totally different, just like most people&#039;s objections to BO are character and policy-driven, not color-based.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana Svsn</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177128</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana Svsn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177128</guid>
		<description>in the US, even those covered by insurance are in for a rude shock when they really need it -- we are going through pancreatic cancer with my mom.  One of the meds she has to take costs $3600 a month and even with insurance, we will still be paying about $2000 a month out-of-pocket for the medications alone. Insurance is for-profit and will find a way to screw you out of benefits you think you are entitled to.  We have never had a problem with money--both of my parents have been well-paid professionals. But even then, this is going to bankrupt us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the US, even those covered by insurance are in for a rude shock when they really need it &#8212; we are going through pancreatic cancer with my mom.  One of the meds she has to take costs $3600 a month and even with insurance, we will still be paying about $2000 a month out-of-pocket for the medications alone. Insurance is for-profit and will find a way to screw you out of benefits you think you are entitled to.  We have never had a problem with money&#8211;both of my parents have been well-paid professionals. But even then, this is going to bankrupt us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mich308</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177127</link>
		<dc:creator>mich308</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177127</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t say Obama&#039;s choices are the reason for his lower opinion ratings, but maybe his inaction on them.  If he committed dearly to his campaign promises then his approval rating would be higher.  To be honest there is an overtone of racism towards Obama.  The Sercret Service reported that there is a 400% increase in legitimate threats to Obama&#039;s safety by certain members of the public, though only a 5% increase in men inrolled in the Secret Service.  I honestly can&#039;t believe that Steyn would support Palin, though.  His postive opinon of her is something that I fail to comprehend, never mind able to understand, and no I&#039;m not sour grapes towards those to the right of me (no matter how far to the right), there are many Rebublicans and conservatives that I deeply admire and respect, but Sarah Palin!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#039;t say Obama&#039;s choices are the reason for his lower opinion ratings, but maybe his inaction on them.  If he committed dearly to his campaign promises then his approval rating would be higher.  To be honest there is an overtone of racism towards Obama.  The Sercret Service reported that there is a 400% increase in legitimate threats to Obama&#039;s safety by certain members of the public, though only a 5% increase in men inrolled in the Secret Service.  I honestly can&#039;t believe that Steyn would support Palin, though.  His postive opinon of her is something that I fail to comprehend, never mind able to understand, and no I&#039;m not sour grapes towards those to the right of me (no matter how far to the right), there are many Rebublicans and conservatives that I deeply admire and respect, but Sarah Palin!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177126</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177126</guid>
		<description>Janeane Garofalo?  SNL flunky.  Why?  Please stop quoting sub-celebrities.  Does anyone really care what they think?  Please stop, this celebrity infatuation is killing my soul.  Whether I agree with the article is pointless, please stop abusing us with celebrity opinion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janeane Garofalo?  SNL flunky.  Why?  Please stop quoting sub-celebrities.  Does anyone really care what they think?  Please stop, this celebrity infatuation is killing my soul.  Whether I agree with the article is pointless, please stop abusing us with celebrity opinion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chesterar</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177125</link>
		<dc:creator>chesterar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177125</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t ever stop questioning for fear of a libtard calling you names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#039;t ever stop questioning for fear of a libtard calling you names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whats your name</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177124</link>
		<dc:creator>Whats your name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177124</guid>
		<description>WOW why should I care I dont live in the states come on MacLeans stop shuving this american media controversies down our throat were in CANADA not AMERICA I DONT LIKE AMERICA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW why should I care I dont live in the states come on MacLeans stop shuving this american media controversies down our throat were in CANADA not AMERICA I DONT LIKE AMERICA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177123</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177123</guid>
		<description>Here is a good analysis in support of Mark Steyn&#039;s column from a blogger on Wordpress:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://divinesatisfaction.com/2009/10/08/the-hate-card/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://divinesatisfaction.com/2009/10/08/the-hate...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a good analysis in support of Mark Steyn&#039;s column from a blogger on WordPress:<br />
<a href="http://divinesatisfaction.com/2009/10/08/the-hate-card/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://divinesatisfaction.com/2009/10/08/the-hate&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177122</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177122</guid>
		<description>Steyn says it like it is!! good on him---most people can not comprehand--left &amp; right. During the war we were alowed 2 use &quot;slang&quot; 4 races--so what&#039;s wrong with that? Has everyone lost their sense of HUmor!!! I only  use--this as example-  heaven forbid-- I should offend any one---- chinese were --chinks--blacks were negros---Japaness were japs---indians were indians---Italians --waps--Russians -russkys--GErmans were Nazis---so on it went. It wasn&#039;t used as racist-- only in your minds!!! U wouldn&#039;t want 2 know what we were called-- I lived-- so keep up the good work--styen--enjoy your columns immensly!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steyn says it like it is!! good on him&#8212;most people can not comprehand&#8211;left &amp; right. During the war we were alowed 2 use &quot;slang&quot; 4 races&#8211;so what&#039;s wrong with that? Has everyone lost their sense of HUmor!!! I only  use&#8211;this as example-  heaven forbid&#8211; I should offend any one&#8212;- chinese were &#8211;chinks&#8211;blacks were negros&#8212;Japaness were japs&#8212;indians were indians&#8212;Italians &#8211;waps&#8211;Russians -russkys&#8211;GErmans were Nazis&#8212;so on it went. It wasn&#039;t used as racist&#8211; only in your minds!!! U wouldn&#039;t want 2 know what we were called&#8211; I lived&#8211; so keep up the good work&#8211;styen&#8211;enjoy your columns immensly!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joachim Heise</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joachim Heise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177121</guid>
		<description>Nobody seems to have noticed the disclaimer &quot;you don&#039;t have to be a racist to dislike Obama.&quot;  I read that, and I think it&#039;s paranoid to assume that the rest is subversively suggesting that you&#039;re racist if you like Obama.  Jack was merely illustrating his personal tendency to natural caution when considering adopting the policies of a known racist.  That&#039;s his prerogative, and its focus is obviously opaque political issues, not common human practices like brushing your teeth or eating.  Twisting his words with tongue-in-cheek platitudes of pantlessness-advocacy is bad debate form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody seems to have noticed the disclaimer &quot;you don&#039;t have to be a racist to dislike Obama.&quot;  I read that, and I think it&#039;s paranoid to assume that the rest is subversively suggesting that you&#039;re racist if you like Obama.  Jack was merely illustrating his personal tendency to natural caution when considering adopting the policies of a known racist.  That&#039;s his prerogative, and its focus is obviously opaque political issues, not common human practices like brushing your teeth or eating.  Twisting his words with tongue-in-cheek platitudes of pantlessness-advocacy is bad debate form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joachim Heise</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177120</link>
		<dc:creator>Joachim Heise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177120</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to step in here as a completely unbiased observer.  A testament to my non-partisanship:  I live in Norway, and I have absolutely no political ideas whatsoever, because I think every debate about how to rule people (or not rule them) inevitably leads back to the same unanswerable questions.  The PEOPLE that occupy the red and blue camps, on the other hand, well, I could say some things... but that&#039;s misanthropy, and is totally unrelated to political bias.

Now, first off, I&#039;ve done some counting, and despite the fact that this article is primarily commented on by obviously conservative readers, I estimate a 1:3.5 ratio as follows:  For every two conservatives saying something that MIGHT be construed as being indicative of latent racism, (I say might, because really, we have no proof, and the subject matter would indicate that they&#039;re just continuing to poke fun at the irrational stigma surrounding racism,) seven liberals put their feet in their mouths with a straw-man, like Scott Tribe.

Even if some of the conservatives here are racist, at least they follow the age-old rules of debate!  As soon as you throw those out the window, there&#039;s no point in even leaving a comment.  ESPECIALLY on an article about politics.  It&#039;s a confusing enough issue as is.  Quit slinging poop, the fan stopped working long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m going to step in here as a completely unbiased observer.  A testament to my non-partisanship:  I live in Norway, and I have absolutely no political ideas whatsoever, because I think every debate about how to rule people (or not rule them) inevitably leads back to the same unanswerable questions.  The PEOPLE that occupy the red and blue camps, on the other hand, well, I could say some things&#8230; but that&#039;s misanthropy, and is totally unrelated to political bias.</p>
<p>Now, first off, I&#039;ve done some counting, and despite the fact that this article is primarily commented on by obviously conservative readers, I estimate a 1:3.5 ratio as follows:  For every two conservatives saying something that MIGHT be construed as being indicative of latent racism, (I say might, because really, we have no proof, and the subject matter would indicate that they&#039;re just continuing to poke fun at the irrational stigma surrounding racism,) seven liberals put their feet in their mouths with a straw-man, like Scott Tribe.</p>
<p>Even if some of the conservatives here are racist, at least they follow the age-old rules of debate!  As soon as you throw those out the window, there&#039;s no point in even leaving a comment.  ESPECIALLY on an article about politics.  It&#039;s a confusing enough issue as is.  Quit slinging poop, the fan stopped working long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foozle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177119</link>
		<dc:creator>foozle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177119</guid>
		<description>The lack of respect for your ideological opponents displayed in this piece serves to discredit your arguments, and to make it easier to label your article as a conservative diatribe (whether it is or not).

You claim that the Obama White House is taking advantage of race issues to deflect criticism, but Obama has repeatedly stated that his race has not hurt him. You would be much better off blaming Obama for the statements of whoever happens to agree with him; though that statement would lack legitimacy for seperate reasons.

You also underhandedly imply that Obama won because he is the first black president. This suggestion is hypocritical in a column that seeks to attack a group for playing games with race.

Any racism that has affected Barack Obama played out long ago when he was growing up. You can safely declare the end of racism when we see equality in the prison population statistics, or when you find conclusive evidence of a gentic predisposition for crime shared by Latinos, Blacks, and Aboriginals.

P.S. I love it when comments are deleted on message boards tied to articles written by free-speech crusaders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of respect for your ideological opponents displayed in this piece serves to discredit your arguments, and to make it easier to label your article as a conservative diatribe (whether it is or not).</p>
<p>You claim that the Obama White House is taking advantage of race issues to deflect criticism, but Obama has repeatedly stated that his race has not hurt him. You would be much better off blaming Obama for the statements of whoever happens to agree with him; though that statement would lack legitimacy for seperate reasons.</p>
<p>You also underhandedly imply that Obama won because he is the first black president. This suggestion is hypocritical in a column that seeks to attack a group for playing games with race.</p>
<p>Any racism that has affected Barack Obama played out long ago when he was growing up. You can safely declare the end of racism when we see equality in the prison population statistics, or when you find conclusive evidence of a gentic predisposition for crime shared by Latinos, Blacks, and Aboriginals.</p>
<p>P.S. I love it when comments are deleted on message boards tied to articles written by free-speech crusaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wakefield Tolbert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177118</link>
		<dc:creator>Wakefield Tolbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177118</guid>
		<description>One sin of late is to confute (which is similar to &quot;confuse&quot;, but seems to be done on purpose) race with CULTURE.

The Paleo-right likes to drone on about both, but some people suspect they actually have in mind race. I&#039;m not sure.

As someone very conservative pointed out in a book that poured over the isolationist shots from guys like Pat Buchanan, if culture is the mainstay of any civiliazation, that is, the CONTENTS you pour into the bowl defined by borders and/or language and common ways of perceiving the role of government , then these lines are getty really blurry in the West.

To boot, if you&#039;re nonplussed &#039;bout culture, then it should be noted (as this commentator did) that it might be better from a conservative culture point of view to import black tribal africans from some regions than your average Londoner, the latter not quite as likely to be as conservative, religious (Africans believe in hell--as they&#039;ve lived it!) and independent.  The Brit might want to know where his health card is.

Though this is not to suggest we should encourage the transplantation of socialized meds with the local witch doctor.

But you see my point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One sin of late is to confute (which is similar to &quot;confuse&quot;, but seems to be done on purpose) race with CULTURE.</p>
<p>The Paleo-right likes to drone on about both, but some people suspect they actually have in mind race. I&#039;m not sure.</p>
<p>As someone very conservative pointed out in a book that poured over the isolationist shots from guys like Pat Buchanan, if culture is the mainstay of any civiliazation, that is, the CONTENTS you pour into the bowl defined by borders and/or language and common ways of perceiving the role of government , then these lines are getty really blurry in the West.</p>
<p>To boot, if you&#039;re nonplussed &#039;bout culture, then it should be noted (as this commentator did) that it might be better from a conservative culture point of view to import black tribal africans from some regions than your average Londoner, the latter not quite as likely to be as conservative, religious (Africans believe in hell&#8211;as they&#039;ve lived it!) and independent.  The Brit might want to know where his health card is.</p>
<p>Though this is not to suggest we should encourage the transplantation of socialized meds with the local witch doctor.</p>
<p>But you see my point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenix mattress</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177117</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenix mattress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177117</guid>
		<description>this article is accurate, but there are some deeper points to be made:

1) native americans were the original people in america.

2) &quot;black-white&quot; relations have not been examined within the broader issue of american race problems dating back to the native americans, who were exterminated by american governments.

3) obama is not a racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this article is accurate, but there are some deeper points to be made:</p>
<p>1) native americans were the original people in america.</p>
<p>2) &#8220;black-white&#8221; relations have not been examined within the broader issue of american race problems dating back to the native americans, who were exterminated by american governments.</p>
<p>3) obama is not a racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177116</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177116</guid>
		<description>The folks holding up Obama-as-Hitler signs are followers of a man called Lyndon LaRouche. They are a far-far-left faction that believes Obama is too far to the &lt;i&gt;right.&lt;/i&gt; I kid you not.

So, um, he&#039;s not looking for nuts on the wrong side of the political spectrum. Or rather, in this case the Left side is the right side. And the Right side is the wrong side. Everything clear now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks holding up Obama-as-Hitler signs are followers of a man called Lyndon LaRouche. They are a far-far-left faction that believes Obama is too far to the <i>right.</i> I kid you not.</p>
<p>So, um, he&#039;s not looking for nuts on the wrong side of the political spectrum. Or rather, in this case the Left side is the right side. And the Right side is the wrong side. Everything clear now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177115</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177115</guid>
		<description>Those folks are followers of a man called Lyndon LaRouche.  They are a far-far-left faction that believes Obama is too far to the &lt;i&gt;right.&lt;/i&gt;  I kid you not.

So, um, he&#039;s not looking for nuts on the wrong side of the political spectrum.  Or rather, in this case the Left side is the right side.  And the Right side is the wrong side.  Everything clear now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those folks are followers of a man called Lyndon LaRouche.  They are a far-far-left faction that believes Obama is too far to the <i>right.</i>  I kid you not.</p>
<p>So, um, he&#039;s not looking for nuts on the wrong side of the political spectrum.  Or rather, in this case the Left side is the right side.  And the Right side is the wrong side.  Everything clear now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177114</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177114</guid>
		<description>Oh no! I bet American Racists also like wearing pants! I better start going pantless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no! I bet American Racists also like wearing pants! I better start going pantless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crit_Reasoning</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177113</link>
		<dc:creator>Crit_Reasoning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177113</guid>
		<description>Negative 23?  That must be some kind of record on IntenseDebate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Negative 23?  That must be some kind of record on IntenseDebate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhazna</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhazna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177112</guid>
		<description>Have you SEEN the crazies out there calling Obama a Nazi? I think you are looking for nuts on the wrong side of the political spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you SEEN the crazies out there calling Obama a Nazi? I think you are looking for nuts on the wrong side of the political spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhazna</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177111</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhazna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177111</guid>
		<description>Ok, Bruce - or is your real name Glen Beck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, Bruce &#8211; or is your real name Glen Beck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhazna</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177110</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhazna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177110</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s crass and uninspired. Steyn could have tried to articulate himself masterfully, but ends up sounding like Glenn Beck and other talking heads who are paranoid about &quot;reverse racism&quot; and think political correctness is some kind of affront or subversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#039;s crass and uninspired. Steyn could have tried to articulate himself masterfully, but ends up sounding like Glenn Beck and other talking heads who are paranoid about &quot;reverse racism&quot; and think political correctness is some kind of affront or subversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aramkr</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177109</link>
		<dc:creator>aramkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177109</guid>
		<description>It must be frustrating being on the wrong side of an intelligence gap as wide as the one between you and Steyn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be frustrating being on the wrong side of an intelligence gap as wide as the one between you and Steyn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177108</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177108</guid>
		<description>Canada&#039;s resident neo con coming to the rescue of Wealthcare.  Funny thing is Mr. Steyn, public single payer healthcare is pretty popular wherever it has been implemented.  Even Thatcher in Britain did not dismember the NHS.  Methinks thats why the Neo cons in the US are so paranoid about reform.  They know people will like it and they will not be able to get rid of it.  Public Healthcare is popular in the US, try convincing seniors to get rid of their medicare or vetrans to drop the VA.  Or for that matter get Republicans in congress to scrap their health plans.

THe resistance to Obama is little more than old fashion Mccarthyesque fearmongering of the US right.  Its a shame an old Canadian magazine is starting to spew the FOx &quot;news&quot; propaganda.

So Mr. Steyn should we also abandon our socialized military and our socialized education system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada&#039;s resident neo con coming to the rescue of Wealthcare.  Funny thing is Mr. Steyn, public single payer healthcare is pretty popular wherever it has been implemented.  Even Thatcher in Britain did not dismember the NHS.  Methinks thats why the Neo cons in the US are so paranoid about reform.  They know people will like it and they will not be able to get rid of it.  Public Healthcare is popular in the US, try convincing seniors to get rid of their medicare or vetrans to drop the VA.  Or for that matter get Republicans in congress to scrap their health plans.</p>
<p>THe resistance to Obama is little more than old fashion Mccarthyesque fearmongering of the US right.  Its a shame an old Canadian magazine is starting to spew the FOx &quot;news&quot; propaganda.</p>
<p>So Mr. Steyn should we also abandon our socialized military and our socialized education system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YYZ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177107</link>
		<dc:creator>YYZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177107</guid>
		<description>This is what I can&#039;t stand about Steyn:

The vast majority of people are attributing Obama&#039;s decline to both his policies and his leadership. In the very column Steyn cites, Dowd herself describes the racist elements as the &quot;loco fringe&quot; - she too has been critical of the President.

In his swipe at the Times, Steyn also ignores the David Brooks column that flat-out rejected Dowd&#039;s opinion.

And finally, Steyn didn&#039;t mention the President himself, who when asked about the question of racism pointed to his own election to say that clearly race is not a factor.

The topic of race has been insignificant in the vast majority of debate on the President&#039;s performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I can&#039;t stand about Steyn:</p>
<p>The vast majority of people are attributing Obama&#039;s decline to both his policies and his leadership. In the very column Steyn cites, Dowd herself describes the racist elements as the &quot;loco fringe&quot; &#8211; she too has been critical of the President.</p>
<p>In his swipe at the Times, Steyn also ignores the David Brooks column that flat-out rejected Dowd&#039;s opinion.</p>
<p>And finally, Steyn didn&#039;t mention the President himself, who when asked about the question of racism pointed to his own election to say that clearly race is not a factor.</p>
<p>The topic of race has been insignificant in the vast majority of debate on the President&#039;s performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YYZ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177106</link>
		<dc:creator>YYZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177106</guid>
		<description>This is what I can&#039;t stand about Steyn:

The vast majority of people are attributing Obama&#039;s decline to both his policies and his leadership.  In the very column Steyn cites, Dowd herself describes the racist elements as the &quot;loco fringe&quot; - she too has been critical of the President.

In his swipe at the Times, Steyn also ignores the David Brooks column that flat-out rejected Dowd&#039;s opinion.

And finally, Steyn didn&#039;t mention the President himself, who when asked about the question of racism pointed to his own election to say that clearly race is not a factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I can&#039;t stand about Steyn:</p>
<p>The vast majority of people are attributing Obama&#039;s decline to both his policies and his leadership.  In the very column Steyn cites, Dowd herself describes the racist elements as the &quot;loco fringe&quot; &#8211; she too has been critical of the President.</p>
<p>In his swipe at the Times, Steyn also ignores the David Brooks column that flat-out rejected Dowd&#039;s opinion.</p>
<p>And finally, Steyn didn&#039;t mention the President himself, who when asked about the question of racism pointed to his own election to say that clearly race is not a factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiggz</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177105</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiggz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177105</guid>
		<description>&quot;You don&#039;t have to be a racist to dislike Obama, but I&#039;d be willing to bet 99% of white American racists do dislike him. If I held a position that was shared by 99% of white American racists, I&#039;d probably think twice about it.&quot;

99% of white American racists probably don&#039;t want their genitals removed by use of a balpeen hammer... and I don&#039;t need to think twice about agreeing with them. What does that have to do with the issue at hand? Nothing at all, just like your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;You don&#039;t have to be a racist to dislike Obama, but I&#039;d be willing to bet 99% of white American racists do dislike him. If I held a position that was shared by 99% of white American racists, I&#039;d probably think twice about it.&quot;</p>
<p>99% of white American racists probably don&#039;t want their genitals removed by use of a balpeen hammer&#8230; and I don&#039;t need to think twice about agreeing with them. What does that have to do with the issue at hand? Nothing at all, just like your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177104</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177104</guid>
		<description>First, conservatives were perfectly willing to give up personal freedoms for security.  Look at the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. act, unwarranted wiretapping, torture, etc.

Second, freedom, or liberty (like &quot;liberal&quot;) was originally envisaged as &quot;liberty from tyranny&quot; which not only included Monarchs, but also companies and other people.  Therefore, most liberals believe that other people cannot tell a woman whether she can have an abortion or not, and that business cannot force people to work 80 hours a week, etc.

Finally, in the utmost irony, it was the Republicans who stepped in between Terry Schiavo and her doctors.  And these people are supposed to be conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, conservatives were perfectly willing to give up personal freedoms for security.  Look at the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. act, unwarranted wiretapping, torture, etc.</p>
<p>Second, freedom, or liberty (like &quot;liberal&quot;) was originally envisaged as &quot;liberty from tyranny&quot; which not only included Monarchs, but also companies and other people.  Therefore, most liberals believe that other people cannot tell a woman whether she can have an abortion or not, and that business cannot force people to work 80 hours a week, etc.</p>
<p>Finally, in the utmost irony, it was the Republicans who stepped in between Terry Schiavo and her doctors.  And these people are supposed to be conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-2/#comment-177103</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177103</guid>
		<description>I thought it was the right&#039;s goal to divide everyone into the &quot;haves&quot; and the &quot;have nots&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was the right&#039;s goal to divide everyone into the &quot;haves&quot; and the &quot;have nots&quot;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177102</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177102</guid>
		<description>Yes, but if he was white, how many people would still be pursuing this &quot;conspiracy&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but if he was white, how many people would still be pursuing this &quot;conspiracy&quot;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177101</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177101</guid>
		<description>That why its called a public OPTION!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That why its called a public OPTION!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177100</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177100</guid>
		<description>40 trillion is a big number, where&#039;d you get that one?  I would love to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40 trillion is a big number, where&#039;d you get that one?  I would love to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-177099</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177099</guid>
		<description>I do not know the thoughts of the original post, but it sounds like he may have left out: &quot;in particular&quot;.  Thus.... &quot;If I held a position that was shared by 99% of white American racists in particular, I&#039;d probably think twice about it.&quot;  99+% percent of _all_ people wear clothes, etc.  Still, if you&#039;re honest with yourself, the post merely asked whether you would think about the motivations that some people have... for example, to try to &quot;make healthcare Obama&#039;s Waterloo&quot;.  Honestly, who would go back to re-examine where they learned things from, once they found that a portion of their potential sources (e.g. white racists) were not reputable.

Also, I suspect that most black racists probably do not like Obama either... do I need to explain why?

Finally, their anger and fear, reveal the right wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not know the thoughts of the original post, but it sounds like he may have left out: &quot;in particular&quot;.  Thus&#8230;. &quot;If I held a position that was shared by 99% of white American racists in particular, I&#039;d probably think twice about it.&quot;  99+% percent of _all_ people wear clothes, etc.  Still, if you&#039;re honest with yourself, the post merely asked whether you would think about the motivations that some people have&#8230; for example, to try to &quot;make healthcare Obama&#039;s Waterloo&quot;.  Honestly, who would go back to re-examine where they learned things from, once they found that a portion of their potential sources (e.g. white racists) were not reputable.</p>
<p>Also, I suspect that most black racists probably do not like Obama either&#8230; do I need to explain why?</p>
<p>Finally, their anger and fear, reveal the right wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulHuedepohl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-4/#comment-177081</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulHuedepohl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177081</guid>
		<description>Oh no, &quot;the the rich assholes on Wall Street ... nearly totally screwed up the world economy for the second time in 80 years&quot;. Check your history- capitalism has increased the world&#039;s wealth by so much that now we can only judge the level of affluence we are attaining. I sympathise with your health problems, but they would be untreatable without the profit motive to encourage big-Pharma, part of the dreaded Wall Street, to develop treatments. Let&#039;s face it, if government was involved in drug development, we&#039;d all have two heads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, &quot;the the rich assholes on Wall Street &#8230; nearly totally screwed up the world economy for the second time in 80 years&quot;. Check your history- capitalism has increased the world&#39;s wealth by so much that now we can only judge the level of affluence we are attaining. I sympathise with your health problems, but they would be untreatable without the profit motive to encourage big-Pharma, part of the dreaded Wall Street, to develop treatments. Let&#39;s face it, if government was involved in drug development, we&#39;d all have two heads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary Brus</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177098</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary Brus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177098</guid>
		<description>I do not dislike Obama because he is black.

I dislike Obama because he is incompetent......overmatched for the job.   These are the same reasons I dislike Jimmy Carter, Obama&#039;s political bosom buddy.

Come on 2010 mid-terms!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not dislike Obama because he is black.</p>
<p>I dislike Obama because he is incompetent&#8230;&#8230;overmatched for the job.   These are the same reasons I dislike Jimmy Carter, Obama&#039;s political bosom buddy.</p>
<p>Come on 2010 mid-terms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: touquer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177097</link>
		<dc:creator>touquer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177097</guid>
		<description>So....Republicans who oppose Obama are racists, yet Dems who voted him in primarily because he was black are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;.Republicans who oppose Obama are racists, yet Dems who voted him in primarily because he was black are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulHuedepohl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177096</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulHuedepohl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177096</guid>
		<description>Pot, meet kettle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pot, meet kettle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/comment-page-5/#comment-177095</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82444#comment-177095</guid>
		<description>Is there a single Conservative writer out there who can argue a point without insult, nastiness, intelligence or an ability to understand that the world is not so simple that you are either left or right.  We already have a Prime Minister who does that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a single Conservative writer out there who can argue a point without insult, nastiness, intelligence or an ability to understand that the world is not so simple that you are either left or right.  We already have a Prime Minister who does that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

