Michael Ignatieff’s weighty autumn

Somewhere in the office of the leader of the Opposition, I feel sure, there is a DVD of season three of The West Wing

by Paul Wells on Friday, September 25, 2009 9:00am - 108 Comments

Michael Ignatieff’s weighty autumn“I stand between you and your dinner,” Michael Ignatieff told a crowd gathered for lunch, which is sort of like dinner, at the Toronto Hilton. “And you’re going to be a little hungrier by the time I get through.”

Ah. This was the Liberal leader explaining the effect of his own presence. It’s the same Michael Ignatieff who likes to punctuate his remarks with asides like, “You know, I’m a pragmatic fellow.” He is an illuminated manuscript come to life, or at least partway. He began with this warning about the still-distant meal, whichever one it might be, because he planned to give us a “more substantive” speech than the audience might be used to.

The Liberal leader is having a substantive autumn. Several days before this he delivered a speech his factotums advertised as being about “Canada in the world: where we’ve been, where we are and where we’re going.” Today his theme was the economy: “What Canada’s been through, the challenges we’re facing, and where we should be going.” You know, he’s a weighty fellow.

The challenge for Ignatieff since he moved to Toronto from Massachussetts in 2004 has been how to position himself. Is he regular folks? When I interviewed him in 2006 he was busy droppin’ his g’s from every gerund and ever-lovin’ participle. He has since decided that won’t work. Small mercies. Now he takes the long view, thinks the big thought, interposes himself between lunch crowds and their dinner with only the weight of his cogitation to hold back the tide.

Somewhere in the office of the leader of the Opposition, I feel sure, there is a DVD of season three of The West Wing. Toby Ziegler’s chess match with president Bartlett has received repeated viewings. Ziegler tells his boss how to win against a populist challenger. “You’re not ‘just folks,’ ” he says. “You’re not plain-spoken. Do not, do not, do not act like it.”

Bartlett protests: “I don’t wanna be killed.”

Ziegler: “Then make this election about smart, and not. Make it about engaged, and not. Qualified, and not. Make it about heavyweight. You’re a heavyweight. And you’ve been holding me up for too many rounds.” And Ziegler knocks down his own beleaguered king, because this guy Bartlett, he cannot be beaten at chess.

God, I love that scene.

Anyway, here was Ignatieff on the economy. He was here to be substantive. But only up to a point: those Conservatives have been fudging the numbers. When he gets elected Ignatieff will “open the books” and figure out what the budget balance really is. Only then will he come up with a financial plan. “We won’t make decisions without numbers we can trust.”

The decisions he makes, after we elect him, will form “a balanced plan,” winding down stimulus spending neither too quickly nor too slowly. “We will balance the books without making the most vulnerable pay the price,” he said. But even then, “expenditure control alone can’t dig us out of the mess Mr. Harper has left us with.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Theresa

    That is an EXCELLENT scene. Now if only we could get a leader, of at least one of the parties, to have as much substance as Bartlett or even half of that, maybe we could return to effective government. Sad. No wonder people don't vote, the selection is awful.

  • kcm

    Er…disingenuous.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/tigerinexil1428 tigerinexile

      I wouldn't take advice from the Post if I were Ignatieff. Just like Harper shouldn't take advice from the Star.

      But I thought the point re Harper getting away with it rang true enough to repeat.

      Some people just do. Ever see Steyn's review of Chretien's bio? He posits what would have happened, had Chretien stuck around to deal with Adscam:
      http://bit.ly/15SWSP

      "What would Chrétien have done? He'd have said, "Waal, da scam is da scam and, when you got da good scam, dat da scam. Me, I like da scam-and-eggs wid da home fries at da Auberge Grand-Mère every Sunday morning. And Aline, she always spray da pepper on it. Like Popeye say, I scam what I scam. Don' make me give you da ol' Shawiniscam handshake …" Etc., etc., until it all dribbled away into a fog of artfully constructed incoherence, and the heads of the last two journalists following the story exploded, and he won his fourth term."

      Anyway, we'll see.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

    All interesting Paul, but why do I think it would be more like this

    [youtube SnxQk8C_-kE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnxQk8C_-kE youtube]

    • scf

      I love parodies like this. Now I know that I'm not the only one that noticed that for some reason people on that show spent a lot of time hurrying from one office to another for no apparent reason or benefit.

  • scf

    Labour productivity growth seems to peak in countries where hiring and firing is very difficult (ie Europe, particularly France), which makes sense. People will buy an expensive machine to lick the envelopes if they cannot hire a receptionist. But a receptionist will treat the customers better. Labour productivity growth is a good thing, but it needs to be place in context to have more meaning.

  • Tripper523

    It's an over-used, age-old cop-out to continually blame previous administrations for the ineptitudes and incompetence of a newly-seated government. I don't find the Harper administration making too many excuses. Rather, they are going about the business of running this nation as best they can, with the cards they've been dealt, regardless of their predecessor gripping the federal plough and the nature of the economic terrain. Contrarily, Mikhail Igneutiev will use the "unknown factor" for his own justification, and a "show me when I get there" blackmailing attitude for his lack of accountability now, and his ambition for the power which eludes him.

    • http://twitter.com/ChrisInKW @ChrisInKW

      "I don't find the Harper administration making too many excuses."

      You've got to be kidding me.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

      It is a tired dodge…per coyne's column of a month ago. And even odder now that the numbers come from Finance, seen by the PBO and audited by the Aud General. Given that Iggy has some former PCO bigwig on staff it makes the claim that they just dont know and can't know even thinner.

      Saying its not possible says that the bureacracy participates in out and out fraud. It would be nice to see this excuse, for both sides, stripped away by those who question them, voters, media watchdogs etc.

  • http://azmattressoutlet.com/ phoenix mattress

    i have a client in toronto who has backed harper, but seems torn by ignatieff. it’s hard to understand why, though: ignatieff is one of these people who takes a stand on things and harper doesn’t, he just does as he’s told to do.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Glad to see that, metaphorically, he's stopped dropping his -g's on gerunds. He'd just have wound up running a bunch of useless erunds.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/tigerinexil1428 tigerinexile

    And we all know he's Russian.

    "Ерунда" ("Erunda") translates to "nonsense".

    Leave that to the policy platform, not the vocab.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/PaulHuedepohl PaulHuedepohl

    Nicely done!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/tigerinexil1428 tigerinexile

    Hubris?

From Macleans