Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

This is who actually won in Calgary

by Paul Wells on Friday, September 25, 2009 3:17pm - 15 Comments

My short article in last week’s issue, arguing that Los Angeles architect Zoltan Pali should build the Cantos Music Foundation’s new National Music Centre in Calgary, was roundly ignored by the jury, who preferred Portland architect Brad Cloepfil and his Allied Works Architecture.

Oh well. I interviewed Cloepfil for my piece, and enjoyed our conversation. He was pretty frank that he had only had time, under the short deadlines of the competition, to come up with a few big ideas: a series of parallel towers to house the centre’s various mandates (music, education, performance); a shell that reflects elements of the region’s geography (to my eye, you sort of have to squint to see that); and, most encouraging, a ground-up, from-the-start collaboration with the multimedia specialists at Portland’s Second Story.

So Cloepfil’s proposal was only a first draft. Elizabeth Diller, another shortlisted architect, told me that’s very often the case: you throw out a few ideas, and then if you win the competition you start the serious work, often based on a closer study of the site, of deciding what three-dimensional conclusions flow from those ideas. The Cantos jury, then, was making a leap of faith in picking this guy. At least it’s not a timid choice.

Bookmark and Share
  • John.K

    I hardly think it "incorporates the historic King Edward Hotel". It surrounds it and makes it look horribly out of place – like they forgot to tear it down, or couldn't persuade the owner to sell.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

      That'd actually be pretty appropriate to the King Eddy.. I can't think of any more fitting way to incorporate it, in all its facets, than exactly that.

      • John.K

        Well, I don't know the building, or its history, so I'll defer on that. But to me, it looks like just another tired old late-nineteenth century pile, with nothing visually distinctive. Every small city has a few of these that the local preservationists go mad to conserve…but for no apparent reason other that their age. Trust me, as a decrepit old pile myself, age alone has nothing to recommend it.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

          Actually, there's not a lot left in Calgary for preservationists to go mad about – decrepit or not.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    It does kind of remind me of seeing the Rockies as you drive west from Calgary. Also kind of reminds me of the building exterior in Gattaca.

    What ever became of the Maclean's competition to redesign 24 Sussex, btw? I emailed it to a few architect friends, though I don't think they submitted anything.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/tigerinexil1428 tigerinexile

      For a moment there, I thought the kids with knapsacks were wearing jet-packs…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

      We actually got some very thoughtful entries for the 24 Sussex thing. I've since been bad at clearing a couple of days to do something with the entries. I'm thinking we'll open up a corner of the website, because a lot of the entries involve very elaborate visuals.

  • Dot

    a shell that reflects elements of the region’s geography

    I think he's referring to the numerous jet vapour trails that criss cross the Calgary skyline because they don't have a high speed rail line to Edmonton. Or are those search lights looking for more migrant workers?

  • Mulletaur

    I like both the Pali and Cloepfil entries, but going back to your original article on the subject, I still think Nouvel would have been the best choice.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

      I think you either loved the Nouvel or hated it. It would certainly have been the most striking presence on the skyline.

    • John

      Agreed on Nouvel Mulletaur. Odds are, the winning entry will make it to everyone's "Eyesore of the Year" list, when complete.

  • Mulletaur

    Here are some pictures for all five entries. Perhaps I'm missing something, but I couldn't find them on the Cantos Web site.

  • even flow

    I was surprised and a little disappointed (for now) that they choose the Allied Works bid. I'm not sure how Calgarians will react. I got the sense that Calgarians were itching for a piece of architecture they could hang their hat on. Something to draw a strong contrast to the rest of the buildings here, i'm not sure we got that.

    I was expecting it to be a three horse race between Pali Fekete (LA), Diller Scofidio and Renfro (New York), or Saucier + Perrotte (Montreal, Quebec) with the Canadian bid winning out as a good compromise. And I agree with you Inkless, I was hoping for the Pali bid to come out on top as well.

    Here's a little explanation of why they won:

    Allied Works was a frontrunner in the competition from the beginning, said Andrew Mosker, executive director of the Cantos Music Foundation.

    "I would say Allied Works, better than any other firm, going back to the EOI phase, has been able to distil the true essence of our project. All 66 of those EOIs were spread out on the project room table and Allied Works' was the first one I read, for no particular reason.

    "I remember the first thing that struck me about their EOI was the way they addressed every single aspect of the project. The vision and understanding of what we wanted to build, their related experience with cultural, and particularly music museum, projects."

    —————————–

    I can understand their point but i wonder if they have made it to complicated. Will the visitors get it?

    Here they are again if anyone wants a refresher.:

    http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/24/king-eddys-new…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/GeoffM GeoffM

    I've been slightly depressed over this selection but I'm warming to it. On the positive side, the jury didn't fall for Nouvel's tall, slender, empty bimbo that he sent to distract us from his insulting and total indifference to this project. I was cheering for Diller or SPF because they radiated such passion for the project and for the music. My reservations for Allied are its ordinariness and a vagueness about the interior, but I'm glad to see his confession that it's a "first draft." Conceptually it has enormous popular appeal—as it should—in that not everyone will make the effort to see a 16th Century harpsichord, but who wouldn't want to spend an afternoon yanking on musical ropes, whacking on two-story gongs and, um…uh…? That's kind of the risk isn't it: the whole thing is unknowable. And therefor exciting. I wish Cloepfel and Cantos all the best and I have a small personal favour to ask. My daughter will be 5 when this thing is scheduled for completion. Build something that will make her love music.

  • scf

    I like some of the ideas in that picture. I don't like the giant, flat, plain walls, characteristic of modern buildings. I love the way you can see inside the buildings.

From Macleans