Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Props for Pops

by Paul Wells on Sunday, September 27, 2009 9:36pm - 10 Comments

They don’t give you an instruction manual when they give you a political column, so in 1997 when The Gazette gave me one (it was extortion; I was threatening to quit) I looked around for my own models. William Safire, the great New York Times columnist who died today at 79, was one. Emulating him was healthy for the same reason it’s okay for a saxophonist to try to play like Sonny Rollins: Because you can’t, but in trying you will push yourself past whatever was blocking you before.

Safire had strong opinions but there was no club whose members were immune from his criticism, nor any that would forever be denied his praise. I am pretty sure he voted for Bill Clinton in 1992, though not in 1996. His example pushed the Washington Post to go get their own conservative columnist, a tweedy kid named George Will. He came to journalism from outside — he was a Nixon speechwriter — but he cared more than most of us about the only tools we will ever have: the techniques of the reporter and the English language.

He was a playful columnist. After Nixon died, Safire filed occasional phone interviews with his old boss from Heaven. His “reading X’s mind” columns, in which he would write in the first person about what some great figure must be thinking, were not fanciful, the way young Dowd would write them, because Safire reported those pieces exhaustively before launching into his voice-appropriation thing. And his annual Office Pool quizzes were awesome displays of polymath showing-off.

Safire trusted his gut and his voice, but never let tone and instinct be the sum of his work. On good days, the rest of us remember his example.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Dennis_F Dennis_F

    Very nice tribute.

  • CAPS

    Sad to hear. Even though he was a conservative commentator I always appreciated what he had to write.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Dennis_F Dennis_F

      If I have it right, Safire was considered part of Nixon's two-man speechwriting tag-team alongside Pat Buchanan. Buchanan was considered to be the right-winger, whereas Safire represented the so-called "moderate" Northeastern wing of the party.

  • Bob Beck

    Nice tribute indeed, and no doubt he was a writer of talent. "Nattering nabobs of negativism," if not necessarily one for the ages, surely belongs in some Political Abuse Hall of Fame.

    But on at least a couple of occasions his instincts, or his judgment, must have let him down. Those posthumous interviews had to be down to a first-rate hoaxer. No way did Richard M. Nixon go to Heaven.

    Alternatively, of course, Nixon could have been telling his last lie.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Dennis_F Dennis_F

      No way did Richard M. Nixon go to Heaven.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's for God to decide, isn't it?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/SisyphusThis SisyphusThis

        I hear St Peter mans the Gate. He is The Rock, ya know.

      • Bob Beck

        I daresay it is. I’m only saying: if Nixon could get to Heaven, then there is no… er… ah… wait just a minute, here…

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Dennis_F Dennis_F

          Now, now. If you look at the historical record, the main difference between him and some of his predecessors is that he got caught. If he didn't get caught, he probably would have gone down as a decent president. Even so, it's hardly fair to mention him in the same breath as some of the truly evil men of history. Not even close, actually.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SisyphusThis SisyphusThis
  • Bob Beck

    And from Jack Shafer of Slate, a dissenting view of Safire:

    http://www.slate.com/id/2229855/

From Macleans