If you were an Irving-employed machinist, you’d be home now: Virtually liveblogging the PM’s Action! Plan update

That’s “virtually” as in, through the magic of television, not almost, but not quite doing so, although if the networks don’t cooperate by running the whole thing live, that may end up being what happens.

Anyway, check back at 12:30 for what ITQ fully expects to be full coverage of the sporadic split screen images of an empty stage on the Hot Room flat screen, as increasingly frantic segment producers rediscover the mercurial magic of prime ministerial scheduling. Or maybe he’ll be on time for once. Who knows? In any case, stay for the show — or as much of it as makes it to broadcast — as well as reaction from the Hill.

12:21:50 PM
Greetings, armchair stimulus spending analysts and/or ordinary Canadians, and welcome to what ITQ feels fairly secure describing as the biggest media circus to hit the Southern Railway mechanical shop in Saint John history: the latest installment in the long-running serial, How I Spent My Your Taxpayer Dollars, starring the one and only prime minister of all of Canada, Stephen Harper. Is everyone excited? ITQ hopes so, since there was some concern expressed yesterthread that we-the-media were focusing far too much attention on the process — why New Brunswick? Why today? What’s the angle? — and not on the substance of the report itself, which has made her even more determined to follow every last carefully-framed moment of today’s announcement.

12:29:34 PM
One minute to go! Oddly, the networks don’t seem to have switched to the live feed yet. Y’all have played this game before, haven’t you?

Incidentally, ITQ actually has a copy of the report, which was deposited with the gallery under strict embargo earlier this morning. I don’t think it’s violating any parliamentary procedure to note that the covers features a stylized ‘STAYING ON COURSE’ action! sign. The fork logo doesn’t look any better in print, in case anyone was wondering.

12:35:16 PM
Five minutes late! Which is practically early by PMO standards.

12:37:34 PM
And here we go! Hey, who’s that? Is that Jim Flaherty? What on earth is *he* doing there? Shouldn’t he be tabling a report in the House?

Okay, he’s now going through the introductions — the whole NB contingent is there, apparently, including MPs, senators and – good heavens, Elsie Wayne? Doesn’t the party have a standing security alert to keep her out of camera range?

12:39:27 PM
That Flaherty character is still going on and on, talking about the Action! Plan like it’s *his* initiative or something. Spotlight hog.

12:41:15 PM
And here he is — the prime minister we’ve all been waiting for, looking — pretty much like he always does, with a tie that, for a horrifying moment, reminds me of the Action! logo. He discusses how glad he is to have successfully lured Flaherty into federal politics, notes that it’s “always great to be back in New Brunswick,” his “ancestral home”, and then swings into the stump speech: He’s spent most of the last few months travelling from coast to coast to coast, doing what he can to help the economy — and, just like he told the G20 last week, the most important thing right now is to Stay The Course.

12:44:34 PM
Ooh, now fully 90 percent of the funding has been committed and/or implemented! Projects are up and running, jobs are being created, and people — like you and you and you (but not *you*, you slacker — are feeling the effects.

Especially, it seems, if by “people”, you mean “Irvings and employees of Irving-owned companies,” because there also seems to be more money on the way for the New Brunswick Southern Railway, which – you’d think would have earned some applause from the crowd, but no. There *is* a crowd, right? Oh, there they are — they liked hearing about the 7,500 projects going on across the country. Yay!

12:47:59 PM
More numbers — numbers that are “increasing every week,” the PM tells us, and no, he doesn’t mean the deficit.

12:49:44 PM
Don’t worry — I’m going to throw in a link to the PM’s speech when it goes online, so you’ll be able to relive the magic and perhaps even reenact the moment with friends and family, provided you have access to a train yard.

12:51:34 PM
Hey, you know what still rocks? Canada’s banks!

12:51:50 PM
We’re seeing the early stages of what could be the recovery, the PM says — it’s fragile, and we’re “not out of the woods yet” – except for Michael Ignatieff, of course, although some members of his party may start dropping breadcrumbs leading back to into its tree-y depths.

12:53:57 PM
Wait, this speech is starting to get partisan. Is that allowed? The PM points out that the Liberals voted for the budget last spring, and insists that it’s not the time to force an election, apparently. Wait, is that in the official update? Because that sounds more like an opinion.

12:56:20 PM
Okay, this is weird: the PM just wrapped up his speech, and handed the floor over to Rodney Weston, the rookie Conservative MP who beat out Paul Zed by a mere sliver of voteshare last time around, and who is now delivering a vaguely embarrassing paeon to the prime minister’s brilliant leadership. That was — sort of painful to watch, although he really seemed to mean it.

12:57:49 PM
Oh, and now it’s time for the media advisory, starting with — hey, Andrew Mayeda made the last flight to Saint John! He asks the PM about the Liberals’ entirely unsurprising move to table a non-confidence motion, and Harper points out that Ignatieff made up his mind “a month ago” on a report he hadn’t seen; it’s “unfortunate”, and Canadians “expect better” — they want parliament to focus on the economy, and — oh for heaven’s sake, he just interrupted his own staffer/moderator to add, “Did I mention nobody wants an election?”

You’ve taken out *ads* to that effect, sir — and no, I’m not even talking about ’stay the course.’ It’s fair to say that particular message has gotten through the media fog, such as it is. Or isn’t.

1:02:20 PM
A question on the Point Lepreau nuclear reactor — long story short, the province wants money from the feds for the refurbishment, Ottawa will “respect its obligations” as far as the previous agreement with the previous government, but isn’t ready to pitch in more. Not yet, that is. (Actually, there were two questions, one in English and one in French, but the answer didn’t change.

1:04:02 PM
In response to a question on whether some of the money may be flowing to projects that aren’t ‘appropriate’, the PM raises, then exorcises the spectre of the sponsorship scandal, at least as far as the potential for lack of oversight to lead to misspending. Don’t worry, that isn’t happening here, he says.

1:05:47 PM
Okay, so there are 4,000 projects in the construction “or pre-construction” phase. That last one sounds awfully broad, doesn’t it?

And that’s it for the Q&A! So far, there’s no word on when the opposition parties will respond, but ITQ will keep her eye on the inbox, so don’t go far.

1:29:50 PM

Still no sign of life from the opposition parties — perhaps they’re waiting until the post-QP scrums to react to the report. Or, in the case of the Liberals, are inarticulate with grief over the loss of their beloved Quebec lieutenant. In the meantime, it — the report, that is — is now online over at the Action! Plan website, and as soon as the PM’s speech goes up, I’ll add the link.

For the all the post-QP scrum antics, click here.

Print Story PrintComment Comment
ShareDelicious

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

43 Responses to “If you were an Irving-employed machinist, you’d be home now: Virtually liveblogging the PM’s Action! Plan update”

  1. VinceClortho says:

    http://www.theweathernetwork.com/weather/canb0088

    Get some dry ice, lower the temp in your room and have a fan going….it will be just like you were there

  2. herringchoker says:

    Be sure to hit O'Leary's before you leave town Kady. It's the Saint John version of D'arcy McGee's.

  3. Riley Hennessey says:

    What is with the new CTV site charging for live feeds… thank goodness for CBC's website. Except that its 1:44 Atlantic and still no live feed.

  4. herringchoker says:

    Try CPAC Riley.

  5. Blammo says:

    CPAC's live feed is showing some people in suits yelling and holding up piles of paper. It looks like it's in a big hall or something.

  6. Riley Hennessey says:

    Thanks! Works like a charm.

  7. WDM says:

    Any relation to the Elsie Wayne who almost quit the PC party when they dared form a Parliamentary coalition with the DRC?

  8. Newg says:

    "It is time to stay stay on track"

    Like that little slip :)

  9. Brad Shaw says:

    "Stay the Course"!!!! Ahhhhhhhhhh….. Has that phrase not been used to death? Does Harper really think everyone is SO stupid that they hear that and accept it by thinking *ah, yes, stay the course… that must be the right thing to do…. Nothing… it is so easy!*
    Perhaps it will occur to *some* Canadian's that they have heard that phrase before" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stay_the_course

    I wonder if the implications of its previous usage have been considered by the Harper's Government and the fun folks over at PMO.

    I just want a new catch phrase.

  • Bonnie N says:

    Stay the Course?

    I don't think using a dubya quote from the Iraq war is the best sound bite for the Harper government. Surely the PMO brain trust could have come up with something less Republican speak.

    Just asking…

  • OntarioTown says:

    Why is Harper not relaying his report to "parliament" like a real man instead of playing games on our "taxpayer money"?

    Is he afraid of parliament? He's suppose to report to parliament on these matters – Mr. Harper, you keep this up and people will think you're a dictator.

  • Andrew (not Potter or Coyne) says:

    Shorter Harper:

    Everything’s dandy–except our country is strangely vulnerable to election fever, and with our depressed electoral immune system, getting the politicians out of the bureaucrats’ hair for 5 weeks we make Canadians consider immigrating to Myanmar.

  • Hey, remember when Conservative politicians were seen as the credible ones when it came to the economy?

  • bigcitylib says:

    Thats it? Where's the poison pill? There was supposed to be a humongous poison pill!

  • SeanStok says:

    " and Canadians “expect better” "

    There it is, folks. The choice is now clear in the next election.

    We can *do* better.

    or

    We can *expect* better.

    I fear this may polarize and divide us for generations.

  • As someone who has been mired in a "pre-employment" phase for the last 8 months now, I can imagine a zillion "projects" in the "pre-construction phase", including a handful that might evenually some day actually employ someone.

  • VinceClortho says:

    So the mystery on the location appears to be little mystery now. There was a big project they could attach hemselves to, the railyard project….

    Why announced so late….dont know.

    But it is defintely about getting airtime to assist in the couple of saves and potential takes they have in the region. Pretty run of the mill as far as updates go…the meats all in the big book they tabled or are tabling.

    CBC pointed out, this had been in the works for some time using the printed books as evidence of that.

    So here is my question, when were the books produced, when would they have been ordered and what would have happened to them if the government fell 10 days ago, would they have been locked up.

    Just curious.

    • Thwim says:

      If the files are ready to go, it takes less than a week to get a print order done on a rush job.

    • KadyITQ says:

      Well, according to the most recent date that appears in the text — on page 96 of the printed version, that is; not sure where that would be online — the update went to press after the Ways and Means motion was passed, which would be sometime since September 18th, 2009.

      ETA: For what it’s worth, the PDF was acrodistilled on September 26th — someone was hard at work on a Saturday!

  • psiclone says:

    Harpers message is the perfect counterpoint to Iggys' whereas with the newly named LPC, now being confirmed in actuality by Dennis, that it is indeed the LPToronto ' we can do better ' has fallen on it's face since all evidence points to the CPC message -' we are doing better and will get betterer ' – poor Iggy! it must suck to be liberal right now. Wait a sec Iggy don't do it, don't look at Harper eye to eye. I know you want to as you can feel the rug being pulled from beneath your feet, but you and I know that if you look the next thing you feel will be the poke in the eye – oops too late well at least you gave it the ol college try.

  • SisyphusThis says:

    Uh, if you're an Irving-employed machinist there's a decent chance you might be from
    Alberta and going to and fro work from a secured motel on a secured bus.

    Labour being mobile and flexible and all.

  • Dave says:

    "He discusses how glad he is to have successfully lured Flaherty into federal politics"

    Because Finance Ministers with a documented history of excellence in pretending deficits don't exist/can be hand waved away are soooooooooo hard to find….

  • Saskboys Homeboy says:

    Lets all sing with Kady…………..

    Michael Grant Ignatieff
    mmmm mmmm mmmm

  • biff says:

    Iggy sure must have though that one through.

    "Forcing" Harper to take multiple opportunites (and full advantage of having the government purse strings and ability to set the agenda) to "report"/take center stage/get free coverage on how much he's been doing to help Canadians.

    • VinceClortho says:

      You "payz yer muny yuz take yer chances"

      It seemed like a good idea when they did it….since they thought it would only get worse. Ironic isnt it, that the party that extolls the virtues of what government can do might have been counting on what government couldnt do…..

      Ok, maybe they just didnt think it through.

  • OntarioTown says:

    "Stay the cours"……hmmm….I've received my 125th or 26th ten percenter from the Conservatives this year – I've saved all but one, but will have to count them again.

    Anyway – today's says "Our Conservative government is cracking down on criminals who:……."

    Shouldn't that be Government of Canada?

    Also, it includes more POLLING on our taxpayer dollars:

    Whis on the right track to protect Canadians from crime?

    Ignatieff Harper Layton May (what? They include May this time)? Polling, polling and we're paying for it.

    25 or 25 (probably 27) ten percenters – postage paid ($0.54), printing costs – how much have the Cons spent of OUR money on this garbage?

    Apparently, some Liberals and NDP ten percenters have gone out as well, but I'll bet not nearly as much as Harper. I have not received any from the Libs or NDP so far.

    During a recession yet……..blowing money like this – unbelievable.

  • OntarioTown says:

    Please excuse my typos – problem with keyboard and (I hate to admit it) but I cut my hand really badly on a can or pork and beans (puts her head down in shame).

    Okay – so, I've received approx 27 – I will have to count the bundle I've save. Threw out the first one.

    This is from the period mid-Jan to today.

    • kc says:

      Are thse ten% only an eastern thing? I ‘ve seen nary a one out west. I wonder if this has the potential to become a major scandal down the road when Sreve’s gone and the books are opened?

  • Tripper523 says:

    I now work for the Government of Canada (and not the CPC, even though they are the only Party which also 'works') after being displaced out of the manufacturing sector. I can relate to anyone facing "career change", especially over the age of 50. Believe me though, there is "help out there", even though it's not easy to alter course after the "bottom drops out" after several years. We get used to the "status quo". The reality is that, unless you're a self-employed professional, the service industry is the way to go. We can't count on those manufacturing jobs to "be there" like they were, especially with the global market place and tides of economic uncertainty, usually stemming from corporate greed and disillusional unions.

  • From Macleans

    >