<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apocalypse now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182589</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182589</guid>
		<description>Yes with these extreme right wing media talk shows we all know a few of those blow bags our democracey was  badly damaged and now with the cbc changes its very close too gone.it seems the extreme right is trying aful hard  to push there ideals lately is it because of all  the coporate failures and corruption and bail outs and some form of socialism had too come too there rescue theres nothing wrong with free markets  private bussinesses  ect but theres also a place for a good public systym roads medicare army social justice  somthings just cant be done properley privately  theres a place and time for everything theres benifits on the right and on the left and hopefuly we can meet somewhere in the middle    hope for balance and harmony in this great country</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes with these extreme right wing media talk shows we all know a few of those blow bags our democracey was  badly damaged and now with the cbc changes its very close too gone.it seems the extreme right is trying aful hard  to push there ideals lately is it because of all  the coporate failures and corruption and bail outs and some form of socialism had too come too there rescue theres nothing wrong with free markets  private bussinesses  ect but theres also a place for a good public systym roads medicare army social justice  somthings just cant be done properley privately  theres a place and time for everything theres benifits on the right and on the left and hopefuly we can meet somewhere in the middle    hope for balance and harmony in this great country</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: `HARRY</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182588</link>
		<dc:creator>`HARRY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182588</guid>
		<description>ITS GETTING REALLY FRIGHTNING  MOST THE NEWSPAPERS RADIO TALK SHOWS TV NEWS ECT IS EXTREMELY RIGHT WING  THE ARE BOUGHT  AND PAYD FOR  BY THE CORPORITE ELITE .BECAUSE THERE PRIVATE THEY CLAIM THEY CAN BE RIGHT WING BIASED THERE SOLE PURPOSE IS TOO PROMOTE AND PROP UP THE EXTREME RIGHT BUT  THE GET GOVT  HANDOUTS PLUS OUR ADVERTISEMENT DOLLARS .  AND BAILOUTS .IVE  ALWAYS FOUND THE CBC VERY FAIR VERY FAIR  AND UNBIASED MAYBE SLIGHTLY RIGHT BUT THEYLL TYE INTO ALL PARTYS WHEN INTERVEIWING .NOW WITH THE NEW CBC GOING  MUCH MORE TOO THE RIGHT WHOES THERE  TOO SPEAK FOR THE OTHER THREE POLITICAL PARTIES  THIS IS VERY DISTURBING AND MUCH LIKE WHAT HAPPENED IN GERMANY DURING HITTLERS REIGN OF TERROR OR IN COMMUNIST RUSSIA WAKE UP PEOPLE WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN HARPER FORMS HIS NEW MAJORITY GOVERMENT WHICH  I THINK  HE WILL .AND CANADIANS WERE MAD ABOUT THE COALAITION  COME ON  . WEVE BEEN BRAINWASHED BIG TIME BY THE PRIVATE  MEDIA THE CBC WAS THE ONLY TV AND RADIO THAT WAS LEFT UNBIASED ALTHOUGH SOME TIMES CONTERVERSIAL .  THERE NOTHING LEFT TOO GIVE US UNBIASED  INFORMATION  AND I THINK CBC IS GOING TOO BECOME PRIVATIZED OR HASTLY BECOME JUST ANOTHER  TOOL FOR THE EXTREME RIGHT WHILE IM NOT AGAINST THE RIGHT OR LEFT OR MIDDLE  .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITS GETTING REALLY FRIGHTNING  MOST THE NEWSPAPERS RADIO TALK SHOWS TV NEWS ECT IS EXTREMELY RIGHT WING  THE ARE BOUGHT  AND PAYD FOR  BY THE CORPORITE ELITE .BECAUSE THERE PRIVATE THEY CLAIM THEY CAN BE RIGHT WING BIASED THERE SOLE PURPOSE IS TOO PROMOTE AND PROP UP THE EXTREME RIGHT BUT  THE GET GOVT  HANDOUTS PLUS OUR ADVERTISEMENT DOLLARS .  AND BAILOUTS .IVE  ALWAYS FOUND THE CBC VERY FAIR VERY FAIR  AND UNBIASED MAYBE SLIGHTLY RIGHT BUT THEYLL TYE INTO ALL PARTYS WHEN INTERVEIWING .NOW WITH THE NEW CBC GOING  MUCH MORE TOO THE RIGHT WHOES THERE  TOO SPEAK FOR THE OTHER THREE POLITICAL PARTIES  THIS IS VERY DISTURBING AND MUCH LIKE WHAT HAPPENED IN GERMANY DURING HITTLERS REIGN OF TERROR OR IN COMMUNIST RUSSIA WAKE UP PEOPLE WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN HARPER FORMS HIS NEW MAJORITY GOVERMENT WHICH  I THINK  HE WILL .AND CANADIANS WERE MAD ABOUT THE COALAITION  COME ON  . WEVE BEEN BRAINWASHED BIG TIME BY THE PRIVATE  MEDIA THE CBC WAS THE ONLY TV AND RADIO THAT WAS LEFT UNBIASED ALTHOUGH SOME TIMES CONTERVERSIAL .  THERE NOTHING LEFT TOO GIVE US UNBIASED  INFORMATION  AND I THINK CBC IS GOING TOO BECOME PRIVATIZED OR HASTLY BECOME JUST ANOTHER  TOOL FOR THE EXTREME RIGHT WHILE IM NOT AGAINST THE RIGHT OR LEFT OR MIDDLE  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.H. Koch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-2/#comment-182587</link>
		<dc:creator>P.H. Koch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182587</guid>
		<description>I know this agreement must sound strange to many readers, but I think either of Andrew&#039;s &quot;two ways of looking at it&quot; would be overstating the case. The CBC is not being privatized, and the National Post is not receiving taxpayer funding. Nor is this agreement really all that &quot;bizarre&quot; &#8212; except when one considers the fact that the National Post not that long ago had an active CBC-bashing campaign. Strange bedfellows, perhaps ... or perhaps not.

For several years at least, many of the stories and photos you find at CBC online have been from Canadian Press, which shares content among numerous other mostly privately owned media outlets, in particular most Canadian newspapers. A couple of years ago, however, Canwest pulled out of Canadian Press, and the word is that Sun Media is preparing to do the same. So this content-sharing agreement between the Post and the CBC seems to reestablish a link in a long-established Canadian media content-sharing chain, a link that was broken when Canwest newspapers left CP.

What is at stake here is not the nature of the CBC as a publicly owned and controlled media organization, nor whether the National Post might receive backdoor funding from Ottawa, but the role of CP as the main vehicle of content-sharing among large Canadian media organizations. For reasons we can imagine, it may be more palatable &#8212; or more feasible &#8212; for the National Post to share content with the public broadcaster than with other privately held media organizations (read competitors).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this agreement must sound strange to many readers, but I think either of Andrew&#039;s &quot;two ways of looking at it&quot; would be overstating the case. The CBC is not being privatized, and the National Post is not receiving taxpayer funding. Nor is this agreement really all that &quot;bizarre&quot; &mdash; except when one considers the fact that the National Post not that long ago had an active CBC-bashing campaign. Strange bedfellows, perhaps &#8230; or perhaps not.</p>
<p>For several years at least, many of the stories and photos you find at CBC online have been from Canadian Press, which shares content among numerous other mostly privately owned media outlets, in particular most Canadian newspapers. A couple of years ago, however, Canwest pulled out of Canadian Press, and the word is that Sun Media is preparing to do the same. So this content-sharing agreement between the Post and the CBC seems to reestablish a link in a long-established Canadian media content-sharing chain, a link that was broken when Canwest newspapers left CP.</p>
<p>What is at stake here is not the nature of the CBC as a publicly owned and controlled media organization, nor whether the National Post might receive backdoor funding from Ottawa, but the role of CP as the main vehicle of content-sharing among large Canadian media organizations. For reasons we can imagine, it may be more palatable &mdash; or more feasible &mdash; for the National Post to share content with the public broadcaster than with other privately held media organizations (read competitors).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-2/#comment-182586</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182586</guid>
		<description>Behind this action is the fact that newspapers, and the media in general, increasingly under financial stress.  This results in them not being able to obtain the breadth of coverage that major newspapers used to have.  They cannot afford to do do the real investigative journalism that provides meaningful insight.  They cannot afford to be controversial because they cannot defend frivolous lawsuites - especially in Canada where if you dare speak of the current international roots of terrorism you get dragged in front of a Human Rights Commission ( We&#039;ve read lots about the unreasonableness and incompetence of those groups in McLeans before)  to defend yourself on your own dollar while taxpayers pay the complainants bill.

All of the foregoing mean that the reader is less informed and that the media, as historically, a key defender of each citizens right to to know, think and express is increasingly being deminished.  The search for a new financial and operatiing model is required and I don&#039;t think the traditional media have solved such core issues.  Just saying, go to the interent, is too vague to be meaningful to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behind this action is the fact that newspapers, and the media in general, increasingly under financial stress.  This results in them not being able to obtain the breadth of coverage that major newspapers used to have.  They cannot afford to do do the real investigative journalism that provides meaningful insight.  They cannot afford to be controversial because they cannot defend frivolous lawsuites &#8211; especially in Canada where if you dare speak of the current international roots of terrorism you get dragged in front of a Human Rights Commission ( We&#8217;ve read lots about the unreasonableness and incompetence of those groups in McLeans before)  to defend yourself on your own dollar while taxpayers pay the complainants bill.</p>
<p>All of the foregoing mean that the reader is less informed and that the media, as historically, a key defender of each citizens right to to know, think and express is increasingly being deminished.  The search for a new financial and operatiing model is required and I don&#8217;t think the traditional media have solved such core issues.  Just saying, go to the interent, is too vague to be meaningful to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harper Rocks NAC</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-2/#comment-182585</link>
		<dc:creator>Harper Rocks NAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182585</guid>
		<description>Weird.  I hope the people who still think that the Post - owned by the heavily Liberal race hustling Asper family - is &quot;right wing&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; get the knack here and clue in.  They&#039;re hideously culturally Marxist and don&#039;t even bother concealing their hatred of white/Christian Canadians anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird.  I hope the people who still think that the Post &#8211; owned by the heavily Liberal race hustling Asper family &#8211; is &quot;right wing&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; get the knack here and clue in.  They&#039;re hideously culturally Marxist and don&#039;t even bother concealing their hatred of white/Christian Canadians anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill G.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-2/#comment-182584</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182584</guid>
		<description>Does this mean that Rex Murphy will write the sports column ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that Rex Murphy will write the sports column ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanStok</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182582</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanStok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182582</guid>
		<description>Source, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanStok</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182583</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanStok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182583</guid>
		<description>Source, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susann</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182581</link>
		<dc:creator>Susann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182581</guid>
		<description>Internal polling in 2006 had 92% of CBC Ottawa employees with voter intentions not allied with the Conservative party. I guess the rest were on paid sabbaticals and union renewal brainwashing retreats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internal polling in 2006 had 92% of CBC Ottawa employees with voter intentions not allied with the Conservative party. I guess the rest were on paid sabbaticals and union renewal brainwashing retreats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blame Crash</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-2/#comment-182580</link>
		<dc:creator>Blame Crash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182580</guid>
		<description>&quot; I love the smell of napalm in the morning, it smells like victory&quot;
Which brings us to the important question of who will be the napalmee, and who will be the napalmer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot; I love the smell of napalm in the morning, it smells like victory&quot;<br />
Which brings us to the important question of who will be the napalmee, and who will be the napalmer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bchunter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-2/#comment-182579</link>
		<dc:creator>bchunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182579</guid>
		<description>Robert MacLelland: The CBC is right wing, and left wing media is almost gone in this country?

How far left can you possibly get that the CBC looks right?  Enver Hoxha?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert MacLelland: The CBC is right wing, and left wing media is almost gone in this country?</p>
<p>How far left can you possibly get that the CBC looks right?  Enver Hoxha?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulesAime</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-2/#comment-182570</link>
		<dc:creator>JulesAime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182570</guid>
		<description>Where did the comments go? There were 52 of them just a while ago and now they have all disappeared?

Update: Never mind, they&#039;re back. For about fifteen minute sthere they wouldn&#039;t show up for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did the comments go? There were 52 of them just a while ago and now they have all disappeared?</p>
<p>Update: Never mind, they&#39;re back. For about fifteen minute sthere they wouldn&#39;t show up for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182578</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182578</guid>
		<description>infrigers was funnier.

lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>infrigers was funnier.</p>
<p>lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182577</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182577</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How will people know whether to cheer or boo news coverage from one of these websites?&lt;/i&gt;

By what the logo looks like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How will people know whether to cheer or boo news coverage from one of these websites?</i></p>
<p>By what the logo looks like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182568</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182568</guid>
		<description>Yes. Page 6, first paragraph sums it up nicely.

Apparently he&#039;s also made similar observations about Newsworld but I&#039;ve never seen that report.

The incident in which a CBC reporter was caught feeding questions to Liberal MP&#039;s was another clear indicator of bias, although to be fair they (the CBC) took action against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Page 6, first paragraph sums it up nicely.</p>
<p>Apparently he&#39;s also made similar observations about Newsworld but I&#39;ve never seen that report.</p>
<p>The incident in which a CBC reporter was caught feeding questions to Liberal MP&#39;s was another clear indicator of bias, although to be fair they (the CBC) took action against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigh</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182576</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182576</guid>
		<description>infringers. (sigh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>infringers. (sigh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigh</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182575</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182575</guid>
		<description>They had better watch out for VANOC. They&#039;re really big on going after Olympic trademark infrigers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had better watch out for VANOC. They&#039;re really big on going after Olympic trademark infrigers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tia</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182574</link>
		<dc:creator>tia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182574</guid>
		<description>we tried 10 years ago but the crtc is rather useless today regarding mergers........yeah, we should be screaming loudly but the fact is we are gutless to do anything about the Big C - and he knows it so he keeps pushing and pushing, disassembling cananda as we once knew it with our priveledges one wee bit at a time.  It started with Mr. mulrooney and the big C........and now global priority interests and big corporations all have a squeeze on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we tried 10 years ago but the crtc is rather useless today regarding mergers&#8230;&#8230;..yeah, we should be screaming loudly but the fact is we are gutless to do anything about the Big C &#8211; and he knows it so he keeps pushing and pushing, disassembling cananda as we once knew it with our priveledges one wee bit at a time.  It started with Mr. mulrooney and the big C&#8230;&#8230;..and now global priority interests and big corporations all have a squeeze on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tia</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182573</link>
		<dc:creator>tia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182573</guid>
		<description>my chuckel for today - bang on!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my chuckel for today &#8211; bang on!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tia</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182572</link>
		<dc:creator>Tia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182572</guid>
		<description>right on and so sad - another manipulation by the skilfull conservative Mr. Harper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right on and so sad &#8211; another manipulation by the skilfull conservative Mr. Harper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macleans</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-2/#comment-182571</link>
		<dc:creator>macleans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182571</guid>
		<description>Thank you, we will look into that issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, we will look into that issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanStok</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182569</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanStok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182569</guid>
		<description>Also, there was the Newsworld one involving Niel MacDonald&#039;s Palin reports, if I recall, and something to do with Mansbridge referencing &quot;reports&quot; that were in fact MacDonald&#039;s own.  (I don&#039;t have time to look it up right now!).

I&#039;m not sure that paints a picture of a corporation with a raging left bias, given that there&#039;s mechanisms to address complaints of such things.  But that said, I&#039;ve never much liked the platform they give Malick (it&#039;s not like there&#039;s a paucity of opinionated bloggers out there).

I just prefer precision over blanket claims.  I have a lot of trouble with the quality of their news these days, but my sense has generally been that they lean toward boring centrism, for the most part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, there was the Newsworld one involving Niel MacDonald&#039;s Palin reports, if I recall, and something to do with Mansbridge referencing &quot;reports&quot; that were in fact MacDonald&#039;s own.  (I don&#039;t have time to look it up right now!).</p>
<p>I&#039;m not sure that paints a picture of a corporation with a raging left bias, given that there&#039;s mechanisms to address complaints of such things.  But that said, I&#039;ve never much liked the platform they give Malick (it&#039;s not like there&#039;s a paucity of opinionated bloggers out there).</p>
<p>I just prefer precision over blanket claims.  I have a lot of trouble with the quality of their news these days, but my sense has generally been that they lean toward boring centrism, for the most part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182567</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182567</guid>
		<description>Yes.  Page 6, first paragraph sums it up nicely.

Apparently he&#039;s also made similar observations about Newsworld but I&#039;ve never seen that report.

The incident in which they were caught feeding questions to Liberal MP&#039;s was another clear indicator of bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  Page 6, first paragraph sums it up nicely.</p>
<p>Apparently he&#039;s also made similar observations about Newsworld but I&#039;ve never seen that report.</p>
<p>The incident in which they were caught feeding questions to Liberal MP&#039;s was another clear indicator of bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182566</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182566</guid>
		<description>Yes.  Page 6, first paragraph sums it up nicely.

Apparently he&#039;s also made similar observations about Newsworld but I&#039;ve never seen that report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  Page 6, first paragraph sums it up nicely.</p>
<p>Apparently he&#039;s also made similar observations about Newsworld but I&#039;ve never seen that report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182565</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182565</guid>
		<description>Yes.  Page 6, first paragraph sums it up nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  Page 6, first paragraph sums it up nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanStok</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182564</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanStok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182564</guid>
		<description>The one on Malick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one on Malick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182563</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182563</guid>
		<description>Their obudsman&#039;s report from last year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their obudsman&#039;s report from last year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182561</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182561</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;... a publicly funded broadcaster who has ... a self preserving interest in balanced reporting. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I think that&#039;s a contradiction in terms.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;While I&#039;m sure there are some who would disagree, I find the CBC to be pretty good at providing both sides of the issues. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Even the CBC&#039;s own ombudsman disagrees with you on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&quot;&#8230; a publicly funded broadcaster who has &#8230; a self preserving interest in balanced reporting. &quot;</i></p>
<p>I think that&#039;s a contradiction in terms.</p>
<p><i>&quot;While I&#039;m sure there are some who would disagree, I find the CBC to be pretty good at providing both sides of the issues. &quot;</i></p>
<p>Even the CBC&#039;s own ombudsman disagrees with you on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182562</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182562</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;... a publicly funded broadcaster who has ... a self preserving interest in balanced reporting. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I think that&#039;s a contradiction in terms.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;While I&#039;m sure there are some who would disagree, I find the CBC to be pretty good at providing both sides of the issues. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Even the CBC&#039;s own ombusdman disagrees with you on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&quot;&#8230; a publicly funded broadcaster who has &#8230; a self preserving interest in balanced reporting. &quot;</i></p>
<p>I think that&#039;s a contradiction in terms.</p>
<p><i>&quot;While I&#039;m sure there are some who would disagree, I find the CBC to be pretty good at providing both sides of the issues. &quot;</i></p>
<p>Even the CBC&#039;s own ombusdman disagrees with you on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182560</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182560</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;... a publicly funded broadcaster who has ... a self preserving interest in balanced reporting. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I think that&#039;a contradiction in terms.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;While I&#039;m sure there are some who would disagree, I find the CBC to be pretty good at providing both sides of the issues. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Even the CBC&#039;s own ombusdman disagrees with you on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&quot;&#8230; a publicly funded broadcaster who has &#8230; a self preserving interest in balanced reporting. &quot;</i></p>
<p>I think that&#039;a contradiction in terms.</p>
<p><i>&quot;While I&#039;m sure there are some who would disagree, I find the CBC to be pretty good at providing both sides of the issues. &quot;</i></p>
<p>Even the CBC&#039;s own ombusdman disagrees with you on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182559</guid>
		<description>Not too surprising that the financial side of the left wing CBC is being replaced. How many socialists would you take financial advice from?

Invest in tin foil (makes nice hats) and anything green!

But they do a bang up job of hockey coverage.

Now if only the news portion of the CBC could be replaced, the Liberals would actually have to start paying for their propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too surprising that the financial side of the left wing CBC is being replaced. How many socialists would you take financial advice from?</p>
<p>Invest in tin foil (makes nice hats) and anything green!</p>
<p>But they do a bang up job of hockey coverage.</p>
<p>Now if only the news portion of the CBC could be replaced, the Liberals would actually have to start paying for their propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182558</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182558</guid>
		<description>But how else would the Liberals get all the free cheerleading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how else would the Liberals get all the free cheerleading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182557</link>
		<dc:creator>John W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182557</guid>
		<description>So it looks like the Harper/Giorno gang are heading for a majority. They&#039;ll take a serious run at dismantling or selling off the CBC. They&#039;ll pack the CRTC with right wing sympathizers.
Is this a brilliant poison pill move by the CBC to avoid being split up and sold, or a brilliant move by the Post to end up with the CBC assets? Both??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it looks like the Harper/Giorno gang are heading for a majority. They&#039;ll take a serious run at dismantling or selling off the CBC. They&#039;ll pack the CRTC with right wing sympathizers.<br />
Is this a brilliant poison pill move by the CBC to avoid being split up and sold, or a brilliant move by the Post to end up with the CBC assets? Both??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OntarioTown</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182556</link>
		<dc:creator>OntarioTown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182556</guid>
		<description>I think media influence should be discussed at the next forum - Macleans/Coyne/Wells and guest participants

The first one was excellent, but I wonder if they&#039;d dare go into that and our lost democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think media influence should be discussed at the next forum &#8211; Macleans/Coyne/Wells and guest participants</p>
<p>The first one was excellent, but I wonder if they&#039;d dare go into that and our lost democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OntarioTown</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182555</link>
		<dc:creator>OntarioTown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182555</guid>
		<description>Explains the constant attack on the Libs.........funding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explains the constant attack on the Libs&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;funding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SisyphusThis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182554</link>
		<dc:creator>SisyphusThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182554</guid>
		<description>The CBC has been like a whipped cur whimpering in the corner ever since the Mulroney Gang
started snarling at it in the 80&#039;s.
Left wing indeed ... like all those flaming radicals on the only political show it has .. At Issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CBC has been like a whipped cur whimpering in the corner ever since the Mulroney Gang<br />
started snarling at it in the 80&#039;s.<br />
Left wing indeed &#8230; like all those flaming radicals on the only political show it has .. At Issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SisyphusThis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182553</link>
		<dc:creator>SisyphusThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182553</guid>
		<description>Like Ron Collister and Peter Kent and the sibling Scud Stud ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Ron Collister and Peter Kent and the sibling Scud Stud ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulesAime</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182552</link>
		<dc:creator>JulesAime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182552</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t you being a little quick identify liberalism with the Trudeau vision? Trudeau pushed a particular kind of liberalism and currently the Trudeauites can&#039;t even be sure of prevailing in their own party.

As to traditional liberal values (is there some reason you needed to put that in scare quotes?) why certainly but every single party currently upholds liberal values in that broader sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#039;t you being a little quick identify liberalism with the Trudeau vision? Trudeau pushed a particular kind of liberalism and currently the Trudeauites can&#039;t even be sure of prevailing in their own party.</p>
<p>As to traditional liberal values (is there some reason you needed to put that in scare quotes?) why certainly but every single party currently upholds liberal values in that broader sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YYZ</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182551</link>
		<dc:creator>YYZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182551</guid>
		<description>On this point I agree with you completely.  In fact, it&#039;s 10x worse in the US.  The Americans will HAVE to raise taxes but no politician is even allowed to talk about it.

To be fair on the tax debate, the left side constantly advocates for raising corporate taxes but not small business or personal as though corporate taxes don&#039;t have an impact on jobs and prices.  The right acts like all tax any tax no matter what is evil.  Neither of these positions are helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this point I agree with you completely.  In fact, it&#039;s 10x worse in the US.  The Americans will HAVE to raise taxes but no politician is even allowed to talk about it.</p>
<p>To be fair on the tax debate, the left side constantly advocates for raising corporate taxes but not small business or personal as though corporate taxes don&#039;t have an impact on jobs and prices.  The right acts like all tax any tax no matter what is evil.  Neither of these positions are helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulletaur</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182550</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulletaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182550</guid>
		<description>Mainly blue, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mainly blue, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulletaur</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182549</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulletaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182549</guid>
		<description>This is going to be like the fusion of Neo with Agent Smith. Too funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be like the fusion of Neo with Agent Smith. Too funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulletaur</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182548</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulletaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182548</guid>
		<description>Um, the number of former employees who have run as NDP candidates, for example ? Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, the number of former employees who have run as NDP candidates, for example ? Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182547</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182547</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;... how will people know whether to cheer or boo news coverage from one of these websites?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Easy, we&#039;ll look to see whether the coverage continues to be biased or not, and boo or cheer accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&quot;&#8230; how will people know whether to cheer or boo news coverage from one of these websites?&quot;</i></p>
<p>Easy, we&#039;ll look to see whether the coverage continues to be biased or not, and boo or cheer accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182546</link>
		<dc:creator>wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182546</guid>
		<description>Of course! the C in CBC stands for Conservative.....that sneaky Harper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course! the C in CBC stands for Conservative&#8230;..that sneaky Harper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOL</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/comment-page-1/#comment-182545</link>
		<dc:creator>KOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#comment-182545</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if CanWest or the NP receive government subsidies but they are certainly dependent on the government inasmuch as they are dependent on advertising revenue.  Major media outlets like CanWest have received millions of dollars in government advertising money in the last two years thanks to the Economic Action! Plan and other government communication campaigns.

I believe the federal government now spends more on advertising than ever before, or at least since the Charlottetown Accord period (I wish a journalist would look into that).  A cynic might conclude that this advertising is really the bailout CanWest and Quebecor were seeking a few months ago, as well as self-serving government propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know if CanWest or the NP receive government subsidies but they are certainly dependent on the government inasmuch as they are dependent on advertising revenue.  Major media outlets like CanWest have received millions of dollars in government advertising money in the last two years thanks to the Economic Action! Plan and other government communication campaigns.</p>
<p>I believe the federal government now spends more on advertising than ever before, or at least since the Charlottetown Accord period (I wish a journalist would look into that).  A cynic might conclude that this advertising is really the bailout CanWest and Quebecor were seeking a few months ago, as well as self-serving government propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

