Deux Maudits Anglais

Deux Maudits Anglais

Deux Maudits Anglais

Martin Patriquin and Philippe Gohier dissect the latest out of Quebec. Follow Philippe on Twitter: @pgohier

Liberal Cheque Mates UPDATED

by Martin Patriquin on Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:45pm - 180 Comments

A propos of absolutely nothing, I swear, here are a few choice pictures of Liberals with giant cheques, from the recent past.

And before anyone accuses this corner of Conservative counter-hackery, let me say this: to hell with the two of them. A pox on both houses. I vote only for one party–at least they’re honest–and will only say this: this kind of holier-than-thou name-calling is the reason good people stop caring enough to vote. Get back to work, the two of you*.

Here’s Richmond Hill MP Bryon Wilfert with a big cheque. “There is no comparison with the Conservatives,” Wilfert told Maclean’s. “No one is trying to pass this off as Liberal money. End of discussion.” (Not quite. See * below.)

Bryon

Here’s Malpeque, PEI MP Wayne “Stephen Harper has done everything that he once criticized” Easter, giving a real Government of Canada cheque to a local PEI businessman in 1998.

muscheque

Here’s Scarborough Guildwood MP John Mckay with big cheque. Found on his own website.

JohnMackay

York West MP Judy Sgro, handing over a surprisingly cheque-like piece of cardboard–without any Government of Canada markings at all. Her office didn’t respond to requests for comment.

2sgro4

Last but never least, Scarborough-Agincourt MP Jim Karygiannis. “Cheques like that have been delivered since parliament was invented,” he told Maclean’s. Exactly!

P1010020

*Oh, and to anyone who says, Well, yes, but at least the Liberals didn’t have the gall to put their names or party affiliation on these oversized cheques, I say this: most of the pictures of ‘Conservative partisan cheques’ wafting out of the Liberal fold are no different from the ones above, in that they are run of the mill political grip-and-grin photo ops. Also, remember this little ditty: Quebec Liberal MP Claude Droin once helped a local college obtain a $5,600 scholarship, and the college repaid him in kind by stamping his name on a plaque. Little more permanent than a novelty cheque, no?

And don’t get anyone started on Alphonso Gagliano. Surely the erstwhile Public Works Cabmin didn’t spend $6,800 of sponsorship money–earmarked, lest we forget, to promote the Federal Government in Quebec–on a “Piazza Canada” plaque… in San Martino, Italy?

He did? Oh.

UPDATE: This is exactly what I’m talking about. The Liberal whatever-room just put out a media release entitled “181 partisan cheques is not an isolated incident”. Among the purported Conservative partisan atrocities is the one below, with Jim Flaherty. Take note: there is no Conservative logo and no Jim Flahery signature, just a grinning Jim Flaherty holding a big piece of cardboard with three other stunned-looking people. Yes, there are some flagrant indulgences in there (You there, Larry Miller, take a bow), but overall the so-called ‘partisan cheques’ are just examples of plain, everyday politicking identical to the (Liberal) pictures above.

4015033394_6a67244247

Bookmark and Share
  • knick

    If the opposition parties hadn't drawn attention to the 'Conservative' cheques, it would only be a matter of time until the practice of labelling everything the government sends out as Conservative would be accepted as standard practice.
    Don Martin calls it "The pursuit of unethical equivalency"
    http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/st…
    I'm glad that somebody in the media gets it.

    • Style

      But these cheques are already standard practice – the Liberals are just pretending it's illegal because the Tories are doing it instead of them. The New Democrats should be making this point clearly and demonstrating that their approach is different.

    • knick

      NP has now changed that heading to: "Tories using Grit playbook they once decried". Puts a somewhat different spin on the story.

  • geo

    Gee with all these cheques being handed out,
    why are the Libs complaining about the stimulus money not getting to the people?

    I bet the Libs are ticked they didn't do pictures and cardboard cheques for the $100 million
    that went missing during the Adscam days,or maybe that was a good thing they didn't.

    • Lord Kitchener's Own

      Gee with all these cheques being handed out, why are the Libs complaining about the stimulus money not getting to the people?

      As several people have pointed out, those aren't really cheques. A picture of an MP with a giant novelty cheque is not proof that the person standing next to the MP has actually received any money from the federal government yet.

  • Garbage Catcher

    Response to your upate:

    The Cheque is signed by Harper. Since when did Harper dole out the funds himself? Isn't there a Treasury or something for that purpose?

  • knick

    By 'these cheques are already standard practice' do you mean government cheques that have a prominent party logo and/or are signed by MPs? Which Liberals have said that they are 'illegal'? The point the NDP are making is the one they should be making – party branding of government cheques is unethical.

  • David Cadogan

    You deliberately tried to mislead us with the pretense that presenting a government cheque with a government logo is the same thing as presenting a government cheque with a party logo. Not only are you dishonest but you insult us by thinking we would be stupid enough to fall for it. Shame on you!

  • Style

    Absolutely cheques that are signed by MPs are within the rules. The two from Keddy that have the logo might be outside the rules. Warren Kinsella said on CTV "Tim, buddy, it's against the law" after flipping through a batch of photos that showed cheques that complied with the rules. The New Democrats should call both parties out here – for the photo ops and for silly games like Kinsella's.

  • knick

    It seems that the Harper gang still don't get what has so many Canadians outraged:

    "Say you're looking for information from your federal government about the economic-stimulus plan. You go to the government's website. . .click on the YouTube link on the top corner, and you can be serenaded by Stephen Harper, singing a Beatles tune at the National Arts Centre."
    http://www.actionplan.gc.ca/eng/index.asp

    http://thestar.blogs.com/politics/2009/10/sing-to…

  • d craig

    cmon people use your heads.. these arent really cheques .they are photo ops…a tradition in politics..here look at what I AM DOING just for you..

  • Mike514

    The CBC has a headline today:

    "Harper gives $3M for Toronto library renovations."

    Hey, shouldn't that say "Gov't of Canada"? Is this an example of more partisan games?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

      Just about every headline writer at one point has said:

      "Ottawa pledges billions to [provinces] / [military] / [puppies & orphans]"

      Such atrocious municipal favoritism in assigning credit…

  • Andy Kanata

    The reason we don't see many Liberal cheques with logos or signatures is that the money they shelled out was often delivered in brown envelopes under the table.

  • Style

    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/660206

    "Treasury Board looked at the cheques this week, and spokesman Robert Makichuk said there is nothing in the formal identity policy "that would prohibit the use of a prop cheque" containing the Canada logo or Conservative slogans."

    Ted quoted it a few days ago.

  • Jim Kane

    What an outrageous article. There is no Liberal Party of Canada logo on any of these cheques. Mclean's should not try and "spin" the heat away from the present government on their unethical behaviour.

  • Lulu

    If all the energy expended on this ridiculous "cheque" crap was redirected
    maybe you all could tackle a subject with some "meat" to it. For example the outlandish and sick Sponsorship regulation in the immigration act?
    Bringing in all the oldies from abroad to suck our seniors resources dry?
    How about chewing up section 15 (free speech) in the Human rights Act?
    "Arms length" gov't depts cash cow for the bureaucrats (and cronies)?
    Come on people. You can do it.

  • maudie

    Whoops, that should be "hockey sweater." But maybe they're also planning a CPC whoopee cushion.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/CanadianSense CanadianSense

    Impressive Jen,

    voters are stupid because we don't want an election (Liberals keep threatening) and Pollsters capture it?

    We are stupid because in 10 months the Liberal Party and the "great thinker" won't give us any details until 5 days before the writ is dropped?

    Jen stop blaming "us" for not trusting the Liberal Party "speeches" as gospel. In the 1990's we lived through those cuts in Health, Education, Social Services ($ 25 Billion) and bragging rights about balancing the Federal Books on the EI ( $ 56 Billion).
    We remember the broken promises and the decisions they took. In 2008 they tried a Carbon Tax (Green Shift). Worst result in over 100 years in POP.

    Now the "Great thinker" and his advisors are terrified to have an "adult conversation" because the CPC will steal or destroy the idea?

    25% is NOT the floor, trust me. The Liberals are busy chasing wafers, unsexy comments, bodybags, olympic logos, and now Novelty cheques (FIP violation)!

    Don't blame the voters or the public for the decisions of the Liberal Party.

  • Barry Whiteley

    You can change a government, but you can't change the LIES !

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    Top of webpage says: 154 comments.

    Bottom of webpage says: There are no comments posted yet. Be the first one!

    So here I am wondering what might happen to THIS first / one-hundred-fifty-fifth comment.

    *waves impotent fist in general direction of Intense Debate gremlins*

  • WhoCares

    Like most things in Politics:
    This is not a Liberal vs Conservative problem, but rather how our Political system is operating. Get rid of them both.

  • Sonny and Cher

    Here's the difference I see:

    Conservatives (cheques)- publicly handing out stimulus money the Government of Canada approved.

    Liberals (adscam) – secretly handing out kick-back money the Government of Canada didn't approve.

    Cheque-mate indeed.

  • Thumper

    This is something one would expect from the liberals. I had hoped the Conservatives were above it.

  • bryan fraser

    Last yr the Liberal Party of Ontario changed the Ontario Trillium Logo, This caused quite a flap. Why ?
    Because the Ontario Trillium logo became the same as the Ontario Liberal Party Logo!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/TwoYen TwoYen

      Hmm…I wonder if David McGuinty knows? He's been out bashing Tories lately.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jenn_ Jenn_

        The emblem change was done in 2006, has stylized people in it, and looks nothing at all like the little trillium in a red square that dots the "i" in Liberal–although the thing is so small it's hard to tell. That is the only trillium of any kind that I could find on the Ontario Liberal website, and frankly it looks more like a propeller than a trillium.

        I must say I love the new design, especially when viewed with the old design, which looks more like a clumsy Spirograph effort to me now. That said, I always think things like this are a waste of money. Or to be more precise, I never think we are rich enough to spend our money on things like this.

  • Steve

    really? you did not just write that article -
    there is no comparison – those cheques don't have the Liberal logo on it – I would expect more responsible reporting from Maclean's

  • Carl

    The Lei-berals didn't have that many cheques to had out. They simply funneled the money in the form of cash to party hacks and back into the Lie-beral bank accounts.

  • Mars

    First off– Iggy–wants powers so badly– he can hardly breath–without it!!!! It's time he called the election–or got off the "pot"!!! He has nothing–no convictions-policies–platforms etc.– so what does he staND FOR? ALL HE STANDS FOR– IS LOOKING FOR "WRONG DOING "IN OTHER TENts. Besides –what's wrong with the logos on the cheques??? It's–whatever Government is in power –at the time of giving–is giving the chegues —compre!!!! If that's how he spends his time– looking for other parties mistakes–help us all- if he ever gets into power!!!

  • Barney

    Look up the word, "Government". Do U see 'Surplus, deficit, or even "We set OUR own wages" ! They run Canada like a business, but when it comes to them screwing-up, "Why can't we just Fire them right now" ? No, we HAVE to wait 4 years of political mistakes,("Their OOPPS", by the way, WE have to pay for, NOT them).
    Finally, "People should NOT be afraid of governments, governments should be afraid of the people" !!!

From Macleans