Is there a future for Canadian TV?

After Canwest’s fall, stations are searching for salvation

by Jason Kirby on Monday, October 19, 2009 11:20am - 18 Comments

A similar approach is under way in Hamilton, where Channel Zero has overhauled CHCH, formerly part of Canwest’s failed E! network. Cal Millar, Channel Zero’s president, says the highest ratings at the station have always come from news, so the station has added 15 new jobs and broadcasts live from 5:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. Then, during the evenings, CHCH becomes a movie channel featuring what Millar calls “comfortable favourites”—popular movies from the last five to 20 years. In short, both CHCH and CHEK believe there’s a large enough number of viewers willing to re-watch movies they may already have seen and enjoyed to make a business out of it.

This isn’t to say the two stations have stumbled upon a magical fix for the industry. It will take time before either can show clear results. Nor will a hyper-local model necessarily be the right fit for those considering a run at Canwest’s remaining conventional stations. A lot will depend on who does the buying. For one thing, there’s a chance the company’s creditors will decide to hold on to the stations themselves, at least until the economy improves, says Christopher Waddell, director of the School of Journalism at Carleton University. And if a single buyer can’t be found for the whole lot, creditors might decide to sell them one at a time to avoid flooding the market.

Canwest’s lenders might also wait to see how the CRTC rules on a highly public dispute between broadcasters and TV service providers. Canwest, CTV and Global want cable and satellite providers to pay to carry their network signals, which are now picked up for free, while the cable companies have fought back, saying any fees would amount to a bailout on the backs of TV viewers.

Amid all that, several names are floating around as potential buyers. Specialty TV providers like Corus Entertainment or Astral Media, both of which would be eager bidders if Canwest sells its own basket of specialty channels, might jump in if they could get the conventional stations at “fire sale prices,” says Sawyer. “It wouldn’t be part of their 10-year corporate success strategy, but they could run them for a few years and make some profit.”

Meanwhile, Onex Corp., whose CEO Gerry Schwartz was an early partner to Izzy Asper, has been suggested. So too have other wealthy individuals in cities across the country, such as Jimmy Pattison in Vancouver, who already owns three small-market stations in B.C. and Alberta. Other private investment funds have also poked around in the industry. Bluepoint Investments considered buying a CTV station in Brandon, Man., last month, but backed out at the last minute.

Waddell says the current economic and media climate offers huge risks, as well as potential returns for anyone bold enough to step up. “This isn’t really the time for people who don’t know anything about the media to suddenly decide they want to become media moguls,” he says. Still, he adds, investment funds could team up with smart media executives to explore new broadcast models. “There is a great opportunity for anyone with a sense of innovation who’s willing to take some risks to experiment.”

One thing is certain: almost any combination of deals will be certain to brush up against the CRTC’s Byzantine media ownership rules, not to mention the sensibilities of nationalists. The regulator’s foreign ownership restrictions all but guarantee the same old names will likely be at the table, while its policies aimed at curbing media concentration will mean other potential bidders such as Rogers, which owns CityTV stations in some major markets, might be shut out.

But as Canwest struggles through its restructuring, and the TV industry battles to remain relevant, perhaps it’s worth taking a page from history, say media watchers like David Tucker, at Ryerson University’s School of Radio and Television. When many of these very stations were launched, they were said to be the death of movie theatres. And in the same way TV and the movies instead came to exist lucratively side by side, media watchers say it’s too soon to write off conventional TV. “There’s a lot of hand-wringing out there, and it will take time to settle out,” Tucker says. “But a new era is going to arise.” It’s just that, for now, the picture is too fuzzy to make out.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/novagardener novagardener

    I resent having to pay for a 4 package deal from the Cable companies because I'm only interested in 1 station. I'm disgusted with the CRTC. But, I don't watch CTV news as I detest Canwest's monopoly of the news in Canada. IIRC, many journalists from the Daily News quit in protest because Canwest management decided to only allow 'political' news from head office. The Daily News went under. Its sad that the CRTC permitted such media control by one conglomerate. I'll be glad to see their demise.

    • Guest

      FYI – CTV news has nothing to do with Canwest, they are different companies.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/novagardener novagardener

        OOps – are they Global, I forget?

        • London, On

          CTV is owned by CTV Globemedia which is owned by Bell which is quite possibly the person selling you your cable subscription.
          Global was owned by Canwest.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

    The CRTC is a network unto itself.They push and push for Canadian content, and I myself watch very little.It's so terrible to watch, hokey and cheap at best.I am also tired of rogers downloading everything to moi

  • Louie the Lilp

    Sad, but the reality is despite protestations to the contrary, people like American television, Small towns have felt the affects of centalization for years and now, despite being fairly large urban areas, the country is finding out just how small we are in the economic scheme of things. CBC should be allowed to fail, but, where would we get our Governor Generals??? The CRTC should join Senators on the slag heap.

  • Rob

    The news offered by Global is irrelevent to our daily lives and generally non informative to critical issues. If Macleans had a TV news station I bet they would be a bit more successful than Canwest Global

    • Guest

      Almost anyone could be a bit more successful than Canwest Global…. Globals biggest problem is their debt. Global went shopping and spent too much.

    • http://apatheticconfessional.com C.Blues

      Yeah, weather and traffic aren't needed by anyone.

      Nor is the crime beat. I'll decide how nice the weather is out there and I'll decide where to go for a walk and which neighboorhoods to stay in.

    • London, On

      Quite possibly. If they asked for help from their parent company…Rogers…who happens to specialize in local media and news for investment.

  • Fred – Brandon MB

    Canwest's demise is only partly due to its decision to finance expansion with debt.

    It is also due, in part, to the changing marketplace. Times are tougher for local stations and the CRTC hasn't responded. TV isn't a free market place, it is a regulated industry, and the regulations have tipped the scales away from local stations and in favour of cable & sattelite companies.

    It is high time that the CRTC evened the playing field by making cable companies carry and pay for local channels, but having their basic fees controlled so that they don;'t simply pass the cost on to the consumer.

    Here in Brandon we have witnessed first hand the folly of the CRTC's inaction. CKX TV is gone, and lost is more than just some local programming. Some of the prominent TV personalities of today had their start at CKX. It was also able to partner with the local community college to offer a broadcasting certificate.

  • Fred – Brandon MB

    The ability to get real experience at a real TV station is gone, and that program is likely dead. The larger stations, and the cable networks will find it harder to recruit talent as the local stations disappear. They will also find themselves bearing more of the cost of training and developing talent in the future.

    To ignore or dismiss the demise of CKX TV is pure folly, as silly as dismissing the melting of polar ice caps. The damage will be far-reaching.

  • guest

    “This isn’t really the time for people who don’t know anything about the media to suddenly decide they want to become media moguls,”
    Maybe this is the perfect time for people who don't know anything about the media to become media moguls. The current crop of media moguls sure don't know what's going on. Nobody knows what the future holds for TV, so the time is ripe for a visionary.

    • Jared

      I agree, however, this may be the perfect for people with no knowledge of the media to decide they want to becoma a media mogul, but the truth is that the local cable TV companies can not keep up with already existing media moguls such as Shaw. These media bigwigs will just knock local TV stations out of the game, no problem. Many people realise this and are too intimidated to start their own station for fear that they will also get shot down just like CKX TV.

  • Manny

    Yes, Canadian TV has a future, but only without the CBC.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    How can there not be a future for Canadian TV? Why, they have put their heads together and got the United-breaks-guitars guys to dress up in a cow costume!

    Now there's your Canadian programming right there, I tells ya.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SaveINGca SaveINGca

    and I'm still outraged at the CRTC's use of "local programming fund" to fund USA stations… geezz

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/LaurelRusswurm LaurelRusswurm

    I applaud the folks at CHEK-TV for taking on their own station. There is no reason why local programming shouldn't work. For all the cries of "Local Programming Matters" there hasn't been any real local programming in Canada in fifty years. The networks ran things by remote control which is why they had no trouble flipping the switch on the little stations during tough economic times.

    I would suggest that they contact their local community college and perhaps even high school to and look into co-op and/or apprenticeship programs. In the early days of radio and then TV, stations created their own content cheaply by providing a forum for local talent.

    Check the local music scene, maybe comedy shops, or community theatre. Early TV filmed stage plays for broadcast. Passe? Last year the Stratford Festival's production of "Caesar and Cleopatra" was videotaped as a stage play and subsequently projected for high prices in a limited movie theatre run.

    Thanks to the possibility of internet distribution, for the first time in decades it is possible for Canadian musical acts to make a career for themselves without attracting big (read american) record labels. The technology has made it possible for them to make and distribute their own stuff. Which should make it easier to both find and promote local music (and visiting acts) on deeply low budget tv shows as in days of yore.

    Canadian culture could well be coming into its own right now thanks to the modern technologies. Small local stations like this would do well to take advantage.

    CRTC has long profoundly failed both the Canadian music and tv worlds, and currently they are doing their best to offer up the internet to Bell Canada's control with rulings designed to condemn the independent ISPs to oblivion. As well, the impending implementation of Usage Based Billing will double the cost of Canadian internet access for the exact same substandard service we get now. http://stopusagebasedbilling.wordpress.com/

    Sign the petition at http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/

From Macleans