<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Commons: And so we come full circle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192891</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192891</guid>
		<description>Again &quot;Just a Small Detail.. CBC contacted the office of Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt to ask about the lobbyist who helped organize a fundraiser on her behalf on Sept. 24. Michael B. McSweeney is vice-president of the Cement Association of Canada. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009...&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009...&lt;/a&gt;

and is this now also related to the Quebec corruptions scandals going on presently as well.. after all some of of the biggest cement companies are in Montreal.. Lafarge Cement included.. and is this why the Conservative federal government does not want to get into Quebec&#039;s legal affairs too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again &quot;Just a Small Detail.. CBC contacted the office of Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt to ask about the lobbyist who helped organize a fundraiser on her behalf on Sept. 24. Michael B. McSweeney is vice-president of the Cement Association of Canada. <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009..." target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009&#8230;</a></p>
<p>and is this now also related to the Quebec corruptions scandals going on presently as well.. after all some of of the biggest cement companies are in Montreal.. Lafarge Cement included.. and is this why the Conservative federal government does not want to get into Quebec&#039;s legal affairs too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted 999</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192890</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted 999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192890</guid>
		<description>Your right. They don&#039;t want to talk about it because they&#039;re afraid people will find out.  visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fakeactionplan.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.fakeactionplan.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right. They don&#039;t want to talk about it because they&#039;re afraid people will find out.  visit <a href="http://www.fakeactionplan.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.fakeactionplan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192889</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192889</guid>
		<description>Thanks, guys -- good to be back.  I&#039;ll keep up the Argentinian analogies, by way of after-the-fact reportage, until someone gently tells me to stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, guys &#8212; good to be back.  I&#039;ll keep up the Argentinian analogies, by way of after-the-fact reportage, until someone gently tells me to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frenchie101</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192888</link>
		<dc:creator>frenchie101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192888</guid>
		<description>Hypocrisy thy name is Chretien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypocrisy thy name is Chretien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192887</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192887</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.   I just wanted to highlight that a lot of Liberals are keen to hammer Conservatives on their hypocrisy, but were themselves quite hypocritical in the first place.  Sort of hypocrisy-squared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.   I just wanted to highlight that a lot of Liberals are keen to hammer Conservatives on their hypocrisy, but were themselves quite hypocritical in the first place.  Sort of hypocrisy-squared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Stick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192886</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192886</guid>
		<description>I am not a Liberal or a member of any party, and have voted for many different parties.  I don&#039;t like Ignatieff all that much, etiher.

But as an Albertan and a Canadian, I have only contempt for Harper, who is the worst PM in living memory, worse even than Mulroney.  Harper betrays Canada and Canadians every chance he gets and our children will suffer for the bad decisions that meanspirited prick makes today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a Liberal or a member of any party, and have voted for many different parties.  I don&#039;t like Ignatieff all that much, etiher.</p>
<p>But as an Albertan and a Canadian, I have only contempt for Harper, who is the worst PM in living memory, worse even than Mulroney.  Harper betrays Canada and Canadians every chance he gets and our children will suffer for the bad decisions that meanspirited prick makes today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJR79</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192884</link>
		<dc:creator>AJR79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192884</guid>
		<description>Many of us find the ole Conbot/Fiberal type language just as endearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us find the ole Conbot/Fiberal type language just as endearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJR79</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192885</link>
		<dc:creator>AJR79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192885</guid>
		<description>Many of us find the ole Conbot/Fiberal type language just as endearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us find the ole Conbot/Fiberal type language just as endearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sea Otter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192883</link>
		<dc:creator>Sea Otter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192883</guid>
		<description>I was just going to say that there is a lady in Alberta named Danielle Smith who might disagree with this assessment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just going to say that there is a lady in Alberta named Danielle Smith who might disagree with this assessment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192882</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192882</guid>
		<description>Gaunilon, that was brilliant.  Well done!

The only point I might make in defence (the rest is bang on, LOL) is that a whole lot of us who are Liberals now, did not vote for the Liberal Party on their next opportunity after the sponsorship scandal came to light.  I speak for myself, yes, but I&#039;m betting I speak for a number of others around here as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaunilon, that was brilliant.  Well done!</p>
<p>The only point I might make in defence (the rest is bang on, LOL) is that a whole lot of us who are Liberals now, did not vote for the Liberal Party on their next opportunity after the sponsorship scandal came to light.  I speak for myself, yes, but I&#039;m betting I speak for a number of others around here as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192881</link>
		<dc:creator>knick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192881</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that the same strategy employed by fraudsters like Madoff, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#039;t that the same strategy employed by fraudsters like Madoff, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IntenseAlex</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192880</link>
		<dc:creator>IntenseAlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192880</guid>
		<description>Good to see you&#039;re back, Jack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you&#039;re back, Jack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thwim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192879</link>
		<dc:creator>Thwim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192879</guid>
		<description>Heh. Shall I change it to &quot;observing&quot; for you next time?
Although those little arrows could be clearer, I&#039;ll admit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. Shall I change it to &quot;observing&quot; for you next time?<br />
Although those little arrows could be clearer, I&#039;ll admit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frenchie101</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192878</link>
		<dc:creator>frenchie101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192878</guid>
		<description>Ahh seeing JC get this award makes me gag.Lord black and he make good companinions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh seeing JC get this award makes me gag.Lord black and he make good companinions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192877</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192877</guid>
		<description>Does this mean the Liberals now think Harper is awesome?  I&#039;ll remind you all of the various justifications:

(1) Yes he&#039;s corrupt, but they&#039;re all corrupt!
(2) A smart slippery PM is exactly what this country needs.  Naive twits like the Opposition could never govern effectively.
(3) Better to elect the devil you know than gamble on the one you don&#039;t!
(4) Yes he&#039;ll misuse taxpayer money and bribe his friends, but at least nothing will get done federally and that&#039;s a good thing!
(5) We don&#039;t care, we like him.
(6) Doesn&#039;t matter what he&#039;s like, we vote Conservative &#039;cause it&#039;s Canada&#039;s Natural Governing Party.
(7) Who cares about corruption.  He looks Prime Ministerial.  Have you seen those backwoods dweebs in the Opposition?
(8) Peter Mansbridge likes him, and news anchors know everything so he must be ok.

Let me also remind everyone that what we have here so far are (a) some disturbing allegations from the Liberals, (b) a lack of openness from the Conservatives to clear things up, and (c) an idiotic statement by Baird.  That is a far cry, as yet, from proven misuse of public money on a grand scale...which is what Chretien&#039;s Liberals left us as their legacy.

So yes, if the CPC is frantically funneling these fantastic funds to CPC ridings, they should face the music.  I&#039;m guessing though that all those on this board who are shocked, &lt;i&gt;shocked&lt;/i&gt; I tell you, at the (alleged) shenanigans were Liberal voters both before and after Chretien&#039;s Shawinigate and Adscam peccadilloes came to light - and by &quot;came to light&quot; I mean &quot;became known facts&quot;, not &quot;were alleged by members of the Opposition&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean the Liberals now think Harper is awesome?  I&#039;ll remind you all of the various justifications:</p>
<p>(1) Yes he&#039;s corrupt, but they&#039;re all corrupt!<br />
(2) A smart slippery PM is exactly what this country needs.  Naive twits like the Opposition could never govern effectively.<br />
(3) Better to elect the devil you know than gamble on the one you don&#039;t!<br />
(4) Yes he&#039;ll misuse taxpayer money and bribe his friends, but at least nothing will get done federally and that&#039;s a good thing!<br />
(5) We don&#039;t care, we like him.<br />
(6) Doesn&#039;t matter what he&#039;s like, we vote Conservative &#039;cause it&#039;s Canada&#039;s Natural Governing Party.<br />
(7) Who cares about corruption.  He looks Prime Ministerial.  Have you seen those backwoods dweebs in the Opposition?<br />
(8) Peter Mansbridge likes him, and news anchors know everything so he must be ok.</p>
<p>Let me also remind everyone that what we have here so far are (a) some disturbing allegations from the Liberals, (b) a lack of openness from the Conservatives to clear things up, and (c) an idiotic statement by Baird.  That is a far cry, as yet, from proven misuse of public money on a grand scale&#8230;which is what Chretien&#039;s Liberals left us as their legacy.</p>
<p>So yes, if the CPC is frantically funneling these fantastic funds to CPC ridings, they should face the music.  I&#039;m guessing though that all those on this board who are shocked, <i>shocked</i> I tell you, at the (alleged) shenanigans were Liberal voters both before and after Chretien&#039;s Shawinigate and Adscam peccadilloes came to light &#8211; and by &quot;came to light&quot; I mean &quot;became known facts&quot;, not &quot;were alleged by members of the Opposition&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192876</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192876</guid>
		<description>Does this mean the Liberals now think Harper is awesome?  I&#039;ll remind you all of the various justifications:

(1) Yes he&#039;s corrupt, but they&#039;re all corrupt!
(2) A smart slippery PM is exactly what this country needs.  Naive twits like the Opposition could never govern effectively.
(3) Better to elect the devil you know than gamble on the one you don&#039;t!
(4) Yes he&#039;ll misuse taxpayer money and bribe his friends, but at least nothing will get done federally and that&#039;s a good thing!
(5) We don&#039;t care, we like him.
(6) Doesn&#039;t matter what he&#039;s like, we vote Conservative &#039;cause it&#039;s Canada&#039;s Natural Governing Party.
(7) Who cares about corruption.  He looks Prime Ministerial.  Have you seen those backwoods dweebs in the Opposition?
(8) Peter Mansbridge likes him, and news anchors know everything so he must be ok.

Let me also remind everyone that what we have here so far are (a) some disturbing allegations from the Liberals, (b) a lack of openness from the Conservatives to clear things up, and (c) an idiotic statement by Baird.  That is a far cry, as yet, from proven misuse of public money on a grand scale...which is what Chretien&#039;s Liberals left us as their legacy.

So yes, if the CPC is funneling these funds to CPC ridings, they should face the music.  I&#039;m guessing though that all those on this board who are shocked, &lt;i&gt;shocked&lt;/i&gt; I tell you, at the (alleged) shenanigans were Liberal voters both before and after Chretien&#039;s Shawinigate and Adscam peccadilloes came to light - and by &quot;came to light&quot; I mean &quot;became known facts&quot;, not &quot;were alleged by members of the Opposition&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean the Liberals now think Harper is awesome?  I&#039;ll remind you all of the various justifications:</p>
<p>(1) Yes he&#039;s corrupt, but they&#039;re all corrupt!<br />
(2) A smart slippery PM is exactly what this country needs.  Naive twits like the Opposition could never govern effectively.<br />
(3) Better to elect the devil you know than gamble on the one you don&#039;t!<br />
(4) Yes he&#039;ll misuse taxpayer money and bribe his friends, but at least nothing will get done federally and that&#039;s a good thing!<br />
(5) We don&#039;t care, we like him.<br />
(6) Doesn&#039;t matter what he&#039;s like, we vote Conservative &#039;cause it&#039;s Canada&#039;s Natural Governing Party.<br />
(7) Who cares about corruption.  He looks Prime Ministerial.  Have you seen those backwoods dweebs in the Opposition?<br />
(8) Peter Mansbridge likes him, and news anchors know everything so he must be ok.</p>
<p>Let me also remind everyone that what we have here so far are (a) some disturbing allegations from the Liberals, (b) a lack of openness from the Conservatives to clear things up, and (c) an idiotic statement by Baird.  That is a far cry, as yet, from proven misuse of public money on a grand scale&#8230;which is what Chretien&#039;s Liberals left us as their legacy.</p>
<p>So yes, if the CPC is funneling these funds to CPC ridings, they should face the music.  I&#039;m guessing though that all those on this board who are shocked, <i>shocked</i> I tell you, at the (alleged) shenanigans were Liberal voters both before and after Chretien&#039;s Shawinigate and Adscam peccadilloes came to light &#8211; and by &quot;came to light&quot; I mean &quot;became known facts&quot;, not &quot;were alleged by members of the Opposition&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-2/#comment-192874</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192874</guid>
		<description>Does this mean the Liberals now think Harper is awesome?  I&#039;ll remind you all of the various justifications:

(1) Yes he&#039;s corrupt, but they&#039;re all corrupt!
(2) A smart slippery PM is exactly what this country needs.  Naive twits like the Opposition could never govern effectively.
(3) Better to elect the devil you know than gamble on the one you don&#039;t!
(4) Yes he&#039;ll misuse taxpayer money and bribe his friends, but at least nothing will get done federally and that&#039;s a good thing!
(5) We don&#039;t care, we like him.
(6) Doesn&#039;t matter what he&#039;s like, we vote Conservative &#039;cause it&#039;s Canada&#039;s Natural Governing Party.
(7) Who cares about corruption.  He looks Prime Ministerial.  Have you seen those backwoods dweebs in the Opposition?
(8) Peter Mansbridge likes him, and news anchors know everything so he must be ok.

Let me also remind everyone that what we have here so far are (a) some disturbing allegations from the Liberals, (b) a lack of openness from the Conservatives to clear things up, and (c) an idiotic statement by Baird.  That is a far cry, as yet, from proven misuse of public money on a grand scale...which is what Chretien left us as his legacy.

So yes, if the CPC is funneling these funds to CPC ridings, they should face the music.  I&#039;m guessing though that all those on this board who are shocked, &lt;i&gt;shocked&lt;/i&gt; I tell you, at the (alleged) shenanigans were Liberal voters both before and after Chretien&#039;s Shawinigate and Adscam peccadilloes came to light - and by &quot;came to light&quot; I mean &quot;became known facts&quot;, not &quot;were alleged by members of the Opposition&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean the Liberals now think Harper is awesome?  I&#039;ll remind you all of the various justifications:</p>
<p>(1) Yes he&#039;s corrupt, but they&#039;re all corrupt!<br />
(2) A smart slippery PM is exactly what this country needs.  Naive twits like the Opposition could never govern effectively.<br />
(3) Better to elect the devil you know than gamble on the one you don&#039;t!<br />
(4) Yes he&#039;ll misuse taxpayer money and bribe his friends, but at least nothing will get done federally and that&#039;s a good thing!<br />
(5) We don&#039;t care, we like him.<br />
(6) Doesn&#039;t matter what he&#039;s like, we vote Conservative &#039;cause it&#039;s Canada&#039;s Natural Governing Party.<br />
(7) Who cares about corruption.  He looks Prime Ministerial.  Have you seen those backwoods dweebs in the Opposition?<br />
(8) Peter Mansbridge likes him, and news anchors know everything so he must be ok.</p>
<p>Let me also remind everyone that what we have here so far are (a) some disturbing allegations from the Liberals, (b) a lack of openness from the Conservatives to clear things up, and (c) an idiotic statement by Baird.  That is a far cry, as yet, from proven misuse of public money on a grand scale&#8230;which is what Chretien left us as his legacy.</p>
<p>So yes, if the CPC is funneling these funds to CPC ridings, they should face the music.  I&#039;m guessing though that all those on this board who are shocked, <i>shocked</i> I tell you, at the (alleged) shenanigans were Liberal voters both before and after Chretien&#039;s Shawinigate and Adscam peccadilloes came to light &#8211; and by &quot;came to light&quot; I mean &quot;became known facts&quot;, not &quot;were alleged by members of the Opposition&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192875</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192875</guid>
		<description>Does this mean all the Liberals now think Harper is awesome?  I&#039;ll remind you all of the various justifications:

(1) Yes he&#039;s corrupt, but they&#039;re all corrupt!
(2) A smart slippery PM is exactly what this country needs.  Naive twits like the Opposition could never govern effectively.
(3) Better to elect the devil you know than gamble on the one you don&#039;t!
(4) Yes he&#039;ll misuse taxpayer money and bribe his friends, but at least nothing will get done federally and that&#039;s a good thing!
(5) We don&#039;t care, we like him.
(6) Doesn&#039;t matter what he&#039;s like, we vote Conservative &#039;cause it&#039;s Canada&#039;s Natural Governing Party.
(7) Who cares about corruption.  He looks Prime Ministerial.  Have you seen those backwoods dweebs in the Opposition?
(8) Peter Mansbridge likes him, and news anchors know everything so he must be ok.

Let me also remind everyone that what we have here so far are (a) some disturbing allegations from the Liberals, (b) a lack of openness from the Conservatives to clear things up, and (c) an idiotic statement by Baird.  That is a far cry, as yet, from proven misuse of public money on a grand scale...which is what Chretien left us as his legacy.

So yes, if the CPC is funneling these funds to CPC ridings, they should face the music.  I&#039;m guessing though that all those on this board who are shocked, &lt;i&gt;shocked&lt;/i&gt; I tell you, at the (alleged) shenanigans were Liberal voters both before and after Chretien&#039;s Shawinigate and Adscam peccadilloes came to light - and by &quot;came to light&quot; I mean &quot;became known facts&quot;, not &quot;were alleged by members of the Opposition&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean all the Liberals now think Harper is awesome?  I&#039;ll remind you all of the various justifications:</p>
<p>(1) Yes he&#039;s corrupt, but they&#039;re all corrupt!<br />
(2) A smart slippery PM is exactly what this country needs.  Naive twits like the Opposition could never govern effectively.<br />
(3) Better to elect the devil you know than gamble on the one you don&#039;t!<br />
(4) Yes he&#039;ll misuse taxpayer money and bribe his friends, but at least nothing will get done federally and that&#039;s a good thing!<br />
(5) We don&#039;t care, we like him.<br />
(6) Doesn&#039;t matter what he&#039;s like, we vote Conservative &#039;cause it&#039;s Canada&#039;s Natural Governing Party.<br />
(7) Who cares about corruption.  He looks Prime Ministerial.  Have you seen those backwoods dweebs in the Opposition?<br />
(8) Peter Mansbridge likes him, and news anchors know everything so he must be ok.</p>
<p>Let me also remind everyone that what we have here so far are (a) some disturbing allegations from the Liberals, (b) a lack of openness from the Conservatives to clear things up, and (c) an idiotic statement by Baird.  That is a far cry, as yet, from proven misuse of public money on a grand scale&#8230;which is what Chretien left us as his legacy.</p>
<p>So yes, if the CPC is funneling these funds to CPC ridings, they should face the music.  I&#039;m guessing though that all those on this board who are shocked, <i>shocked</i> I tell you, at the (alleged) shenanigans were Liberal voters both before and after Chretien&#039;s Shawinigate and Adscam peccadilloes came to light &#8211; and by &quot;came to light&quot; I mean &quot;became known facts&quot;, not &quot;were alleged by members of the Opposition&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thwim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192872</link>
		<dc:creator>Thwim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192872</guid>
		<description>How many employees of the company also &quot;made&quot; a donation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many employees of the company also &quot;made&quot; a donation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thwim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192873</link>
		<dc:creator>Thwim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192873</guid>
		<description>How many employees of the company also made a donation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many employees of the company also made a donation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192870</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192870</guid>
		<description>Jenn...give this thing a rest. There is nobody in this world and I repeat nobody who receives this stimulus money who doesn&#039;t understand that the money is coming from the government of Canada. Lets stop with the silliness. It&#039;s a fake cardboard check. I don&#039;t care what logo was on it or who signed it and whether the MP was wearing green, yellow or purple put the tinfoil hat away.
I know Liberals and the other opposition parties are trying to make this an issue but the bottom line is Canadians will need to make a choice in the next election. Harper or Iffy. We all know from polling that Harper consistently outpolls Iffy on all the economic leadership criteria and this issue will not change that fact.
The Libs are great at trying to invent faux scandals but what they are doing shows a lot of desperation and will not endear them to the Canadian people after all is said and done. It makes them look petty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenn&#8230;give this thing a rest. There is nobody in this world and I repeat nobody who receives this stimulus money who doesn&#039;t understand that the money is coming from the government of Canada. Lets stop with the silliness. It&#039;s a fake cardboard check. I don&#039;t care what logo was on it or who signed it and whether the MP was wearing green, yellow or purple put the tinfoil hat away.<br />
I know Liberals and the other opposition parties are trying to make this an issue but the bottom line is Canadians will need to make a choice in the next election. Harper or Iffy. We all know from polling that Harper consistently outpolls Iffy on all the economic leadership criteria and this issue will not change that fact.<br />
The Libs are great at trying to invent faux scandals but what they are doing shows a lot of desperation and will not endear them to the Canadian people after all is said and done. It makes them look petty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192871</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192871</guid>
		<description>Jenn...give this thing a rest. There is nobody in this world and I repeat nobody who receives this stimulus money who doesn&#039;t understand that the money is coming from the government of Canada. Lets stop with the silliness. It a fake cardboard check. I don&#039;t care what logo was on it or who signed it and whether the MP was wearing green, yellow or purple put the tinfoil hat away.
I know Liberals and the other opposition parties are trying to make this an issue but the bottom line is Canadians will need to make a choice in the next election. Harper or Iffy. We all know from polling that Harper consistently outpolls Iffy on all the economic leadership criteria and this issue will not change that fact.
The Libs are great at trying to invent faux scandals but what they are doing shows a lot of desperation and will not endear them to the Canadian people after all is said and done. It makes them look petty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenn&#8230;give this thing a rest. There is nobody in this world and I repeat nobody who receives this stimulus money who doesn&#039;t understand that the money is coming from the government of Canada. Lets stop with the silliness. It a fake cardboard check. I don&#039;t care what logo was on it or who signed it and whether the MP was wearing green, yellow or purple put the tinfoil hat away.<br />
I know Liberals and the other opposition parties are trying to make this an issue but the bottom line is Canadians will need to make a choice in the next election. Harper or Iffy. We all know from polling that Harper consistently outpolls Iffy on all the economic leadership criteria and this issue will not change that fact.<br />
The Libs are great at trying to invent faux scandals but what they are doing shows a lot of desperation and will not endear them to the Canadian people after all is said and done. It makes them look petty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192869</link>
		<dc:creator>Candace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192869</guid>
		<description>&quot;How hard can it be to link Conservative party donations straight back to executives of companies receiving contracts?&quot;

Yeah, right. A $1,000 contribution (annual max, might be 1,100) is going to lead to a new bridge or highway? What planet are you living on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;How hard can it be to link Conservative party donations straight back to executives of companies receiving contracts?&quot;</p>
<p>Yeah, right. A $1,000 contribution (annual max, might be 1,100) is going to lead to a new bridge or highway? What planet are you living on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwoYen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192868</link>
		<dc:creator>TwoYen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192868</guid>
		<description>I can just see it now. Liberal Truth squads telling Prime Minister Bob Rae that he&#039;s not allowed to make announcements of government stimulus programs. Although Rae was Premier of Ontario before the Internet was invented (well, almost) I&#039;m sure someone can dredge up pictures of him holding props during announcement ceremonies. Props are good. They help publicize an event. Let&#039;s not throw the baby out with the bath water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can just see it now. Liberal Truth squads telling Prime Minister Bob Rae that he&#039;s not allowed to make announcements of government stimulus programs. Although Rae was Premier of Ontario before the Internet was invented (well, almost) I&#039;m sure someone can dredge up pictures of him holding props during announcement ceremonies. Props are good. They help publicize an event. Let&#039;s not throw the baby out with the bath water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192867</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192867</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah I also meant to say that apparently there&#039;s nothing WRONG with passing money in a brown paper bag in a restaurant.

And to any Liberal MPs, or potential Liberal MPs, please know we will not think kindly if you do it too, years later.  &quot;The Conservatives did it first&quot; will not, repeat will not, be an acceptable excuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah I also meant to say that apparently there&#039;s nothing WRONG with passing money in a brown paper bag in a restaurant.</p>
<p>And to any Liberal MPs, or potential Liberal MPs, please know we will not think kindly if you do it too, years later.  &quot;The Conservatives did it first&quot; will not, repeat will not, be an acceptable excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192866</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192866</guid>
		<description>There is not a single living, breathing card-carrying Liberal that does not know.  That is probably true.  But there are more eligible voters than there are Liberals (I&#039;ll wait for your cheering to die down).  Can you be as sure that every one of those eligible voters didn&#039;t look at a novelty cheque that right where companies generally put their name on a cheque, states Larry Miller MP, and realize this cheque was NOT coming from Larry Miller?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is not a single living, breathing card-carrying Liberal that does not know.  That is probably true.  But there are more eligible voters than there are Liberals (I&#039;ll wait for your cheering to die down).  Can you be as sure that every one of those eligible voters didn&#039;t look at a novelty cheque that right where companies generally put their name on a cheque, states Larry Miller MP, and realize this cheque was NOT coming from Larry Miller?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwoYen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192865</link>
		<dc:creator>TwoYen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192865</guid>
		<description>Ther is not a single living. breathing. Liberal in Canada that does not know that this is GOVERMENT stimulus funds. If this bothers you, vote agaisnt the Tories in the next election. It&#039;s not as if the money was passed in a brown paper bag in a restaurant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ther is not a single living. breathing. Liberal in Canada that does not know that this is GOVERMENT stimulus funds. If this bothers you, vote agaisnt the Tories in the next election. It&#039;s not as if the money was passed in a brown paper bag in a restaurant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192864</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192864</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just like to go on the record here as thinking Lisa Raitt&#039;s clothing options are completely irrelevant.  She could go to the photo-op wearing Stephen Harper Team hat, sweater, gloves, whatever.  As long as the cheque says Government of Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d just like to go on the record here as thinking Lisa Raitt&#039;s clothing options are completely irrelevant.  She could go to the photo-op wearing Stephen Harper Team hat, sweater, gloves, whatever.  As long as the cheque says Government of Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192863</guid>
		<description>Do you not see another problem, TwoYen?  Take the Larry Miller boatload of cheques, for example.  Only in the tiniest, most inconspicuous place does it show Canada has anything whatsoever to do with the funds.  It is hard NOT to be bribed with your own money when you don&#039;t know it&#039;s your own money.  Or, it is hard to be proud of the way you are spending your money when you don&#039;t know it is your money you&#039;re spending.

I have absolutely no problem with an MP having a photo-op where he hands over a large novelty cheque for the cameras.  He is seen to support his constituents.  But I do think the large novelty cheque needs to be a rough representation of the actual cheque to both make any sense and avoid misunderstandings.  Yes, you can make the case that you&#039;ve got to be stupid not to understand what is going on, but if we were that bright would we keep falling for politicians&#039; lies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you not see another problem, TwoYen?  Take the Larry Miller boatload of cheques, for example.  Only in the tiniest, most inconspicuous place does it show Canada has anything whatsoever to do with the funds.  It is hard NOT to be bribed with your own money when you don&#039;t know it&#039;s your own money.  Or, it is hard to be proud of the way you are spending your money when you don&#039;t know it is your money you&#039;re spending.</p>
<p>I have absolutely no problem with an MP having a photo-op where he hands over a large novelty cheque for the cameras.  He is seen to support his constituents.  But I do think the large novelty cheque needs to be a rough representation of the actual cheque to both make any sense and avoid misunderstandings.  Yes, you can make the case that you&#039;ve got to be stupid not to understand what is going on, but if we were that bright would we keep falling for politicians&#039; lies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192862</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192862</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a species of coniferous tree in California who&#039;s cones can only open with the heat of a forest fire. They do so explosively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s a species of coniferous tree in California who&#039;s cones can only open with the heat of a forest fire. They do so explosively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192861</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192861</guid>
		<description>The CTV had lobbyists in the House long before Duffy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CTV had lobbyists in the House long before Duffy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192860</link>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192860</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah i finally got it. Duh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah i finally got it. Duh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192859</link>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192859</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Conservatives don&#039;t have to take any lessons from the Liberal party of Canada.&quot;

On the contrary the pupil is fast becoming the master. And all you can do is you can manage is:&#039; just because we said we were better, doesn&#039;t mean you actually expected us to try and be better did you&#039;? As for not believing what comes out of the mouths of politicians, i&#039;d lay odds you didn&#039;t think that way when Saint Steve was threatening to burn the place down and drive the money changers out of the temple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The Conservatives don&#039;t have to take any lessons from the Liberal party of Canada.&quot;</p>
<p>On the contrary the pupil is fast becoming the master. And all you can do is you can manage is:&#039; just because we said we were better, doesn&#039;t mean you actually expected us to try and be better did you&#039;? As for not believing what comes out of the mouths of politicians, i&#039;d lay odds you didn&#039;t think that way when Saint Steve was threatening to burn the place down and drive the money changers out of the temple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192858</link>
		<dc:creator>knick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192858</guid>
		<description>No doubt whatever that most Canadians would be carefully examining those chequeboards to see if they contained the criteria to make them valid and negotiable, but wouldn&#039;t have a second thought about the Conservative logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt whatever that most Canadians would be carefully examining those chequeboards to see if they contained the criteria to make them valid and negotiable, but wouldn&#039;t have a second thought about the Conservative logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192857</link>
		<dc:creator>knick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192857</guid>
		<description>Sloppy journalism has it&#039;s own rewards - like false rumours planted with a gullible journalist who didn&#039;t bother to look anywhere else for confirmation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sloppy journalism has it&#039;s own rewards &#8211; like false rumours planted with a gullible journalist who didn&#039;t bother to look anywhere else for confirmation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192856</link>
		<dc:creator>knick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192856</guid>
		<description>Again with the Liberals did it too theme.   If that&#039;s the best defence that Harper supporters can muster, then it only goes to show that they&#039;ve learned nothing from the past,, or that they&#039;ve learned how to do it better - not much to inspire confidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again with the Liberals did it too theme.   If that&#039;s the best defence that Harper supporters can muster, then it only goes to show that they&#039;ve learned nothing from the past,, or that they&#039;ve learned how to do it better &#8211; not much to inspire confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192855</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192855</guid>
		<description>The PM&#039;s never around to take the heat. He sneaks out of bad situations before they happen, example:  last december and more recently  this mess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PM&#039;s never around to take the heat. He sneaks out of bad situations before they happen, example:  last december and more recently  this mess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192854</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192854</guid>
		<description>The PM&#039;s never around to take the heat. He sneeks out of bad situations before they happen, example:  last december and now this mess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PM&#039;s never around to take the heat. He sneeks out of bad situations before they happen, example:  last december and now this mess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192853</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192853</guid>
		<description>ah....its called being in opposition. Do you honestly believe that Iffy believes everything that comes out of his mouth these days. Its called politics. When in opposition there is a tendency to be unrealistic in expectations (ask Jack Layton) but in government it is a whole different matter.

In fact I recall the Liberal platform in 1993 where Chretien talked about bringing honest, accountable government etc. etc. What did we get a tightly controlled government with boondoggle after boondoggle and outright theft of taxpayer money.

The Conservatives don&#039;t have to take any lessons from the Liberal party of Canada. The Libs are the masters of deception and deceit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah&#8230;.its called being in opposition. Do you honestly believe that Iffy believes everything that comes out of his mouth these days. Its called politics. When in opposition there is a tendency to be unrealistic in expectations (ask Jack Layton) but in government it is a whole different matter.</p>
<p>In fact I recall the Liberal platform in 1993 where Chretien talked about bringing honest, accountable government etc. etc. What did we get a tightly controlled government with boondoggle after boondoggle and outright theft of taxpayer money.</p>
<p>The Conservatives don&#039;t have to take any lessons from the Liberal party of Canada. The Libs are the masters of deception and deceit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192852</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192852</guid>
		<description>ah....its called being in opposition. Do you honestly believe that Iffy believes everything that comes out of his mouth these days. Its called politics. When in opposition there is a tendency to be unrealistic in expectations (ask Jack Layton) but in government it is a whole different matter.

In fact I recall the Liberal platform in 1993 where Chretien talked about bringing honest, accountable government etc. etc. What did we get a tightly controlled government with boondoggle after boondoggle and outright theft of taxpayer money.

The Conservatives don&#039;t have to take any lessons from the Liberal party of Canada. They are the masters of deception and deceit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah&#8230;.its called being in opposition. Do you honestly believe that Iffy believes everything that comes out of his mouth these days. Its called politics. When in opposition there is a tendency to be unrealistic in expectations (ask Jack Layton) but in government it is a whole different matter.</p>
<p>In fact I recall the Liberal platform in 1993 where Chretien talked about bringing honest, accountable government etc. etc. What did we get a tightly controlled government with boondoggle after boondoggle and outright theft of taxpayer money.</p>
<p>The Conservatives don&#039;t have to take any lessons from the Liberal party of Canada. They are the masters of deception and deceit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: further clarify</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192851</link>
		<dc:creator>further clarify</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192851</guid>
		<description>All the time and effort intelligent, educated and enlightened canadians spent trying to kill of the disease known as &quot;movement conservatism&quot;  turns out to have been totally wasted.  All we had to do was let Stephen Harper do the job for us.   Of course we never dreamed how effective a job he would do.  The shear scope of conservative dishonesty is breath taking.  Keep up the good work Stevie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the time and effort intelligent, educated and enlightened canadians spent trying to kill of the disease known as &quot;movement conservatism&quot;  turns out to have been totally wasted.  All we had to do was let Stephen Harper do the job for us.   Of course we never dreamed how effective a job he would do.  The shear scope of conservative dishonesty is breath taking.  Keep up the good work Stevie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192849</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192849</guid>
		<description>hollinm continued....

They have already lost much of their credibility with the public and this kind of silliness will only reinforce that image. Lets not forget all the stimulus funding is decided jointly by the three levels of government and it is they who manage the projects not the federal government. I recall the Libs complaining about the process at the time but the fact remains it was an effort to minimize mismanagement etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hollinm continued&#8230;.</p>
<p>They have already lost much of their credibility with the public and this kind of silliness will only reinforce that image. Lets not forget all the stimulus funding is decided jointly by the three levels of government and it is they who manage the projects not the federal government. I recall the Libs complaining about the process at the time but the fact remains it was an effort to minimize mismanagement etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192850</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192850</guid>
		<description>In case you haven&#039;t noticed this is politics. How pure as the driven snow the Liberals are when they are in opposition. We watched for 13 years scandal after scandal, abuse of taxpayers funds and in fact outright theft of taxpayer money with nothing much accomplished once the deficit was covered.
Your buddies asked for quarterly reports and they got them. They were reports to the Canadian people not to the Liberal party of Canada. Oh, I forgot they still think they are the government. Iffy outsmarted himself and Harper and his government simply used the occasion to ensure everybody found out how the government was managing the stimulus spending. You can&#039;t demand something and then whine when you get it because you don&#039;t like the process.
Do I agree that the government of Canada websites should be used for partisan purposes? No. However, the PM has a right to speak to Canadians in all corners of the country whether the Libs like it or not and unfortuantely this costs money. Trouble is they are being beat at their own game and they don&#039;t much like it.
Complaining about logos on jackets and doorknobs will certainly not raise the Liberal party in the eyes of Canadians. TBC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you haven&#039;t noticed this is politics. How pure as the driven snow the Liberals are when they are in opposition. We watched for 13 years scandal after scandal, abuse of taxpayers funds and in fact outright theft of taxpayer money with nothing much accomplished once the deficit was covered.<br />
Your buddies asked for quarterly reports and they got them. They were reports to the Canadian people not to the Liberal party of Canada. Oh, I forgot they still think they are the government. Iffy outsmarted himself and Harper and his government simply used the occasion to ensure everybody found out how the government was managing the stimulus spending. You can&#039;t demand something and then whine when you get it because you don&#039;t like the process.<br />
Do I agree that the government of Canada websites should be used for partisan purposes? No. However, the PM has a right to speak to Canadians in all corners of the country whether the Libs like it or not and unfortuantely this costs money. Trouble is they are being beat at their own game and they don&#039;t much like it.<br />
Complaining about logos on jackets and doorknobs will certainly not raise the Liberal party in the eyes of Canadians. TBC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192848</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192848</guid>
		<description>In case you haven&#039;t noticed this is politics. How pure as the driven snow the Liberals are when they are in opposition. We watched for 13 years scandal after scandal, abuse of taxpayers funds and in fact outright theft of taxpayer money with nothing much accomplished once the deficit was covered.
Your buddies asked for quarterly reports and they got them. They were reports to the Canadian people not to the Liberal party of Canada. Oh, I forgot they still think they are the government. Iffy outsmarted himself and Harper and his government simply used the occasion to ensure everybody found out how the government was managing the stimulus spending. You can&#039;t demand something and then whine when you get it because you don&#039;t like the process.
Do I agree that the government of Canada websites should be used for partisan purposes? No. However, the PM has a right to speak to Canadians in all corners of the country whether the Libs like it or not and unfortuantely this costs money. Trouble is they are being beat at their own game and they don&#039;t much like it.
Complaining about logos on jackets and doorknobs will certainly not raise the Liberal party in the eyes of Canadians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you haven&#039;t noticed this is politics. How pure as the driven snow the Liberals are when they are in opposition. We watched for 13 years scandal after scandal, abuse of taxpayers funds and in fact outright theft of taxpayer money with nothing much accomplished once the deficit was covered.<br />
Your buddies asked for quarterly reports and they got them. They were reports to the Canadian people not to the Liberal party of Canada. Oh, I forgot they still think they are the government. Iffy outsmarted himself and Harper and his government simply used the occasion to ensure everybody found out how the government was managing the stimulus spending. You can&#039;t demand something and then whine when you get it because you don&#039;t like the process.<br />
Do I agree that the government of Canada websites should be used for partisan purposes? No. However, the PM has a right to speak to Canadians in all corners of the country whether the Libs like it or not and unfortuantely this costs money. Trouble is they are being beat at their own game and they don&#039;t much like it.<br />
Complaining about logos on jackets and doorknobs will certainly not raise the Liberal party in the eyes of Canadians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/comment-page-1/#comment-192847</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054#comment-192847</guid>
		<description>And over at the National Post today, Ivison actually was impressed by Baird&#039;s performance. No wonder people get disgusted with politics and some journalists too, I might add.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And over at the National Post today, Ivison actually was impressed by Baird&#039;s performance. No wonder people get disgusted with politics and some journalists too, I might add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

