<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#039;t look away (II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolJunkie</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192920</link>
		<dc:creator>PolJunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192920</guid>
		<description>I think Hillier is a complete media whore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Hillier is a complete media whore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SisyphusThis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192919</link>
		<dc:creator>SisyphusThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192919</guid>
		<description>Gave a speech to the Kenora Chamber of Commerce ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gave a speech to the Kenora Chamber of Commerce ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolJunkie</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192918</link>
		<dc:creator>PolJunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192918</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m gonna ask the obvious question here:

If Hillier knew about the potential torture of prisoners under his watch, what exactly did he do about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m gonna ask the obvious question here:</p>
<p>If Hillier knew about the potential torture of prisoners under his watch, what exactly did he do about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192917</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192917</guid>
		<description>Over at the Ottawa Citizen today, they are saying that Hillier was aware of the Colvin reports. Given Hillier&#039;s strained relations with PMO, no one bothered to warn the three amigos of the potential problems for the government with the Colvin reports being in the hands of an unmuzzledable (is this a word?) Hillier? The dog would probably be smart not to be seen with him. LOL

Seriously though, does anyone out there have an answer to my original question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at the Ottawa Citizen today, they are saying that Hillier was aware of the Colvin reports. Given Hillier&#039;s strained relations with PMO, no one bothered to warn the three amigos of the potential problems for the government with the Colvin reports being in the hands of an unmuzzledable (is this a word?) Hillier? The dog would probably be smart not to be seen with him. LOL</p>
<p>Seriously though, does anyone out there have an answer to my original question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgarvin</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192916</link>
		<dc:creator>lgarvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192916</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve gone from Plausible Deniability to Implausible Deniability to &quot;Are You Fu%king Kidding Me?&quot;

The single most serious controversy in your department for the past &lt;b&gt;THREE YEARS!!!&lt;/b&gt; and it &quot;never made it to your desk?&quot;  The neighbour&#039;s dog will refuse to be seen with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#039;ve gone from Plausible Deniability to Implausible Deniability to &quot;Are You Fu%king Kidding Me?&quot;</p>
<p>The single most serious controversy in your department for the past <b>THREE YEARS!!!</b> and it &quot;never made it to your desk?&quot;  The neighbour&#039;s dog will refuse to be seen with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192915</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192915</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or has anyone (hello, you journalists) out there asked the three amigos whether they &quot;knew&quot; or &quot;had heard&quot; about Colvin&#039;s report?

Seems to me that they are claiming they had not &quot;seen&quot; the report. Kind of like the &quot;if they had asked me whether I had a business relationship ... you know the rest&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or has anyone (hello, you journalists) out there asked the three amigos whether they &quot;knew&quot; or &quot;had heard&quot; about Colvin&#039;s report?</p>
<p>Seems to me that they are claiming they had not &quot;seen&quot; the report. Kind of like the &quot;if they had asked me whether I had a business relationship &#8230; you know the rest&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedTylerEzro</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192914</link>
		<dc:creator>TedTylerEzro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192914</guid>
		<description>Could there be any criminal prosecutions coming out of this if someone knew something but didn&#039;t pass it upstairs, or if it was passed upstairs, nobody did anything about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could there be any criminal prosecutions coming out of this if someone knew something but didn&#039;t pass it upstairs, or if it was passed upstairs, nobody did anything about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192913</link>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192913</guid>
		<description>Nooo! Not the potatoe patch again PLEASE not the potatoe patch again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nooo! Not the potatoe patch again PLEASE not the potatoe patch again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192912</link>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192912</guid>
		<description>Ta!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ta!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ Patchouli</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192911</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Patchouli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192911</guid>
		<description>I believe Hillier.  Why would he lie?

I also don&#039;t understand why McKay and O&#039;Connor think Canadians prefer an ignorant defense minister who doesn&#039;t read essential reports over one that is fully aware and onside with what&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Hillier.  Why would he lie?</p>
<p>I also don&#039;t understand why McKay and O&#039;Connor think Canadians prefer an ignorant defense minister who doesn&#039;t read essential reports over one that is fully aware and onside with what&#039;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanStok</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192910</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanStok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192910</guid>
		<description>You should sign up for the Intense Debate thingy, as you can then edit your comments (until someone replies).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should sign up for the Intense Debate thingy, as you can then edit your comments (until someone replies).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan in van</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192909</link>
		<dc:creator>dan in van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192909</guid>
		<description>Methinks Peter McKay&#039;s going to be taking another walk with his neighbour&#039;s dog, and soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks Peter McKay&#039;s going to be taking another walk with his neighbour&#039;s dog, and soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192908</link>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192908</guid>
		<description>Ah...reciprocate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230;reciprocate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192907</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192907</guid>
		<description>This allegation is really serious.  Sickening, if true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This allegation is really serious.  Sickening, if true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/dont-look-away-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-192906</link>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88083#comment-192906</guid>
		<description>So who are these senior sources military and govt sources? Are the walls starting to crumble for the Harper Tories? Isn&#039;t this how it started for Mulroney- or is it still a little early for that yet? You can&#039;t operate in the way Harper has without eventually amassing enemies.
If you want loyalty and trust you gotta recipricate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who are these senior sources military and govt sources? Are the walls starting to crumble for the Harper Tories? Isn&#039;t this how it started for Mulroney- or is it still a little early for that yet? You can&#039;t operate in the way Harper has without eventually amassing enemies.<br />
If you want loyalty and trust you gotta recipricate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

