Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

Allegation and refutation of intimidation in the House

by Aaron Wherry on Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:31am - 39 Comments

After Question Period yesterday, and after the House had finished celebrating the career of Peter Milliken, Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt rose on the following point of privilege.

Mr. Speaker, earlier this month, the member for Mississauga South rose in the House and accused me of intimidation. I was not in the chamber when he raised the issue so I would like to take a moment now to respond. I want to make it clear that I did not make the gesture alleged by the member opposite, nor did I in any way intimidate the member opposite. Indeed, I am very cognizant of the fact that my two children, who are eight and five, watch question period and I would not make that gesture as a result of that, and not only that but also because I have respect for the House. Accordingly, there is nothing for which I can apologize to the House or its members. I want to thank you, Mr. Speaker, for giving me this opportunity to address the incident. I regret that we have to take the House’s time to respond in this way. We should be debating and facing the real issues of Canadians: crime, criminal sentencing, stimulating the financial recovery of industry, protecting jobs and protecting the environment. Those are the things that actually matter to the people of Canada from coast to coast to coast.

Paul Szabo’s original complaint, with description of the alleged “rude finger gesture” in question, was filed October 2. His colleague Bryon Wilfert rose the following Monday to say that he had witnessed the same “rude gesture.”

Absent other evidence, the Speaker has declared the matter closed.

Bookmark and Share
  • Andrew (not Potter or Coyne)

    Either we need dozens of cameras on every member, or no cameras at all. This is ridiculous.

    • kcm

      What is the answer? A friend of mind who attended the house before there were cameras told me he noticed members openly sleeping/napping or throwing paper airplanes. Personally i'd prefer that to this.

  • knick

    It's probably because of some politician (can't remember who) talking about 'all of Canada, from (somewhere on the east coast) to the Rocky Mountains'.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/AJR79 AJR79

    Mr. Szabo gets a big "fuddle duddle" from the speaker

    It doesn't seem to take too much to intimidate him, although Lisa Raitt is pretty imposing.

  • Sigh

    Personally, I'd prefer the paper airplanes.

  • Sigh

    And by the way, can we also make it illegal for any MP to use the phrase "what Canadians want"?

  • kcm

    Er…any chance ST pulled that beauty out of context at all JG – him being such a scruplously fair blogger and all?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jenn_ Jenn_

    Hey, why is anger the only emotion permitted? Woman up, lgarvin.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/TwoYen TwoYen

    Stephen Taylor is partisan, but I would also agree with you that he is scrupulously fair as well.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Ed_Sweeney Ed_Sweeney

    ..but not as dumb as thinking that 'coast to coast' doesn't include the geography in between.

    I think there are two attractions to the phrase that bear on its longevity. The first is that it serves as a reminder to central Canada that there are lands extending, and people residing, beyond Quebec and Ontario – something frequently forgotten. The second is simply a fond nostalgia for a time when 'Coast to coast' broadcasts were a big part of what brought Canadians together.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Ed_Sweeney Ed_Sweeney

    so I presume that politician had no interest in the vast majority of BC being part of Canada.

  • kcm

    I can see how you would read it that way but i was being ironic.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/TwoYen TwoYen

    I realize where you weree coming from. I just wanted to re-emphasize the point that ST is scrupulously fair. He is partisan, I'll admit, but I've never seen evidence of him being unfair.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    Is all this sexier than medical isotopes?

From Macleans