How Microsoft got hip

After years of flops, the software giant is making a comeback

by Colin Campbell on Thursday, October 22, 2009 1:00pm - 8 Comments

How Microsoft got hipFor the past 18 months, the future of the world’s largest and most powerful computer company has been lugged around in the backpack of a 14-year-old schoolboy in Seattle, Wash. His laptop is loaded with a new piece of software, and he’s been told to use it and abuse it and then give his impressions to one very important person-—his dad, the CEO of Microsoft Corp., Steve Ballmer. Ballmer says his son has been his toughest critic—someone who has been helping find bugs in the company’s new operating system and pointing out the kinds of flaws and errors that made the previous version of the software, Vista, such a monumental failure. A lot is riding on his small shoulders.

The new operating system, called Windows 7, is the one thing that could finally shake the company from a nightmare of embarrassing flops and image problems under Ballmer’s tenure. Vista was not only sluggish and bug-filled, it drove many users to distraction and into the arms of rival computer companies, like Apple. And that was not the company’s only problem. Its MP3 player—the brickish-looking Zune—was a poor copy of the iPod, and its XBox 360 gaming system was plagued with technical problems in its early days-—troubles that cost the company an estimated US$1 billion in warranty repairs. And as consumers began a critical shift to mobile computing, Microsoft missed the boat completely on smart phones, handing the market to Apple and Research In Motion. Having fallen well off technology’s cutting edge, this year the Redmond, Wash.-based company suffered its first drop in revenue since going public in 1986. It also announced it will lay off 5,000 workers, another company first.

But there are signs that Microsoft is on the verge of a comeback. The early reviews of Windows 7, which comes out Oct. 22, are glowing (Ballmer’s son, it seems, has a future in software development). Microsoft has also launched Bing, its entry in the online search business, and after reaching a landmark deal to make it the search engine for Yahoo, some analysts estimate Microsoft could grab 30 per cent of a market that’s long been dominated by Google. New XBox gaming technology and a new Zune have also been generating buzz. Next up, Microsoft is setting its sights on the growing netbook and tablet market—something it believes will eclipse smart phones as the mobile device of the future. All these new offerings represent a kind of renewed innovation “beyond anything we have seen from Microsoft for multiple years,” noted a recent Goldman Sachs report.

Perhaps most importantly, the company says it is refocusing on the one thing it most neglected: consumers. “We lived through a period as a company—you can almost think of it as our teenage years—where maybe we had a bit of arrogance,” says Darren Huston, the vice-president of Microsoft’s consumer and online division, in an interview with Maclean’s. “This new way forward is about listening to consumers, creating things that people really want.”

That might seem a tall order for a company that just a year ago was running the now-infamous Windows ads, featuring Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates doing things like buying shoes. The spots baffled viewers, and came across as clueless and confusing—kind of like the company at the time. “Windows was a train wreck,” says Rob Enderle, a technology analyst at Enderle Group, who says that under Ballmer, the company seemed to completely lose control of the brand. But this year, Microsoft is back with new Windows ads that suggest it really has been listening. Featuring a four-year-old girl named Kylie using Windows to make slide shows and email digital pictures, they convey a key message: whether you’re six or 60, you will enjoy Windows again.

Microsoft has long had success as the platform that businesses use. It now wants to do the same for families. “Windows 7 will automatically recognize all the wireless products in your home: TV, phone, toasters, whatever,” says Huston. Connecting all these kinds of digital bits and pieces in a meaningful way is one of the holy grails for the software company, he adds. The aim is to create what he calls “moments of magic”—where the software takes care of complex tasks without you having to ask it to. Things as simple as merging the numbers on your cellphone with the address book on your computer.

To get to that point, Microsoft has had to rethink and simplify not just Windows, but the way it does business. For starters, it’s no longer off-loading anti-virus coverage to third-party companies. Virus protection is built into the operating system and also offered as free, additional software. And to make programs quicker and easier to update, they’ll be offered in both off-line and online versions. Microsoft has also been changing how it markets Windows. It used to leave that job almost entirely to the PC makers like Dell and Sony (one reason it lost control of the brand as customers soured on Vista). “Vista was an important step back for the company, both relative to the way we do our development, but also in the way that we manage perceptions around our products,” says Huston.

Regaining its clout in the PC market is crucial. Despite Microsoft’s various side projects and subsidiaries, software is still the big money-maker. Windows sales totalled $3.4 billion in its latest quarter, down from $4 billion a year earlier.

But the turnaround effort also comes at a time when the industry is at a crossroads. Much as Microsoft might like to be the company that manages the digital home, the reality is that consumers are quickly abandoning the home computer and going mobile. Sales of traditional PCs are down nearly 20 per cent. And mobile is the one area where Microsoft is still behind the curve, says Rob Helm, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft. Last year, Microsoft bought a company called Danger, which makes the smart phone brand SideKick. There has been some speculation that it will launch a Zune-branded phone of its own to chase after the iPhone. That would be a logical bet, given Microsoft’s reputation as a company that tends to play catch-up more than it innovates.

Bookmark and Share
  • Eggy

    You have got to be kidding me. There are plenty of angles you could take on a story of the Windows 7 launch, 'hipness' is most definitely not the right one. Have you SEEN the Windows 7 Launch Party ads? Generic and lazy writing, Maclean's can do better.

  • Amateur Hour

    If you read through the second page of the article, that issue is mentioned.

  • Kenny Norton

    I think this is a remarkable story. Every entrepreneur/business owner knows that the key to success is failure.
    I've been using Windows 7 for about 3 months and it's a great improvement over Vista and even XP.

    I think the marketing for the little kids is accepted from it's targeted audience quite well.
    I also like the ads where they go into the store with a budget and get the computer that they want.
    Let's face it, it's going to cost you close to 3 grand to get a top of the line Macbook Pro.
    Where as you can get equivalent specs on a PC and get it for 1500.
    Apple is marketing, and they've done a hell of a job – there OS is extremely fun to use as well.

    I think in order for MS to succeed, first they need to make Bing awesome, which they've been doing an excellent job at thus far. As well jump into the mobile market before they're left behind.

    Great read.

  • Vikram

    This article narrowly focuses on Microsoft's operating system Windows 7 and declares it a success within 2 days of its launch. Right now it looks good because Vista was an unmitigated disaster and set the bar low.

    Microsoft suffered an enormous setback as a serious enterprise server platform after the London Stock Exchange crash. Now the LSE is now switching over to Linux. NYSE was already running Red Hat Linux and so do 85 % of the world's super computers. I don't see a bright future for Microsoft in the enterprise space as they cant out compete the collaborate efforts of Google, IBM, Novell, Red hat, Oracle, Intel, HP, Dell in the Linux space. I don't think the person who wrote this article gets open source. Android and Chrome OS mentioned here are based on the Linux kernel and are essentially Linux kernels with different UIs.

    The reason Microsoft is paying attention to personal users is that they now have a choice other than slow, buggy, virus prone PCs and polished but expensive Macs. Distros like Mandriva Linux are so user friendly and work out of the box that my 70 year of Dad can use them and not have to worry about virus, defragging disks, spyware, registration keys and registry errors. All this for free ! There will be continued pressure on their PC margins as more and more people realize they have a choice.

  • coastlogger

    The real question is does it even come close to working as good as a ten year old Apple? Even DOS is better than Vista. At least it works.

    • Will

      A 10 year old Mac wouldn't even be running OS X not to mention the first iterations of OS X were probably one of the most unstable and sluggish operating systems ever made. I bet you never even used Vista.

  • TGuy

    Yeah I dono.

    On one hand, they had "I'm Kylie, I'm a PC and I'm 3 and a half years old". Amazing. Simply amazing.
    Then on the other, they had the Windows 7 Launch party. Hilariously awful.
    On one hand, they have the girl with her laptop shopping "I'm not cool enough to buy a mac". Counterculture clever for a market leader.
    Then on the other, they have the Zune. Ugly, ugly, ugly, and people are offended if you give it to them as a gift (what, i'm not good enough for an iPod?)

    Microsoft isn't hip. It's rich, and managed to hire a stylist that bought it some nice clothes and fixed the unibrow, but it's still the same old Microsoft.

  • Jamie

    As far as accessibility goes, Mac's OS X is eons ahead of Windows, which refuses to develop its platform. Voice Over is used across platforms – the computers, ipod's, iphones, and probably more, making so much more accessible. Windows still has Microsoft Sam? Come on! Windows users who are blind can fork out hundreds of dollars for years for third party apps, such as Jaws and Window Eyes, which are continually trying to keep up to date with what is being offered, and imho not very well, often causing apps, and even Windows to crash. While VO is not perfect, it is part of the operating system, and is certainly eons ahead of what Microsoft has to offer.

From Macleans