San Francisco has to pay for its sins

In this novel set in 2040, the U.S. has split into an Islamic Republic and a Christian Bible belt

by Mark Steyn on Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:00pm - 69 Comments

San Francisco has to pay for its sinsSeven and a half years ago, a girls’ school in Mecca caught fire. Many of the pupils were able to escape the burning building, but unfortunately they ran straight into the hands of the mutaween, Saudi Arabia’s “religious police,” who flayed them for having fled the conflagration without first putting on their head scarves and then drove them back to die in the flames. Fifteen schoolgirls perished—for being “immodestly” dressed. Remember that story? Robert Ferrigno does:

“The upper windows of the madrassa blew out, glass shimmering as it fell through the air. Five girls clustered on the outer balcony, far above the street, raising their arms to the sky, howling, their white night clothes billowing up past their knees . . .

“Three teenagers leaped through a ground-floor window, sprawled on the ground for a moment, bleeding, then ran toward their parents. Jenkins intercepted them, whipped them back, the tips of his beard smoldering, pinpricks of red light surrounding his face as the flail rose and fell. Police joined in, pushing the girls back into the flames.”

Jenkins? That’s right: “Mullah Jenkins.” In his new novel Heart of the Assassin, Robert Ferrigno recreates the Saudi school burning in every particular except one: the madrassa is now in America.

I recall the original report very clearly. It was not long after 9/11, and it was hard not to be struck by the contrast: on the one hand, the brave men of the New York Fire Department pounding up the stairwell of the World Trade Center to save innocent victims from the inferno; on the other, the brave men of the Commission for the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice forcing innocents back into the inferno in order to protect their “honour.” The incident seemed to distill something profound about two cultures, and serve as an implicit rebuke to Edward Said’s insistence that each was too “intertwined” with the other to be able to “draw the line”: the respective authorities’ response to fire evacuation seemed a pretty clear line.

Seven years is a long time for such a vivid image to strike the fancy of a novelist. If truth is indeed stranger than fiction, nowadays that may be a conscious choice: Der Spiegel reported the other day that the Droste publishing house of Düsseldorf had cancelled a new novel about “honour killing” in Germany, pleading the now familiar “safety” concerns.

Ferrigno’s “Assassin” trilogy was his response to a simple question he posed in the early days of the post-9/11 era: “What if it’s a long war?” In a short war, bet on technology—smart bombs and unmanned drones. In a long war, bet on will—or, as the novelist put it, “it’s the spiritual strength of the combatants that matters.” We like to think that those fearless firemen are emblematic, but what if that German publisher is more typical? What then?

For Ferrigno, the answer was North America circa 2040: the United States has split into an Islamic Republic in the north and west, and in the southeast “the Belt”—a Christian Bible belt. The edges are being nibbled off everywhere: a hedonist playground in the Nevada Free State, the Mormon Territories, Nueva Florida, a mighty Mexico reborn as the Aztlán Empire and annexing turf from California to Texas, and (golly) a Dominion of Canada that’s somehow managed to seep south of the 49th parallel and grab great chunks of Minnesota and Wisconsin. The Islamic Republic is mostly “moderate”—more Morocco than Yemen—but San Francisco, formerly the land of Milk (Harvey) and Nancy (Pelosi), is paying the price for its past. Renamed New Fallujah, it’s under the control of the Black Robes, a Saudi-style mutaween. Don’t waste your time looking for your favourite gay bar. The fornicators and sodomites have scrammed. And what’s left of those who didn’t can be found on the city’s new landmark: the Bridge of Skulls, formerly the Golden Gate.

Meanwhile, the Belt is less a bastion of republican virtue than an impoverished swamp of garish sentimentality whose national shrines are Waco and Graceland.

It’s an ingenious scenario brilliantly realized, and its detail is persuasive enough to enable Ferrigno to pursue all the traditional thriller conventions, the molls and McGuffins, against a familiar yet utterly transformed landscape. If the final third of the trilogy doesn’t seem entirely to resolve the story of maverick fedayeen Rakkim Epps, perhaps that means that the author will one day return to his Islamic Republic for further dispatches. Meanwhile, there are two aspects of his Islamotopian future I came especially to appreciate as the saga progressed: his villain, a would-be Twelfth Imam known as “the Old One,” is a very literal embodiment of Islam’s pre-modernity and fecundity. The guy is a century and a half old, so he plays a long game: “The world was a vast, multilayered chessboard, and the Old One took years between moves.” His patience is aided by multitudes of children by dozens of wives, “the many seeds planted across the earth, beautiful girls raised among the kaffirs in the Belt and Russia and China, raised among the faithful in Arabia and Europe.” His daughters marry powerful men. His sons wield it for themselves: one becomes pope. The Old One is the apotheosis of Muslim demographic insinuation.

Bookmark and Share
  • Gary K.

    "Before we all start getting wet dreams about Steyn and his heroic book review [...]"

    I do not get wet dreams over Mark Steyn. However, I do admire his heroic stance against government-sanctioned kangaroo court abuses (CHRC and provincial counter-parts) that target regular citizens who do not belong to a designated victim class or protected group. The law is not applied equally to all citizens – this is tyranny.

    On another note – what was the prophet's (PBUH) grandson's name? Was it Barack, Hussein, or Obama?

  • opportunity cost

    Cobalt? Cape Breton? What?

  • Jae

    Sounds good to me!

  • Hannah G

    Excellent article! Regarding mass conversions to Islam, I think it's entirely possible. If one will not have God as Father, one must have Him as Master.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/minaka minaka

    I wouldn't have believed in the mass conversions Ferrigno imagined either but after seeing a dry run of very gullible people electing an unqualified marxist mulatto nobody into the White House on the basis that he can pass for black and can read a teleprompter, then remaining worshipful as he destroys an exceptional country to substitute just another socialist backwater, everything's possible. That scenario is weirder than anything Ferrigno could dream up.

    At the very least, Obama is an Islamophile as implied by:
    1) his early indoctrination in Indonesia,
    2) his servile bow to the Saudi "king"
    3) his sucking up to Muslims rewriting history to flatter them unjustifiably
    4) his double claim that America does not consider herself a Christian nation and is "one of the largest Muslim nations". Since the USA does not make it into even the top 20 Muslim nations by population, this indicates the President's (wishful) thinking.
    5) refusing to take part in the Christian National Prayer Day while celebrating Ramadan ostentatiously at the White House.
    6) flaunting the name Hussein AFTER the election whereas it was verboten during the campaign.

    At worst, if Hussein Obama retained his popularity (no longer a given as his policies start to bite middle class voters) it was conceivable that he would come out as a "born again" Muslim and many of his robotic worshipers would follow, especially the airheads in the media-entertainment conglomerate.

  • Nairb

    Hit your "G" spot, did he, Brian?

  • Michelle

    So do you think he might be a Muslim? Is going to church and saying he's a Christian just a cover?

  • responder

    You are watching too much American Republican news, Minaka. Fortunately, I live in Canada where I can be a rational Conservative.

  • Abruzio

    Aren't you the lucky one, Responder! You get your "news" from the Globe and Mail and Mother CBC. No wonder you feel so superior (well, as a good Canuck, I should say, perhaps a little moderately superior)!
    Embarrassed by your reply.
    Another Canadian

    • Foreigner

      And I'm embarrassed by your shrill scolding. Grow up.

  • HANNAH MONTANA

    craaazy!

  • Rush

    Heavens! Are you saying that Obama likes Muslims? That's almost as bad as somebody who likes Jews! (Sarcasm alert)

  • Guest

    And that's just Toronto.

  • Guest

    Look at the American Left Brian. They detest their own civilization. How willing do you think they would be to defend it with force? It is said that great civilizations never crumble from without. They always crumble from within first when those that nurtured them no longer care. Is the spectre of rising militant Islam spreading across the globe really so far fetched? We have seen this before and for millions of people it ended in the worst way possible.

  • Guest

    They didn't renounce or get wiped out. They just moved to San Francisco.

  • Guest

    He isn't a Muslim. He is just a secular humanist that is either afraid of or sympathetic to them.

    • Michelle

      So this whole going to church and saying he's a Christian thing, that stuff is all a sham?

  • gm1000

    put your ear to the ground Mark, you must hear it, so do i, so do lots of people who were old liberals,you know the ones who prized tolerance, and hear the drums….the age of moral relativism is dying as its threadbare perverted view of the world is revealed as little more than "get whitey"….the chattering classes hurl racism at all those who won't embrace multiculturalism but we peons who can't afford organic arugula are no longer frightened of liberal disdain, we're more frightened by how the liberals are destroying western values and civilization…., how ironic it would be if they were first casualties…..

  • Foreigner

    Instalment no. 488982 of Mark Steyn's "The People I hate."

    The feeling's mutual, you unlettered twit.

    • Rob H

      Unlettered? Based on what?

  • Foreigner

    Don't kick so high, cheer-leader. I can see your panties.

  • Foreigner

    Jesus, what a bitch.

  • Humanist

    And part b) is a good thing why exactly? As for a), what kind of objective standards do you hope to find in books written hundreds or thousands of years ago, and exclusively by men? Do you advocate the stoning of adultress women because the Bible and the Koran condone it? Most western democracies (including ours) are founded on the separation of Church and State, and the triumph of reason and humanism over fanaticism. Human rights are defined by humans, and no one else. Amen to that, I'd say.

  • jlp

    "these self-aggrandizing statist hacks are simply too bone-crushingly stupid to have any say over your lives" Pot-kettle-black, Mr. Steyn. I am not at all surprised, though. As far as self-styled martyrs go, you are certainly one of the whiniest. I find it utterly fascinating how an individual, who clearly considers himself to be a little smarter than most, can sit through an entire court proceeding and come out the other side without a working knowledge of his own case.
    I sat through many days of the hearing in BC. You won. Get over it. I know it must have been crushing to have to hand back your crown of thorns, but your case set the "high water mark" for the speech provisions in human rights legislation, at least in BC.

  • jlp

    The Tribunal can't just ignore a case. Anyone can file a case with any court. It's called "access to justice". I would be very upset if I filed a case in small claims and the court rejected it on the grounds that the registrar thought it was silly, without it ever being heard. The Tribunal had to hear the case. No court has the right to deny someone their day in court. We should all be very thankful for that, as that would entail bureaucrats making legal decisions on the merits of a case.

  • jlp

    Furthermore, the Tribunal did not rule on whether this was a "hate crime". This is not a criminal court. Human rights legislation looks to restore dignity to the complainant, not punish the offender. Really, the legislation is closer to libel law than criminal law. The Tribunal members are akin to judges, not prosecutors. And yes, many people, myself included, feel the law is unnecessary. In my case, not because I think the law infringes freedom of speech but rather because I believe that these laws are counter-productive.
    Mr. Steyn, I suspect that you know this. I suspect you know you set an important legal precedent. I suspect you know that human rights law is not comparable to criminal law and I suspect you know that you were not prosecuted by the state but your publisher was a respondent in a case brought by Mohamed Elmasry and Naiyer Habib.
    If you don't, you are too "simply too bone-crushingly stupid " to be taken seriously. If you do, your exploitation of your readers to further your ideological cause at the cost of truth and open discussion is an embarrassment to those of us who truly value free speech and democracy

    • Rob H

      Open discussion? Is that where anything said must meet with your approval? Do you understand the issue of free speech at all? Whose ideological cause is acceptable to you?

  • TGuy

    What in the hell was the point of this article?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/YYZ YYZ

      PHEW!

      I was beginngint to think it was just me.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/minaka minaka

    Michelle asked: " So this whole going to church and saying he's a Christian thing, that stuff is all a sham?"

    Study the church Obama attended in Chicago, Michelle, (Trinity United Church of Christ) and you will find little Christian about it. It preaches what's called "black liberation theology" making it more like a black supremacist community hall where the fire-breathing minister (Reverend Wright), Obama's mentor who married him and christened his children preached anti-white bigotry e.g. that whites invented AIDS and purposely spread it to black communities.

    Obama went to this church to make the connections he needed to make in Chicago to get the black vote. The fact remains he attended every Sunday with his wife and kids and either clapped and cheered the anti-white racism with the rest of the congregation or as he claimed, never heard it (meaning he zoned out during 52 sermons a year for 20 years).

    Whether he's Muslim or not, (they're allowed to lie about their faith -takiya- to gain strategic advantage for Allah) he's no Christian as in forgiving whites for their supposed sins.

    The person comparing his Muslimophilia to liking Jews is throwing the sand of his own ignorance in others' eyes. We're not talking about mere tolerance for practitioners of various religions. Obama is promoting one particular religion in all his Mid-East speeches and it is Islam, not Christianity. I gave many examples domestically as well. Does Obama declare that the United States is one of the biggest Jewish nations? Does he ostentatiously celebrate Yom Kippur? Does he say he's going to take personal responsibility for fighting against anti-semitism? He did the equivalent for Islam. He is an Islam apologist (re-writing history to flatter them) and promoter.

    • joe in ottawa

      Right on the MARK!

    • Michelle

      Whatever he's doing in the States, the Jews seem to like it, given that the vast majority of them voted for him.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/minaka minaka

        Yes. 80% of American Jews vote Democrat no matter who the candidate or his policies and make up a large part of that party's financial backing. Their reflex leftism is more important to them than their Jewishness or at least Israel because they now march with the anti-Israel pro-Palestinian group. Many spout the "apartheid" and even "nazi" comparisons in relation to Israel.

        So Jews are definitely divided on the subject of Israel, and divided houses fall. Muslims the world over on the other hand are unified in their hatred of Jews and insistence that Israel must be removed from their midst. All the two state palaver is just a stage on the way to a judenrein Mid-East from the Arab point of view.

        It's bizarre why American Jews think they won't be next in Muslims' sights. Their leftism won't save them.

From Macleans