<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBC&#039;s stand-up act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sell gold</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-2/#comment-196702</link>
		<dc:creator>sell gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196702</guid>
		<description>Never thought this could be so serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never thought this could be so serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-2/#comment-196701</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196701</guid>
		<description>You lost me when you misspelled YouTube.

That&#039;s a pet peeve of mine.

Their slogan is &quot;Broadcast Yourself&quot;, not &quot;Broadcast random letters of the alphabet&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lost me when you misspelled YouTube.</p>
<p>That&#039;s a pet peeve of mine.</p>
<p>Their slogan is &quot;Broadcast Yourself&quot;, not &quot;Broadcast random letters of the alphabet&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196700</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196700</guid>
		<description>I third that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I third that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196699</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196699</guid>
		<description>Exactly.

&quot;Slow news day&quot; is just a rationalization of &quot;Lazy news reporters&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
<p>&quot;Slow news day&quot; is just a rationalization of &quot;Lazy news reporters&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimD</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196698</link>
		<dc:creator>JimD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196698</guid>
		<description>&quot;Louder, faster, dumber.&quot;

I couldn&#039;t agree more.  They&#039;ve got Mansbridge doing his damnedest to come across like Wolf Blitzer, which is like a director asking Daniel Day-Lewis to star in the next Harold and Kumar movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Louder, faster, dumber.&quot;</p>
<p>I couldn&#039;t agree more.  They&#039;ve got Mansbridge doing his damnedest to come across like Wolf Blitzer, which is like a director asking Daniel Day-Lewis to star in the next Harold and Kumar movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-2/#comment-196697</link>
		<dc:creator>David B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196697</guid>
		<description>The new Internet media c/w live U-Tube fillers much of which is captured along with the eye-reporters to news networks is becoming dulls ville. If it was not for the Cafferty File who would really watch Wolf Blizer.  CTV has been using day late CNN material for years, Mike and Pamela have moved on the Senate, no more inside rat finking there,  This leaves nothing more than another around of dead  people from Iraq and Afghanistan,  but wait could we have a good ode Shock and Awe in Iran.  oops more dead people!
Far too many people are living one pay check away from poverty and are totally wiped out and disgusted with all politicians and have decided they have cast their last vote.  So why watch any political type on TV, they are all the same be they CEO&#039; s or generals.    Thanks Macleans at least I get some say  and comfort with a few words here and there accepted for print or not.  More &amp; more of us ode dudes are well informed and choose not to vote because we have learned Politics is Self Serving plain and simple more than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Internet media c/w live U-Tube fillers much of which is captured along with the eye-reporters to news networks is becoming dulls ville. If it was not for the Cafferty File who would really watch Wolf Blizer.  CTV has been using day late CNN material for years, Mike and Pamela have moved on the Senate, no more inside rat finking there,  This leaves nothing more than another around of dead  people from Iraq and Afghanistan,  but wait could we have a good ode Shock and Awe in Iran.  oops more dead people!<br />
Far too many people are living one pay check away from poverty and are totally wiped out and disgusted with all politicians and have decided they have cast their last vote.  So why watch any political type on TV, they are all the same be they CEO&#039; s or generals.    Thanks Macleans at least I get some say  and comfort with a few words here and there accepted for print or not.  More &amp; more of us ode dudes are well informed and choose not to vote because we have learned Politics is Self Serving plain and simple more than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-2/#comment-196696</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196696</guid>
		<description>I appreciated Wendy Mesley&#039;s take on Africa tonight, &quot;Can we have a snack please?&quot; -- the sarcasm here is so youthful and edgy.

I am young and uninformed, but this new sarcastic, vapid, edgy and ADD ridden format has really peaked my interest in the news. Way to keep it real CBC...

BOLF!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciated Wendy Mesley&#039;s take on Africa tonight, &quot;Can we have a snack please?&quot; &#8212; the sarcasm here is so youthful and edgy.</p>
<p>I am young and uninformed, but this new sarcastic, vapid, edgy and ADD ridden format has really peaked my interest in the news. Way to keep it real CBC&#8230;</p>
<p>BOLF!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wally</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-2/#comment-196695</link>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196695</guid>
		<description>I was cautiously optimistic about the redo of CBC News.  Wow.  What a load of poo.  Total lack of depth.  The National is just putrid. And Newsworld&#039;s redo is all flash, no substance.  The Mark Kelley Connect show is unbelievably bad - totally reliant of free content from the web.  What does Stursberg have over those who are keeping him employed?? It is breathtaking in its vapidness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was cautiously optimistic about the redo of CBC News.  Wow.  What a load of poo.  Total lack of depth.  The National is just putrid. And Newsworld&#039;s redo is all flash, no substance.  The Mark Kelley Connect show is unbelievably bad &#8211; totally reliant of free content from the web.  What does Stursberg have over those who are keeping him employed?? It is breathtaking in its vapidness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Collins</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-2/#comment-196694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196694</guid>
		<description>Start of a post at &quot;Dust my Broom&quot;:

&quot;CNN (North): Why bother?

Indeed.  Most of  Mother Corpse&#039;s &quot;news&quot; makeover, with money from taxpayers in the Great White North having gone, er, south in the effort, is now a frenetic (&quot;frantic kineticism&quot;? see link at last para of post) reality show, fixated this morning on a sad, but individual, anomaly...&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dustmybroom.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=12708:cnn-north-why-bother&amp;catid=43:drama-city&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://dustmybroom.com/index.php?option=com_conte...&lt;/a&gt;

Mark
Ottawa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start of a post at &quot;Dust my Broom&quot;:</p>
<p>&quot;CNN (North): Why bother?</p>
<p>Indeed.  Most of  Mother Corpse&#039;s &quot;news&quot; makeover, with money from taxpayers in the Great White North having gone, er, south in the effort, is now a frenetic (&quot;frantic kineticism&quot;? see link at last para of post) reality show, fixated this morning on a sad, but individual, anomaly&#8230;&quot;<br />
<a href="http://dustmybroom.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=12708:cnn-north-why-bother&amp;catid=43:drama-city" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://dustmybroom.com/index.php?option=com_conte&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Mark<br />
Ottawa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaggiesFarmboy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-2/#comment-196693</link>
		<dc:creator>MaggiesFarmboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196693</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m watching Mark Kelly last night and I start focussing on the zooming and flashing crawls underneath him.  Suddenly, it induced a seizure and hallucinations like I&#039;m a Japanese kid watching bad anime.  When I woke up, I swear I saw Peter Mansbridge shuffling nervously back and forth with his head lopped off by the camera, talking to some reporter off stage right.

Next time they decide to have a.v. night for the local high school kids, they should post a warning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#039;m watching Mark Kelly last night and I start focussing on the zooming and flashing crawls underneath him.  Suddenly, it induced a seizure and hallucinations like I&#039;m a Japanese kid watching bad anime.  When I woke up, I swear I saw Peter Mansbridge shuffling nervously back and forth with his head lopped off by the camera, talking to some reporter off stage right.</p>
<p>Next time they decide to have a.v. night for the local high school kids, they should post a warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torlander</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-2/#comment-196692</link>
		<dc:creator>torlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196692</guid>
		<description>What I want to know is if somebody is investigating whether or not CBC violated its journalistic policy by putting that bloodied protester in the studio in the first place. It would seem to me that the putting a bloodied protestor on air would be considered &#8220;the presentation of violence&#8221; and it seems clear to me that he was put on the air in the state he was for &#8220;shock effect&#8221;.

According to the CBC&#8217;s policy:
&#8220;In all cases, the presentation of violence should be warranted and should not be undertaken for shock effect or for trivial reasons.&#8221;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/accountability/journalistic/goodtaste.shtml#44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/accountability/jou...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to know is if somebody is investigating whether or not CBC violated its journalistic policy by putting that bloodied protester in the studio in the first place. It would seem to me that the putting a bloodied protestor on air would be considered &ldquo;the presentation of violence&rdquo; and it seems clear to me that he was put on the air in the state he was for &ldquo;shock effect&rdquo;.</p>
<p>According to the CBC&rsquo;s policy:<br />
&ldquo;In all cases, the presentation of violence should be warranted and should not be undertaken for shock effect or for trivial reasons.&rdquo;<br />
<a href="http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/accountability/journalistic/goodtaste.shtml#44" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/accountability/jou&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Nick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196691</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196691</guid>
		<description>Cutting back on chair costs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting back on chair costs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196690</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196690</guid>
		<description>I watched last night.

I WANTED to like it.

Honest, I did; I think Lang and O&#039;Leary were a coup for those of us who wanted someone capable of understanding LIBOR or bank capitalizations or venture capital to be staffing a beat for their evening newscasts.

Instead, I was actually embarrassed to be watching. The breaking point was the bit where Mansbridge said to Hillier, &quot;and watch this clip,&quot; and Canada&#039;s best general since the war is reduced to awkwardly looking around trying to figure out which of the ten green screens and monitors has the clip that&#039;s supposed to be so embarrassing to him. How hard would it have been to have had Mansbridge say, &quot;In 2005, you said... [quote]. Do you stand by that today?&quot; It would have been more effective, frankly.

And this morning, at a diner over breakfast, I got a headache from whats-her-name on the 9ish shift. She was practically shouting these cheezy lines - &quot;A teen died....[dramatic pause].........and it *could* have been H1N1!&quot; over and over like it was from a script, and I couldn&#039;t figure out why she suddenly felt the need to shout when she seemed so reasonable a day prior. And then they panned back and I realized: the poor bastards in studio are placed fourteen miles from the nearest actual human. Miked or not, hey feel the need to scream to actually be heard by their own colleagues.

Wish I knew how many more reporters they could have hired with the money spent on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched last night.</p>
<p>I WANTED to like it.</p>
<p>Honest, I did; I think Lang and O&#039;Leary were a coup for those of us who wanted someone capable of understanding LIBOR or bank capitalizations or venture capital to be staffing a beat for their evening newscasts.</p>
<p>Instead, I was actually embarrassed to be watching. The breaking point was the bit where Mansbridge said to Hillier, &quot;and watch this clip,&quot; and Canada&#039;s best general since the war is reduced to awkwardly looking around trying to figure out which of the ten green screens and monitors has the clip that&#039;s supposed to be so embarrassing to him. How hard would it have been to have had Mansbridge say, &quot;In 2005, you said&#8230; [quote]. Do you stand by that today?&quot; It would have been more effective, frankly.</p>
<p>And this morning, at a diner over breakfast, I got a headache from whats-her-name on the 9ish shift. She was practically shouting these cheezy lines &#8211; &quot;A teen died&#8230;.[dramatic pause]&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;and it *could* have been H1N1!&quot; over and over like it was from a script, and I couldn&#039;t figure out why she suddenly felt the need to shout when she seemed so reasonable a day prior. And then they panned back and I realized: the poor bastards in studio are placed fourteen miles from the nearest actual human. Miked or not, hey feel the need to scream to actually be heard by their own colleagues.</p>
<p>Wish I knew how many more reporters they could have hired with the money spent on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196689</link>
		<dc:creator>John W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196689</guid>
		<description>I too missed any acknowledgement of KO on this site. Petty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too missed any acknowledgement of KO on this site. Petty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanStok</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196688</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanStok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196688</guid>
		<description>The National was horrible last night.  Top to bottom.  I&#039;d say it shows a complete abandonment of substance for style, but I&#039;m hard pressed to call that collage of crap &#039;style&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National was horrible last night.  Top to bottom.  I&#039;d say it shows a complete abandonment of substance for style, but I&#039;m hard pressed to call that collage of crap &#039;style&#039;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaydee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196687</link>
		<dc:creator>jaydee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196687</guid>
		<description>Poor Peter Mansbridge. He looked foolish having to stand through the whole thing. He reminded me of the security guard in episode 113 of Seinfeld. Get that guy a chair!

http://www.seinfeldscripts.com/TheMaestro.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Peter Mansbridge. He looked foolish having to stand through the whole thing. He reminded me of the security guard in episode 113 of Seinfeld. Get that guy a chair!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seinfeldscripts.com/TheMaestro.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.seinfeldscripts.com/TheMaestro.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CndnRschr</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196686</link>
		<dc:creator>CndnRschr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196686</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get the stand-up format. The 2 inch piece of acrylic glass is impressive but the camera cuing is clearly uncomfortable for the presenters. It&#039;s not an off the cuff chat. It&#8217;s a scripted event and trying to look informal when each exchange is planned down to where the person is supposed to be focussing their eyes is simply fake. Will the At Issue Panel have to stand too in their respective studios?  Will we be subject to a full frontal of Coyne and Hebert? Check your flies guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#039;t get the stand-up format. The 2 inch piece of acrylic glass is impressive but the camera cuing is clearly uncomfortable for the presenters. It&#039;s not an off the cuff chat. It&rsquo;s a scripted event and trying to look informal when each exchange is planned down to where the person is supposed to be focussing their eyes is simply fake. Will the At Issue Panel have to stand too in their respective studios?  Will we be subject to a full frontal of Coyne and Hebert? Check your flies guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Bob</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196685</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196685</guid>
		<description>A perkiness contest, eh? I think Mansbridge might end up judging that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A perkiness contest, eh? I think Mansbridge might end up judging that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foreigner</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196684</link>
		<dc:creator>Foreigner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196684</guid>
		<description>I look forward to the day when one of our public broadcasters has the balls to host a permanent media critique feature in the vein of BBC&#039;s &quot;Newswipe&quot; or NPR&#039;s &quot;On the Media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to the day when one of our public broadcasters has the balls to host a permanent media critique feature in the vein of BBC&#039;s &quot;Newswipe&quot; or NPR&#039;s &quot;On the Media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foreigner</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196683</link>
		<dc:creator>Foreigner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196683</guid>
		<description>&quot;Give the CBC a few weeks before you pass judgment...&quot;

No time, no time....There&#039;s a newshole to fill!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Give the CBC a few weeks before you pass judgment&#8230;&quot;</p>
<p>No time, no time&#8230;.There&#039;s a newshole to fill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.B.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196682</link>
		<dc:creator>E.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196682</guid>
		<description>Based on the first &#039;episode&#039; of the National last night, I was unimpressed.  A couple of tongue in cheek observations:

Is the CBC kowtowing to the Conservatives?  Is this more evidence of the Conservatives blurring the lines between the Party and The Government?  Is the CBC now &quot;Standing Up for Canada&quot;?  Is the National subliminally reminding me to &quot;Stand Up for Canada&quot;?

And, is it just me, or is anyone else considering the possiblity of a reality show competetition between Kady and Wendy to determine just who the perkiest CBC reporter is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the first &#039;episode&#039; of the National last night, I was unimpressed.  A couple of tongue in cheek observations:</p>
<p>Is the CBC kowtowing to the Conservatives?  Is this more evidence of the Conservatives blurring the lines between the Party and The Government?  Is the CBC now &quot;Standing Up for Canada&quot;?  Is the National subliminally reminding me to &quot;Stand Up for Canada&quot;?</p>
<p>And, is it just me, or is anyone else considering the possiblity of a reality show competetition between Kady and Wendy to determine just who the perkiest CBC reporter is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lu Galasso</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196681</link>
		<dc:creator>Lu Galasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196681</guid>
		<description>The Jim Prentice interview was a joke.  Those pre-arranged questions from the Canadian youth delegation on climate change were hard to sit through and then Prentice didn&#039;t answer a single one.  Just reestablished that Canada invests in CCS, is a &#039;leader (scoff) on climate issues and faces greater challenges than other nations in the lead up to Copenhagen.  Sorry but i didn&#039;t need to waste 10 mins of my time watching Prentice follow the old do nothing line.  Thanks CBC!!
&lt;a href=&quot;http://envirogy.wordpress.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://envirogy.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jim Prentice interview was a joke.  Those pre-arranged questions from the Canadian youth delegation on climate change were hard to sit through and then Prentice didn&#039;t answer a single one.  Just reestablished that Canada invests in CCS, is a &#039;leader (scoff) on climate issues and faces greater challenges than other nations in the lead up to Copenhagen.  Sorry but i didn&#039;t need to waste 10 mins of my time watching Prentice follow the old do nothing line.  Thanks CBC!!<br />
<a href="http://envirogy.wordpress.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://envirogy.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196680</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196680</guid>
		<description>Why watch the news on TV according to the Corp&#039;s schedule/pace when you can get it online at your own schedule and pace.

Bonus feature: you don&#039;t have to watch Mansbridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why watch the news on TV according to the Corp&#039;s schedule/pace when you can get it online at your own schedule and pace.</p>
<p>Bonus feature: you don&#039;t have to watch Mansbridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BCer in Mtl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196679</link>
		<dc:creator>BCer in Mtl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196679</guid>
		<description>A couple days ago I happened to hear some of the promo stuff for their new news coverage . . . .&quot;CBC News  . . . No More&quot; and I thought, oh dear, it seems jarrid&#039;s wet dream really has come true.   But then I saw the screen a bit later, and realized my misinterpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple days ago I happened to hear some of the promo stuff for their new news coverage . . . .&quot;CBC News  . . . No More&quot; and I thought, oh dear, it seems jarrid&#039;s wet dream really has come true.   But then I saw the screen a bit later, and realized my misinterpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobyornottoby</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196678</link>
		<dc:creator>tobyornottoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196678</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m unable to watch TV news especially at night. I&#039;m not old enough to have a cane to wave at the screen, so I just get pissed off and can&#039;t sleep. Better to watch TV that accepts its role is to be vapid drivel. If I want infromation I can listen to CBC Radio while I&#039;m on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m unable to watch TV news especially at night. I&#039;m not old enough to have a cane to wave at the screen, so I just get pissed off and can&#039;t sleep. Better to watch TV that accepts its role is to be vapid drivel. If I want infromation I can listen to CBC Radio while I&#039;m on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie N</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196677</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196677</guid>
		<description>Wells, Wells, Wells
Give the CBC a few weeks before you pass judgment - they will no doubt tweek the format and the frenetics will be less pronounced.

I do have a bone to pick with you and Coyne about our favourite pixel committee wonk. No acknowledgment of her contributions to Macleans really looked like sour grapes.

Would a post on your blog really have been that hard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wells, Wells, Wells<br />
Give the CBC a few weeks before you pass judgment &#8211; they will no doubt tweek the format and the frenetics will be less pronounced.</p>
<p>I do have a bone to pick with you and Coyne about our favourite pixel committee wonk. No acknowledgment of her contributions to Macleans really looked like sour grapes.</p>
<p>Would a post on your blog really have been that hard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulletaur</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196676</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulletaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196676</guid>
		<description>They hired those two away from BNN lately, perhaps that&#039;s what CBC has in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They hired those two away from BNN lately, perhaps that&#039;s what CBC has in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McClelland</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196675</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McClelland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196675</guid>
		<description>If only you could watch The Agenda on the web at a time of your choosing. That would be great, wouldn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only you could watch The Agenda on the web at a time of your choosing. That would be great, wouldn&#039;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McClelland</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196674</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McClelland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196674</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The deeper news hole is, clearly, a hell of a challenge to fill on a day when there actually isn&#8217;t all that much going on in the world.&lt;/i&gt;

There is no such thing as, &quot;a day when there actually isn&#039;t all that much going on in the world.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The deeper news hole is, clearly, a hell of a challenge to fill on a day when there actually isn&rsquo;t all that much going on in the world.</i></p>
<p>There is no such thing as, &quot;a day when there actually isn&#039;t all that much going on in the world.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196673</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196673</guid>
		<description>Louder, faster, dumber.  More promos, more stunts and more Hollywood gossip.  Jesus wept.  I think I liked them better when they were just a bunch of dour old lefties who lectured us on Canadian values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louder, faster, dumber.  More promos, more stunts and more Hollywood gossip.  Jesus wept.  I think I liked them better when they were just a bunch of dour old lefties who lectured us on Canadian values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilian Nattel</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196672</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilian Nattel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196672</guid>
		<description>I want depth. If the CBC would give that, I would be back to CBC. Tidbits are on offer everywhere.  But something like The Agenda on TVO is a rarity. I wish The Agenda would come on at 10:00. The early show is too early, my kids are still up, and 11:00 is too late for me to watch it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want depth. If the CBC would give that, I would be back to CBC. Tidbits are on offer everywhere.  But something like The Agenda on TVO is a rarity. I wish The Agenda would come on at 10:00. The early show is too early, my kids are still up, and 11:00 is too late for me to watch it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whiskey</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196671</link>
		<dc:creator>Whiskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196671</guid>
		<description>Enjoy Terry Milewski on the Ottawa beat.

Things may get very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy Terry Milewski on the Ottawa beat.</p>
<p>Things may get very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196670</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196670</guid>
		<description>They can fill a lot of their newshole with business coverage. A lot of the cross-promo will disappear, one hopes, after the first week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can fill a lot of their newshole with business coverage. A lot of the cross-promo will disappear, one hopes, after the first week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196669</link>
		<dc:creator>knick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196669</guid>
		<description>Thought that too.  But without the &#039;Magic Wall&#039; thingy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought that too.  But without the &#039;Magic Wall&#039; thingy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sea_n_mountains</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196668</link>
		<dc:creator>sea_n_mountains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196668</guid>
		<description>&quot;And no amount of frenetic urgency from a dizzying succession of hosts, all of them bolt upright on hind legs as though they had been forbidden the use of their asses (jazz hands, everyone! Motion motion motion!) can substitute for the purposeful use of the extra time the network has allotted itself.&quot;

I am not sure. you might be right. But, and i mean this in a complimentary way, when blog central was/is at its best it suggested otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;And no amount of frenetic urgency from a dizzying succession of hosts, all of them bolt upright on hind legs as though they had been forbidden the use of their asses (jazz hands, everyone! Motion motion motion!) can substitute for the purposeful use of the extra time the network has allotted itself.&quot;</p>
<p>I am not sure. you might be right. But, and i mean this in a complimentary way, when blog central was/is at its best it suggested otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew (not P or C)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196667</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew (not P or C)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196667</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think O&#039;Leary held anything back. He was acting even crazier than usual.

And Lang was a good catch. I think her show on BNN might have been a better format. The 30 minute show seemed rushed, and they were firing off topics like it was some kind of lightning round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think O&#039;Leary held anything back. He was acting even crazier than usual.</p>
<p>And Lang was a good catch. I think her show on BNN might have been a better format. The 30 minute show seemed rushed, and they were firing off topics like it was some kind of lightning round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196666</link>
		<dc:creator>CBP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196666</guid>
		<description>Watching right now....and every time they cut to an in-studio reporter (Cameron Macintosh in this case), the camera will NOT STOP MOVING.  Why would you bring edgy, cop-drama production values to an H1N1 update story?   Or is the cameraman loaded?

Why does it keep flashing &quot;News....Now&quot; on the screen?  It&#039;s a freaking news channel.  And I have a watch.   Got it.

Heather is hard to listen to and now there is more to see given the CBC has sold all the chairs to pay for graphic designers and Colleen Jones&#039; hair people.

I&#039;ll continue to give it a shot but the morning show is leaving me disappointed.  Will try later in the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching right now&#8230;.and every time they cut to an in-studio reporter (Cameron Macintosh in this case), the camera will NOT STOP MOVING.  Why would you bring edgy, cop-drama production values to an H1N1 update story?   Or is the cameraman loaded?</p>
<p>Why does it keep flashing &quot;News&#8230;.Now&quot; on the screen?  It&#039;s a freaking news channel.  And I have a watch.   Got it.</p>
<p>Heather is hard to listen to and now there is more to see given the CBC has sold all the chairs to pay for graphic designers and Colleen Jones&#039; hair people.</p>
<p>I&#039;ll continue to give it a shot but the morning show is leaving me disappointed.  Will try later in the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JennyC</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196665</link>
		<dc:creator>JennyC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196665</guid>
		<description>&quot;...I can&#8217;t tell the difference between news and promos-for-news.&quot;

Isn&#039;t that the existing format of The Hour, a show which has about three minutes of actual content over the course of 42 minutes?

New format seems gimmicky and distracting from journalism. Guess I&#039;m not as optimistic about the newshole...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&#8230;I can&rsquo;t tell the difference between news and promos-for-news.&quot;</p>
<p>Isn&#039;t that the existing format of The Hour, a show which has about three minutes of actual content over the course of 42 minutes?</p>
<p>New format seems gimmicky and distracting from journalism. Guess I&#039;m not as optimistic about the newshole&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196664</link>
		<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196664</guid>
		<description>The stem to gudgeon...

I&#039;m an old sailor and i haven&#039;t heard it quite that way before. PW you have hidden talents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stem to gudgeon&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#039;m an old sailor and i haven&#039;t heard it quite that way before. PW you have hidden talents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwoYen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196663</link>
		<dc:creator>TwoYen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196663</guid>
		<description>I also had the nagging sense there were more commercials on the National than before. Thank god for my PVR and the fact I didn&#039;t watch it live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also had the nagging sense there were more commercials on the National than before. Thank god for my PVR and the fact I didn&#039;t watch it live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffM</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196662</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196662</guid>
		<description>Say no more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say no more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196661</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196661</guid>
		<description>In this restructuring, or reprogramming of the CBC, I&#039;m starting to look at them like one does Microsoft. Never the innovator, but once one of the upstarts discovers a winning formula, and has worked out the kinks, buy them out, or copy it - through reverse engineering.

Hey, KO&#039;M is a loss to Macleans, but frankly, as a non paying online reader, I myself had difficulty figuring out the economics of her employ by Whyte. She didn&#039;t write columns in the mag, so was her employ sustainable here without a wider audience that CBC/tv provides? Remember when Wolf had two blogger analysts observing opposing sides of the debate (now down to one) ,  and Don Newman had his Monday blog review with KOM? Will history repeat?

This whole restructuring /reprogramming looks like the PC guy on the Mac commercials. Even the lead in program, with Amanda Lang and Kevin O&#039;Leary is a ripoff of their similar program on BNN. Hell, they even sit in the same positions with the same camera angle! And ask O&#039;Leary about gov&#039;t involvement in industry- he&#039;d jump off the deep end while on BNN - I guess the ego has wonderful ways of smoothing over ideology.

Windows 7? No thanks, I&#039;m sticking with my PowerMac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this restructuring, or reprogramming of the CBC, I&#039;m starting to look at them like one does Microsoft. Never the innovator, but once one of the upstarts discovers a winning formula, and has worked out the kinks, buy them out, or copy it &#8211; through reverse engineering.</p>
<p>Hey, KO&#039;M is a loss to Macleans, but frankly, as a non paying online reader, I myself had difficulty figuring out the economics of her employ by Whyte. She didn&#039;t write columns in the mag, so was her employ sustainable here without a wider audience that CBC/tv provides? Remember when Wolf had two blogger analysts observing opposing sides of the debate (now down to one) ,  and Don Newman had his Monday blog review with KOM? Will history repeat?</p>
<p>This whole restructuring /reprogramming looks like the PC guy on the Mac commercials. Even the lead in program, with Amanda Lang and Kevin O&#039;Leary is a ripoff of their similar program on BNN. Hell, they even sit in the same positions with the same camera angle! And ask O&#039;Leary about gov&#039;t involvement in industry- he&#039;d jump off the deep end while on BNN &#8211; I guess the ego has wonderful ways of smoothing over ideology.</p>
<p>Windows 7? No thanks, I&#039;m sticking with my PowerMac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inkless</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196659</link>
		<dc:creator>Inkless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196659</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gudgeons-on-shaft.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gudgeons-on-sha...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gudgeons-on-shaft.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gudgeons-on-sha&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inkless</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196660</link>
		<dc:creator>Inkless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196660</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gudgeons-on-shaft.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gudgeons-on-sha...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gudgeons-on-shaft.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gudgeons-on-sha&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/stand-up-act/comment-page-1/#comment-196658</link>
		<dc:creator>wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89061#comment-196658</guid>
		<description>Kinda like CNN North.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda like CNN North.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

