<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Commons: If we can&#039;t talk to each other, we can only talk to ourselves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: frenchie101</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198886</link>
		<dc:creator>frenchie101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198886</guid>
		<description>Toronto is no longer the center of the universe, it barely makes a mark anymore.Rae would be a useless leader, for the liberal party, and for the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toronto is no longer the center of the universe, it barely makes a mark anymore.Rae would be a useless leader, for the liberal party, and for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilCP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198885</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198885</guid>
		<description>It seems that our perspectives dictate what we take as provocative.

Knowing what I knew at the time, I thought that the basic assertion that Bob Rae used was reasonable - delays equates to deaths.  However, let me add right now, I actually don&#039;t agree that any delays that &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; have occurred during the last six months or so are at all inexcusable, and I am not going to try to defend Bob Rae&#039;s torguing of the basic question.  OTOH, you, knowing what you already knew saw that as a provocative question.  Fair enough.

And then the reverse is true wrt your statement, because you had accessed some information that I hadn&#039;t I saw the statement as provocative, and you see it as reasonable.

As an aside, I would say that public health officials and Minister Agluqaak and others have actually been doing an admirable job over this time.

Anyways, thanks for hanging in there with me.  I accept that you are simply trying to engage in honest debate, and I am actually trying to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that our perspectives dictate what we take as provocative.</p>
<p>Knowing what I knew at the time, I thought that the basic assertion that Bob Rae used was reasonable &#8211; delays equates to deaths.  However, let me add right now, I actually don&#039;t agree that any delays that <i>might</i> have occurred during the last six months or so are at all inexcusable, and I am not going to try to defend Bob Rae&#039;s torguing of the basic question.  OTOH, you, knowing what you already knew saw that as a provocative question.  Fair enough.</p>
<p>And then the reverse is true wrt your statement, because you had accessed some information that I hadn&#039;t I saw the statement as provocative, and you see it as reasonable.</p>
<p>As an aside, I would say that public health officials and Minister Agluqaak and others have actually been doing an admirable job over this time.</p>
<p>Anyways, thanks for hanging in there with me.  I accept that you are simply trying to engage in honest debate, and I am actually trying to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil in London</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198884</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil in London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198884</guid>
		<description>Small point recognizing that he is NOT NOW the health minister, Clement was the health minister in Ontario during SARS so he does have some expertise to offer on pandemics. I don&#039;t think the Conservatives are trying to protect her, she seems quite capable and has been in the public eye just fine.

Bob Rae is a sad answer to whatever question was posed to his contsituents, either that those who occupy the centre of the universe (Toronto to the rest of us) really need to consider their own separatist movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small point recognizing that he is NOT NOW the health minister, Clement was the health minister in Ontario during SARS so he does have some expertise to offer on pandemics. I don&#039;t think the Conservatives are trying to protect her, she seems quite capable and has been in the public eye just fine.</p>
<p>Bob Rae is a sad answer to whatever question was posed to his contsituents, either that those who occupy the centre of the universe (Toronto to the rest of us) really need to consider their own separatist movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198883</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198883</guid>
		<description>OK.

I&#039;m somewhat confused by what is considered provocative about the statement &lt;i&gt;There is no evidence that the vaccine will save lives&lt;/i&gt;  To me, this is plain and honest fact.  I&#039;m not trying to be provocative.  I am explaining why Bob Rae&#039;s statement is inflammatory.  When he says &quot;these delays have cost and will cost lives&quot;, to me that is a provocative statement, a strong statement that may be entirely false, because there is no evidence for it.  I am trying to set the record straight, which to me is not provocative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.</p>
<p>I&#039;m somewhat confused by what is considered provocative about the statement <i>There is no evidence that the vaccine will save lives</i>  To me, this is plain and honest fact.  I&#039;m not trying to be provocative.  I am explaining why Bob Rae&#039;s statement is inflammatory.  When he says &quot;these delays have cost and will cost lives&quot;, to me that is a provocative statement, a strong statement that may be entirely false, because there is no evidence for it.  I am trying to set the record straight, which to me is not provocative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilCP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198882</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198882</guid>
		<description>Well you were wrong about my question being essentially rhetorical.

I was simply trying to understand the first sentence of your original post: &lt;i&gt;There is no evidence that the vaccine will save lives.&lt;/i&gt;  That statement seemed provocative, so I was trying to get at the thinking behind it.

And just out of curiosity - accepting that there is no scientific evidence supporting the contention that the vaccine will save lives - would you say that it is at least plausible that a few lives will be saved as a consequence of avoiding the flu in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you were wrong about my question being essentially rhetorical.</p>
<p>I was simply trying to understand the first sentence of your original post: <i>There is no evidence that the vaccine will save lives.</i>  That statement seemed provocative, so I was trying to get at the thinking behind it.</p>
<p>And just out of curiosity &#8211; accepting that there is no scientific evidence supporting the contention that the vaccine will save lives &#8211; would you say that it is at least plausible that a few lives will be saved as a consequence of avoiding the flu in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198881</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198881</guid>
		<description>&quot;So what is the point of obtaining and distributing the vaccine? &quot;

The purpose of getting a flu vaccine is to help prevent the flu.  That&#039;s it.

I don&#039;t know, it seems obvious to me, which is why I said it was an idiotic question - I actually thought it was a completely rhetorical sarcastic comment because the answer is so simple and obvious.

What I have been talking about is not whether the vaccine can or cannot prevent the flu.

It&#039;s debatable how effective it is, that&#039;s why I am talking about.  And it&#039;s debatable whether it works for people who are at affected most by the flu, those that are at risk of losing their life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;So what is the point of obtaining and distributing the vaccine? &quot;</p>
<p>The purpose of getting a flu vaccine is to help prevent the flu.  That&#039;s it.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t know, it seems obvious to me, which is why I said it was an idiotic question &#8211; I actually thought it was a completely rhetorical sarcastic comment because the answer is so simple and obvious.</p>
<p>What I have been talking about is not whether the vaccine can or cannot prevent the flu.</p>
<p>It&#039;s debatable how effective it is, that&#039;s why I am talking about.  And it&#039;s debatable whether it works for people who are at affected most by the flu, those that are at risk of losing their life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilCP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198880</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198880</guid>
		<description>Realizing that I don&#039;t know everything and seeking to clarify comments makes my question idiotic?  Or some other reason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realizing that I don&#039;t know everything and seeking to clarify comments makes my question idiotic?  Or some other reason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilCP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198879</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198879</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t have asked the question if the answer was obvious to me.

Thanks for spelling it out for me, and for providing those links for the other phil;  they were an interesting read.

Your last question is a good one, and I don&#039;t have an answer to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#039;t have asked the question if the answer was obvious to me.</p>
<p>Thanks for spelling it out for me, and for providing those links for the other phil;  they were an interesting read.</p>
<p>Your last question is a good one, and I don&#039;t have an answer to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motor</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198878</link>
		<dc:creator>motor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198878</guid>
		<description>Why is the Transport Minister answering questions on Health?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the Transport Minister answering questions on Health?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198877</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198877</guid>
		<description>While that is a good point, it still offers no proof that the vaccine saves lives.  Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While that is a good point, it still offers no proof that the vaccine saves lives.  Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198876</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198876</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re an idiot too, that blanket statement is false, there is plenty of doubt regarding the effectiveness of flu vaccines, the only certainty is that it won&#039;t harm you.  There is absolutely no proof that is saves lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re an idiot too, that blanket statement is false, there is plenty of doubt regarding the effectiveness of flu vaccines, the only certainty is that it won&#039;t harm you.  There is absolutely no proof that is saves lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198875</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198875</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say it was 1% rhetorical, 2% genuine, and 97% idiotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d say it was 1% rhetorical, 2% genuine, and 97% idiotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198874</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198874</guid>
		<description>Preventing the flu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preventing the flu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198873</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198873</guid>
		<description>No it&#039;s not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it&#039;s not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198872</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198872</guid>
		<description>Rae is certainly loosing something, such as being an honest statesman whom the people can put their trust in. This guy will tell a bold face lie, search for a nuanced position on an issue, backpedal, and do it all with certitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rae is certainly loosing something, such as being an honest statesman whom the people can put their trust in. This guy will tell a bold face lie, search for a nuanced position on an issue, backpedal, and do it all with certitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Star Falling</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198871</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Star Falling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198871</guid>
		<description>How could anyone believe this man? He lied on the Jim Rutherford program, by saying that Iggy never signed the coalition agreement. Then he insisted that the coalition wasn&#039;t upsetting to Canadians. Perhaps not to Toronto&#039;s massive lefty population and their very own Toronto Star, but to the rest of the country it was a bit concerning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could anyone believe this man? He lied on the Jim Rutherford program, by saying that Iggy never signed the coalition agreement. Then he insisted that the coalition wasn&#039;t upsetting to Canadians. Perhaps not to Toronto&#039;s massive lefty population and their very own Toronto Star, but to the rest of the country it was a bit concerning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198870</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198870</guid>
		<description>Rae looks as happy as a young girl in spring. Iggy is away and the Rae conspiracy to overthrow him-Rae is working with the old fart, Chretien- is unfolding as planned, unlike his conspiracy to work with Jack Layton to overturn an election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rae looks as happy as a young girl in spring. Iggy is away and the Rae conspiracy to overthrow him-Rae is working with the old fart, Chretien- is unfolding as planned, unlike his conspiracy to work with Jack Layton to overturn an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Stick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198869</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198869</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the typical Conservative attitude.  I&#039;m sure Harper would approve - he&#039;s that kind of guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s the typical Conservative attitude.  I&#039;m sure Harper would approve &#8211; he&#039;s that kind of guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Stick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198868</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198868</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the Government of Canada could have delivered small amounts of the vaccine earlier, which might have saved some of the horrendous lineups when the vaccines all came out at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the Government of Canada could have delivered small amounts of the vaccine earlier, which might have saved some of the horrendous lineups when the vaccines all came out at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blues Clair</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198867</link>
		<dc:creator>Blues Clair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198867</guid>
		<description>Styen, Taylor, Amiel. Not to mention,  Wells and Coyne, two former National Postees (though both, great writers, one more so.).  How can anyone take a muppet seriously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Styen, Taylor, Amiel. Not to mention,  Wells and Coyne, two former National Postees (though both, great writers, one more so.).  How can anyone take a muppet seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198866</guid>
		<description>Do you get paid by the Liberals directly Wherry, or do you work pro bono?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you get paid by the Liberals directly Wherry, or do you work pro bono?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john g</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198865</link>
		<dc:creator>john g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198865</guid>
		<description>Agreed. In my opinion, that is why Coyne and Wells are so much more effective critics of the government than Wherry. You know that they&#039;ll tear a strip off the Liberals when they deserve it too, so their criticism carries real weight.

How can anyone take Wherry seriously as someone interested in improving the decency and decorum of politics when he ignores the most egregious examples of the Liberals&#039; descent into the gutter, like he has this week? He clearly doesn&#039;t care about decency and decorum at all...except to the extent that he can use it to score points against the Conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. In my opinion, that is why Coyne and Wells are so much more effective critics of the government than Wherry. You know that they&#039;ll tear a strip off the Liberals when they deserve it too, so their criticism carries real weight.</p>
<p>How can anyone take Wherry seriously as someone interested in improving the decency and decorum of politics when he ignores the most egregious examples of the Liberals&#039; descent into the gutter, like he has this week? He clearly doesn&#039;t care about decency and decorum at all&#8230;except to the extent that he can use it to score points against the Conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198864</link>
		<dc:creator>knick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198864</guid>
		<description>&quot;his comments yesterday accusing the govt of killing Canadians with H1N1&quot;

Must have missed the part where Rae said the government is &#039;killing Canadians&#039; - do you have a link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;his comments yesterday accusing the govt of killing Canadians with H1N1&quot;</p>
<p>Must have missed the part where Rae said the government is &#039;killing Canadians&#039; &#8211; do you have a link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frenchie101</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198863</link>
		<dc:creator>frenchie101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198863</guid>
		<description>With a tan I might add. Obviously he&#039;s been away, and not &#039;fearing deaths&quot;
 about H1Ni</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a tan I might add. Obviously he&#039;s been away, and not &#039;fearing deaths&quot;<br />
 about H1Ni</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perspective...</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198862</link>
		<dc:creator>Perspective...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198862</guid>
		<description>Candace... the following countries delivered the vaccine earlier (not a complete list, only what I could track down):

Australia: Monday 28 September
US: Tuesday 6 October
France: Tuesday 20 October
UK: Wednesday 21 October

I will note that some of these roll-outs (such as in the US, which differs by state) begun on a relatively small scale for the size of the country, these are simply the days when the vaccine was first available to the public.  As you will notice Europe is very much in-line with our vaccination plan, although Australia was far ahead of everyone...

Additionally, there continues to be much confusion about the vaccine, its impact and specifically reasons why everyone should receive one... (I happen to work at a prominent polling firm, we track this information and I can confirm it is very disturbing how little the general public knows about H1N1 and the vaccine).  I do place some blame on the shoulders of our federal government, I realize they are trying to walk a fine line between inducing panic and educating the public... but the spread of information could have been much more effective (specifically the advertising surrounding the delivery of the vaccine and reasons for getting it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candace&#8230; the following countries delivered the vaccine earlier (not a complete list, only what I could track down):</p>
<p>Australia: Monday 28 September<br />
US: Tuesday 6 October<br />
France: Tuesday 20 October<br />
UK: Wednesday 21 October</p>
<p>I will note that some of these roll-outs (such as in the US, which differs by state) begun on a relatively small scale for the size of the country, these are simply the days when the vaccine was first available to the public.  As you will notice Europe is very much in-line with our vaccination plan, although Australia was far ahead of everyone&#8230;</p>
<p>Additionally, there continues to be much confusion about the vaccine, its impact and specifically reasons why everyone should receive one&#8230; (I happen to work at a prominent polling firm, we track this information and I can confirm it is very disturbing how little the general public knows about H1N1 and the vaccine).  I do place some blame on the shoulders of our federal government, I realize they are trying to walk a fine line between inducing panic and educating the public&#8230; but the spread of information could have been much more effective (specifically the advertising surrounding the delivery of the vaccine and reasons for getting it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psiclone</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198861</link>
		<dc:creator>psiclone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198861</guid>
		<description>you forgot firing the liberal chief of staff by remote control without even the decency of a face to face first meeting - how woul you like to turn on the news only to discover you&#039;ve been fired! - talk about tacky. Last but not least the ever present poll numbers showing that the poor showing does not seem to be temporary but part of a constant trendline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you forgot firing the liberal chief of staff by remote control without even the decency of a face to face first meeting &#8211; how woul you like to turn on the news only to discover you&#039;ve been fired! &#8211; talk about tacky. Last but not least the ever present poll numbers showing that the poor showing does not seem to be temporary but part of a constant trendline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe in ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198860</link>
		<dc:creator>joe in ottawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198860</guid>
		<description>If I could caption the picture of Bob Rae above it would be the following, &quot;Hey don&#039;t blame me, I can&#039;t help the everyone else wanted Iggy instead of me!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could caption the picture of Bob Rae above it would be the following, &quot;Hey don&#039;t blame me, I can&#039;t help the everyone else wanted Iggy instead of me!&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john g</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198859</link>
		<dc:creator>john g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198859</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Way way way beyond the pale.

This has been a week from Hell for the Liberals. Let&#039;s recap:

* Hedy Fry tries to make an issue out of the colour blue
* Ignatieff botched the communications in changing his chief of staff
* Liberal pink book suggests that Harper is responsible for escalating violence against women
* Carolyn Bennett&#039;s apology for her shameful flyer being sent into native ridings
* Hedy Fry suggesting that MPs should be vaccinated first
* Bob Rae suggests that the government is killing people
* Liberal senator invites a lawsuit by claiming that CTV is being paid by the Conservatives to broadcast propaganda
* Liberals put out a press release containing only the latin jibberish sample text you see on legal documents and such

If our media were half as interested in playing &quot;gotcha&quot; when it&#039;s the Liberals instead of the Conservatives, they&#039;d probably be polling below the NDP at this point. What a train wreck of a party. Donolo must be a bit intimidated by the challenge he&#039;s facing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Way way way beyond the pale.</p>
<p>This has been a week from Hell for the Liberals. Let&#039;s recap:</p>
<p>* Hedy Fry tries to make an issue out of the colour blue<br />
* Ignatieff botched the communications in changing his chief of staff<br />
* Liberal pink book suggests that Harper is responsible for escalating violence against women<br />
* Carolyn Bennett&#039;s apology for her shameful flyer being sent into native ridings<br />
* Hedy Fry suggesting that MPs should be vaccinated first<br />
* Bob Rae suggests that the government is killing people<br />
* Liberal senator invites a lawsuit by claiming that CTV is being paid by the Conservatives to broadcast propaganda<br />
* Liberals put out a press release containing only the latin jibberish sample text you see on legal documents and such</p>
<p>If our media were half as interested in playing &quot;gotcha&quot; when it&#039;s the Liberals instead of the Conservatives, they&#039;d probably be polling below the NDP at this point. What a train wreck of a party. Donolo must be a bit intimidated by the challenge he&#039;s facing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred - Brandon MB</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198858</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred - Brandon MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198858</guid>
		<description>I honestly think that Bob Rae is slowly losing his mind.  He keeps coming with more and more outrageous statements.  I think he&#039;s been spending too much time with Hedy Fry (who is already a full-blown loon).

But his comments yesterday accusing the govt of killing Canadians with H1N1 goes beyond crazy all the way to dispicable.  Bob Rae is dead to me now.  I will never speak or type his name again.

That has to be one of the most moronic and insensitive remarks I&#039;ve ever heard.  He should apologize to the whole country!  Make him the next Liberal leader and the Bloc will vote Conservative!

What little respect I had left for the nameless one, is gone now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly think that Bob Rae is slowly losing his mind.  He keeps coming with more and more outrageous statements.  I think he&#039;s been spending too much time with Hedy Fry (who is already a full-blown loon).</p>
<p>But his comments yesterday accusing the govt of killing Canadians with H1N1 goes beyond crazy all the way to dispicable.  Bob Rae is dead to me now.  I will never speak or type his name again.</p>
<p>That has to be one of the most moronic and insensitive remarks I&#039;ve ever heard.  He should apologize to the whole country!  Make him the next Liberal leader and the Bloc will vote Conservative!</p>
<p>What little respect I had left for the nameless one, is gone now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgarvin</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198857</link>
		<dc:creator>lgarvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198857</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As for Coyne, he may be a fiscal conservative, but that doesn&#039;t make him a big &quot;C&quot; conservative. &lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s for sure.  Coyne may not be the most vociferous critic of the Harper government, but he&#039;s certainly the most effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As for Coyne, he may be a fiscal conservative, but that doesn&#039;t make him a big &quot;C&quot; conservative. </i></p>
<p>That&#039;s for sure.  Coyne may not be the most vociferous critic of the Harper government, but he&#039;s certainly the most effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwoYen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198856</link>
		<dc:creator>TwoYen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198856</guid>
		<description>I on&#039;t know where you get the idea that the others at Macleans are conservative. Wells is about as &quot;equal opportunity bash each party equally&quot; non-partisan as they come. So is Geddes. As for Coyne, he may be a fiscal conservative, but that doesn&#039;t make him a big &quot;C&quot; conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I on&#039;t know where you get the idea that the others at Macleans are conservative. Wells is about as &quot;equal opportunity bash each party equally&quot; non-partisan as they come. So is Geddes. As for Coyne, he may be a fiscal conservative, but that doesn&#039;t make him a big &quot;C&quot; conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OntarioTown</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198855</link>
		<dc:creator>OntarioTown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198855</guid>
		<description>Well, this is Macleans&#039; &quot;balance&quot; my dear.  All others are Conservative........Wherry is the token leftie.

Give your head a shake.

Besides, he can&#039;t make it up, because you see it on TV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is Macleans&#039; &quot;balance&quot; my dear.  All others are Conservative&#8230;&#8230;..Wherry is the token leftie.</p>
<p>Give your head a shake.</p>
<p>Besides, he can&#039;t make it up, because you see it on TV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OntarioTown</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198854</link>
		<dc:creator>OntarioTown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198854</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s nasty to say the least.  Insult a woman because she&#039;s aging?  Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s nasty to say the least.  Insult a woman because she&#039;s aging?  Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198853</link>
		<dc:creator>Candace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198853</guid>
		<description>Final note:  Wherry. Give your head a shake. Do you truly think you provide unbiased columns and/or blog posts? Really? Could you carry the Liberal pail, bereft as it is, any further without serious side effects?

Are you legally allowed to drive? I&#039;m concerned for the citizens of your home town. Seriously. Take a friggin&#039; powder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Final note:  Wherry. Give your head a shake. Do you truly think you provide unbiased columns and/or blog posts? Really? Could you carry the Liberal pail, bereft as it is, any further without serious side effects?</p>
<p>Are you legally allowed to drive? I&#039;m concerned for the citizens of your home town. Seriously. Take a friggin&#039; powder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198852</link>
		<dc:creator>Candace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198852</guid>
		<description>Bonnie, I get it. I took my very sick (by her standards, ie unable to eat and talking very little) daughter to the doctor yesterday to find that she had a viral (no medical fix, immunization or otherwise) issue.

Pray tell - WHAT COUNTRIES have delivered on the vaccine earlier? For crying out loud, it came out THIS WEEK. Do you understand the crapshoot that flu vaccines are?

Not to take away from the pain of families that have lost loved ones, but for goodness sakes, vaccines, of any kind, take time to develop. If not, why have we not all been vaccinated against oh, lets see, AIDS, Herpes, etc? Because its a medical crap shoot, that&#039;s why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie, I get it. I took my very sick (by her standards, ie unable to eat and talking very little) daughter to the doctor yesterday to find that she had a viral (no medical fix, immunization or otherwise) issue.</p>
<p>Pray tell &#8211; WHAT COUNTRIES have delivered on the vaccine earlier? For crying out loud, it came out THIS WEEK. Do you understand the crapshoot that flu vaccines are?</p>
<p>Not to take away from the pain of families that have lost loved ones, but for goodness sakes, vaccines, of any kind, take time to develop. If not, why have we not all been vaccinated against oh, lets see, AIDS, Herpes, etc? Because its a medical crap shoot, that&#039;s why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torylover</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198851</link>
		<dc:creator>Torylover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198851</guid>
		<description>So in the ongoing LPC effort to politicize this issue Bob Rae has sunk to a new low. Under the legal protection of the HoC he is now accusing a non-elected official, the Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. David Butler-Jones (a Liberal appointee by none other than Carolyn Bennett) of negligence causing death. Just think, soon the LPC will reach even further down to the very bottom of the barrel and make this low life their new leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in the ongoing LPC effort to politicize this issue Bob Rae has sunk to a new low. Under the legal protection of the HoC he is now accusing a non-elected official, the Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. David Butler-Jones (a Liberal appointee by none other than Carolyn Bennett) of negligence causing death. Just think, soon the LPC will reach even further down to the very bottom of the barrel and make this low life their new leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motor</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198849</link>
		<dc:creator>motor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198849</guid>
		<description>Why is baird answering questions that other ministers should be answering?
Where is the accountability?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is baird answering questions that other ministers should be answering?<br />
Where is the accountability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crit_Reasoning</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198850</link>
		<dc:creator>Crit_Reasoning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198850</guid>
		<description>If only the Liberals had developed a detailed, credible alternative vision for Canada so the Party wouldn&#039;t have to rely exclusively on trumped-up, petty attacks like these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only the Liberals had developed a detailed, credible alternative vision for Canada so the Party wouldn&#039;t have to rely exclusively on trumped-up, petty attacks like these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IanBC</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198848</link>
		<dc:creator>IanBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198848</guid>
		<description>This answer just demonstrates that you don&#039;t understand vaccination. You don&#039;t get the vaccine for yourself, you get it for all the people who have the misfortune to interact with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This answer just demonstrates that you don&#039;t understand vaccination. You don&#039;t get the vaccine for yourself, you get it for all the people who have the misfortune to interact with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilCP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198847</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198847</guid>
		<description>To be clear, &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; question was only 7% rhetorical / 93% genuine....however, is your comment genuine or sarcastic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, <i>my</i> question was only 7% rhetorical / 93% genuine&#8230;.however, is your comment genuine or sarcastic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollinm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198846</link>
		<dc:creator>hollinm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198846</guid>
		<description>If it wasn&#039;t for John Baird and his answers I would have fallen asleep. Bennett is looking more like Granny from the Beverly Hillbillies TV show and McGuinty looks like he has a pickle stuffed up his a$$. No wonder nobody is paying attention to the Libs. Then you have that silly woman Hedy Fry suggesting MPs should get priority for the vaccine and Bob Rae suggesting that people are dying because the vaccine isn&#039;t being delivered to his liking. The Libs are becoming jokes and no magic by Peter Donolo will change the sad members of that sad poltiical party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it wasn&#039;t for John Baird and his answers I would have fallen asleep. Bennett is looking more like Granny from the Beverly Hillbillies TV show and McGuinty looks like he has a pickle stuffed up his a$$. No wonder nobody is paying attention to the Libs. Then you have that silly woman Hedy Fry suggesting MPs should get priority for the vaccine and Bob Rae suggesting that people are dying because the vaccine isn&#039;t being delivered to his liking. The Libs are becoming jokes and no magic by Peter Donolo will change the sad members of that sad poltiical party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Northern PoV</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198845</link>
		<dc:creator>Northern PoV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198845</guid>
		<description>Say what you like about Bob Rae - but he has guided a gov&#039;t  through a terrible recession period (at the cost of popularity, esp. from his former-base)  and got the HWY 407 built - all these Harris retreads know how to do is destroy stuff and waste our money on pet projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you like about Bob Rae &#8211; but he has guided a gov&#039;t  through a terrible recession period (at the cost of popularity, esp. from his former-base)  and got the HWY 407 built &#8211; all these Harris retreads know how to do is destroy stuff and waste our money on pet projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Star Falling</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198844</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Star Falling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198844</guid>
		<description>Is Bob Rae the Silver Scab?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Bob Rae the Silver Scab?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198843</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198843</guid>
		<description>Because it&#039;s a rhetorical question and no health official doubts the effectiveness of the vaccine nor do they have a reason to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#039;s a rhetorical question and no health official doubts the effectiveness of the vaccine nor do they have a reason to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-198842</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807#comment-198842</guid>
		<description>Yeah, what is the point in distributing a vaccine that may not be effective in those who need it most?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, what is the point in distributing a vaccine that may not be effective in those who need it most?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

