Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW
He also offers his thoughtful perspective of Stephen Harper’s last 10 years in his recent eBook, The Harper Decade.

Moonlighting Wells; and un nouveau bloggeur

by Paul Wells on Monday, November 2, 2009 9:35am - 7 Comments

If Monday’s slow at work, feel free to check out two outside projects from your Inkless servant. In this month’s Literary Review of Canada, I review John English’s new Trudeau biography. (The review opens with a hilarious extended riff about what we really need is a new Robert Borden biography. Thigh-slapper! One problem: As he hastens to point out in a rebuttal in the print edition, John English already wrote a Borden biography. Whoopsie.) Over on CPAC, last week I interviewed Ben Rowswell, the current Representative of Canada in Kandahar, in preparation for the big Coyne-Wells extravaganza in Halifax next week. This interview amounts to my debut as a teevee host, rather than just a guest. You can survey the wreckage over here.

I hear some readers are interested in those parts of the world that aren’t hosted or commented-on by me. Hard to believe, but if it’s so, you will want to check out the new blog at our sister publication l’Actualité, written by none other than Jean-François Lisée. Lisée was a reporter for the same magazine in 1994 when Jacques Parizeau was elected, and promptly amazed everyone by becoming Parizeau’s senior strategic advisor in the run-up to the secession referendum. I’ve long believed (it was the subject of my first article for Saturday Night) that Parizeau was a far more dangerous opponent for federalists than Lucien Bouchard was, and Lisée had imagination Parizeau lacked, thus making him even more formidable. But it’s not just because I’m on the other side of that debate that I’m glad Lisée has returned to (a kind of) journalism. It’s a good blog, with entries on Trudeau’s sex life, a rather delicious feud between Denise Bombardier and Pierre Foglia, and a review of John Parisella’s George W. Bush interview last week. Lisée accomplishes the first task of a blogger: he posts frequently. And in Chantal Hébert, he has excellent blogging company. Go check ‘em out if you are, or would like to become, fluent in the tongue of Molière.

Bookmark and Share
  • Alex Nixon

    Paul, in the article, you say that "John English had the right temperament for a Pearson biography." Could you expand on that?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

      I meant only that Pearson and English are two pleasant, confrontation-averse men, whereas Trudeau practically demands a confrontation: either you tackle his ideas, or you endorse his ideas while heading off to tackle his detractors.

  • matt

    Interesting, I have formal study of the language of Molière at College Boreal. Hi Emily! (my instructor). And I can offer you a photo of Molière's grave from Pere Lachaise cemetery (but so can Google images) during a May sojourn to Paris. If his final resting place doesn't remind you of an overwrought shuffleboard table, there is something wrong with you.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

    While Rowswell is deserving of immense respect, I can't help but sense he may be so consumed by his own particular arena that he's a bit oblivious to some of the broader context.

    The Wells-Coyne discussion featured in last week's Maclean's touched on what I see as the core problem with missions like this: we simply can't approach weeding out a particular segment of a population (Taliban from Afghanistan) with the same tools that work in a full out, state-to-state war.

    I sometimes worry that we collectively bring an immature perspective to such projects: by focussing on the diplomatic-development angle, it allows us to ignore the harsh realities of military engagement – lots of death and destruction – much of it borne by innocent civilians – is pretty much the only way to excise the bad guys from a region (when the starting point is guns and bombs). I'm not sure that a hybrid involving some force and some grassroots development is going to achieve anything lasting.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

    "obvlivious" isn't the right word – he's clearly a thoughtful man. I sure as heck am not being dismissive of him. I just sense that he's very focussed on his own immediate project, perhaps to the point where he neither the tiime, nor the use for some of the bigger picture things.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/TwoYen TwoYen

    I enjoyed your book review. It may be more interesting than the book being reviewed.

    If you are looking for yet another biography of Robert Borden, however, I might remind you that not only has John English written a bography, but Bob Plamondon's new book Blue Thunder published earlier this year contains three chapters on Robert Borden. Borden biographies are popping up all over the place.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/jolyon jolyon

    General Hillier is being interviewed on The Agenda tonight, if anyone is interested.

From Macleans