There's a shortage of vaccines, and it's all the fault of [Your Government Here]

by Andrew Coyne on Tuesday, November 3, 2009 4:57pm - 142 Comments

091104_N1H1Obama will fix H1N1 vaccine shortage: White House

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama is frustrated with shortages in the availability of the H1N1 flu vaccine but the problem was being tackled, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday.

“We’re working each and every day to fix this,” Gibbs told a daily news briefing.

Gosh. You mean other countries are having trouble delivering vaccines on time, too? It’s not just a matter of the Harper government’s incompetence or miserliness? It’s just, you know, a logistical nightmare ?

Apparently so:
H1N1 Spreading Faster Than Vaccine, CDC Says
Children swine flu deaths spike in US amid vaccine shortage
Behind The H1N1 Vaccine Shortage
H1N1 vaccine shortage could be political pitfall for Obama
Critics say vaccine woes show administration’s lack of preparedness
CDC Chief ‘Frustrated’ By Swine Flu Vaccine Shortage
H1N1 vaccine shortage stings politically

Other parellels: while Republicans charge the Obama administration with mishandling the epidemic, vaccine shortages are also cropping up as local issues — just as in every province of Canada, the opposition is blaming the provincial government.

And of course, on either side of the border, there’s someone ready with the same cheap, inflammatory analogy:
Liberal launches political storm by comparing H1N1 response to hurricane Katrina
Limbaugh: H1N1 vaccine shortage “ought to be Obama’s Katrina”

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

    Our government spent months insisting everything's under control.

    Our government was wrong.

    Blame the critics. It makes you look clever.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

      They were wrong to go with the same old contract old man chretien decided on. The one where only one place could make the vaccine Canada for 10 years, how archaic.OTOH, he got a lump sum for having that contract.! Note- its in Quebec.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

        If that was the problem then the goverment of the day should have identified the risk as part of its plan from the get-go since that's what good governance is all about.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

          Yes they shouldMaybe they needed that little gem to play out, or maybe the HM didnt want to slag of the Liberals.It is possible that a female took the high road.Unlike the old boys club.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

            Particularly when it comes to seeing to the needs of the most vulnerable, withholding information for political reasons isn't much of an excuse.

          • kcm

            It's been established elsewhere on the blog [ or the next one] that that contract did not mean that future govt's couldn't source from elsewhere. Indeed i believe this govt has already done so – one less excuse available.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

            you gotta admit it sounds good

      • tobyornottoby

        Seriously is that what you're going with? Pin it on Chretien? Why not on Borden? He should have had a plan in place after the 1917 Spanish Flu.

        Sheesh

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

          Not pinning it on anyone, nice kick back he got

  • Andre

    So our excuse now is that our health care doesn't suck as much as the US. Brilliant Andrew, brilliant.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

      Have you been following this at all…….EVERY jusrisdiction is having some production delays that lag behind immeadiate demand. Which once again if you look at per capita we are doing significantly better.

      Talk to me again in 2 weeks when we will have more vaccine than we know what to do with.

      Expect to see a story in December about Canada considering selling or goving excess vaccine to another country….

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

        Just marking this comment so I can find it again on November 18th.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

          thats fine, i was thinking more the week after, which is US thanksgiving, but worth checking in on this issue in 2 weeks. If shipments happen the way they are supposed to I believe there will have been 5 – 6 million additional doses delivered by that time, for a total of 10 to 12 million. And a pipeline of 2 million a week coming at that stage. By that time the high risk groups will have largely been vaccinated…and we will be into the mushy middle of low risk adults.

          We will see if it sticks to plan or not.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

    This time last week any Provincial civil servant who tried to implement a needs test in their jurisdiction's clinics to enforce prioritization would have spent the rest of the week on the carpet since, after all, the Feds were insistent supply was not a problem.

    Guess who's taking the heat anyways.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

      I get what you're saying. But even if 100% of the supply was somehow available at once, wouldn't there still be the pragmatic issue ot sticking needles in arms?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

        bad information from Ottawa isn't making it any easier.

        • kcm

          This is my view too. Arguably the govt should have ordered earlier, particularly as testing has apparently been fairly skimpy by normal standards. But the crux of the matter is incompetent or partisan political messaging. The govt wanted the mesage out there that there was no supply issues – presumably for political reasons. Meanwhile we are all being told to not be selfish and get our shots [ but remenber to prioritize too!!] Combine that with media hype of some tragic deaths and you got a panic. How this lets the feds off the hook is beyond me. I guess the moral is don't play politics with a potential national health crisis. The liberals are doing pretty much the same thing – only their excuse is they're the opposition, not the govt. And so we get back to the govt ultimately being responsible because they should be – they are the govt. But hese guys are so immature that they see everything in terms of poltical loss or gain.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

            I've learned to assume that's all that's expected of them anymore.

          • kcm

            Not that we could expect much different from the liberals. I'm beginning to wonder if even a majority govt will get these cons governing?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

            "When we come back with a majority, all bets are off" – Gerry Ritz, Conservative Minister of Agriculture.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

            I'm just unclear as to what they should be "on the hook" for. We don't currently have a set-up where the feds can take control of the entire process. I'm not even sure it's possible or desirable to centralize our pandemic responses fully – though clearly our regional health agencies were often woefully unprepared to vaccinate thousands in the midst of an unanticipated panic. And it's not fair to expect the federal government to issue directives or specify strategies outside of their jurisdiction. They'd have no ability to enforce practices, and furthermore would likely endure howls of criticism that they were overstepping their bounds.

            They were, and are, responsible for the supply of vaccine. All evidence suggests they balanced safety and expediency well (remember, part of the "delay" had to do with changing medical advice regarding the safety of adjuvanted vaccine for pregnant women), and it's hard to imagine the supply being secured much sooner than it was.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

            It would have killed them to mention there was a good chance they'd be short out of the chute and suggest planning accordingly downstream. It really would've.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

            Unless some serious lying was taking place, I thought the manufacturer only let the government know about shortages at the last minute.

            Now, we can discuss whether the government ought to have kept staff permanently camped out at the plant where the vaccine was produced (I would, were I the PM).

            But isn't our concern over delays a bit misplaced, given that we're talking about delays against an early rollout? Put another way, I don't recall anyone saying vaccinations by year end was too late when that plan was laid over the summer.

            I know I keep saying this, but I'm hardly a fan of this government. I think they're generally a group of toxic, contemptuous jerks. But in this case, I just don't think they've failed (though Baird's antics in QP last week were despicable – regardless of who was asking the questions).

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

            It's called Risk Management.

            Single point of failure.

            They should have been prepared.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

            jarrid, is that you?

          • lovinglife

            You still not getting it..You will find any excuse to still blame the goverment…

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

            So the all of the other provincial health officers, Deuty ministers of health, ministers of health etc that were part of this plan, and didnt say boo on this were also calculating politically on this file. And they all came to the same political calculation that they shoudl "order late"

            Nice assertion, I assume it sits beside the Bldg 7 and Roswell.

          • kcm

            Look no-one is suggesting a conspiracy here, just you right now. For me it's simple. I want to know if the govt or health officials mixed messaging is responsible for this cock up, ie., the long line ups? I'm fully prepared to except that mistakes would have been made no matter what was done. So, did the govt's political stategy make things worse? Or was it simply a combination of events that were largely beyond the govt's control? Given the track record of this govt i'm suspicious. Nothing more.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

            You are the one who placed the emphasis on political strategy and said that this was driving the decisions "But the crux of the matter is incompetent or partisan political messaging" and "But hese guys are so immature that they see everything in terms of poltical loss or gain" How else is one supposed to interpret comments like that?

            The only ones who have politicized this issue are the Liberals and the Dippers to lesser extent. The government didnt paint their ads blue on this, they didnt hog the political spotlight, they worked with the provinces as they should> Were they perfect, absolutely not, I would have preferred a little more clairity about looking to the provinces for guidance, as it always should be.

            What was the governments political strategy here? Other than ensure that they werent flying solo and had the provinces onboard? What other big foreheaded, chessmaster political calculation was there?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

            Upon reflection I would say there was one strategy, that would have been to promise the vaccine for November when they knew they had a good chance of delivering it in October. I think that was a pretty badly lept secret, because I think the provinces were willing participants in that ruse, it makes them all look good. Other than that, the partisan strategy is hard to see here

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/psiclone psiclone

            careful vince you are peilously close to using reality and common sense which just ruins the daily dose of liberal kool aid!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

    Not to mention the CBC-CNN lite is reporting incorrectly The.vaccine was not shipped, a component of vaccine that the supplier had too much of was shipped. Everybody breath…. deeply. CBC wins again for misleading headlines!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

      Because, it is logistics, as Coyne said. You have too much of one component that doesnt match some of your other production line. So you move it around, which in this case is also the moral thing to do since someone else can use it. I asusme if Bennet was helath minister she would be on the line at GSK barking orders about what to do, making production decisions and packaging it herself.

      Focus on delivery of needles in arms, thats the problem. To give a sense of how short of capacity and not vaccine Ontario was, the main clinics only had a capacity of about 1500 (no I am not missing a zero) a day. The bottleneck was not lack of vaccine, it was lack of staff and their amazingly inept computer system. A local pediatrician here in Thornhill received their supply on the weekend and they ran 500 kids through in the first day!, no line ups, no muss no fuss no freaking e health records.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

    I'm not sure I understand you.. this is just the standard conservative/3 yr old defense of "But Moooommmmm! They did it too!"

    The only difference is that this time it's being applied to the US rather than the Liberal party.

    And again I come back to, "If they're just doing what the others would, and in the course of such making our government less transparent and accountable.. why the hell do we have them in again?"

  • RagingRanter

    I'm curious now. Did the Liberals paraphrase Rush Limbaugh? Or did Rush Limbaugh paraphrase the Liberals? Or did this brilliant, insightful analogy arrive independently – at exactly the same time – in the tiny little minds of Rush Limbaugh and a Liberal strategist?

    • lovinglife

      I think they just think alike, lol!

  • Fred – Brandon MB

    The opposition attacks on the govt over the H1N1 vaccine are cheap, sleazy, and dishonest. The mark of Donolo and Kinsella

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/VinceClortho VinceClortho

      More the latter, the former remains unsullied for the moment imho. I would be surprised in Donolo has his arms around the organization yet, some like Apps and Kinsella have reasons to try to maintain some independence, Apps gets some, Kinsella and the Warroom should be at the beck and call of the OLO and their strategy. Its a little early for them to have one yet.

From Macleans