Notes on a non-crisis

by Andrew Coyne on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 2:45pm - 421 Comments

091104_N1H1_2A summary of what we know now:

- The federal government put in an order for 50 million doses of swine flu vaccine — enough to vaccinate everyone in the country 1.5 times — with GlaxoSmithKline in early August. As of this week, GSK has delivered to the feds, and the feds have shipped to the provinces, 6.7 million doses. But at last count only 2 million had been administered. The feds have delivered nearly twice as many doses, per capita, as the Obama administration (deliveries in the US have lately crested 30 million), and claim to have the highest per capita delivery rate in the world, but even if they had delivered twice as many again, they’d only ensure that 10 million doses were backed up waiting to be administered.

- Perhaps the vaccinations should have been ready sooner. But two decisions, both medically defensible, contributed to this. One, they held off producing the H1N1 vaccine, on the advice of the public health officer, to produce the seasonal flu variant — understandably, since it’s far more deadly, at least in the short run. And two, they slowed production of the adjuvanted (more potent) vaccine this week, in favour of the unadjuvanted variety, which the World Health Organization had recommended as safer for pregnant women. The WHO has since changed its mind.

- Even at that, we might have got by without the lineups of the past week. Not two weeks ago, the public gave every indication of giving the whole thing a pass. Polls showed only a small minority intended to get vaccinated. So the authorities were likely planning on the basis of a leisurely take-up rate. Then 13-year-old hockey player died suddenly of the disease, and everyone flipped — from apathy to mass panic, in the space of a couple of days. Couple that with large numbers of queue-jumpers, healthy adults who are not among the high-priority, and you have a recipe for incipient chaos.

- There is no emergency. The current flu outbreak kills at a fraction of the rate of regular, seasonal flu, which hardly anyone worries about. The child who died of the disease was freakishly unlucky. Obviously the sooner the better, but it’s debatable whether anyone will die because the vaccinations are administered in November rather than October, since you have to take the already tiny proportion of people who would have been susceptible to dying from it, divide that by the proportion of those who would have caught it in the absence of a vaccine, and divide that by the proportion of those who would have had the foresight to get themselves vaccinated.

- Should the government have relied on a single supplier? Maybe, maybe not. But the Liberals are ill placed to make this point, since the contract to supply the flu vaccine was signed with Ste. Foy, Quebec-based Shire BioChem (later bought by GSK) in 2001, by the Chretien government: a 10-year contract worth $323.5-million. CTV reports the Liberals received a $56,000-plus donation from Shire BioChem that same year.

- The Auditor General makes some good points about emergency planning — in general. But she was auditing the Public Safety department, not Public Health, and she did not look specifically at the H1N1 issue. Doubtless there has been some bungling, but this was a) mostly by the provinces, who are responsible for administering the vaccine, b) no worse than garden variety government bungling, c) probably made worse by the confusion of overlapping roles between three levels of government. Some provinces have done a better job than others, and within each province some regions have done better than others.

- Bottom line: This was an inherently difficult undertaking: the largest vaccination program in the country’s history. The task now should not be to point fingers, but to learn so we can all do a better job the next time, when the stakes may be very much higher.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/CanadianSense CanadianSense

    How did the Federal government fail to assist the provinces? (Opposition talking point-from Liberals after "shortage" got exposed as a fabrication)

    The Federal Government was EARLY in their APPROVAL OCT 26 vs the initial plan. Are you suggesting NOW the Federal government should have held it back until the Province and Local health officials got ramped up?

    Clearly the Feds got it right, got it out early, had a PLAN to deliver but the breakdown took place with the Provinces and the local health officials in SOME provinces.

    Did EVERY province or local health office have problems rolling out the mass immunizations? NO.

    Focus.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/h1n1-s…

    • knick

      There seems to be some sort of disconnect between what I write and what you read.
      If I was suggesting that the federal government should have delayed delivery of the vaccine that was approved early, that's what I would have said instead of what I did say.

      Early approval of the vaccine by the federal government is obviously not something the provinces are accustomed to dealing with, so it would have been prudent of the federal government to advise and assist the provinces in rolling out the vaccine earlier than planned for. The fact that some jurisdictions managed the rollout better than others would seem to prove my point that it could have been managed better by all jurisdictions if the federal government had properly assumed it's responsibility as the senior level of government and offered advice and resources to all the provinces.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    Then allow me to be the not-quite-first to tell you to TAKE A BREATH. And this is coming from a middle-aged male whose entire family has spent the week in "domestic lockup" because we've each had a turn with the virus. Our province has been, I think, the absolute slowest to roll out vaccine to us mere citizens, and yet even if we were magically undeservedly first in line the virus might have beat our immune response to the vaccine anyways. For me and my family, the virus beat the vaccine. It was bound to happen to many of us, and was the ONLY weakness I saw coming when I was battling it out with the freakazoids in the "swine flu fiasco" post.

    It's a mild disease. The major concern, statistically, is not that you or someone you know will die of this, or spend weeks in ICU. The major concern is that even if a dozen people do at every hospital, we're sunk, our system can't handle that.

    Your "reasons" link send me to the top of this page, not to the specific comment, so I am guessing you are monday-morning quarterbacking over decisions made based on best-available evidence at the time. Which is not a fair methodology for any partisan sniping, and, frankly, beneath you. Not others, mind, but beneath you.

    On another thread, I laid out why this was a loser scenario politically from the start, and that it would be too easy for losers to take self-satisfied smirking shots at the people who are working their asses off trying to get it right. And you never struck me as the loser type. So please take this as a friendly fellow commenter who enjoys our occasional conversations: step back from the cliff.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/CanadianSense CanadianSense

    Mulletaur the Moron

    Opens his mouth and states he knows better than the experts. You don't care about the truth or lives. It is all about your idealogy.

  • Brian

    The Auditor General , for whom I usually have a lot of respect acted like an idiot.

    There was already enough panic and hysteria about H1N1 without the AG adding to the fire with her comments which were not H1N1 specific.

    If she had any common sense , she would have held her comments until after the H1N1 immunization was complete … UNLESS her department just wanted to further embarrass the government.

    • Mulletaur

      Yes, very uncomfortable for the government, isn't it ? Otherwise known as accountability. You would rather that she made her comments when it was no longer an issue, but what use would that be ? Oh, sorry, forgot, it wouldn't embarass the government that way, yeeeeesssss ….

  • Mulletaur

    You may not have been patient enough with the link, you have to wait a second for Intense Debate to load :

    http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/04/notes-on-a-non…

    " … so I am guessing you are monday-morning quarterbacking over decisions made based on best-available evidence at the time … "

    Nope, I am criticising the federal government based on facts and arguments. I would just add some of Harper's ministers were minister in the Ontario government when SARS hit and the province was clearly unprepared. They should have learned something from the experience, which they clearly have not.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

      OK, I hit the link and this time got to your list of block-lettered FACTs.

      You can second-guess the decision to complete the seasonal flu vaccine order before doing H1N1. But please note that your punching bags in elected office took advice based on available evidence from their public health smart people. And seasonal flu will STILL kill more people every year than H1N1 will (your "greater threat" line fails as fact, here), so the decision to go seasonal first was not without justification. The whole adjuvant / no-adjuvant mess also had a very reasonable basis at the time. Turns out H1N1 reared its ugly head in large numbers starting mid-October, and having vaccine around even a week earlier would have made a difference. But vaccine WAS around ahead of schedule, and a very significant number of doses of vaccine are already inside the muscles of Canadians, many of whom were telling pollsters to just kiss off this whole vaccine thing anyways only a couple weeks earlier.

      Look at the whole picture. Spare a thought for the people who are doing everything they can to get this right, and keep modifying the rules because we all keep learning about this thing. Look outside our borders and see that Canada is holding up very well. Spare us the histrionic "tell that to the dead kid's family" line — everyone agrees a premature death is tragic. Putting that boy's blood on the hands of our public health people and Minister Aglukkaq and Harper is facile, wrong, partisan, irresponsible and disgusting. And does absolutely nothing useful to support our decision-makers as they work at rolling out still more vaccine asap across the country.

      • Mulletaur

        "But please note that your punching bags in elected office took advice based on available evidence from their public health smart people."

        No they didn't. They were recommended not to have a sole source of vaccine. They did not take that advice. Please stick to the facts.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

          Recommended by whom? Senior managers at public health? Or competitors to the sole source, which by the way has rolled out vaccine faster than anybody can use anyways? Referrals to documented evidence would be nice.

          • Mulletaur

            You can read the Globe and Mail as well as I can :

            "Canada needs more than one vaccine manufacturer to deal with future flu pandemics and to avoid production delays that have affected the fight against the H1N1 virus, federal officials say.

            "There is no debate. We all feel that when the time will come to renegotiate, we will go to tenders on a two-part contract to ensure maximum flexibility," said a senior official who has been working directly on the file.

            While the Harper government has applauded GlaxoSmithKline Inc. for making more than 6 million doses so far at its facility in Ste-Foy, Que., a number of officials involved in the crisis said Canada deserves a second producer in the future.

            Had that been the case this time, one manufacturer could have worked on the production of vaccines with the adjuvant additive, while the other one could have produced non-adjuvanted vaccines for pregnant women.

            GSK was forced to make changes to its production line in mid-course, which caused delays in the delivery of vaccines to the provinces.

            The official said that a simple stroke of bad luck can endanger thousands of doses of vaccine, and that it's better to "be safe than sorry" when it comes to production matters."

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

            Two suppliers DOUBLES the chance that something bad might happen to the order, but the bad would only happen to half of it. One supplier indeed puts all the eggs in one basket.

            Unless you want to pay for both suppliers to belt out 50 million doses each, just to be safe. So why stop there, why not three? four?

            All for the privilege of flooding the zone with product so much sooner that the provinces still can't handle anyways. So sorry, I remain unconvinced that the federal government has been so incompetent on this issue to merit your kids'-blood-on-their-hands hair-pulling. Especially if you actually care to look around the globe.

          • Mulletaur

            "Two suppliers DOUBLES the chance that something bad might happen to the order … "

            ConBots twisting themselves into pretzels trying to justify the incompetence of the Harper Conservative government makes for good entertainment, but it doesn't change the fact of the incompetence of the Harper Conservative government on H1N1.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

            Buddy, feel free to read the whole paragraph, would you? At least the first one? You might actually discern that I was actually partially agreeing with you on the risk to the whole order.

            And there is NOTHING entertaining about this story. They did their best. The virus beat the vaccine for many, but not all. The vaccine made it in significant but not total quantities, and distribution is snagging (not surprisingly) anyways. People are dying. The Monday morning quarterbacks are now all braying about how H1N1 should have been produced instead before seasonal. Dudes, if the timing of H1N1 were earlier enough it WOULD HAVE BEEN one of the three components of the seasonal vaccine itself!

            In the spring, the prevailing wisdom was that H1N1 seemed mild so let's make sure we've got seasonal ready to save more lives. Then they changed their minds to try to cover H1N1 first, because the virus never really "went away" in the summer and folks worried about an earlier H1N1 season.

            But go ahead and yell "ConBot! ConBot!" all you like Mr. Nonshrill Nonpartisan. Because now I know you are out of useful things to say, and I am through with you. Your execrable hyperbole around here will stand on its own, um, merits, with no additional commentary on my part. Anytime you want to be fair and reasonable again, I will look forward to the conversation.

          • Mulletaur

            "In the spring, the prevailing wisdom was that H1N1 seemed mild so let's make sure we've got seasonal ready to save more lives."

            It is impossible to have any kind of a discussion with somebody who lies like you did in the above quotation from your post. But you don't want a real discussion, you just want to try to save Stevie's bacon on H1N1. Keep diggin'.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/CanadianSense CanadianSense

    FACTS can be brutal. You are a shameful person who used "deaths of children" for political cheap shots.

  • Mulletaur

    "The major concern is that even if a dozen people do at every hospital, we're sunk, our system can't handle that."

    My major concern is that children, who are not in a legal position to make their own decisions and are at the start of their lives, have been made vulnerable to death or severe illness due to H1N1 because the government didn't act quickly enough to protect them. Seasonal flu may kill more people, but they are almost always elderly adults or adults with other health complications, and adults are able to decide to take the flu shot or not as they wish.

    But you are completely right, if the number of cases increases dramatically and ICUs start getting flooded with people on ventilators, we are going to have a very big problem. That is why I am so critical and adament about this, MYL – I want the government to know that if it comes to this, they are going to catch the dark and smelly stuff for it. My hope is that they will now make up for their past bad decisions and bad management and move heaven and earth to get it right, quickly. That's the real meaning of accountability – getting the government to do better or face an angry electorate.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/CanadianSense CanadianSense

    The Liberals distorted the facts for political points. They insulted the aboriginals with the 10%. They apologized for a disgusting flyer.

    You and the Liberals is what is wrong with democracy. Putting your partisan gain above the country and well being of its citizens.

    The Polls show they are back to the Oct 2008 election results the WORST standing in pop in over 100 years.

  • Mulletaur

    "You and the Liberals is what is wrong with democracy."

    I know, you and Stevie want a one party state, just like Alberta. In your dreams (and our nightmares).

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/CanadianSense CanadianSense

    The problem with Liberals is they are ignorant of history. PET love Cuba and China. The current liberals keep bragging about China. Liberals want Ottawa to have MORE power over the provinces.
    The last time I checked only the Liberals used the War Measures Act on Canadians. Those Canadians ran away to Cuba.

    Liberals love power and big government.

  • Mulletaur

    When you are insulting others gratuitously, troll, you should at least try to spell correctly.

  • Mulletaur

    Your position is very simply that the deaths of children, which could have been prevented if the Harper Conservative government had acted in a competent and timely manner, is an acceptable cost in view of the number of deaths every year from seasonal flu. Sorry, I don't agree. Lots of other electors who also disagree will have their say on the matter at the next election. Count on it.

  • Mulletaur

    It must be exhausting to you Conservatives to be so full of hate all the time. I guess it's what keeps you warm at night …

  • Dieter

    The old bird Bennett contributed to a panic because one regrettable teen died from the virus. This is an example of politics from the bottom of the barely. We notice that the old crow isn't against same sex men having unprotected sex even though we know this to be a very high risk behavior. We notice that this old feather is mute re the other strain of influenza which we are being vaccinated against.

  • Dieter

    The old Bennett almost did to us what the Toronto 18 tried to do-create a panic so severe that Canadians would be afraid to leave their homes. Well done liberals and well done Bob Rae, who significantly reduced the number of Ontario doctors during his ill fated tenure as Ontario premier.

  • Westerner

    The people who are complaining the loudest are probably in the same risk group as me-low- yet are the ones who want to first in line for the shot. Chill out, let the ladies and children go first and then we men (if you can call those who butted in line ahead of the women and children men) can get our shots. There will be plenty to go around and then the Libs will have to come up with another scary crisis.

  • Dieter

    Should the government have relied on a single supplier? Maybe, maybe not. But the Liberals are ill placed to make this point, since the contract to supply the flu vaccine was signed with Ste. Foy, Quebec-based Shire BioChem (later bought by GSK) in 2001, by the Chretien government: a 10-year contract worth $323.5-million.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    Single supplier delivers ahead of schedule. More vaccine than we can actually handle this week, and more antigen than they can bottle, so antigen gets exported to help save lives elsewhere, too. Quelle scandale.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/CanadianSense CanadianSense

    Impressive mullethead pulls denying every Poll as a Liberal Proof. J.C. must be proud. At least 5 posters from all voting patterns have called you out for over the top crap on this post. You have been reduced as a talking and walking Liberal shill who is playing games with a serious issue. You have ended any credibility after ignoring any rational debate. Done!

    You are now exposed and finished for your imbecilic posts on H1N1. Be proud!

    • Mulletaur

      All your bile doesn't change the fact that Stevie totally dropped the ball on this one.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/CanadianSense CanadianSense

        You have ZERO credibility for your "extremist" ranting on this post. Cheers.

        • Mulletaur

          You've lost the argument when all you can do is spew bile. You should admit that you're wrong and move on. Drawing further attention to the fact that Stephen Harper's Conservative government totally dropped the ball on H1N1 and they know it doesn't help your cause.

  • Worried Mother

    you say "task now should not be to point fingers, but to learn so we can all do a better job the next time" Didn't we say that after SARs. As a nation we should have been better prepared this time round.

  • J campbell

    One flu east
    One flu west
    One flu over the cuckoo's nest.

  • maria jones

    I am very grateful for Andrew Coyne's comments as always, clear, investigated, truthful and relevant also in this case re H1N1

    But do you what is sad about this country that I emigrated to? The constant in house bickering.. never seeing the big picturre.. never working together in Unity..to protect Canada.. and in doing so help other nations —
    Where have all the Idealists gone? should be the title for a new song.. surely Canadians can do better than this..
    And if things get worse.. will everybody just start blaming each other.. or will they role up their sleeves and say…'instead of bickering and posting pointed comments, why dont I go out and volunteer.. my time.. at lets say the local hospital' because guess what folks… my dad went to a war that he didnt start so that I would be free today…
    Would be nice to see a more generous response to 'global problems' as they creep up on us rather than … the constant bickering… I saw often see in these comments..
    Mary

  • Public Health Nurse

    It's not easy to vaccinate so many people so quickly. We (public health nurses) found out yesterday that a new H1N1 clinic was planned for today, so we've been scrambling to do our best as quick as we can.

  • Oemissions

    The scare on H1N1 has been talked about for almost a year.
    Why does this always have to be a Con vs Lib thing?
    Does it promote democracy or bring attention to what needs to be fixed or solutions.
    Bob B reporting on the polio example is a very good contribution.
    Before the hockey boy First Nations were having this flu epidemic.
    Others had died too but a hockey player is a big deal, right?
    Shows where our priorities are.
    We still have NOT got the final coroner report on that hockey boy's real cause of death.

  • Angry!

    We, the people know it is not a Level 6 crisis. The pharmaceutical companies don't give a damn about the people. But, they stand to lose millions, even billions if they don't create some form of panic to scare the pubic into a pandemic. As long as they get their paycheck.
    I read that just before the h1n1 was even known to the public, the pharmaceutical company put a patent on this vaccine. Why is that? And why are they forcing it on the public? Are these not legitimate questions to be answered? How about our PM answer these. He won't because he doesn't know either.

From Macleans