No one saw Barack in the balloon?

Wafting ever upwards on gaseous clouds of hope, only to have his numbers crash . . .

by Mark Steyn on Thursday, November 5, 2009 12:00pm - 72 Comments

No one saw Barack in the balloon?On the day America went Balloon Boy crazy, I chanced to be on the radio, appearing live coast to coast on The Hugh Hewitt Show. And, as the Balloon Boy was the hot breaking news, Hugh asked me about it. “I don’t know what to say,” I said, “except it’s one of those peculiar and potentially tragic and instantly horrifying combination of circumstances.” If I sound a bit vague, well, that’s the idea. I’d gotten the gist of what was happening a couple of minutes before I went on air, but these days I’m wary: almost any “human interest” story turns out to be interesting for an entirely different set of reasons from the initial ones—the shocking “hate crime” the victim turns out to have perpetrated on himself, etc. So simply out of a sense of self-preservation, when I’m told that a six-year-old boy is sailing through the skies in a balloon, I try to suppress the urge to demand mandatory pilot’s licences for kindergartners or making helium a prohibited substance.

So Hugh moved on to Afghanistan and the economy and other peripheral matters, and a couple of minutes later broke in with the news that the boy had been found safe and well. He wasn’t in the balloon at all. “Thank God,” I said, still wary, “but you know, there are a lot of law enforcement people, there have been a lot of people who have been sitting around at airports waiting to scramble into planes, and at the end of the day, this kid is likely to have cost authorities some significant six-figure sum.”

Almost right: it was a seven-figure sum. Which is why Sheriff Jim Alderden wants to bring criminal charges against Balloon Boy’s dad, Richard Heene. I confess it did not occur to me, in that short as-it-happens interview, that a man might fake his kid’s airborne adventure out of a longing to get on cable TV. I think it was Groucho Marx who said an audience will laugh at an actress playing a little old lady falling down stairs, but, if you’re a professional comedian, it has to be a real little old lady. That’s the way I feel: I want an America that does crazy things, not fakes crazy things.

Mr. Heene had been on a reality TV show called Wife Swap. Never seen it. On balance, I think I’d prefer the old-school wife swap of 1970s suburban parties where you toss your car keys in the ring and get to bonk the blowsy blond at Number 23. In this as in many other areas, reality TV seems a somewhat anemic substitute for reality. But, after two weeks on Wife Swap, Mr. Heene had apparently acquired a taste for the debased form of contemporary electronic celebrity.

There are usually three stages to this kind of story: first, the media herd trample over each other in the stampede to fall for the scam. Then come the recriminations, heaping abuse on the guy who suckered them. And finally the “cultural observers” weigh in with a grand thumb-sucker on the broader significance: this is a time-honoured device whereby we lads from the respectable prints can get to cover tabloid stories while still feeling lofty and above it all. Thus, Frank Rich of the New York Times decided to treat his readers to a dissertation of “what ‘balloon boy’ says about 2009.” So off trots Frank Rich, marvelling at “how practised we are at suspending disbelief when watching anything labelled news,” whether it’s a balloon drifting “buoyantly through the skies for hours with a six-year-old boy hidden within its contours” or “WMDs in Iraq.” “The Colorado balloon may have led to the rerouting of flights and the wasteful deployment of law enforcement resources,” observed Rich. “But at least it didn’t lead the country into fiasco the way George W. Bush’s flyboy spectacle on an aircraft carrier helped beguile most of the Beltway press and too much of the public into believing that the mission had been accomplished in Iraq.”

Hmm. Instead of a big essay on “what ‘balloon boy’ says about 2009,” Rich appears to have turned in a piece on what Balloon Boy says about 2003. Perhaps it was a typo in the editor’s memo. But, at the time George W. Bush and (by the way) every senior Democrat were going on about WMDs in Iraq, Balloon Boy wasn’t even born. So he seems a bit of a stretch as a metaphor for the early Bush years, just as Susan Boyle would be an unlikely metaphor for the Relief of Mafeking. Bush, in that useful American formulation, is history. And so, for the moment, is the Republican party. Democrats run everything—the presidency, the House, the Senate, the media, the movies, the lot. Yet, “George W. Bush” remains the only answer on the liberal Rorschach test: whatever ink blot you lay before them, it’s Bush’s fault.

C’mon, man. This isn’t difficult. CNN and Co. cut away to Balloon Boy in the middle of a live broadcast of the current president, one Barack Obama, talking, as is his wont. So let’s see: the whole of America goes bananas, mesmerized by a hot air balloon soaring into the stratosphere before coming down to earth and being revealed to be entirely empty. And you think it’s a metaphor for the first Bush term? It’s no wonder the New York Times is junk stock and laying off journalists faster than at any time in its history.

Any self-respecting cultural critic not trapped in the spring of ’03 ought to be able to do this in his sleep: there he was, Barack the Balloon Boy, wafted ever upwards on great gaseous clouds of hope and change, only to have his approval numbers crash farther faster than any president of the last 60 years. He found the reality TV show of campaigning more congenial than the reality of governing. He thought his multi-trillion-dollar ballooning debt could defy the laws of economic gravity but it just floated off over the far horizon and was never seen again.

You want a defence of the dad? Why begrudge Richard Heene wanting wall-to-wall TV coverage without doing anything to earn it when he’d just sat through a week of media fawning over Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize? The Norwegians concede the new president (in office for just 11 days before Nobel nominations closed) hasn’t actually advanced the cause of peace, but he just might, one day, and in the meantime, like young Falcon Heene, he’s cute and inspiring and we’re all rooting for him!

Likewise, Rich goes back to the last time America knew hard times—the 1930s—when a land riven by economic collapse had sought out novelty distractions like dance marathons. But the point about dance marathons is that you actually had to do something—for hours, days on end, round and round and round, not foxtrotting or waltzing but just blearily staggering. The difference between the gruelling pain of the dance marathon and the non-event of the balloon hoax is, in its way, the difference between the Depression and the current malaise. In the thirties, Americans lost money they’d earned in the good times of the twenties. Today, by contrast, Americans are (temporarily?) finding it difficult to spend beyond their means as so many did in recent years. In the thirties, farms that had been in the family for generations and whose sons worked the hardscrabble land seven days a week were first mortgaged and then lost to the bank. Today, banks repossess “homes” in which the “owners” have no equity and whose loan terms, even in the good times, never bore any relation to any ability to repay. As with the Balloon Boy’s non-flight and the Nobel Boy’s non-peace, we want success on easy credit terms. Gimme the house now, gimme the TV coverage now, gimme the prize now.

There is something almost poignant about the transparency of the Heene scam. There have always been hucksters, but in the old days you actually used to require, say, a bearded lady. Maybe not all the facial hair was her own, and you filled it out with a few stick-on bits. But, to make a couple of bucks at a carny sideshow, even a con act needed an act. To be able to spur law enforcement and news organizations to spend millions chasing an empty balloon across the skies is, in its way, awesome, and oddly inspiring—at least to a president who in Afghanistan, North Korea, Iran, Eastern Europe and Latin America is attempting to sell a sack of gaseous nothing as something bold and appealing.

The best tabloid stories function as an overripe reductio of the foibles of the age. So, just in time for the first anniversary of Barack Obama’s election, Balloon Boy came along. The fact that the New York media sophisticates are so lacking in self-awareness they can’t even see the connection makes the point as drolly as anything possibly could.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/AlcoveOne AlcoveOne

    Steyn is great as always.

  • http://tubularman.com texasboom

    I'd say beyond great. Can't get enough.

  • Steynomite

    Angie is in love with Steynomite

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    I wish this metaphor were entirely true. Unfortunately, although Obama's foreign policy is largely either vapid or a continuation of Bush's, his domestic policy is looking increasingly non-vapid and fairly hard-left.

  • Rob H

    Another great column from Mark.
    Isn't there anyone on the Left who can write as informative and observant column on our increasingly disfunctional society? And make you smile.
    Well, no actually. There is no exposure of folly or sense of humour in "hopey changey" world.

  • mike

    did anyone actually think a guy with no executive experience, any significant achievements and an inability to speak without a teleprompter would be a good POTUS?

    seriously?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/EdSki EdSki

      It appears – ACORN aside – at least 50% + 1 voting Americans did.

  • Montjoie

    Balloon MAN, you racists.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/JohnnyKnuckles JohnnyKnuckles

      Snort.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/minaka minaka

      "Boy" is absolutely correct describing a President with a childish inability to take responsibility for anything after a year in office whose answer to everything is still "the other guy did it". Well, the other guy didn't spend a trillion paying off all his special interest supporters pretending it was stimulating anything but their undying loyalty. The other guy didn't lower the White House by squealing like a baby about being criticized and drawing a bead on his critics, both individuals and media outlets. The other guy didn't kiss up to every undemocratic thug in the world while letting down allies. That's all on the little boy in the oval office who's all "wee-weed up" to quote an Obamaism.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/barbthedarb barbthedarb

        Obama bailed out Wall Street, right?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/EdSki EdSki

      You're a balloonist racist. It's "air-pressure challenged."

    • Lisa

      But wait a minute, I thought we were proud to be racists? I thought we didn't care about the loony left's political correctness? You mean we have to give in to their lame political correctness? So… no more tea parties?

  • Madoffa

    The Balloon Boy metaphor for Obama's rise and deflation is quite a good one, right down to the fact that it was all quite deliberately a scam from the start.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

      True enough.

      Except that in the case of the tomfoolery of a kid getting shanghaid into service for free air time, the Balloon parents could actually be prosecuted for their idiotic deception that had everyone going on all burners.

      At the national and international level, however, I'm afraid we're not quite that lucky for the analogy.

  • guillermo

    I will not be able to look at the POTUS without thinking of that balloon.
    Fantastic Mr. Steyn!

  • Helen

    "So let’s see: the whole of America goes bananas, mesmerized by a hot air balloon soaring into the stratosphere before coming down to earth and being revealed to be entirely empty. And you think it’s a metaphor for the first Bush term?"

    Brilliantly put, as always.

    Mark Steyn always calls it like it is.

  • PatB

    Shouldn't the song of the week be "Up, Up and Away in my Beautiful Baloon"?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

      Ya beat me to it.

      And wasn't that the Fifth Dimension who gave us that song?

      Age of Aquarius, and all that rot.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

    Astonishing.

    Steyn skewers–my God, once again–the Left's continued penchant for thinking they've come up with someone or something cleverly suited to the moment (in this case Balloonomania) and misapply the pedals all laid out for them under the dashboard and the analogy gets popped into reverse and crashes the garage wall.

    So Frank Rich like many if not most liberals cannot fathom the magical and apparently counterintuitive concept of "CONTEXT", and thinks balloons are more proximate to Things Bush than the hot air now emanating from the White House.

    Or as the latest Steynpost outpost has it:

    Democrats run everything—the presidency, the House, the Senate, the media, the movies, the lot. Yet, “George W. Bush” remains the only answer on the liberal Rorschach test: whatever ink blot you lay before them, it’s Bush’s fault.

    • dave

      "for thinking they've come up with someone or something cleverly suited to the moment"

      Kinda like your idol just did in this column?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

        Hmm.

        Just what do you think you're doing, Dave

        Hot air, malappropriated quotes from major columnists like Rich who someone keep missing how the dots are connected.

        Well, not sure about "idot", but it seems someone is still standing on the shore while the boat moves out of the harbor here, Dave.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

        Hmm.

        Just what do you think you're doing, Dave

        Hot air, malappropriated quotes from major columnists like Rich who someone keep missing how the dots are connected.

        Well, not sure about "idol", as that's a little strong for someone I merely agree with for pointing out the painfully obvious fact that beautiful analogies and metaphors veritably plopped in your lap can't get picked up by libs without dropping one end of them.

        But it seems someone is still standing on the shore while the boat moves out of the harbor here, Dave.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

        Hmm.

        Just what do you think you're doing, Dave?

        Hot air, malappropriated quotes from major columnists like Rich, and pointing out how some keep missing how the dots are connected.

        Well, not sure about "idol", as that's a little strong for someone I merely agree with for pointing out the painfully obvious fact that beautiful analogies and metaphors veritably plopped in your lap can't get picked up by libs without dropping one end of them.

        But it seems someone is still standing on the shore while the boat moves out of the harbor here, Dave.

  • Revnant Dream

    As with the Balloon Boy’s non-flight and the Nobel Boy’s non-peace, we want success on easy credit terms. Gimme the house now, gimme the TV coverage now, gimme the prize now.

    Mr. Steyn illuminates the feel of the Age with this snip it of well thought out wisdom.
    To me this represents the wishful thinking decadence of the times.
    A cotton candy world with no solidity.People have become less real to each other than their pretensions or wishes for themselves.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

    Suddenly…I think we're losing altitude here…

  • Clothilde

    Love that Steyn>

    Another thought that ballooned into my brain, How long before a terrorist builds something like this filled with something very noxious? and this could so easily have been a practice run.

  • Paul from Brooklyn

    Just fantastic. Well done, Mark. Right on the money.

  • Gary Ephedra

    Vapid is being gracious: in actual fact Oba mao has deliberately lost allies: Turkey, Israel, Czech Republic, Poland, and many others. It will be costly and difficult (if possible) to get them back on side after betraying them gratuitously and without any gains for the USA by having done so.

    • http://www.youtube.com/user/AbuAfakski Jed Marlin

      wow
      first time I've seen "Oba-Mao"
      I like it!
      Did you make that up or see it somewhere else?
      (I'm not being facetious, I like it)

      Steyn is awesome, proud to have him living here in the States.

      http://www.youtube.com/user/AbuAfakski#p/u/3/rAr2…

  • http://twitter.com/TerryOC @TerryOC

    Left or right, do you really think it matters ? You're supposed to be on the same side but from the outside looking in, you're all looking a bit silly right now.
    Without a doubt the venomous criticism from the Republicans is not at all constructive. In fact it comes across as hateful…wonder where that stems from ? ? ?

    • dbk

      Spit it out.

      Anyone who criticizes Obama is RACIST.

      What are you doing? Trying to protect the powerless and oppressed President of the United States?

      Derek

      • http://twitter.com/TerryOC @TerryOC

        It was way funnier when it was Bush , whereas the anti Obama discourse is just ugly. And BTW, trust me on this, it's very obvious that there are racist issues in the republican camp. Those ignoramuses, what's their nickname 'tea-baggers' ? Oh yeah, I'm sure they "have black friends" but their red-neckery was plain to see.

        They've worked themselves into a fervour and Obama has not made any real mistakes yet. Imagine how crazy it will get when he pulls a Clinton or a Nixon foul-up! Not on that scale, but to err is human. What I'm saying is by then Republican outrage will have lost its' credibility with the oh so many storms in teacups, mountains on molehills and all the rest of the OTT, holier than thou, righteous indignation.

        • Michael

          It was the Juvenile Anderson Cooper that tried to discredit the Tea part movement by nicknaming them Teabaggers in reference to probably something he does in private.What is even more telling is that you consider the Tea Party Movement "Red -Neckery", which goes hand and hand with the main stream media that tried to label them as racist for a couple of poster that were shown over and over again.If you dig a little deeper and didn't only rely on CNN for your unoriginal opinion you might be surprised to find that the Tea Party is certainly not a Republican movement but a movement of Democrats ,Republicans,Independents of all different races tired of Big overreaching Government .

  • Peter K

    Mark, this is the best column you've written all year. You avoided the temptation to wander into the scatological, which is usually what torpedoes an otherwise excellent column of yours.

    And, for all of the conservative bluster above, it's an excellent column because it's so non-partisan. It's a great summary of the age we live in – especially the bit about the contrast between the housing crisis and the Great Depression.

    • http://www.youtube.com/user/AbuAfakski Jed Marlin

      scatalogical?
      when does Mark get into poop?
      can u give an example?

      otherwise I agree, this is an excellent column, and the economies of not just the US but much of the Western World, have a long way to fall

      this is not a crisis for the US alone, but for all the deficit spending welfare state economies
      this is the end of Keynesian economics

      http://www.youtube.com/user/AbuAfakski#p/u/48/BQA…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/GaryB GaryB

      Did you look up scatological? Are Mark's columns ever so?

  • http://twitter.com/colros @colros

    OMG, Mark, tell me it's not true. Am I going to have to take down my shrine to Obamessiah?

    • John

      Just let the air out of it.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/barbthedarb barbthedarb

      I think I recall a certain president (name escapes me) saying that God chose him to lead his nation. But obviously Obama is the one with the Messiah complex.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Nich Nich

    These articles, the gentle hyperbole, is not dissimilar to a gentle laxative I would imagine. The mind, like the bowels, gets some short term relief, but the same excrement builds up again and is spewed forth, creating the next Rorschach blot to be analyzed and pondered, and thankfully you all see ponies and sunshine on the right, Hitler and hate on the left.

    Yes, those on the left are evil terrible people who have tricked decent, hard working people through lies and deceit because of an insatiable desire for power (just as left wing nut jobs accused Bush of similar things).

    Is this supposed to be parody of the looney left, or it's right wing equivalent?

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/AbuAfakski Jed Marlin

    hey, where'd my comments go?
    I didn't think I wuz that bad…

    an excellent article by Mark, once again
    the current economic crisis is a problem not just of the US, but of the entire Western Welfare State, in my opinion

    Mark, you're awesome!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

    Fantastic analysis and writing, as always.

    Why begrudge Richard Heene wanting wall-to-wall TV coverage without doing anything to earn it when he’d just sat through a week of media fawning over Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize?

    Absolutely. Today's liberal culture is to award prizes for doing nothing, to award prizes to those finishing 1st, 10th, 20th and last in a race, and to equate effort with results, even to equate spin with results.

    In the thirties, farms that had been in the family for generations and whose sons worked the hardscrabble land seven days a week were first mortgaged and then lost to the bank. Today, banks repossess “homes” in which the “owners” have no equity and whose loan terms, even in the good times, never bore any relation to any ability to repay.

    Absolutely. Perfect analysis for the blowhards comparing today to the 30s, claiming we are in a depression when in reality we are simply being scammed by wall street, scammed by the government, and scammed by irresponsible and devious borrowers who have no inention nor ability to pay for the things they take from society.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    LOL, I see the Steynettes are really digging deep in their constructive criticism. "Mark, please father my children! Please!!"

    • John

      criticism is so hurtful…..especially when you hit the wingnut on the head

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/craigola craigola

      "Mark, please father my children! Please!!"
      And that's just the men.
      Best column EVER, Mark, at least until next week.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

        Oh, nicely done! Sirrah.

        Thou servest us well!

        Except……if it please the Praetorians….. I can't help but also wonder just how many people snorted and gurgled on their morning coffee in glee while reading yet another Frank Rich column (desperately trying to manage their adulation of his brilliance) where Bush is–once again–the proximate reason for everything from the death of the dinosaurs to Obama's confused daze on foreign policy questions that don't involved fabulous trips and Milli Vanilli accolades…

        • Foreigner

          You wrote that whilst wearing a bra and panties, didn't you?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

            I realize that you, like some of your comrades, are here for cheap entertainment only.

            But I'm afraid there is little I can do for you in the continuence of some of these oddball fantasies.

            For that, you might take a peek at Salon or Slate Mag or join a bathhouse group on Facebook.

    • http://anatomyofculture.blogspot.com/ R.B. Glennie

      Oh Twitchell, what'd I tell you about trying to channel your squirrels?

      I thought after that last exchange, you'd have moved to Siberia or something.

    • Ceeger

      I notice you're here lapping up the golden words too, Mitchell.
      The problem with you is that — while the rest of us can honestly admire the common sense and brilliant writing style Steyn displays here — you're left frustrated and wondering how the shallow pool of your "thinkers" on the left could ever offer up such a big fish to match the offerings of this accomplished right-wing writer.
      Try not to dwell on it too much, though; those on the right simply don't supply as much idiocy and hypocrisy as grist for your writers' mills.

  • Dougal Labro

    Look for a Balloon Czar to be appointed next. Another socialist dreamer who'll be responsible for monitoring hot air.

From Macleans