<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What a waste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203798</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203798</guid>
		<description>Very good point, I Germany there are now many debattes about this issue too. If we want to leave this planet in a good shape then we should work more responsible with the ressources that we have. My friend Jessica who is currently also on &lt;a href=&quot;http://sprachreisenvergleicher.com/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sprachreisen&lt;/a&gt; in Canada also told me that the debatte is still very strong about this issue. I hope that we can have a similar debatte in Europe. This would at least help to move the countries further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point, I Germany there are now many debattes about this issue too. If we want to leave this planet in a good shape then we should work more responsible with the ressources that we have. My friend Jessica who is currently also on <a href="http://sprachreisenvergleicher.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">sprachreisen</a> in Canada also told me that the debatte is still very strong about this issue. I hope that we can have a similar debatte in Europe. This would at least help to move the countries further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: welders</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203797</link>
		<dc:creator>welders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203797</guid>
		<description>Gord tulk is right,

Hans has an interesting option, but as someone who has worked in the field (pardon the pun) the economics of it just aren&#039;t there and with natural gas and oil supplies increasing they Likely won&#039;t be for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gord tulk is right,</p>
<p>Hans has an interesting option, but as someone who has worked in the field (pardon the pun) the economics of it just aren&#039;t there and with natural gas and oil supplies increasing they Likely won&#039;t be for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plasma Cutters</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203796</link>
		<dc:creator>Plasma Cutters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203796</guid>
		<description>As per the words by Jacksonville Fence  It is &quot;Monkey&#039;s dream&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As per the words by Jacksonville Fence  It is &quot;Monkey&#039;s dream&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Jose Movers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203795</link>
		<dc:creator>San Jose Movers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203795</guid>
		<description>I can see the food of tons and tons of monkey wasted here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the food of tons and tons of monkey wasted here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sell gold</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203794</link>
		<dc:creator>sell gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203794</guid>
		<description>I saw the news the other night regarding food consumption. It&#039;s scary but the fact that we harvest more than we want is really not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the news the other night regarding food consumption. It&#039;s scary but the fact that we harvest more than we want is really not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacksonville Fence</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacksonville Fence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 19:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203793</guid>
		<description>A monkey&#039;s dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A monkey&#039;s dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delford t louis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203792</link>
		<dc:creator>delford t louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203792</guid>
		<description>garbage is now slightly challenged food unfit for human consumption</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>garbage is now slightly challenged food unfit for human consumption</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home412AD</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203791</link>
		<dc:creator>Home412AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203791</guid>
		<description>Thank you for proving my point about the average IQ of some people. For your information, about 20 percent of the farms in Canada are very well run businesses. Some are even family businesses in their third generation of profit-making. Naturally, they are all far larger than a paltry 2,000 acres, a size so inefficient it can&#039;t possibly make a profit, but can only be supported by taxpayers, like any family on welfare.

For your information, farming families supported by government subsidies, like any public sector unionist, have 100 percent of their gross income paid for by people who do work and pay taxes. Therefore, their taxes are paid by the taxpayers, and they don&#039;t pay any taxes at all themselves. Possibly the arithmetic of gross, taxes, and net is a little too complicated for you to grasp.

The successful farmers in Canada make a lot of money, and they have no need to be supported by taxpayers in any way. Farming is the easiest occupation in the world, and making a lot of money farming is very easy as well. All that&#039;s required is an IQ above 85.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for proving my point about the average IQ of some people. For your information, about 20 percent of the farms in Canada are very well run businesses. Some are even family businesses in their third generation of profit-making. Naturally, they are all far larger than a paltry 2,000 acres, a size so inefficient it can&#039;t possibly make a profit, but can only be supported by taxpayers, like any family on welfare.</p>
<p>For your information, farming families supported by government subsidies, like any public sector unionist, have 100 percent of their gross income paid for by people who do work and pay taxes. Therefore, their taxes are paid by the taxpayers, and they don&#039;t pay any taxes at all themselves. Possibly the arithmetic of gross, taxes, and net is a little too complicated for you to grasp.</p>
<p>The successful farmers in Canada make a lot of money, and they have no need to be supported by taxpayers in any way. Farming is the easiest occupation in the world, and making a lot of money farming is very easy as well. All that&#039;s required is an IQ above 85.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Helrich</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203790</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Helrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203790</guid>
		<description>Ya ok buddy....farmers feed our cities everyday! Our produce and meat products would be through the roofs in cost if we had to get it shipped to our grocery stores all the time.....farmers pay the same taxes as city folks you turd!!! How about you go do a bull and die slow! Your a piece of poop and a disgrace to society!! Have a nice day homo412AD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya ok buddy&#8230;.farmers feed our cities everyday! Our produce and meat products would be through the roofs in cost if we had to get it shipped to our grocery stores all the time&#8230;..farmers pay the same taxes as city folks you turd!!! How about you go do a bull and die slow! Your a piece of poop and a disgrace to society!! Have a nice day homo412AD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home412AD</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203789</link>
		<dc:creator>Home412AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203789</guid>
		<description>Your comment, like the previous one, is not worth a reply. What evidence do you have that I am wrong, aside from rhetorical blanket assertions containing no data? The physical, biological fact remains that most -- more than 75 percent -- of family farm members are extremely stupid, so stupid that they can&#039;t work in any occupation more complex than farming, they can&#039;t even do that competently, and they are extraneous and superfluous to human society. They are unnecessary, redundant, and nothing but a burden on everyone else, who actually do contribute to humanity, and keep farming families alive with our taxes. Denials and maudlin rhetoric won&#039;t change the physical, biological facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment, like the previous one, is not worth a reply. What evidence do you have that I am wrong, aside from rhetorical blanket assertions containing no data? The physical, biological fact remains that most &#8212; more than 75 percent &#8212; of family farm members are extremely stupid, so stupid that they can&#039;t work in any occupation more complex than farming, they can&#039;t even do that competently, and they are extraneous and superfluous to human society. They are unnecessary, redundant, and nothing but a burden on everyone else, who actually do contribute to humanity, and keep farming families alive with our taxes. Denials and maudlin rhetoric won&#039;t change the physical, biological facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203788</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203788</guid>
		<description>This is the problem Monsanto genetically modified food and world health organization run by Freemasons.
Get rid off both the world is happier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the problem Monsanto genetically modified food and world health organization run by Freemasons.<br />
Get rid off both the world is happier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RagingRanter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203787</link>
		<dc:creator>RagingRanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203787</guid>
		<description>The spuds story is nothing unique. Dairy and egg producers ALL throw out produce every year after their quotas have been filled.

And how many hogs were &quot;depopulated&quot; this year, using millions in government subsidies to do so? And this after governments spent billions in the 1990s subsidizing super hog barns to the point that the market could no longer absorb the production?

As an example of how silly this all got, consider that Manitoba has a population of 10 hogs for every person in the province, largely because of ridiculous subsidies over the past 15 years to &quot;encourage diversification amongst Manitoba&#039;s farmers.&quot; (That&#039;s 1 million Tobans; ten million hogs.) Precisely how did the government ever think that could end well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spuds story is nothing unique. Dairy and egg producers ALL throw out produce every year after their quotas have been filled.</p>
<p>And how many hogs were &quot;depopulated&quot; this year, using millions in government subsidies to do so? And this after governments spent billions in the 1990s subsidizing super hog barns to the point that the market could no longer absorb the production?</p>
<p>As an example of how silly this all got, consider that Manitoba has a population of 10 hogs for every person in the province, largely because of ridiculous subsidies over the past 15 years to &quot;encourage diversification amongst Manitoba&#039;s farmers.&quot; (That&#039;s 1 million Tobans; ten million hogs.) Precisely how did the government ever think that could end well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RagingRanter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203786</link>
		<dc:creator>RagingRanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203786</guid>
		<description>Well then we should burn it for fuel!!! Oh wait, that idea is already being subsidized with billions of our money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then we should burn it for fuel!!! Oh wait, that idea is already being subsidized with billions of our money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KatieMate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203785</link>
		<dc:creator>KatieMate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203785</guid>
		<description>There is a terrific book by Peter Singer and Jim Mason called &quot;The way we eat: Why our food choices matter&quot;.  It explores (among other things) the ethics involved in chosing our daily bread.

I highly recomend reading this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a terrific book by Peter Singer and Jim Mason called &quot;The way we eat: Why our food choices matter&quot;.  It explores (among other things) the ethics involved in chosing our daily bread.</p>
<p>I highly recomend reading this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gord tulk</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203784</link>
		<dc:creator>Gord tulk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203784</guid>
		<description>Hans has an interesting option, but as someone who has worked in the field (pardon the pun) the economics of it just aren&#039;t there and with natural gas and oil supplies increasing they Likely won&#039;t be for decades.

&quot;Waste&quot; happens in all aspects of a capitalist economy. (how many thousands of paper copies of macleans go unread some aftr being shipped across the continent?) In fact it is a Principle tenet of capitalism that there needs to be &#039;creative destruction&#039;. Compare the surplusses of food that permit us as consumers to be picky and only buy the best. Ever see a potato that was grown in poland before the wall fell? Try peeling the lumpy scabby mass. To single out the AG sector for the frankly necessary waste is to dmonstrate ones ignorance of hoiw markets work and in the long run result in less, not more, waste. Take for instance apples. Technology was developed for controlled atmosphere (CA) storage that enabled apples to be stored in pristine condition for up to a year. The only difficulty is that any scabby or damaged apples that type of storage will cause the entire lot to rot far too quickly. Thus very strict culling is required. The result - some waste at harvest but far less than would occur if CA wasn&#039;t used and over time breeding, cultural and harvesting practices have resulted in far far fewer culls - the economc pressure on producers begat it.

Thus pointing to (very) isolated incidents of attempts at supply control is wrong-headed if well-meaning. (some of the most evil acts of humankind were well-meaning, i digress) This includes the culling that happens at the shop level - a spoiled banana causes the others to rot more quickly, and it turns off consumers so less are purchased and presumably eaten. The trickle-down impact of bad food handling in a shop will either put the shop out of business or make it handle and manage it&#039;s inventory better.

And if you are someone who still thinks it is unacceptable you either never eat bananas or any other tropical fruit because of the evironmental impact of the transport involved or you are a hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans has an interesting option, but as someone who has worked in the field (pardon the pun) the economics of it just aren&#8217;t there and with natural gas and oil supplies increasing they Likely won&#8217;t be for decades.</p>
<p>&#8220;Waste&#8221; happens in all aspects of a capitalist economy. (how many thousands of paper copies of macleans go unread some aftr being shipped across the continent?) In fact it is a Principle tenet of capitalism that there needs to be &#8216;creative destruction&#8217;. Compare the surplusses of food that permit us as consumers to be picky and only buy the best. Ever see a potato that was grown in poland before the wall fell? Try peeling the lumpy scabby mass. To single out the AG sector for the frankly necessary waste is to dmonstrate ones ignorance of hoiw markets work and in the long run result in less, not more, waste. Take for instance apples. Technology was developed for controlled atmosphere (CA) storage that enabled apples to be stored in pristine condition for up to a year. The only difficulty is that any scabby or damaged apples that type of storage will cause the entire lot to rot far too quickly. Thus very strict culling is required. The result &#8211; some waste at harvest but far less than would occur if CA wasn&#8217;t used and over time breeding, cultural and harvesting practices have resulted in far far fewer culls &#8211; the economc pressure on producers begat it.</p>
<p>Thus pointing to (very) isolated incidents of attempts at supply control is wrong-headed if well-meaning. (some of the most evil acts of humankind were well-meaning, i digress) This includes the culling that happens at the shop level &#8211; a spoiled banana causes the others to rot more quickly, and it turns off consumers so less are purchased and presumably eaten. The trickle-down impact of bad food handling in a shop will either put the shop out of business or make it handle and manage it&#8217;s inventory better.</p>
<p>And if you are someone who still thinks it is unacceptable you either never eat bananas or any other tropical fruit because of the evironmental impact of the transport involved or you are a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Wegner</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203783</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Wegner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203783</guid>
		<description>Regarding your article &quot; What a Waste. &quot;

I feel this problem of too many people wasting good food has a spiritual base to it - ingratitude. A lack of thanksgiving to God for giving you your daily bread.

I went through some interesting times when younger and once ran out of money - with only 4 cents in my pocket - and was homeless for awhile, but would not beg or steal, so went three days without food, before I got a job with a temp agency - this was in Toronto. This taught me a good lesson in humility and taught me to appreciate my daily bread which God gives me.  Rarely go to restaurants, but this evening I did go out for a meal, and ate every last little tiny morsel.

Ray Wegner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your article &quot; What a Waste. &quot;</p>
<p>I feel this problem of too many people wasting good food has a spiritual base to it &#8211; ingratitude. A lack of thanksgiving to God for giving you your daily bread.</p>
<p>I went through some interesting times when younger and once ran out of money &#8211; with only 4 cents in my pocket &#8211; and was homeless for awhile, but would not beg or steal, so went three days without food, before I got a job with a temp agency &#8211; this was in Toronto. This taught me a good lesson in humility and taught me to appreciate my daily bread which God gives me.  Rarely go to restaurants, but this evening I did go out for a meal, and ate every last little tiny morsel.</p>
<p>Ray Wegner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Duerichen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203782</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Duerichen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203782</guid>
		<description>Here is David Blume&#039;s video:
[youtube x-Y08RSDP6s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-Y08RSDP6s&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-Y08RSDP6s&lt;/a&gt; youtube]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is David Blume&#039;s video:<br />
[youtube x-Y08RSDP6s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-Y08RSDP6s" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-Y08RSDP6s</a> youtube]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Duerichen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203781</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Duerichen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203781</guid>
		<description>Re: Nancy McDonald&#039;s Article, &quot;what a Waste&quot;

David Blume has the perfect solution on a farmer&#039;s level what to do with the waste. All that waste can easily be turned into ethanol for fuel in cars displacing gasoline. the material left over from making the ethanol is perfect organic fertilizer! Se his site:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.permaculture.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.permaculture.com/&lt;/a&gt;

Hans Duerichen, PEng</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Nancy McDonald&#039;s Article, &quot;what a Waste&quot;</p>
<p>David Blume has the perfect solution on a farmer&#039;s level what to do with the waste. All that waste can easily be turned into ethanol for fuel in cars displacing gasoline. the material left over from making the ethanol is perfect organic fertilizer! Se his site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.permaculture.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.permaculture.com/</a></p>
<p>Hans Duerichen, PEng</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Kamminga</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203780</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Kamminga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203780</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the article and am disappointed with our culture.  What disturbs me is the by line on the top of the page.  The big concern regarding the waste is on the environmental impact.  What of the poor and starving people all over the world.  I read articles exposing charitable organizations telling the poor all over the world to have fewer children and more abortions when we in the west alone trash more food every day than most of these people eat in a month.   We sit hear and talk about environmental impact.  How about something a little more immediate like the starving refugees of war and famine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the article and am disappointed with our culture.  What disturbs me is the by line on the top of the page.  The big concern regarding the waste is on the environmental impact.  What of the poor and starving people all over the world.  I read articles exposing charitable organizations telling the poor all over the world to have fewer children and more abortions when we in the west alone trash more food every day than most of these people eat in a month.   We sit hear and talk about environmental impact.  How about something a little more immediate like the starving refugees of war and famine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigfarmer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203779</link>
		<dc:creator>bigfarmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203779</guid>
		<description>A good start would be in reducing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good start would be in reducing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home412AD</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203778</link>
		<dc:creator>Home412AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203778</guid>
		<description>The over-production caused by farming subsidies, which result in food wastage, are a pragmatic, practical choice of governments. Even in the most developed countries of North America and Europe, the vast majority of farms are still small (under 2,000 acres) family farms. The sad reality is that most family farmers are not too bright, and there are only so many truck driver and cleaning women needed in any nation. Even when farming is only 2 percent of the population, it is actually cheaper for a government to pay those families farming subsidies than it would be to pay the same number of people welfare. The same equation of governance is far worse, naturally, in the nations of Latin America, Africa, South Asia, Southeast and Central Asia, China, and East Europe, including Russia. The only way to remove the restriction is to reduce the number and percentage of slow-witted people in the world, which no one has been able to do yet, with a practical, realistic plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The over-production caused by farming subsidies, which result in food wastage, are a pragmatic, practical choice of governments. Even in the most developed countries of North America and Europe, the vast majority of farms are still small (under 2,000 acres) family farms. The sad reality is that most family farmers are not too bright, and there are only so many truck driver and cleaning women needed in any nation. Even when farming is only 2 percent of the population, it is actually cheaper for a government to pay those families farming subsidies than it would be to pay the same number of people welfare. The same equation of governance is far worse, naturally, in the nations of Latin America, Africa, South Asia, Southeast and Central Asia, China, and East Europe, including Russia. The only way to remove the restriction is to reduce the number and percentage of slow-witted people in the world, which no one has been able to do yet, with a practical, realistic plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olga P</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203777</link>
		<dc:creator>Olga P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203777</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this article. We are all hypocrites talking about sustainability on one side and demanding the perfect fruit or vegetable on the other. It is time we realize that the food we eat comes from organisms that come in all sizes and shapes. When we look for the uniform  perfection we see in supermarkets it comes at a huge price.  You have highlighted one of the untold stories of our agricultural systems. Fruit and vegetables that does not make the grade and that is perfectly good to eat goes to waste at an alarming rate!  To become really sustainable we have to start by changing our own ways and be satisfied with produce that may have a blemish on the skin or  be odd looking but tasty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this article. We are all hypocrites talking about sustainability on one side and demanding the perfect fruit or vegetable on the other. It is time we realize that the food we eat comes from organisms that come in all sizes and shapes. When we look for the uniform  perfection we see in supermarkets it comes at a huge price.  You have highlighted one of the untold stories of our agricultural systems. Fruit and vegetables that does not make the grade and that is perfectly good to eat goes to waste at an alarming rate!  To become really sustainable we have to start by changing our own ways and be satisfied with produce that may have a blemish on the skin or  be odd looking but tasty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedTylerEzro</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/what-a-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-203776</link>
		<dc:creator>TedTylerEzro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90545#comment-203776</guid>
		<description>The need for uniform, unblemished food in supermarkets is what favours factory farms more than anything else.   If your food is unblemished, it is probably being produced with some amount of fungicides, pesticides, or genetic engineering.  Organic doesn&#039;t always mean what people think it means.

If you want to support a type of food production that people are always saying that they want, you need to buy a variety of foods, and a varieties of particular types of foods.   So not only should you be buying things of every shape and colour, you should also buy individual products (say tomatoes) that are different shapes, sizes and flavours.

Factory farms are good at producing very few monocultures which are best suited to that type of farming.   Smaller units of production are able to give personal attention to products that require it.  Why should you care?  Because varieties selected for appearance, tolerance of hardship, and fast growth aren&#039;t usually the most nutritious or tasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The need for uniform, unblemished food in supermarkets is what favours factory farms more than anything else.   If your food is unblemished, it is probably being produced with some amount of fungicides, pesticides, or genetic engineering.  Organic doesn&#039;t always mean what people think it means.</p>
<p>If you want to support a type of food production that people are always saying that they want, you need to buy a variety of foods, and a varieties of particular types of foods.   So not only should you be buying things of every shape and colour, you should also buy individual products (say tomatoes) that are different shapes, sizes and flavours.</p>
<p>Factory farms are good at producing very few monocultures which are best suited to that type of farming.   Smaller units of production are able to give personal attention to products that require it.  Why should you care?  Because varieties selected for appearance, tolerance of hardship, and fast growth aren&#039;t usually the most nutritious or tasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

