<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#039;Blood’s a Rover,&#039; by James Ellroy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/10/blood%e2%80%99s-a-rover-by-james-ellroy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/10/blood%e2%80%99s-a-rover-by-james-ellroy/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RagingRanter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/10/blood%e2%80%99s-a-rover-by-james-ellroy/comment-page-1/#comment-204448</link>
		<dc:creator>RagingRanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90941#comment-204448</guid>
		<description>This book was good, but simply &quot;good&quot; is a major disappointment coming from Ellroy. American Tabloid and Cold Six Thousand were easily the two best novels I&#039;ve ever read. Ellroy abandoned his machine-gun writing style for this one, returning to a more standard style of complete sentences and more descriptive prose. And it comes out all wrong. Still a good read, but NOTHING like its two predecessors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book was good, but simply &quot;good&quot; is a major disappointment coming from Ellroy. American Tabloid and Cold Six Thousand were easily the two best novels I&#039;ve ever read. Ellroy abandoned his machine-gun writing style for this one, returning to a more standard style of complete sentences and more descriptive prose. And it comes out all wrong. Still a good read, but NOTHING like its two predecessors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

