The “Help Stephen Harper Name His Next Senator” Challenge

Scott Feschuk suggests we could really use an ‘adorable senator’

by Scott Feschuk on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:49am - 127 Comments

*Update: Challenge winner announced in the Comments below.

In today’s Ottawa Notebook, Jane Taber describes Tom Flanagan as “super Tory strategist.”

Does she mean “super,” as in “especially good at what he does?”

Does she mean “super,” as in “possessing extra-human powers such as the ability to strategize faster than a speeding Stephanopoulos?”

Or does she mean “super,” as in “I’m sorry I had to take a whole day off from saying nice things about Laureen Harper or directly quoting Conservative talking points, so I’m doing this instead?”

More important, the Notebook points out that Senator Jerry Grafstein is soon retiring, which gives the Prime Minister yet another opportunity to appoint someone new, or the rest of Mike Duffy, to a seat in the upper chamber.

[Brief pause to allow outraged readers to use comments to assail fat joke...]

I’m actually pretty sure there are a couple senators stepping down before Grafstein, but the point remains – soon it will be time yet again for Stephen Harper to respect his promise never to fill a single Senate seat through patronage, except for all of them.

Suggestions:

Janine Krieber – Think of the play this would get: the disaffected wife of a former Liberal leader welcomed into the Conservative fold and given a platform for her anti-Ignatieff views. This would receive more press than any defection since Belinda Stronach left the Tories or Peter Van Loan’s senses left Peter Van Loan.

A loyal, highly partisan Conservative with even fewer credentials than Carolyn Stewart-Olsen because Harper can get away with appointing anyone right now and goddamn it that’s what he’s going to do – The most likely choice.

Zombie Louis St. Laurent – As I mentioned yesterday, he is already disinterred and could easily be reanimated. (I know a guy.) A statesman of St. Laurent’s stature would lend gravitas to the upper chamber, foster a spirit of bipartisan co-operation and— braaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiinnnnnnsssssss. And don’t worry about me: I could find a new hat rack.

A baby panda – We could really use an adorable senator, so it’s either the panda or Coyne.

Who do you think Stephen Harper should appoint to the Senate? Make your suggestion in the Comments below. The best entry, as decided by a jury of me, will receive a lifelong sinecure prize valued in the tens of dollars.

CHALLENGE RESULTS UPDATE:
When it comes to judging these things, I try to be honest and pick the entry that amused me most – the one that generated the most genuine and immediate reaction. And in this case, it’s Con Man’s. I’m pretty sure he’s not trying to be funny, but for some reason it cracked me up to witness the solemnity with which he took on the assignment and the comprehensive nature of his reply. Plus – Bob Runciman! You can’t make this stuff up.

So congratulations (of a sort), Con Man. Please send your address to me at sfeschuk AT sympatico DOT ca and I’ll send off your reward.

Bookmark and Share
  • Kaplan

    Scott Feschuk. Killer speeches, y'know. Lots of the funny.

    Prize, please.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

    Mark Steyn!

  • D man

    William Shatner…what more can I say.

  • Con Man

    For Newfoundland, former Conservative MP and Grand-Falls Windsor Mayor Rex Barnes, For New Brunswick former Premier Bernard Lord, in Quebec former MP Andre Bachand or party loyalist and ADQ leadership contender Myriam Taschereau, and for Ontario, long term MPP and Senate reform advocate Bob Runciman and former candidate Hugh Arrison

  • Forrester

    What about Tie Domi and Belinda… Domi is out of work with Battle of the Blades over and still paying off his divorce…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

      Not a bad idea, Belinda could sit as a Liberal one week and a Conservative the next, she could play musical Senate chairs.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/YYZ YYZ

    Although the contest is over, I don't care. I vote for Captain Picard. In character and uniform whilst in the chamber. Must vote in favour of bills by saying "make it so."

    I am a nerd.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

      Well, if that's not an invitation to waste a bit of time, I don't know what is.

      Let's see, Baird as Whorf, Clement as a tribble…

      Other suggestions?

      • kcm

        Harper as data…if he can find some more of that NAC make-up again?

        • kcm

          And Ignatieff has to be a shoo-in for Spock.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeanStok SeanStok

          Quite a resemblance there, now that you mention it.

          Iggy as Spock?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/ScottFeschuk ScottFeschuk

    CHALLENGE RESULTS -

    When it comes to judging these things, I try to be honest and pick the entry that amused me most – the one that generated the most genuine and immediate reaction. And in this case, it's Con Man's. I'm pretty sure he's not trying to be funny, but for some reason it cracked me up to witness the solemnity with which he took on the assignment and the comprehensive nature of his reply. God – Bob Runciman! You can't make this stuff up.

    So congratulations (of a sort), Con Man. Please send your address to me at sfeschuk AT sympatico DOT ca and I'll send off your reward.

    • Dot

      100 Strowger Boulevard, Suite 101,
      Brockville, ON, K6V 5J9
      Telephone: (613) 342-9522

    • kcm

      Hey no fair…you didn't say there would be special consideration for unintended irony, or satire! Good pick. Made me laugh, and i don't know any of those guys.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Tceh Tceh

    That Canadian MC from Jeopardy!

    Who is Alex Trebek

  • Jason G.

    Ben Mulroney. 100% more sexiness.
    Rick Mercer. We need slapstick.
    Leonard Cohen. Bring some life into it.

  • constituent

    Gerald Keddy; he could abdicate in favour of one of" those lazy bastards sitting on the sidewalk in Halifax."

  • Fred – Brandon MB

    For some reason the press and the public have a double standard as to what behaviour is acceptable depending if the govt is Liberal or Conservative.

    Stephen Harper is just being pragmatic. The Liberals spend their entire tenure in govt stacking the Senate with Liberal supporters. Harper realizes that in the present climate it is impossible to have an elected Senate, as most Canadians want. So he must do the next best thing and try to balance out the partisan imbalance in the Senate created by the Liberals.

    • Dick Richards

      It may have something to do with Stephen Harper sitting in opposition, foaming at the mouth, claim that it was unethical and than promising to never to it himself.

  • Dick Richards

    Warren Kinsella…the look on Mark Steyn's face would be work $175,000 a year (is it too late to collect prize?)

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/DownEast DownEast

    The next senator should be Mr. or Ms. Abolition. This undemocratic, unelected institution, along with the monarchy are two of the most useless institutions that we inherited from Britain. The senate is based on the British House of Lords. It was put in place in Canada to watch over the common folk, represented in The House of Commons by MP put there by you and I.

    Put this "boys club", who are friends of the PM ,out to do a real day's work. Most of them are wealthy. The senate cost us $60million a year. Be gone senate!!

  • Eva

    I vote for Andrew Coyne

  • delford t louis

    some one in the same stature and company of the pro cons he heads…mulroney, robert latimer, karl heinz schreiber…get the picture!

  • Fred – Brandon MB

    I like the idea of Rick Mercer in the Senate. Why not also Marg Delahunty?

    Or who is more adorable than Don Cherry, Greatest Canadian!

  • Gary

    Hillier for his sycophantic testimony yesterday protecting his and Harper's posteriors. The prisoners were just scum bags anyway and Geneva conventions only apply to good people like us when we are prisoners.
    The arrogance of Harper and Hillier is monumental.

From Macleans