The first wave of fresh U.S. troops coming to Afghanistan will set about creating a security halo around Kandahar, where Canadian forces have spent three years trying to suppress the Taliban, according to the Wall Street Journal. The plan by U.S. commanders is an acknowledgement of sorts that the Canadian-led allied effort in the region has failed, and a recognition that Kandahar is a strategic linchpin to fighting the insurgency in the country’s mostly Pashtun south. Full marks to the American brass if it works. But critics point out the generals are following the same failed strategy the Soviets did in Afghanistan during the 1980s, retreating to city bastions while insurgents gained power in the countryside.
Categories: Need to know
‘Fortress Kandahar’ in U.S. plans
Plan to encircle city with troops a tacit admission that Canada and allies have failed
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
944216 Responseshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/25/fortress-kandahar-in-u-s-plans/%27Fortress+Kandahar%27+in+U.S.+plans2009-11-25+20%3A35%3A01macleans.ca to “‘Fortress Kandahar’ in U.S. plans”
- Col. Russell Williams' double life? - 127 Comments
- Credibility is what’s really melting - 326 Comments
- Maxime Bernier unplugged - 96 Comments
- Shy Adam Lambert comes to town - 62 Comments
- Our banking rules are smarter, not tighter - 36 Comments
- First Nations University loses funding Tuesday, February 9, 2010 18:21 - 1063490 Commentshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/first-nations-university-loses-funding/First+Nations+University+loses+funding2010-02-09+23%3A21%3A19macleans.ca
- “Today we started to make 20 per cent enriched nuclear fuel” Tuesday, February 9, 2010 17:55 - 1063540 Commentshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/%e2%80%9ctoday-we-started-to-make-20-per-cent-enriched-nuclear-fuel%e2%80%9d/%E2%80%9CToday+we+started+to+make+20+per+cent+enriched+nuclear+fuel%E2%80%9D2010-02-09+22%3A55%3A48macleans.ca
- Idea alert Tuesday, February 9, 2010 17:41 - 1063508 Commentshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/idea-alert-18/Idea+alert2010-02-09+22%3A41%3A39Aaron+Wherry
- ‘I look forward to your clarification of these issues for Canadians’ Tuesday, February 9, 2010 17:20 - 1063465 Commentshttp://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/i-look-forward-to-your-clarification-of-these-issues-for-canadians/%27I+look+forward+to+your+clarification+of+these+issues+for+Canadians%272010-02-09+22%3A20%3A06Aaron+Wherry
Contrary to popular belief, the ceremonial lighting of the Olympic flame at the Opening Ceremonies is, in fact, a decidedly modern affair. The culmination of the torch relay in a grandiose display at the Opening Ceremonies is a relic of the 1936 Berlin Games—just one of many attempts by the Nazi regime to lend a mythical air to the Games. Still, despite its dubious history, the lighting of the cauldron has evolved into one of the most spectacular and ostentatious displays at the Games. And the secretiveness that surrounds the lead-up to the ceremony only lends to the hype.
When it comes to the 2010 Games, the speculation about who will be selected to light the cauldron has coalesced around whether VANOC will go the traditional route and opt for a former Olympian or take the road less-travelled and pick someone from outside the sports world. Facebook groups have popped up promoting everyone from Terry Fox’s mother, Betty, to former Vancouver Canucks captain Trevor Linden. So far, Vancouver’s Olympic organizers have kept a tight lid on who the potential candidates might be. We’ve assembled a list of the names making the rounds, but feel free to add your own in the poll or in the comments below.
From Macleans
Health

Could cows hold the cure for Crohn’s?
A pathogen found in cattle may lead to a cure for Crohn’s disease
Andrew Coyne

Our banking rules are smarter, not tighter
ANDREW COYNE: Obama’s banking reforms would make the U.S. and Canadian systems even less alike than they are at present
Beyond The Commons

The Commons: Jack Layton doing as Jack Layton does
In all sorts of ways, it’s difficult to imagine him ever stopping
Arts & Culture

Shy Adam Lambert comes to town
The ‘American Idol’ runner-up shares his views on gays on TV and the ‘closed-minded’
Colby Cosh

The Wardrobe Malfunction Paradox
Colby Cosh on the current state of the Super Bowl halftime show—and how to fix it
Arts & Culture

Tales of over-the-top Christmas
In a wealthy suburb, a writer discovers people who take celebrating to a whole new level
Newsmakers

Friend in high places, Dog tired and Bubba’s other bombshell
Newsmakers of the week








Its about time Obama! get your finger out.These men should have been over weeks ago.Nothing our men and women have done is deemed a failure
How exactly have we "failed"? The Taliban presence around Kandahar has grown exponentially over the last 18 months, owing to their influx of new recruits. If it weren't for Canadian troops in 2006-2009, these US troops would now be deploying half way to Kabul.
As Jack Mitchell said, how has Canada "failed"? You do what you can with the resources at hand the best way you can – having more boots on the ground means more can be done overall, not that something didn't work and more will fix.
If we cut and run it says we lost. Do we want to lose? Shame on those that want to hold up the white flag of France.
What Jack said….
You do the job with the tools you're given, but just because there's more help coming DOESN'T mean the Canadians failed doing the job they did with what they had at hand.
Or is this more of the "Canada should just leave because we say it's not working" meme?
Well, let’s face it: Our guys, and the other guys, did the best they could with what they had.
But the Greeks, Romans, Mongols, the Caliphate, the 19th Century British, the Russians, and countless other invaders have all gone in, tried, to do whatever they wanted to do, and leave.
Time for us to do the same…. We have no business in Afghan-land, bring the boys home….