<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awaiting the Tiger tale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215093</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215093</guid>
		<description>The number of mistresses is almost in double digits now.  Almost all of them have presented credible stories with witnesses.
As for the very first one, it&#039;s been shown now that Tiger&#039;s organization flew her to Australia, she&#039;s been shown to have lied about everything.  The second has him on voice-mail.  All the others have credible stories when and where  the affairs occurred.
At this point, I&#039;m inclined to believe he had mistresses everywhere, all of the time, even when he was engaged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number of mistresses is almost in double digits now.  Almost all of them have presented credible stories with witnesses.<br />
As for the very first one, it&#039;s been shown now that Tiger&#039;s organization flew her to Australia, she&#039;s been shown to have lied about everything.  The second has him on voice-mail.  All the others have credible stories when and where  the affairs occurred.<br />
At this point, I&#039;m inclined to believe he had mistresses everywhere, all of the time, even when he was engaged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215092</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215092</guid>
		<description>See: above, but I think perhaps s_c_f and I were both kinda right.  Looks like Tiger did have an affair, but that I might have been right to be skeptical as it appears he did NOT have an affair with the woman everyone was claiming he had an affair with, but with a totally different woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See: above, but I think perhaps s_c_f and I were both kinda right.  Looks like Tiger did have an affair, but that I might have been right to be skeptical as it appears he did NOT have an affair with the woman everyone was claiming he had an affair with, but with a totally different woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215091</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215091</guid>
		<description>Well, it appears perhaps Tiger did in fact have an affair.

I feel somewhat comfortable still with my skepticism though, as it would appear from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/12/02/tiger.woods/index.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this report&lt;/a&gt; that while he may well have had an affair, it&#039;s not with the woman everyone (read: TMZ and the Enquirer) were SAYING he had an affair with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it appears perhaps Tiger did in fact have an affair.</p>
<p>I feel somewhat comfortable still with my skepticism though, as it would appear from <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/12/02/tiger.woods/index.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">this report</a> that while he may well have had an affair, it&#039;s not with the woman everyone (read: TMZ and the Enquirer) were SAYING he had an affair with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-2/#comment-215090</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215090</guid>
		<description>See, I find that kinda sad.

The next time there&#039;s a story suggesting some husband somewhere had a fight with his wife, caused lacerations on her face then chased her as she tried to drive away, smashing the windows of her car, forcing her off the road, and causing her to crash and lose consciousness, all because he suspected she was having an affair, try responding to the story with a &quot;Right on dude!&quot;.

I bet your wife reacts differently to your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I find that kinda sad.</p>
<p>The next time there&#039;s a story suggesting some husband somewhere had a fight with his wife, caused lacerations on her face then chased her as she tried to drive away, smashing the windows of her car, forcing her off the road, and causing her to crash and lose consciousness, all because he suspected she was having an affair, try responding to the story with a &quot;Right on dude!&quot;.</p>
<p>I bet your wife reacts differently to your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frenchie101</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215089</link>
		<dc:creator>frenchie101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215089</guid>
		<description>If we reversed this, and it was Tigers wife who was in the car, perhaps fleeing, we would want to know.The more he hides, the more untruths come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we reversed this, and it was Tigers wife who was in the car, perhaps fleeing, we would want to know.The more he hides, the more untruths come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananapatch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215088</link>
		<dc:creator>bananapatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215088</guid>
		<description>Colby Cosh, one of Canada&#039;s best writers, is reduced to writing about...Tiger Woods and his wife having a fight.

I guess you gotta cover whatever your assignment editor tells you to cover...but Jesus, couldn&#039;t they find some intern to do this? Or, even better, find something interesting or newsworthy to investigate?

Something like Bubble Boy analysis or the Couple that Crashed the White House Dinner. You know, real important stuff. Alanis Morrissette smoked some pot once! Get on it, Cosh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colby Cosh, one of Canada&#039;s best writers, is reduced to writing about&#8230;Tiger Woods and his wife having a fight.</p>
<p>I guess you gotta cover whatever your assignment editor tells you to cover&#8230;but Jesus, couldn&#039;t they find some intern to do this? Or, even better, find something interesting or newsworthy to investigate?</p>
<p>Something like Bubble Boy analysis or the Couple that Crashed the White House Dinner. You know, real important stuff. Alanis Morrissette smoked some pot once! Get on it, Cosh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sea Otter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215087</link>
		<dc:creator>Sea Otter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215087</guid>
		<description>When my wife heard this story, her only response was, &quot;You go, girl!&quot;  Elin has, quite literally, struck a blow for the sisterhood...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When my wife heard this story, her only response was, &quot;You go, girl!&quot;  Elin has, quite literally, struck a blow for the sisterhood&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred - Brandon MB</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215084</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred - Brandon MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215084</guid>
		<description>If Mrs Woods tried to tame Tiger&#039;s wandering ways with a nine iron, how is that any of our business.  Let them work it out, and the Police do what they have to do.

She wouldn&#039;t be the first wife to lay a licking on a cheating husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Mrs Woods tried to tame Tiger&#39;s wandering ways with a nine iron, how is that any of our business.  Let them work it out, and the Police do what they have to do.</p>
<p>She wouldn&#39;t be the first wife to lay a licking on a cheating husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieter Sprockets</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215086</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter Sprockets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215086</guid>
		<description>The guy was dunking his donut and he got caught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy was dunking his donut and he got caught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred - Brandon MB</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215085</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred - Brandon MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215085</guid>
		<description>If Mrs Woods tried to tame Tiger&#039;s wandering ways with a nine iron, how is that any of our business.  Let them work it out, and the Police do what they have to do.

She wouldn&#039;t be the first wife to lay a licking on a cheating husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Mrs Woods tried to tame Tiger&#039;s wandering ways with a nine iron, how is that any of our business.  Let them work it out, and the Police do what they have to do.</p>
<p>She wouldn&#039;t be the first wife to lay a licking on a cheating husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffM</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215083</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215083</guid>
		<description>I knew the OnStar system was involved somehow. Did Mrs. Woods not see the ad where Tiger locks himself out of his Buick Enclave (ha! Works as advertised) and the OnStar lady beeps him in? Maybe the OnStar lady could have slashed up Tigers face on her behalf too. I can&#039;t wait to see the next commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew the OnStar system was involved somehow. Did Mrs. Woods not see the ad where Tiger locks himself out of his Buick Enclave (ha! Works as advertised) and the OnStar lady beeps him in? Maybe the OnStar lady could have slashed up Tigers face on her behalf too. I can&#039;t wait to see the next commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215082</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215082</guid>
		<description>In Rider land we&#039;ve learned to cultivate next year country...out of necessity. I did think the Riders were the better team, but they lost. Too bad the score wasn&#039;t being kept at EAU-CRU, the riders could have argued the score wasn&#039;t adjusted properly to account for the 13 players on the penultimate play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Rider land we&#039;ve learned to cultivate next year country&#8230;out of necessity. I did think the Riders were the better team, but they lost. Too bad the score wasn&#039;t being kept at EAU-CRU, the riders could have argued the score wasn&#039;t adjusted properly to account for the 13 players on the penultimate play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walker</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215075</link>
		<dc:creator>Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215075</guid>
		<description>And let&#039;s not forget the National Enquirer with the John Edwards scandal. The tabloids are gaining a terrifying amount of credibility these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let&#39;s not forget the National Enquirer with the John Edwards scandal. The tabloids are gaining a terrifying amount of credibility these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215081</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215081</guid>
		<description>Is this any of our business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this any of our business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canucklehead</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215071</link>
		<dc:creator>canucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215071</guid>
		<description>This is entertaining?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is entertaining?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolyon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215070</link>
		<dc:creator>jolyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215070</guid>
		<description>&quot;chip butties and a pint&quot;

Proper comfort food. Doesn&#039;t get much better than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;chip butties and a pint&quot;</p>
<p>Proper comfort food. Doesn&#39;t get much better than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colbycosh</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215080</link>
		<dc:creator>colbycosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215080</guid>
		<description>I kind of enjoyed the day, actually. How about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of enjoyed the day, actually. How about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215066</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215066</guid>
		<description>&quot;What club was that Elin - 7-iron ?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;What club was that Elin &#8211; 7-iron ?&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Creek</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215079</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Creek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215079</guid>
		<description>Poor Tiger...he couldn&#039;t keep his &quot;woodie&quot; in his pants.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Tiger&#8230;he couldn&#039;t keep his &quot;woodie&quot; in his pants&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215078</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215078</guid>
		<description>Well, I am pretty sceptical, though I have no interest in seeing Tiger Woods having sex with that woman (frankly, the fact that his wife is so much more attractive than the alleged mistress just bolsters my scepticism).  I&#039;m sceptical enough that &quot;some anonymous person told TMZ that he or she had a conversation with Tiger Woods in which Tiger said his wife beat him up because there are reports that he&#039;s having an affair&quot;.  Maybe I&#039;m giving Woods too much credit, but would he really have that conversation with someone AT ALL likely to turn around and let TMZ know all about it within 48 hours???

Again, it may all be true, I&#039;m just not totally convinced yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am pretty sceptical, though I have no interest in seeing Tiger Woods having sex with that woman (frankly, the fact that his wife is so much more attractive than the alleged mistress just bolsters my scepticism).  I&#039;m sceptical enough that &quot;some anonymous person told TMZ that he or she had a conversation with Tiger Woods in which Tiger said his wife beat him up because there are reports that he&#039;s having an affair&quot;.  Maybe I&#039;m giving Woods too much credit, but would he really have that conversation with someone AT ALL likely to turn around and let TMZ know all about it within 48 hours???</p>
<p>Again, it may all be true, I&#039;m just not totally convinced yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215064</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215064</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it!  Had to be!

Whew, thanks for clearing all of that up, Dot.  I was really worried we weren&#039;t going to come up with a plausible explanation that didn&#039;t end in divorce or jail time or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s it!  Had to be!</p>
<p>Whew, thanks for clearing all of that up, Dot.  I was really worried we weren&#39;t going to come up with a plausible explanation that didn&#39;t end in divorce or jail time or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215077</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215077</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;there&#039;s technically actually less evidence that she attacked him and chased him with a golf club &lt;/i&gt;

The evidence seemed obvious to me.  The SUV had both back windows smashed.  I fail to see why you would break a second window to get into the car.

It&#039;s  been essentially confirmed, probably by a leak from someone who is in the know.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/28/tiger-woods-elin-nordegren-fight-accident-suv-lacerations/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/28/tiger-woods-elin-no...&lt;/a&gt;

You strike me as someone incredibly skeptical.  It sounds like you&#039;d need to be in the room to believe it.  We have a friend popping up in the same hotel at the same time on the other side of the world, and going to the same floor, and being seen with him, a woman who has been spending time with him elsehwere.  I can assure you there is not a wife on earth who would consider this behaviour acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>there&#039;s technically actually less evidence that she attacked him and chased him with a golf club </i></p>
<p>The evidence seemed obvious to me.  The SUV had both back windows smashed.  I fail to see why you would break a second window to get into the car.</p>
<p>It&#039;s  been essentially confirmed, probably by a leak from someone who is in the know.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/28/tiger-woods-elin-nordegren-fight-accident-suv-lacerations/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/28/tiger-woods-elin-no&#8230;</a></p>
<p>You strike me as someone incredibly skeptical.  It sounds like you&#039;d need to be in the room to believe it.  We have a friend popping up in the same hotel at the same time on the other side of the world, and going to the same floor, and being seen with him, a woman who has been spending time with him elsehwere.  I can assure you there is not a wife on earth who would consider this behaviour acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedTylerEzro</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215076</link>
		<dc:creator>TedTylerEzro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215076</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of gossipy trailer trash.  Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of gossipy trailer trash.  Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215074</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215074</guid>
		<description>What could we possibly be interested in a guy whose career earnings are 100M and whose career endorsement earnings because of his image are 800M. When you drink this deeply at the public trough of public adoration you are going to be scrutinized to the level you market your name. btw I watch every tournament (whether tiger plays or not) and am constantly amazed at his skill and daring and am truly blown away by his super human putting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What could we possibly be interested in a guy whose career earnings are 100M and whose career endorsement earnings because of his image are 800M. When you drink this deeply at the public trough of public adoration you are going to be scrutinized to the level you market your name. btw I watch every tournament (whether tiger plays or not) and am constantly amazed at his skill and daring and am truly blown away by his super human putting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215042</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215042</guid>
		<description>Well now I&#039;ve read somewhere that it wasn&#039;t the back window at all, but both rear passenger windows.  If that&#039;s the case it isn&#039;t suspicious to me because those (one of those, anyway) would have been the window I&#039;d have smashed if my loving hubby were unconscious in a locked car.  Not so sure how plausible no second set of keys is, but I can well understand smashing the window rather than hunting for keys that may or may not be in the house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well now I&#39;ve read somewhere that it wasn&#39;t the back window at all, but both rear passenger windows.  If that&#39;s the case it isn&#39;t suspicious to me because those (one of those, anyway) would have been the window I&#39;d have smashed if my loving hubby were unconscious in a locked car.  Not so sure how plausible no second set of keys is, but I can well understand smashing the window rather than hunting for keys that may or may not be in the house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-2/#comment-215073</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215073</guid>
		<description>Well, yes.  I meant to say that.  But I didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes.  I meant to say that.  But I didn&#039;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamDavies</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215072</link>
		<dc:creator>SamDavies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215072</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry - but after reading this thread, I have a better understanding of all the partisan fighting.
Most of you are addicted to sensationalism.
I can&#039;t believe the amount of depth and analysis that is focused on one man&#039;s domestic affairs.
Could sensationalism also be the reason why our political system is failing us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sorry &#8211; but after reading this thread, I have a better understanding of all the partisan fighting.<br />
Most of you are addicted to sensationalism.<br />
I can&#039;t believe the amount of depth and analysis that is focused on one man&#039;s domestic affairs.<br />
Could sensationalism also be the reason why our political system is failing us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215069</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215069</guid>
		<description>I guess if she was chasing him with a golf club and scratching his face that MAYBE she&#039;d only do so based on &quot;evidence&quot; (though, c&#039;mon, no wife has ever attacked her husband based on the strong SUGGESTION of an affair???).

That said, there&#039;s technically actually less evidence that she attacked him and chased him with a golf club than there is that he had an affair.

As for that evidence, fine, she&#039;s been seen with Tiger Woods in public.  Shocking.  I&#039;m impressed that someone remembers that she took the elevator to the VIP floor in Melbourne but A) is it possible she had a room on that floor too, and B) C&#039;mon.  Someone remembers which floor she got off of at a hotel?  That&#039;s evidence of an affair?  I don&#039;t buy the first part of that anyway, but as for the second, the answer is clearly no.  As for her friend&#039;s assertion, I&#039;m not sure if that story came before or after the cheque for $25,000 from the National Enquirer cleared, but at the very least the payment makes one wonder, no?

Maybe he did have an affair with her mind you.  I&#039;m just not convinced of that fact yet by the evidence I&#039;ve heard so far from the Enquirer and TMZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if she was chasing him with a golf club and scratching his face that MAYBE she&#039;d only do so based on &quot;evidence&quot; (though, c&#039;mon, no wife has ever attacked her husband based on the strong SUGGESTION of an affair???).</p>
<p>That said, there&#039;s technically actually less evidence that she attacked him and chased him with a golf club than there is that he had an affair.</p>
<p>As for that evidence, fine, she&#039;s been seen with Tiger Woods in public.  Shocking.  I&#039;m impressed that someone remembers that she took the elevator to the VIP floor in Melbourne but A) is it possible she had a room on that floor too, and B) C&#039;mon.  Someone remembers which floor she got off of at a hotel?  That&#039;s evidence of an affair?  I don&#039;t buy the first part of that anyway, but as for the second, the answer is clearly no.  As for her friend&#039;s assertion, I&#039;m not sure if that story came before or after the cheque for $25,000 from the National Enquirer cleared, but at the very least the payment makes one wonder, no?</p>
<p>Maybe he did have an affair with her mind you.  I&#039;m just not convinced of that fact yet by the evidence I&#039;ve heard so far from the Enquirer and TMZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-2/#comment-215068</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215068</guid>
		<description>Actually, I kinda hope I&#039;m right.  They SHOULDN&#039;T take the husband&#039;s word for it in that case, and they shouldn&#039;t take the wife&#039;s word for it in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I kinda hope I&#039;m right.  They SHOULDN&#039;T take the husband&#039;s word for it in that case, and they shouldn&#039;t take the wife&#039;s word for it in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215067</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215067</guid>
		<description>lol,

Thanks, that was helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol,</p>
<p>Thanks, that was helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglass</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215065</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215065</guid>
		<description>Definatly my favorite answer so far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definatly my favorite answer so far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215036</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215036</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Or to put it another way, would police take Elin&#039;s word for it if she was just some schmo married to another schmo? &lt;/i&gt;

Or to put it another way, celebrity status or no, would police take Elin&#039;s word for it if she was the man and Tiger was the woman?  If everyone&#039;s suspicions are true (and maybe they aren&#039;t) then I have to say, if the (gender) roles were reversed, Tiger might well already be in jail for assault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Or to put it another way, would police take Elin&#39;s word for it if she was just some schmo married to another schmo? </i></p>
<p>Or to put it another way, celebrity status or no, would police take Elin&#39;s word for it if she was the man and Tiger was the woman?  If everyone&#39;s suspicions are true (and maybe they aren&#39;t) then I have to say, if the (gender) roles were reversed, Tiger might well already be in jail for assault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215063</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215063</guid>
		<description>Some guys from England hacked in GM&#039;s OnStar system and remotely started Tiger Woods&#039; car. Frank, the tiger head cover was in the backseat sleeping, woke, freaked out, and started banging on the rear windows to escape. As Tiger ran downstairs to save Frank, he jumped into the driver&#039;s seat, only to discover that the english hackers, accustomed to driving on the other side of the road, remotely turned left, while Tiger was trying to turn right. Instead they went straight, into the fire hydrant.

Frank jumped out of the backseat into Tigers&#039; wife&#039;s arms, Tiger awoke, daed, and the english hackers went off to have chip butties and a pint to celebrate, with a side of onion rings - (strangely with extra thick batter, go figure - scandalous!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some guys from England hacked in GM&#039;s OnStar system and remotely started Tiger Woods&#039; car. Frank, the tiger head cover was in the backseat sleeping, woke, freaked out, and started banging on the rear windows to escape. As Tiger ran downstairs to save Frank, he jumped into the driver&#039;s seat, only to discover that the english hackers, accustomed to driving on the other side of the road, remotely turned left, while Tiger was trying to turn right. Instead they went straight, into the fire hydrant.</p>
<p>Frank jumped out of the backseat into Tigers&#039; wife&#039;s arms, Tiger awoke, daed, and the english hackers went off to have chip butties and a pint to celebrate, with a side of onion rings &#8211; (strangely with extra thick batter, go figure &#8211; scandalous!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215062</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215062</guid>
		<description>Whoa, s_c_f!

No spouse EVER deserves to be beaten by their partner.  Man or woman.  Ever.

Not saying I don&#039;t understand the desire, because believe me, I do.  So if an SUV (or fiist through drywall) has to take it instead, so be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, s_c_f!</p>
<p>No spouse EVER deserves to be beaten by their partner.  Man or woman.  Ever.</p>
<p>Not saying I don&#039;t understand the desire, because believe me, I do.  So if an SUV (or fiist through drywall) has to take it instead, so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-2/#comment-215061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215061</guid>
		<description>I do hope you&#039;re wrong on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do hope you&#039;re wrong on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215060</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215060</guid>
		<description>Oh, I missed that.  Thanks so much for pointing it out--I heartily add my vote for best headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I missed that.  Thanks so much for pointing it out&#8211;I heartily add my vote for best headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215059</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215059</guid>
		<description>I like your driving angle, you may be right that he&#039;s never driven that vehicle.

As for going medieval on his face with a golf club, OUCH!  It could be that he did get hit hard though, although it&#039;s hard to believe she would actually hit him with a club.  But somehow he was very dazed, even though the airbags did not deploy which means it was probably not the car that dazed him so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your driving angle, you may be right that he&#039;s never driven that vehicle.</p>
<p>As for going medieval on his face with a golf club, OUCH!  It could be that he did get hit hard though, although it&#039;s hard to believe she would actually hit him with a club.  But somehow he was very dazed, even though the airbags did not deploy which means it was probably not the car that dazed him so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215058</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215058</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m inclined to believe that is a woman is chasing a man with a golf club and scratching his face, then she&#039;s acting on more than just rumours.  But if you think Elin would do that without evidence, then you don&#039;t give her much credit, I&#039;d say.

As for the evidence, there is lots and lots, including the fact the mistress was seen with him in Australia by several witnesses, and also was seen with him in NY and Las Vegas. She was also seen taking the elevator to the VIP floor in the Australian hotel.  Perhaps you would need to be in the same room in order to believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m inclined to believe that is a woman is chasing a man with a golf club and scratching his face, then she&#039;s acting on more than just rumours.  But if you think Elin would do that without evidence, then you don&#039;t give her much credit, I&#039;d say.</p>
<p>As for the evidence, there is lots and lots, including the fact the mistress was seen with him in Australia by several witnesses, and also was seen with him in NY and Las Vegas. She was also seen taking the elevator to the VIP floor in the Australian hotel.  Perhaps you would need to be in the same room in order to believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceeger</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215057</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215057</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened, the New York Post had the best headline for this story: Tiger not a Lion Cheetah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened, the New York Post had the best headline for this story: Tiger not a Lion Cheetah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s_c_f</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215056</link>
		<dc:creator>s_c_f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215056</guid>
		<description>Yes, you have missed some evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you have missed some evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215055</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215055</guid>
		<description>Obviously above I meant to write that she&#039;s said to have stayed in the same HOTEL as Tiger.  If she&#039;d been booked in the same ROOM, I agree that would have been strong evidence of an affair, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously above I meant to write that she&#039;s said to have stayed in the same HOTEL as Tiger.  If she&#039;d been booked in the same ROOM, I agree that would have been strong evidence of an affair, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew potter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215054</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215054</guid>
		<description>What about this: The truth is not that Tiger drives some  military-grade SUV, it&#039;s that he doesn&#039;t know how to drive. You figure that guy has had a personal driver since he was two years old. Do we know if he even has a driver&#039;s license? Could *that* be the charges that are pending -- driving sans license?

My guess: He pulled a Phil Hartman. Told his wife he had been cheating and was going to leave her, then goes to sleep. He wakes up and she &#039;s getting medieval on his face with a golf club. He runs downstairs, grabs the car keys to the SUV he&#039;s never driven. Puts &#039;er in gear, and plows into the tree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about this: The truth is not that Tiger drives some  military-grade SUV, it&#039;s that he doesn&#039;t know how to drive. You figure that guy has had a personal driver since he was two years old. Do we know if he even has a driver&#039;s license? Could *that* be the charges that are pending &#8212; driving sans license?</p>
<p>My guess: He pulled a Phil Hartman. Told his wife he had been cheating and was going to leave her, then goes to sleep. He wakes up and she &#039;s getting medieval on his face with a golf club. He runs downstairs, grabs the car keys to the SUV he&#039;s never driven. Puts &#039;er in gear, and plows into the tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215053</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215053</guid>
		<description>If the supposed &quot;other woman&quot; is to be believed, I&#039;m not sure what &quot;smoking gun&quot; could have been found, given that in addition to denying ever having an affair with Tiger, and denying ever seeing him in Australia, she denies ever having talked on the phone with him or ever sending or receiving text messages to/from Tiger.

She&#039;s also offered to take a polygraph test to prove she&#039;s never had an affair with him, and claims a &quot;friend&quot; (I&#039;m thinking now perhaps an &quot;acquaintance&quot;) made up the story when the National Enquirer gave her $25,000.

She could obviously be lying, and sometimes the National Enquirer and TMZ are actually &lt;i&gt;right&lt;/i&gt; about stuff, but even if I think Elin may have actually gone after Tiger because she THOUGHT he was having an affair, I see no convincing evidence (yet) that he actually did.

Also, on a superficial level, I&#039;ve seen Elin, and I&#039;ve seen the woman Tiger is accused of having an affair with, and if it&#039;s true, Tiger&#039;s just not very bright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the supposed &quot;other woman&quot; is to be believed, I&#039;m not sure what &quot;smoking gun&quot; could have been found, given that in addition to denying ever having an affair with Tiger, and denying ever seeing him in Australia, she denies ever having talked on the phone with him or ever sending or receiving text messages to/from Tiger.</p>
<p>She&#039;s also offered to take a polygraph test to prove she&#039;s never had an affair with him, and claims a &quot;friend&quot; (I&#039;m thinking now perhaps an &quot;acquaintance&quot;) made up the story when the National Enquirer gave her $25,000.</p>
<p>She could obviously be lying, and sometimes the National Enquirer and TMZ are actually <i>right</i> about stuff, but even if I think Elin may have actually gone after Tiger because she THOUGHT he was having an affair, I see no convincing evidence (yet) that he actually did.</p>
<p>Also, on a superficial level, I&#039;ve seen Elin, and I&#039;ve seen the woman Tiger is accused of having an affair with, and if it&#039;s true, Tiger&#039;s just not very bright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglass</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-215052</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215052</guid>
		<description>Oh agreed. Although rational thought seems to not be a factor in this &#039;accident&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh agreed. Although rational thought seems to not be a factor in this &#039;accident&#039;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/29/awaiting-the-tiger-tale/comment-page-2/#comment-215051</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95050#comment-215051</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Now reverse the roles and assume it was his wife in the SUV. Would police really wait days to speak to her, and accept the husbands assurances that she didn&#039;t want to talk, or the presses?&lt;/i&gt;

No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now reverse the roles and assume it was his wife in the SUV. Would police really wait days to speak to her, and accept the husbands assurances that she didn&#039;t want to talk, or the presses?</i></p>
<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

