<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not to get all California Closets on you but&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/30/not-to-get-all-california-closets-on-you-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/30/not-to-get-all-california-closets-on-you-but/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/30/not-to-get-all-california-closets-on-you-but/comment-page-1/#comment-215572</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95102#comment-215572</guid>
		<description>Could you describe the indocrtrination process at Macleans before new hires can be referred to as &quot;Colleague?&quot; Obviously head shaving is not part of the ritual, though it&#039;s difficult to see if the eyebrows are real and intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you describe the indocrtrination process at Macleans before new hires can be referred to as &quot;Colleague?&quot; Obviously head shaving is not part of the ritual, though it&#039;s difficult to see if the eyebrows are real and intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolyon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/30/not-to-get-all-california-closets-on-you-but/comment-page-1/#comment-215571</link>
		<dc:creator>jolyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95102#comment-215571</guid>
		<description>When attacking your spouse, which clubs are best. Wood or iron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When attacking your spouse, which clubs are best. Wood or iron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanStok</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/30/not-to-get-all-california-closets-on-you-but/comment-page-1/#comment-215570</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanStok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95102#comment-215570</guid>
		<description>And I thought the trick part was assuming that rescue would be attempted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I thought the trick part was assuming that rescue would be attempted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/30/not-to-get-all-california-closets-on-you-but/comment-page-1/#comment-215569</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kitchener&#039;s Own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95102#comment-215569</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;who do you reckon is better off being sacrificed as food to keep the rest alive&lt;/i&gt;

This is a trick question.  Given the people outlined in the scenario above, Scott should sacrifice ALL OF THEM to stay alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>who do you reckon is better off being sacrificed as food to keep the rest alive</i></p>
<p>This is a trick question.  Given the people outlined in the scenario above, Scott should sacrifice ALL OF THEM to stay alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanStok</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/30/not-to-get-all-california-closets-on-you-but/comment-page-1/#comment-215568</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanStok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95102#comment-215568</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Imagine you&#039;re trapped on a desert island with Lindsay Lohan......  Ok, I&#039;m assuming it&#039;s been about ten minutes since you got back to reading the rest of this....  Now, imagine you&#039;re trapped on a desert island with all the federal party leaders.  Among that group, who would you guess would best contribute to group survival until rescue, and who do you reckon is better off being sacrificed as food to keep the rest alive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Imagine you&#039;re trapped on a desert island with Lindsay Lohan&#8230;&#8230;  Ok, I&#039;m assuming it&#039;s been about ten minutes since you got back to reading the rest of this&#8230;.  Now, imagine you&#039;re trapped on a desert island with all the federal party leaders.  Among that group, who would you guess would best contribute to group survival until rescue, and who do you reckon is better off being sacrificed as food to keep the rest alive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan222</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/30/not-to-get-all-california-closets-on-you-but/comment-page-1/#comment-215567</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95102#comment-215567</guid>
		<description>Dearest Scott; Why don&#039;t you write about robots anymore? Has the robot apocalypse been postponed? or have you gone over to their side?!

- Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dearest Scott; Why don&#039;t you write about robots anymore? Has the robot apocalypse been postponed? or have you gone over to their side?!</p>
<p>- Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

