The emperor’s new carbon credits

Hans Christian Andersen would surely have been inspired by the ‘science’ of Copenhagen

by Mark Steyn on Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:00am - 218 Comments

Answer: because after 1960 the tree rings show no express elevator up the thermometer, but in fact a decline. That’s the “decline” that Dr. Phil Jones, in his leaked email, is trying to “hide.” Because, if you don’t hide it, a basic truth emerges—that the Medieval Warm Period was warmer than today, and the planet managed to survive and indeed prosper during it. It took two dogged Canadians, Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, to demolish the hockey-stick fraud, and the enraged priests of the Settled Science cult have spent the years since 2006 trying to stick it back together. Dr. Keith Briffa had a crack in 2007 for the IPCC report. As usual, the CRU refused, in defiance of basic scientific etiquette, to reveal its raw data, but eventually the Royal Society ordered them to. And, when they did, it emerged that Dr. Briffa had cherry-picked a few trees from the Yamal peninsula in Siberia to obtain the desired result.

Question: can you measure any tree-ring cycles for the last millennium and get a genuine hockey stick?

Answer: yes. Tree Number YAD061. That’s it. One tree. The temperature records show no warming in Siberia over the last half-century. But you can’t see the forest for the tree, singular. Mr. McIntyre calls it “the most influential tree in the world,” which hardly does justice to what’s being contemplated in its name. YAD061 is the Tree of Life, at least in the sense that millions of lives across the world will, in its name, be transformed by ever greater taxation and regulation. And, as Dr. Pachauri rebukes us, YAD061 can never be questioned because it’s peer-reviewed. Every December the CRU Tabernacle Choir should place (non-incandescent) lights on its snow-laden boughs and sing:
“O-Sixty-One! O-Sixty-One!
How lovely are thy cycles!
O-Sixty-One! O-Sixty-One!
At last, a match for Michael’s!”

It’s the speed that impresses. In 2008, carbon trading worldwide reached $128 billion. That’s why Morgan Stanley and Citigroup are hot for emissions schemes. According to the writer Jo Nova, carbon is on course to become the largest traded commodity—bigger than oil or gas. As she says, it’s the subprime mortgage of the commodities market. Like Al Gore, the world’s first carbon billionaire, it’s testament mainly to a kind of globalized gullibility. In the blink of an eye, the “settled science” of a small number of ideologues was propelled upwards into a “peer-reviewed” “consensus” and then an international fait accompli.

Had he been around this week, Hans Christian Andersen, that great son of Copenhagen, might have given us a sequel to one of his famous tales—“The Emperor’s New Carbon Credits,” perhaps. But an age in which the hookers are free but the British Parliament is proposing issuing each citizen with a “carbon allowance” is beyond satire.

Bookmark and Share
  • Garry

    Forget the hockey stick, Marc. Tree rings are known to be unreliable.
    Look into bore holes in glacial and arctic ice. There you will find data that, though deflating to your argument, is at least compatible with your personality.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Wakefield Wakefield Tolbert

      Forget the Stick, eh?

      That was one of the grand lynchpins to all this bruha!

      How many get to be yanked before it starts to truly unravel, then?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Tom_Hartley Tom_Hartley

      What wit, and how apropos! Please post a link to your blog so I may smile out the other side of my face after reading Steyn.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/scorpio1023 scorpio1023

    I it just me,or is the Prophet Suzuki sounding just a tad Nazi-ish in his condemnation of any and all who disagree with his so-called scientific "Facts"??This global warming is a phenom that is completely out of reach of human intervention and i believe it's arrogant to think otherwise…..oh and another question.__ With all the talk about treaties of all kinds,out of all the countries that signed on to farce called the Kyoto Accord has any met the targets set forth in the accord??__

    • virgil

      david suzuki should be tarred and feathered!

  • scissorpaws

    Enough hot air in this column to qualify for carbon credits. The problem with this sort of goofiness is that it discredits everything the man writes (and his dittohead rabble). At some point something he cares about will come along and he'll be out of an audience absent the usual suspects (who are suspect). We who once read him out of amusement and a sop to balancing our view of the world, will vote in favour of Sharia Law and more taxes on the rich even if we're essentially against them, as kneeing the jerk reactions.

    • virgil

      you are the jerk! you are suspect! you are the goof! mark steyn is way out of your league. refined wit is not for the thick. you are naive and a dhimmi to boot. you are not worthy of commenting on mark steyn, you are a useful idiot!

    • Rob H

      Sorry, the global warming scam is exposed for the fraud it always was. You only have to read the blogs of McIntyre and McKitrick to see this. They aren't even arguing about whether global warming exists, only that the "science" is deeply flawed and corrupt. How long are you going to keep going on with your warmie religion? The "science in junk" is the fact of the matter. (shame about the 150 years of original temperature data "destroyed" by Hadley/CRU. You could have used that to make your warming case.)

  • Mike T.

    Rolled eyes at the headline, stopped reading at the byline.

    • virgil

      bury your head in the sand!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/westkraut westkraut

    Great article….one I never thought I would see that included one of the greatest pieces of literature about human behavior but what better story to use to describe the gathering at Copenhagen. I frequently cited Hans' brief story to students who I had assigned reviews of various scientific papers, some flawed, some sound, to encourage them to determine if the scientific method was followed in the author's research and publications. So many times the students were amazed that the grand claims and conclusions headlined in the Abstracts were often gross exaggerations, with key components never being included in the experimental design or no data whatsoever provided to support conclusions. Yep, it's even worse today when "scientists" don't even have to party with their reviewers or agree with them to get published as they can just go on line and show pictures of boar polar bears eating nice fluffy polar bear cubs and you have instant proof of global warming.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/westkraut westkraut

    The real trajedy of this whole issue is the bastardization of science (prositiution of science is a good descriptor as well but conveys a mutually beneficial effort) and we have already seen at least one Nobel Peace Price awarded to a politician (not even a railroad engineer) and Alternative Nobel prizes to some of the flakiest Canadians who wave the global warming banner and are renowned as scientists because they have access to government subsidized television. The wee lad is still watching and laughing at the Emporer but no one is listening!

  • Spenc BC

    Deniers also want Nutzuki, and Gore Jailed!

    • virgil

      al gore should be immediatly lynched!

  • Jordan

    Oh Lord, lookie. It's Mark Steyn, the guest host for clods like Hannity in the U.S. Is it any wonder he's promoting this sort of view? He knows what side of the bread the American butter's on and he knows no boundaries when it comes to selling out logic and reality. Steyn's point of view takes social politics and attempts to debunk science with it, forming a peculiar "opinion" that a sad number of my fellow Canadians appear to be swallowing without thinking.

    Bravo, Canada, but tell me this: what if you're wrong? What do you WIN by denying the obvious science of climate change? Conversely, what if we're wrong about climate change? The worst case scenario to being wrong about climate change is…what, exactly? Taking better care of our planet (heaven forbid)? Reigning in big polluters (oh no, don't touch the corporations!)?

    And if the deniers are wrong? You figure it out. You really think it's about politics? Do you really think it's all a global conspiracy to "transfer power" or some other such nonsense? And the climate scientists all got on board with it because they were promised suitcases of cash? And the ice is melting like crazy because someone's got a giant heater next to it?

    Okay. Whatever.

    • Paul

      Progressive totalitarians just can't take criticism when it's warranted. Clearly it irks this secular cult that the "science" of climate change is turning out to be what any shrewd observer of climate hysteria has suspected all along: incredibly dishonest.

      Never mind that among other "inconvenient truths" destroying the alarmists' narrative, Warming Periods and Cooling Periods have been noted independently through several centuries of recorded history: clearly, we should all be so epistemologically challenged as postmodernist progressives to discount these occurences.

      Should we just let angry neo-Marxists and eco-idealists bust up our capitalist and democratic society, reducing it to third world levels of poverty, just so they would feel justified?

      Sure. Whatever, eh?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/balabu balabu

      "Conversely, what if we're wrong about climate change? The worst case scenario to being wrong about climate change is…what, exactly?"
      Climate change will do nothing. Chicken little – the sky will not fall. But the ridiculous measures that are proposed to fight this non existent threat will bring our country to its knees, destroy the economy, cause massive unemployment, transfer jobs to third world countries.

    • Dendro

      You are wasting your breath here Jordan. I agree with you, but the denialists are out in full force thanks to Harper. Don't waster your time trying to reason with them.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/PolJunkie PolJunkie

    This is what passes for journalism at Macleans these days?

    • virgil

      mark steyn is a columnist and a polemicist. he is not a journalist!

    • Dendro

      This is shoddy journalism and full of half truths and distortions. I do not even know where to start.

      • virgil

        start by getting your head out of your ass!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Tom_Hartley Tom_Hartley

    Both Steyn and Suzuki/Prince Charles/etal do an admirable job tweeting out warnings. A canary in a coal mine must indeed sing loud amidst all these voices, but both sides go too far in order to score points regarding 'carbon credits.'
    Such is the nature of a hearty debate. Plato certainly endorsed skewing the truth for the benefit of the commoner, and others since have condoned the same by engaging in strenuous argument, often with quasi-fanatical rhetoric. Yet as long as wit trumps the occassional ad hominem attack, I look forward to Steyn's next diatribe against the greatness of Mr. Suzuki and others who play for the 'other' team in this grand dialectic that promotes the health of the body politic..

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Telidon Telidon

    Just to add some light on the subject (with what I hope is a minimum of heat – anthropogenically generated or not):

    http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizati…

  • ken

    As the UK grinds to a halt in -10C temperatures and common people die on the snow bound roads I was wondering how the hypocrite Prince Charles was surviving as he predicts the end of the world is nigh in his mansion on high?
    It’s a beautiful irony that Nature, the God of the eco-nuts,smacks them down with such blind impartiality while they predict death by heat.
    Meanwhile the UK metoffice models look suspect again (“odds on for a barbecue Summer!”-It wasnt) and now its “only a 20% chance of a cold winter”. But the closed minds of the alarmists erase (literally in the case of the CRU) facts that dont fit. As a degree physicist myself its painful to see Professors prostituting themselves for continued government grants. But “Green” is a religion after all!

    • virgil

      once this giant hoax has been thoroughly debunked, i suggest allnight firing squads for all of its prominent cheerleaders!

  • Olivier Doyon

    I love it when someone who has no idea what he's talking takes incredibly complicated data and tries to dumb it down for himself and his readers as an excuse to make derogatory comments about pretty much everything he dislikes.

    Had this journalist actually done his job and did research about the issue concerning the CRU leak he would have found out that the jury is very much still out on the issue of the scientific relevance of these leaks. The only certainty that came out of this as of yet is that the peer review system these scientists is seriously flawed, the accuracy of the science these people have been working on is still being debated by people who know what they are talking about.
    I am not one of those people but I have bothered trying to look at both sides of the argument and have come to the conlcusion that most scientific agencies agree that AGW is real and could consitute a serious problem, but the seriousness of the issue is still up in the air. Some say we're doomed, some say it won't be as bad as we think, some say it's getting worse and so on.

    • virgil

      you are a useful idiot!

  • Garry

    Anybody with doubts about the reality of current global warming and its human induced causes should read The Discovery of Global Warming by Spencer Weart, available online. He will change your mind, if you are not already determined to ignore the facts, which many deniers are for reasons of their own.

    Garry Eaton

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/balabu balabu

      So we have seen the" Inconvenient truth" with its ficticious facts and you want me to read this new BS. How much grant money did the author got for making it up? As Groucho Marx said a new sucker is borne every second and you are a living proof to that.

  • Alces

    The CRU maintains that it was a hack, and have called in the British police to investigate the alleged crime, as well as initiating an independent inquiry.
    http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/2009/de…

    Meanwhile Mark Steyn and many commenters on this story are stating confidently that it was a leak, not a hack. Does anyone have a reliable citation to support that allegation?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/balabu balabu

      It was too elaborate and too detailed to be a hacking job. It must be an insider that got fed up with the shenanigans of the settled scientist that decided to expose the fraud.

  • virgil

    gordon campbell must immediately abolish the carbon tax. refusal to do so will mean that he will be next to david suzuki during the coming tar and feather fest!

  • http://www.carboncentral.co sid

    the climate is showing a remarkable change and now it has become a political affair . but now the truth is in front of everyone.
    and we must spread it..

From Macleans