Europe’s war against Islam

Attacks on religious freedoms are going mainstream

by Michael Petrou on Thursday, January 14, 2010 9:50am - 93 Comments

Europe's war against IslamPerhaps it is fitting that it was French President Nicolas Sarkozy who came to the defence of the Swiss, who voted in November to ban the construction of new minarets in their country. Sarkozy’s father was an immigrant to France, and his mother’s ancestors included Ottoman Sephardic Jews from Thessalonica. Sarkozy’s father abandoned his family and refused to help them financially. Sarkozy grew up poorer than his peers and resented it. “What made me who I am now is the sum of all the humiliations suffered during childhood.”

He was, in other words, something of an outsider. It wouldn’t be a stretch to imagine that he might be predisposed to sympathy toward the millions of other outsiders now trying to find their place in Europe—the continent’s growing Muslim population. Yet Sarkozy reacted to the Swiss vote by urging that it be respected. “Instead of condemning the Swiss out of hand, we should try to understand what they meant to express and what so many people in Europe feel, including people in France,” he wrote in the French newspaper Le Monde. “Nothing would be worse than denial.” He urged French Muslims, who make up four per cent of France’s population and are more numerous than in any other country in Europe, not to challenge France’s Christian heritage and republican values.

Sarkozy, a populist politician, was simply reflecting widespread popular discomfort about Islam in Europe. A 2008 survey funded by the Germany Marshall Fund of the United States found that more than 50 per cent of respondents in Germany, Italy, Holland, and France believe that “Western and Muslim ways of life are irreconcilable.” Another study, by the Pew Research Center, revealed an increase in negative views toward Muslims and Jews in Europe from 2004 to 2008. (Attitudes towards Muslims and Jews in the United States improved during the same time period.)

Some sort of symbolic demonstration was likely inevitable. But the Swiss never looked like obvious candidates to launch what is arguably the most illiberal and bigoted legislation Europe has seen in years.

Switzerland hasn’t suffered an Islamist terror attack. And Swiss Muslims, who make up about five per cent of the population, are more integrated and upwardly mobile than Muslims elsewhere in Europe. Most Swiss Muslims come from Turkey, Albania, and the former Yugoslavia. Few are radical or even all that conservative. Women who hide their faces behind Islamic niqabs are a common sight in east London, but not in Berne.

Islam’s presence isn’t that visible in Swiss architecture, either. In the entire country, there are a grand total of four minarets—the steeple-like spires that often adorn mosques where Muslims pray. But that was four too many for the Swiss. More than 57 per cent of participating voters approved the proposed ban, with majorities in 22 out of 26 cantons supporting the constitutional amendment.

The conservative Swiss People’s Party spearheaded the referendum campaign. Their anti-immigrant public relations campaigns in the past have included posters depicting three white sheep kicking a black one off of a Swiss flag. This time around, their posters featured a sinister-looking woman in a black burka standing before a Swiss flag riddled with missile-like minarets.

Those supporting a minaret ban pointed to a poem Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan recited more than 10 years ago that compares minarets to bayonets. But the vote wasn’t really about minarets, or architectural harmony, or even, as some have suggested, the Swiss thumbing their noses at political and media elites who assured them that the responsible thing to do would be to reject the proposed ban.

Bookmark and Share
  • Parker1227

    The author of this article should try reading the Koran – or better yet – try living in any Islamic State as a non-Muslim. Mohamed was a warrior prophet who carried out, encouraged and taught violent oppression, forced conversion, mafia-like "protection" taxes, and hideous oppression and ownership of women.

    And there has been no Islamic reformation.

    A high incidence of rape of female infidels – the torching of autos by the thousands every year across Europe – no go zones for law enforcement in Muslim enclaves throughout Europe.

    And Macleans thinks the problem is with intolerant Europeans?

    Its political correctness gone insane. Tolerance of the intolerant is a prescription for disaster. If Muslims hate Western society, Western laws and mores – then they should go back to the failed Islamic states from where they came.

    • Marushka

      I agree. Western democratic countries are insane to allow Muslim immigration. We believe in separation of church and state; they want their religious beliefs to supercede our democratic beliefs. 'Sharia' law has no place here. It scares the crap out of me to see Muslim women covered head-to-toe with only their eyes visible (or worse, with those caged-mask headresses) walking the streets. How would anyone describe a person in this attire to the police in the case of an illegal incident (bank robbery, bombing, hit-and-run traffic accident, murder, etc.) If they can't even dress appropriately for a western world country, they don't belong in it. Keep them out.
      I don't consider myself a racist, I define myself as a 'culteralist'. And militant Islam is definitely a culture/religion I would rather not have in Canada. Politically incorrect? You bet! So what? Better safe than sorry.

  • McQuack

    I'm amazed at the old bozo's who continue to bat the drum of political correctness while not yet cognizant that our population is old, old, and getting older.

    As old Viagra ridden Thomas Walkon,, who still thinks he's hip, finds some aspect of our existence to ridicule, he is seemingly unaware that he is adrift in a powerful current, which is carrying him ever closer to a transforative sea of change.

    it's as if his office floor is a raft, and with eyes glued to his computer screen, the old timer is adrift,reminiscing about the good old days where flower children set out to change the world.

    Well you did Thomas. Now the only remaining question is, how long can you stay afloat?

  • Barbara Chan

    Fantastic I agree, thank you for your services to all good people Weibo.
    I wish I could meet a real man like you, in Vancouver and not a drippy hippy or metro boy.

  • Kevin

    I have always advocated that in Canada we adhere to the following: "All religious laws are secondary to secular laws". All people who become citizens of Canada must pledge to uphold Canadian laws, sign a document that adheres to that sentiment and lose citizenship if they don't. Everyone in the RCMP should be wearing the same uniform, everyone must wear a helmet if riding a motorcycle, no one can have their face covered when getting an official gov't id, muslim kids can't take ceremonial knives to schools, etc. Common sense. However, the only true way to eradicate religious problems is to come to the understanding that all religions need to be done away with. Only the simple minded believe in 'God'. As for Muslims, they are engaged in the new crusades. Do nations have the stomach and political incorrectness to avert their plans? Time will tell.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/joesixpack joesixpack

      One problem here is that the Koran trumps national law. Have you not noticed how the phrase of "Nation of Islam" is used? If you study the Islamic legal system, not only will you find many conflicts with the modern national government, but issues that trigger wars.

      Many religions have adapted to accept the modern nation-state authority. Islam has not. This alone is one of the causes of so much violence and warfare.

    • Canadian Immigrant

      Sorry Kevin, it`s not Muslim kids who are carrying cerimonial knives into schools. It is SIKHS, FROM INDIA!
      All religions to be done away… What about 'to be done away' with all totalitarism?
      We should defend democracy, and not imposing totalitarist ideas as if they were `humanists` or `secular`.
      Soviet Union did what you propose. China is still doing so (Fallum Gon, Dalai Lama).

    • distinction

      Thanks for highlighting the underlying phenemona within this issue. A lack of knowledge on the religion of Islam. Turn off your radio, switch of your televisions, and close your internets for just a MOMENT. And open up a book for once about Islam. You got to hear what non-muslims think about Islam, now give muslims a chance! Isn't that the only way to create crtical thinking on a dialect, to hear both sides of the story? Because if you truly did study Islam you would know that Muslim kids were not the ones to bring knives to school it was Sikhs. A seperate and distinct religion from Islam, contrary to popular belief ofcourse. And let me tell you I have been a PRACTICING muslim living in Canada for 20 years with peace with everyone else,
      SURE we don't believe in the same God but that does not mean we can't peacefully coexsist! And contrary to your oppinion I think Canada is one country moving towards peace, afterall we asked that "God keep our land glorious and free"

  • McQuack

    it's too late!! Political correctness, infertile secularists, an aging dying old collection of flower children, immigrant dependent societies, are in their last stages.

    Islam is young, vivacious, politically motivated and ready to move from tenant to landlord. Our politically correct sell outs refuse to admit this, or even admit that there's writing on the wall. But the day is not far when the shrew will walk inside a tent, or at the least cover her head and walk three feet behind the man. And in parts of Europe where she doesn't, she is seen as a whore and often raped.

  • McQuack

    http://sites.google.com/site/thegospelaccordingto…

    political correctness is the fertilizer which allows the healthy growth of Islamification, who's believers don't give a rat's ass about political correctness or the weaklings who support it.

    40% of Islamic Muslims want sharia law in the UK

    32% of British Muslims believe that western society is decadent and immoral and that Muslims should seek to bring it to an end.

  • Kill Bill

    What a JOKE!!!

    Mention of SHARIA anywhere? nope…

    But guys, lets not forget Islam means peace, just look to surah 9:29, or 5:34 for confirmation!

  • Kill Bill

    For referance to the Beni Qurayza extermination and Battle of the Trench please see: Sahih Bukhari Vol 4 Book 52 Num 68 (also Bukhari Vol 5 Book 59 Num 443), Bukhari Vol 5, Book 59, Num 444 (also Muslim 19, Num 4370 and 4371), Sahih Bukhari Vol 5, Book 59, Num 449, Sahih Bukhari Vol 4, Book 52, Num 280 (also Bukhari V5, B58, N146, and V5, B59, N447, and V8, B74, N278), Abu Dawud Book 38 Num 4390, Abu Dawud Book 14 Num 2665, and more…

    I ask Muslims; Is this the "uswa hasana" you want to be like and follow? Your "perfect man, perfect example"? A warlord? who personally sought out the murder of 900 people in one day?

  • Stowie

    JIHAD

    As Mohammad says in Bukhari Vol 4 Book 52 Num 268; “War is Deceit”

    Sahih Muslim 30—It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right, and his affairs rest with Allah.

    Sahih al-Bukhari 2785—Narrated Abu Hurairah: A man came to Allah’s Messenger and said, “Guide me to such a deed as equals Jihad (in reward).” He replied, “I do not find such a deed.”

    Sahih al-Bukhari 2796—Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, “A single endeavor (of fighting) in Allah’s cause in the afternoon or in the forenoon is better than all the world and whatever is in it.”

  • Stephen

    JIHAD cont…

    Sunan An-Nasa’i 3099—It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Prophet said: “Whoever dies without having fought or having thought of fighting, he dies on one of the branches of hypocrisy.”

    Sunan Ibn Majah 2763—It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah said: “Whoever meets Allah with no mark on him (as a result of fighting) in His cause, he will meet Him with a deficiency.”

    Sunan Ibn Majah 2794—It was narrated that Amr bin Abasah said: “I came to the Prophet and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, which Jihad is best?’ He said: ‘(That of a man) whose blood is shed and his horse is wounded.’”

  • gan0n

    i wonder if a christian or jew or hindu or buddhist could openly worship and lead their christian/jewish/hindu/buddhist life in an islamic country like saudi arabia with all the freedoms and rights of saudi citizens. oh yeah, the answer is no.

    the west's active persecution of islam? really? sounds like it is just more reactionary than active.

  • future

    one day it be a fight between chinese, east indian and peoples of muslim culture. people of european descent are on downturn, even your birthrate is too low to continue. face facts and get over yourselves.

  • Van Grungy

    We need a United Mosque… Kinda like the United Church… Yeah, I know, it's a terrible idea/comparison… But it would signify a break from fundamentalism…

    Apostate Shelters… Needed big time… Some Muslims want to get away, but don't know how… Apostate Shelters would help bridge the gap for those seeking freedom from religion or conversion…

    Just some thoughts… fire your flame throwers at will….

  • Islam in Inevitable

    WOW NO ONE HAS A BRAIN. I BELIEVE COMPLETELY WITH THIS ARTICLE. THANK YOU AUTHOR, THANK YOU.

    And for all the IDIOTS that have commented, deaf dumb and blind, never will you see or hear the truth! Shame on you allllll.

  • Allah is Great

    HAHAHAH everyone is soooo mad. You see, you may degrade Islam all you want, try to force out all you want. However, eventually you will realize that you were ALWAYS wrong.

    Inshallah. And Allahu Akbar! Allah is GREAT.

    • Allah is Great

      Allah is a dog rolling in pigs blood, Mohamed is Allah's poop… Stoop and Scoop…

  • distinction

    You have highlighted all the parts of the Quran that support your motives. Now its time to hear both sides of the story. Directly from the Quran:
    In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

    109:1 Say : O ye that reject Faith!

    109:2 I worship not that which ye worship,

    109:3 Nor will ye worship that which I worship.

    109:4 And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship,

    109:5 Nor will ye worship that which I worship.

    109:6 To you be your Way, and to me mine.

    This is a universal message of peace applied to every human on the face of the planet. Because we may not all follow specific religions but we all worship something, whether it be our own desires or celebrities. But verse shows that although we may have our differences we can still live peacefully by letting each other live our own ways of life.

  • http://www.aliend.com Aliend

    I have always advocated that in Canada we adhere to the following: "All religious laws are secondary to secular laws". All people who become citizens of Canada must pledge to uphold Canadian laws, sign a document that adheres to that sentiment and lose citizenship if they don't.

  • Ryan

    This article contains two conclusive remarks – "Integration won't be easy" and "Islam is now a European religion". As I understand it, Islam is a totalized dictum – it functions prefectly well without the assumptions of other beliefs…therefore, it seems that Mr. Petrou is misinformed.

    I am disappointed in Maclean's for having gone to print with this article, given that it offers scant evidence of useful synthesis. Also, the accompanying photo-collage on p.24 of the print edition seems sensational and damaging.

    Maclean's and M.Steyn won the recent 'human rights' case that threatened to chill critical discussion of this issue, but M.Petrou's article seems to indicate that Maclean's has been chilled.

  • Wisteria Blossom

    I'm glad to see that Maclean's has an open mind. That title, "Europe’s war against Islam – Attacks on religious freedoms are going mainstream" immediately lets the reader know that there's no prejudice here, doesn't it?
    I don't like mosques or, at least, I don't like muezzins. I don't like churches either ever since, as a student at UofT, I made the mistake of taking a flat right next to a church in downtown Toronto. Church bells on Sunday mornings are not what a student wants. Churches, mosques. They're all public nuisances.
    And, I certainly agree that no state should allow forced marriages, female circumcision, forbidding females from being educated, and, generally, treating girls and women as property, allowed to do only what their families permit. This has nothing to do with religion. The way some Sicilian, Greek and other families in Toronto have treated their daughters shouldn't have been allowed either.

  • Shannon

    The most intelligent post thus far.

  • omfj

    i think I'm going to throw up.

  • Mike

    There is a new war coming. Muslims believe all non-muslims are inferior and should be conquered. We are not welcome in their countries and we are killed if non-muslim. Get your head out of your posteriors, they will not stop until everything is muslim, it is simply what they believe in and will never change. Yes, they will exploit democracy and kindness if allowed.

  • http://www.premieretreeservices.com/ tree pruning

    I never knew there's a thing such as these going on. Thanks for sharing this article.

  • Mike

    Religious freedom is essential, however one must discern between religious freedom and dangerous religion. A religion is dangerous and must be stopped, when it attempts to impose its values on others – when it has no tolerance of other creeds and when it exacts vegence on those who don't follow their dictates. Back in the 80's the 'Orange People' became such a dangerous religion, imposing its WILL on communities and expelling those of other faiths, by taking over political positions in local councils. Today, Islam is attempting to do the same in the West. Their are some very sick fanatics who cloth themselves in the Moslem faith to attempt to usurp power.

    the fact is that ISLAM is a striving THEO-POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY of world-
    domination masquerading in drags of pornographic false piety before
    its intended SUBJECTS as a "religion of peace

    If the Fascist proto-Nazis in Brussels will overturn centuries of
    coherent jurisprudential thinking of the West by saying that an
    abstract conceptual category such as ISLAM can now in the latter days
    be slandered — (whereas once it was sanely understood that only a
    flesh and blood PERSON and his/her individual identity be
    slandered/libeled) — then I say that if a whole religion
    can be slandered then [good for goose; good for gander[ a whole
    religion can well be held accountable for any and all acts
    that any one of its zombie-bots visits upon other human beings

  • W.G. Churchill

    The issue is not about freedom of religion in Europe and Switzerland which exists and is guaranteed! The issue is that Islam is not only a religion but a political, judicial and social system which is incompatible with ours! Change the way you think!! Islam wants to substitute itself to our secular societies! Fight for your future freedom now!

From Macleans