The man who wants to kill crunches

A Canadian professor of spine biomechanics rails about the dangers of the ubiquitous sit-up

by Patricia Treble on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:00am - 78 Comments

The man who wants to kill crunches

After three decades of figuring how out the spine works, Stuart McGill has come to loathe sit-ups. It doesn’t matter whether they are the full sit-ups beloved by military trainers or the crunch versions so ubiquitous in gyms. “What happens when you perform a sit-up?” he asks. “The spine is flexed into the position at which it damages sooner.”

The professor of spine biomechanics at the University of Waterloo knows a thing or two about snapping spines. In his lab, McGill proudly shows off a machine that’s probably created more disc herniations than any other in the world. “We get real [pig] spines from the butcher and we compress them, shear them and bend them to simulate activities such as golf swings and sit-ups, and watch as unique patterns of injury emerge.” A disc has a ring around it, and the middle, the nucleus, is filled with a mucus-like liquid. Do a sit-up and the spine’s compression will squeeze the nucleus. On his computer, McGill shows how the nucleus can work its way out of the disc, hit a nerve root and cause that oh-so-familiar back pain. “From observing the way your total gym routine is performed, we can predict the type of disc damage you’re eventually going to have.”

While there are lots of ways to injure a back, the sit-up is an easily preventable one. According to his research, a crunch or traditional sit-up generates at least 3,350 newtons (the equivalent of 340 kg) of compressive force on the spine. The U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health states that anything above 3,300 newtons is unsafe.

So McGill suggests replacing sit-ups with exercises to strengthen the core while not bending the spine: bridges, planks, leg extensions, bird dogs, and “stir the pot.” The bird dog, for instance, simply involves getting on all fours and, while keeping the core muscles tight, extending the opposite arm and leg, then switching limbs. “Stir the pot” is a more complex movement: moving shoulders in a small circle while in a prone push-up position with forearms balanced on an exercise ball.

The results of McGill’s decades of spine research is slowly being accepted outside the worlds of academia and elite athletics. Ian Crosby of the Calgary Fire Department saw the shift first-hand. He’s on a committee of the International Association of Fire Fighters that establishes criteria for the make-or-break fitness test. A few years ago, they reviewed the annual sit-up test, which involved doing steady crunches in time to a metronome. The problem, for Crosby, is that anyone being assessed “will train to get better. And that involves repeated bouts of sit-ups.” So last year, after talking to Stuart McGill and other experts, the IAFF dropped the sit-up in favour of the prone plank—basically a static push-up that will leave the unfit trembling with fatigue.

For those who believe sit-ups are the only key to strong abdominals, Crosby points to research that shows the new movements can be just as effective in improving core strength. A study of U.S. soldiers published earlier this year in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise compared sit-ups with back-friendly core stabilization exercises, including bird dogs, and found there was no difference in overall fitness between the two groups. In fact, those who did core exercises showed significant improvement in the army’s sit-up test.

The decline of the crunch can also be seen at ordinary sweat-filled gyms. Anthony Ierulli, manager of fitness programming for the YMCA in Brampton, Ont., says that while in the past all anyone “did were crunches, now they’re doing some Pilates and yoga that engage the abdomen in different ways.” But Ierulli emphasizes that changing routines isn’t enough if the technique isn’t there. And that requires finding a teacher who can fine-tune those unfamiliar exercises.

As for McGill, he keeps spreading his message. Recently, Asia Nelson, a local Waterloo-based trainer of yoga instructors, invited the expert to talk to her class of student teachers about his philosophy. She knows that not all traditional yoga postures are back-friendly. One example Nelson gives is the sun salutation’s forward fold—basically a standing crunch with the added hanging weight of the body. Now, after the professor’s lecture, she’s figuring out ways to modify that and other movements. While Nelson and the Y’s Ierulli recommend people find a balance between old and new techniques, McGill’s message is more blunt: “There are only so many bends in your spine until the discs eventually herniate.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Cary

    This is very interesting although I am not sure comparing pig spines to that of humans is a good tool – humans are biomechanically able to bend forward a lot easier than a pig. Listening to your body is definitely key :)

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

      You and I clearly didn't have the same pet pig growing up.

    • http://downtoearthliving.wordpress.com/ Alison

      If you read Stuart McGill's original research and books, such as "Low Back Disorders", you'll find that he's worked extensively with very body-aware athletes as well as people with long term back problems.

    • Bobby

      Pigs have been used for decades in medical schools to simulate human surgeries and to study biomechanics with medical students. Pig joints are about as close as it gets to a humans. Its not perfect but I would assume that the AMA would not approve students using pic cadavers as practice for humans surgeries if it were not very similar.

  • bwb

    on the pig note, the normal physiological stressors to the swine spine are 90 degrees different then in humans. Horizontal vs Vertical, thus the swine spine has not been evolutionized to support compressive forces in the same matter as human

    • Tamara

      its not about the active physiological stressors, its the fact the the pig spine is similar in number of vertebrae, shape of the vertebra and muscle attachement as that of the human spine. It is the closest thing researchers can use without an actual human spine. Similar tests are being perfomed on swine spine in Australia by Dr. Paul Hodges. He is the leading expert on the core muscles and back pain.

  • ChinT

    I say you do some research on spine biomechanics before making statements without empirical evidence.

  • http://theslamdunktrove.blogspot.com slamdunk

    It will be interesting to see how this develops.

  • http://wisejamaican.com Wisejamaican

    This is a very informative article. There is always new developments and it is good that this is allowing persons that there are other choices.

  • http://www.haciendahotelsmexico.com Haciendas

    Interesting article. Core excercises are important, but I really don't see crunches, if performed properly, causing to much harm. Sitting in front of a computer for 9 hours a day in an air conditioned office is probably worse for you :))

    • http://reidklos.com reid klos

      I concur being that I sit "in front of a computer for 9 hours a day in an air conditioned office" The teacher of my first yoga class came to me to correct a pose and she said, "You have a desk job don't you." I asked, "How did you know." Her reply: "Every student I have that comes from an office environment sitting most of the day has the same posture as you and have difficulty performing this pose." Telling.

      • http://www.outsourcefreelancersindia.com anish

        which yoga excercise you did than to correct that pose problem

  • http://verylonglife.wordpress.com Verylonglife

    I wonder how McGill's torso looks. Planks and leg extensions are good for developing "core" strength/stability, but for aesthetics, crunches and hanging leg raises are the most effective and efficient (best results in the shortest amount of time). Certainly, athletes, professional rescuers, and the like are interested in the benefits of core strength for performance purposes, but for the lay-person who wants to look good in swim-wear and doesn't need to worry about strain on their back aside from lifting paper reams for the copier, crunches are still the best solution.

    • Tony

      Incorrect. For aesthetics, No amount of training on your abs or waistline will give you result any faster than. It is 95% diet / nutrition control and calories that allow for 'looking good'. Exercise gives the body a reason to change, nutrition allows it to happen. You never crunch in life, don't train that way. The abs, for example (as McGill clearly points out), if about bracing the spine, especially deaccelerating the the "backward" moving forces of the upper spine, say, when you start walking forward or push open a door. The abs will 'brace' to keep you from folding backward as you press open a door. Imagine if you could cut someone' abs, like cutting a belt into two pieces…. even step a person takes would result in the upper body lean back…unless you had intact abs bracing for you. READ MGGILLS BOOKS. There are two of them. Trust me, it is great stuff. If there is something you don't understand in the book, keep on reading. The first 40 pages really clear many things up.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Spock2009 Spock2009

        I wonder how the number of male individuals who have won a physique contest using nutrition alone without exercise would compare to the number of contestants who have used exercise alone without any specific focus on nutrition.

    • http://www.haciendahotelsmexico.com Haciendas

      Got to agree with you, hanging leg raises and crunches for sexy abs. At the end of the day people will be more impressed with a six pack than how long you can hold a downward dog for!

    • john

      You are so wrong….I stopped doing crunches and the like because of my back issues, and am totally down with Dr. McGills work, and my abs & obliques are stronger (and nicer looking than ever).

      This article doesn't mention it (unfortunately), but there is an ab exercise from Dr. McGill that is spine friendly and hits my abs HARD!! Planks and side planks are more targeted towards your TA, erector spinae, and obliques…

      Also, showing abs is mostly about fat loss…

    • w.health

      the fact that you are putting looks before health is another prime example of what is wrong with the average person when it comes to exercise. Why put yourself through a strenuous workout that is good for looking buff in the short term, but terrible for your body and remaining active and pain free in the long run? Quality of life and maintaing physical functioning should always be put before 'looking sexy at the beach", but rarely is.

    • ggb

      Vanity confuses the issue here; in seach of the 6-pack, many exercisers resort to the crunch. However, most of us actually already possess a 6-pack …but it's hidden under too much body fat. The crunch is useless.

    • guest

      In terms of bulking up on muscle any exercise in which you can do High repetitions isn't very effective. If you want a six pack and are relying fully on sit ups then you should really consider doing some research (unless you can't do all that that many). In my opinion body fat is the biggest aspect of showing a six pack. I would think that it is clear to most of you the best ways to lose weight, but I am also writing to a group who can't seem to figure out how to build muscle. Good luck in looking good, and more so in learning what you should already know.

    • Melanie, RYT

      I haven't done a crunch in several years. I perform short, intense total body training, that includes core training as one single unit, suspension training, and unstable training such as on one leg or on a BOSU. My torso looks fantasitic, I must say.

    • Doc

      To assume that athletes, rescue workers and anyone else with demanding job related duties strain their backs more then the "lay person" is comical. I treat more desk jockeys and "lay persons" in my chiropractic clinic for back strains then any other.
      McGill is spot on. I'd like to see him reach the military and other federal agencies to have them alter their PTA protocols. Im sure this will decrease the amount of disabilities and early transfers.

  • Natalia

    Well, this certainly is an interesting discovery that might even change my exercise routine – some strong words coming from someone who does 8 minute abs religiously.
    However how would this relate to back flexibility? I am definitely interested in the findings of spinal biomechanics in that area.

  • tipppz

    I'm 19 years old and have had 2 back surgery's. So all you who HAVEN'T you have no clue what spinal damage feels like! The core of you stomach helps mediate your back, so when you are doing crunches (which dont help your back what so everrrr) all your doing is putting meaningless pressure on your lower vertabra's.

  • http://www.thewholeway.wordpress.com Wendy

    I'm a personal trainer and had the great fortune of taking a 6 hour workshop with Stu McGill a few years ago. He is right on the edge of scientific research/knowledge and best practice. Read his books; check out his website. I have put his knowledge to sound use with many clients.

  • http://reidklos.com reid klos

    Being ex-military and a former dancer I am in total agreement with this guy's findings from experience. In dance the only time we do crunches is to warm up the muscles other than that it is strictly based on core engagement.

    • Aboundhealth

      I did not know that you danced!!!???? What??? I did some missionary work in the West Indies islands and notice a lot of young and elderly men, who worked in their gardens every day, had very tight abs. They did not go to a gym or do crunches, but they did a lot of manual labor.

  • http://www.jingleyanqiu.wordpress.com jingle

    great observations,
    I love the way you take the photo,
    timeless post.

  • http://www.seslishe.com seslishe

    thenk you very much very nice blog dancing http://www.seslishe.com

  • http://pppministries.wordpress.com Mercedes Moss

    I do Pilates which involves spinal contortions of the sort described (as in roll ups, for example) and will try one of the exercises described here. But what is the shape of a pig's spine?

  • http://www.shamfuture.com Sham Future

    great observations,
    I love the way you take the photo,
    timeless post.

  • Jerry

    If most porkers would just do the old "butt walk" exercise instead of lab an computer modules you'd do better.

  • http://www.mataphysique.com Mata Physique

    Nowadays there is very little left for a real discovery in the field of health and wellness but scientists are people and as most of us they are consumed by their ego. Consequently about 60% of modern scientific "discoveries" in the field of human kinetics are scandalous tabloids. And as any 'yellow' press it is entertaining for people who understand the workings of a human body and misleading for the seekers of truth.
    It is obvious to any thinking creature that too many repetitions of any movement will call for an excessive wear on the system if the system doesn't have a chance for recovery. Military and emergency response fitness training methods have hardly been ever known to be creative in their approach. But for an educated practitioner the logic of numerous repetitions of the test movement in order to pass the test doesn't quite apply. In this particular case, for example, the main working unit of a "crunch" is the midsection's frontal plain and there are gabagilion-and-five movements to make that plain stronger.
    I suppose for a person that believes in the philosophy of numerous repetitions of a crunch in order to get good at it, this article would be somewhat of an 'aha'…

    • tania

      go on…… im listening

    • bobbert

      A crunch consists of spinal flexion in the saggital plane not the frontal plane. Maybe you by plane you were just referring to the anterior portion of the core is primarily responsible for the movement but it would be incorrect to say its a frontal plane movement.

  • http://lakiagordon.com Lakia Gordon

    See, I knew crunches were the devil lol

  • http://www.nataliekarapetian.wordpress.com nataliejk

    I had absoultely no idea!!! No wonder my back has been hurting so much lately!!! I usually to about 400 crunches a day!!!

    • Jerry

      Try mixing a few high back bridges into the cruch workout. Don't forget the side crunches. Elbow to knee.
      Jerry

      • Bibi

        Check out the fitness table method

    • Julie

      400 crunches a day ,How are you doing these I wonder ?? NOW there's maybe your problem , excessive & too fast possibly , try doing sets of 10 slowly & controlled , try many different ab excercises , do you engage those abs from the inside out , so many people still think navel to spine , sucking the abs in , & so flattening the back to the floor , overworking your back extensors, overtucking the pelvis , overworking the hip flexors ect.
      I am a certified Pilates Instructor & would appreciate these ideas if a human spine had been studied , we are meant to flex the spine .

    • Roo Bookaroo

      I feel immensely sorry for you.

  • Bibi

    For all who wants to perform safe exercise movements check out the fitness table method. (just google it) A very unique and personalized method which aimes to keep you healthy and fit!

  • http://nso0767.wordpress.com/ Nick

    Some of these supplements may help also. Check out my blog

    http://nso0767.wordpress.com/

  • RagingRanter

    This is nothing new. A lot of fitness trainers eschew sit-ups and crunches completely, simply because they can lead to neck muscle strain. The focus is on planks and various rotational moves (e.g. Russian kettle-bell twists, windshield wipers).

    • http://www.brownintegratedchiropractic.com Jason Brown, DC

      The differnce is McGill has taken the effort to design beautifully orchestrated research studies to back up this idea. He is one of the main reasons the spine rehab community and fitness trainers you mention have figured this out. Check out his book or Ultimate Back Fitness DVD to get a better feel for how far advanced his understanding is compared to that of most fitness trainers. Really great stuff!

  • Stopgap

    My dad lived to be 87 and never did a crunch in his whole life. He worked in a textile mill on a concrete floor for 30 years and as far as I know he never complained of back pain. Too much "beneficial" exercise is not necessarily a good thing. I've had knee, back, neck, and ankle pain all from various exercise regimens, not to mention I almost had a heat stroke.

  • Tamara

    For those in doubt, you should look up articles by Dr. Paul Hodges and Julie Hydes. They are based out of Australia and have spent the last decade and more focused on studying back pain and core muscles. Their research supports McGills.

  • ggb

    I am also a personal trainer and advocate Dr. McGill's work. This article lets on that McGill's research has just been released …well, it's not. McGill published his finding years ago and has copious documentation as to validity and also to the similarity between the swine spine and the human spine. His measurement of the Newtons of force has been out for a numbers of year, in fact quoted in Men's Heath over a year ago.
    Further, McGill is regarded as "the back man" throughout much of the western world, he speaks as numerous health-centred conferences and often is quoted in health publications and popular magazines such as Men's Health.
    The crunch works rectus abdominus which has almost nothing to do with core strength and spinal health. As McGill notes, the "plank" works the core muscles isomentrically and that's exactly how we use the core mucscles from the minute we rise in the morning until we go to bed at night. .. functionally appropriate.
    Vanity confuses the issue here; in seach of the 6-pack, many exercisers resort to the crunch. However, most of us actually already possess a 6-pack …but it's hidden under too much body fat.

From Macleans