99-year-old Granny isn’t the problem

Airport ‘security’ has to pretend all seven billion of us on this planet are an equal threat

by Mark Steyn on Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:13am - 206 Comments

99 year old granny isn't the problem

A couple of days after the Christmas Day Pantybomber tried to light up his gusset on the approach to Detroit, I was at a small airport in Vermont shuffling through the line to what they call the “sterile” area. Anyway, I handed over my driver’s licence and, as he had done with all the previous passengers, the Transportation Security Administration agent examined it. And examined it. And examined it some more. He had a loupe, one of those magnifying glasses jewellers use to examine diamonds for any surface blemishes or internal flaws. In this case, he was deploying it to examine how the ink lies on the paper. And when he’d finished doing that he got out his UV light to study the watermark on my licence.

And, looking down at his bald patch as he went about his work with loving care, I was overcome by a sudden urge to point out that nobody had ever blown up a U.S. airliner with a fake driver’s licence. Why bother going to all that trouble when a real one is so easy to get? On Sept. 11, 2001, four of the terrorists boarded the flight with genuine, valid picture ID issued by the state of Virginia and obtained through the illegal-immigrant day-workers’ network run out of the parking lot of the 7-Eleven in Falls Church. Almost two years earlier, Ahmed Ressam, the Millennium Bomber, had been arrested on the British Columbia-Washington state border travelling on a genuine Canadian passport. In that instance, the terrorist had been stopped because the guard thought he seemed nervous when she looked him in the eye. But in Vermont the guy didn’t look me or anybody else in the eye. He remained hunched over his loupes and licences—no doubt in part because if he looked me or any other regular air traveller in the eye all he’d see staring back at him was an expression of total contempt at the pointless and stupid “security.” So they avoid looking at you, and instead peer through their magnifiers, and amble back and forth barking out the rules about how the three-ounce containers of liquids and gels have to be placed in a one-quart zip-top clear plastic bag, and rummage through your carry-on for more and more proscribed items. But they never look at you. Because they’re not looking for terrorists. They’re looking for things, and an ever-growing list of them.


Oh, to be sure, you can still find the occasional nonagenarian spinster who thinks if they’re patting her down and making her unscrew her leg brace it’s a sign that they’re being extra-super-careful about security. Which, of course, they’re not. Every minute spent on the nonagenarian spinster is a minute not being spent on, say, a nervous 23-year-old Muslim male who’s a bit twitchy because his crotch is loaded with PETN. In the end, I forbore to mock the scrutiny of my driver’s licence, as most of us do, lest the TSA stick us on the no-fly list. Even by the standards of government make-work bureaucracies, they dislike being questioned, and they seem to believe they have the power to pull you off the flight for lèse-majesté. A week after the Pantybomber, a man broke into the “sterile” area at Newark. When I say “broke into,” that’s Homeland Security-speak for “strolled into,” while crack TSA agent Ruben Hernandez had wandered away from his post and had his back turned. He wouldn’t have noticed it, but a member of the public, whiling away an hour or three waiting for an arriving passenger, chanced to see it and brought it to the TSA’s attention. They immediately swung into action and checked the surveillance cameras to get a good look at the man. Alas, the cameras weren’t recording. They required a reboot, and nobody at the TSA had got around to asking for one. Still, it looks nice and reassuring having all those cameras everywhere, doesn’t it? Even if there’s nothing in them.

Fortunately, Continental Airlines at Newark keep their own surveillance video. Unfortunately, the TSA didn’t know the phone number to call or the procedures that had been agreed on for getting hold of the backup tape.

So instead they locked down the airport, stopped all flights, pulled everyone off the plane, prevented them from getting food or drink or using the bathroom, and rescreened them all, causing massive inconvenience and loss of time and money. All because TSA “model employee” Ruben Hernandez turned his back. In the wake of the Newark incident, I received a number of emails from airport workers suggesting this sort of thing happens fairly regularly. For example, one correspondent tells me that at Detroit’s North Terminal last year some fellow sauntered into the “secure” area through the exit, bought some food from Village Pizza, and was halfway through eating it before the TSA caught up with him. Presumably the cameras were working that day.

At Newark it took a little longer. After six days, they finally found the security breacher—a man called Haisong Jiang, a 28-year-old Rutgers grad student who’d decided to give his sweetheart one last kiss. New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg is furious that Mr. Jiang may only get a fine and not serious jail time. “It wasn’t some prank that didn’t do any harm,” fumed the senator. “It did a lot of harm because it sent out an alert that people can get away with something like this.”

Er, yes. But isn’t that the problem you should be focusing on? That people can “get away with something like this,” because the model employee turns his back, and your security tape isn’t running, and you don’t have the phone number for the backup.

But for a while they’ll be more careful. So the lines will move slower, and get longer. If you’re at a busy airport on a Friday afternoon, two thoughts occur:

Bookmark and Share
  • Keith

    Profiling is a partial solution, as is intelligence gathering. If you want perfection, you're in the wrong place.
    However my preference is for better intell as it is more precise. Abdulmutallab was known, and nothing was done with this knowledge. This would be equivalent to TSA seeing his panties and waving him through. This was a massive intell failure pure and simple, yet all we see is the heads of Intell indulging in public hand wringing. These heads need to be rolling. A message must be sent to the Intell "community" (as it is quaintly called) to lift their game, incompetence won't be tolerated. The meally-mouthed platitude of "systemic problem" does not excuse failure. Let their replacements address the systemic failures, if they do in fact exist.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/minaka minaka

      A big part of the intell failure is systemic political correctness so you just circle back to the underlying problem of being unwilling to profile or in the case of intell connect the dots when they involve the group that to date yields 99.9% of terrorists.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/minaka minaka

    Why all the liberal outrage on behalf of Muslims? It's beyond foolish, the suicidal kind of foolish.

    If people with my group characteristics were causing the mayhem that Muslim jihadis are responsible for around the world in thousands of documented incidents killing thousands of people, then I would expect to be searched very carefully and submit to it gracefully because I do not want to be blown out of the sky even by someone who looks like me or says they believe the same things except for that niggling detail about killing innocents.

    If I wanted to mutter under my breath about the unfairness of it all, then my mutterings would be about the horrible few giving a bad name to my group and THAT's the direction my criticism would take, not toward people trying to defend us all against attacks by the crazies.

    Presently so-called moderate Muslims are not behaving this constructive way at all. Those who speak up on the issue are overwhelmingly whining about the inconvenience to them and doing everything in their power to guilt the authorities into minimizing it thereby increasing chances of jihadi success.

    This is the behavior of people who are at best narcissistic and cavalier about their fellow citizens' well being, at worst sympathizers and jihadi enablers.

    Why the big concern about merely bruising such people's feelings when they are unconcerned about increasing your odds of dying?

  • pok

    When a policeman arrives at the scene of a crime, the first question asked is, "Can you describe the perpetrator?"

    Is this "profiling"?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stergeye Stergeye

    On the money once again, Mark.
    Too many posters above focus too much on the racism/descrimination screed and miss the point: The forces of political correctness are achieving dhimmitude in that our TSA employees are more terrified at being called "racist" than they are of missing a terrorist.
    Abdulmullatab might as well have had "terrorist" tatooed on his forehead; since nobody in security was actually looking at a nervous young muslim man flying without baggage on a one-way ticket purchased with cash, that wouldn't have been a deterrent.
    Political correctness subverts the mission of TSA from stopping terrorists to "respecting diversity."

  • http://kralizec.wordpress.com/ Kralizec

    The Americans are so moralistic and self-denying in matters of their own security, letting their rulers and their rulers' servants put them through hours of pointless waiting, rather than insisting that their rulers subjugate their enemies. The Americans could take possession of the wealth of their enemies; instead, they take off their shoes. I've come to despise the Americans and to look forward to those occasions when you will suffer for your stupidity.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/WRMaverick WRMaverick

    The Israelis have it right, of course, but we have gone to the usual bureaucratic solution of setting it up so the least capable people in our society can do the job. What's needed is smart people looking for nervous, anxious, men, women, declared or undeclared Muslims,……. The key is smart people looking. We have dumb people following rules. I, for one, pay a lot of attention to the other people flying with me and I will turn in anyone I think looks suspicious. I would also choose to miss a flight if my concern was not treated seriously. I know the odds are small and there is more danger driving to the store but I also drive defensively and avoid putting myself in jeopardy AS MUCH AS I POSSIBLY CAN. I am sorry if I upset someone but we are all still alive, upset or not.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/minaka minaka

      "The key is smart people looking. We have dumb people following rules".

      That could be expanded to: "The key is smart people looking (at people for certain clues both behavioral and in appearance) . We have dumb people following (dumb) rules (looking for things).

  • tressa

    Let me tell you, they must profile jewelry designers, because when I went to L.A. in October for a jewelry show, I had a carry-on filled with handcrafted designed jewelry, and there were 145 pieces in zip lock bags…I had a business card, I was well dressed, not nervous, no bells went off when I went through, but the security agent looked through 145 bags of my handcrafted jewelry and then ran it through the explosive machine…Yes,all this scrutiny while a Fruit of the Loom Loonie who is a terrorist and hates us and wants to murder 300 passengers, is allowed to go through without any examination, he had no luggage, no passport…Unbelievable and to top it off, I got the same scrutiny at LAX on my return to NY. Yes, I was a little annoyed, but these underpaid security people are doing their job, but they are scrutinizing the wrong people…Did you ever see a 60 year old attractive woman, an American citizen, with a legitimate passport and license, who is a wife, mother of 3, grandparent of 7 kids, want to blow up a plane? . I don't think so…I took this imposition good naturedly but they didn't search that vermin who had all the signs of being a terrorist, and they let him get on a U.S. plane! Unbelievable.

  • Gerry

    Nobody mentions the fact that islamic fundamentalist all believe that we are infidels and that they have a duty to kill as many of us as they can.The adherants of any religion that prescribes that type of action deserve to be marginalised. We cannot lessen their hatred nor reason with them. They are believers and know they are right!!

  • John Dorman

    The way to go is back to the hydrogen filled dirigible when a man with a book of matches and malcontent could instead of lighting his cigar have made the skys flash like heaven had suddenly descended on us all.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/mendelbot mendelbot

      This demonstrates the limitations of the thumbs up/ thumbs down model. Where's my question mark?

  • Richard_Iowa

    Ah, reading this article brought back memories of the TSA stealing my fingernail clippers and toothpaste. They must have confiscated 4-5 pair of, not just any make of clippers, but Revlon. Checked the price of Revlon fingernail clippers lately? They ain't cheap. And then there is the toothpaste. Why have they taken so much of my toothpaste? Not to worry you say as when you get to the hotel just ask for a complimentary tube. I have lost count of how many times they were out. Any quess why they are out of toothpaste? It is because TSA is stealing everyones' toothpaste and the hotels can't keep it in stock. A number of years ago I made a command decision to become a pilot. Will have my Commercial license by this summer and will be flying myself and my family on trips. Now, what are the odds that the stealers of toothpaste and fingernail clippers will show up at my plane as I am boarding??

  • Mike

    So Oklahoma City was due to Muslims? Air India? If I fly out on a Spanish airline and the security forces are focused on Muslims, it's not like the Basques don't still have some extremists around who might try something.

    Profiling has it's place if what you want to do is balance the odds against wait times and costs, but comprehensive security still strikes me as a better alternative – even if that means that you too have to wait a bit while your documentation gets checked.

  • Just passing through

    It is indeed not about the grannies. It is also not about checking passports but not looking in the eyeballs of the person. If you are about to blow up a plane and yourself, surely there would be some sign?
    I do not fly if I can help it. The goal is to bring down the economy, well, it's beginning to happen quite well and Steyne certainly has explained a great deal of this to me.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/mendelbot mendelbot

      Oh don't worry, we'll managing quite well in ruining the economy with deficit financing.

  • maryann

    Mark ,see the trudeau, lib, bare naked ladies, CBC, PC raised sesame street types that comment here. It's the reason I can't for the life of me subscribe or pick up a Macleans magazine let alone read a Canadian paper. Bunch of Moonbats. I went to your site as I usually do, so was linked here. I'll stick with the big guns National Review,Hot Air, Big Government, WSJ,. Man it's like an alternate universe after coming off the grownup sites. Hey the grownup commentators can head over to Moonbattery for some real reviews of the day's news, they LOVE Steyn . Oh and yes I meant to write trudeau with a small t. Never met a commie he didn't like.
    So chris, Rob H, patriot one, CDJ, ionamic for some great stuff check "Moonbattery" daily and any other cool conservatives I may have missed.

  • Craig O

    Never mind the inherent bigotry in this article, stereotyping opens up a massive, gaping hole in airport security. If the only requirement to avoid real screening is to look non-muslim, any half-competent terrorist is going to see that loophole and run right through it. A little hair dye, a few colour contacts and a suit, that's about all it'd take. And since this stereotyping already takes place to an extent (with light hair, skin and blue eyes, I have never been through screening more intense than stepping through a metal detector or being asked a few quick, pointless questions), making such a policy official would be laying a road map for potential terrorists.

    As per usual, Steyn has taken a preconceived notion and developed a way to push that notion on others under the pretense of something else, using impressive writing skills, but a complete lack of rational thought.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/mendelbot mendelbot

      For someone so open minded and dedicated to the mental backflips inherent in multiculturalism, you have a strangely polarized reasoning process.

      According to you,
      (Support of profiling) –implies->
      (racism) which –implies->
      (the total neglect of any factor outside of race.)

      If this is your perception of steyn "As per usual" perhaps you should consider your monochromatic perspective might be a function of your unimaginative and illogic perception.

      If you can't do better than "Hair-dye and color contacts, therefore we should abandon common sense", I don't know if you even take your own nonsense seriously.

      • Craig O

        And how do you suggest profiling someone besides their looks? Muslims don't walk around with a giant sign saying "Hey, I'm Muslim, please subject me to extra screening". Names can easily be changed, disguises can be worn for photo ID as well. What then? Are we going to ask them whether they're Muslim and count on the terrorists to be honest before they try to blow an airplane out of the sky?

        Yes, there are other factors, and those other factors are what actually matters. Most Muslims aren't going to blow up jack and if we preferentially screen people who look like Muslims than the easiest thing for terrorists to do is appear non-Muslim and skirt the process. Rather than profile, we should be training our airport to security to properly identify and respond to those other factors, without that, superficial judgments about a person's religious views aren't going to make a damn difference except when catching the dumbest of terrorists (who, we would expect, would be easily identifiable by those other factors anyway!)

        • Jonathan W

          Every single airline bomber, including the 9/11 hijackers, travelled on valid passports, under their legal names. The underwear bomber had an arabic name, bought a one way ticket, paid for at the counter, and didn't check any luggage. These guys are not that smart. Unfortunately, our security system is so paralyzed by political correctness, we can't even bring ourselves to provide extra scrutiny to somebody who is a perfect match for the profile of an islamist terrorist. I completely agree that behaviour should definately be one factor that also attracts extra scrutiny. To do that, we'd have to have properly trained, well trained security professionals rather than the minimum wage, mouth breathing rent a cops we presently entrust our lives to. It is to weep.

  • Revnant Dream

    The solution seems apparent. Hire the Israelis to train a cadre of real security. Such as they employ, including of course their methods. Why punish or humiliate the flying public? For the feeble protestations from the PC fanatics with no survival instinct. The self flagellate, who make airports like the palaces of the Spanish inquisition.
    Wrenches like self mutilates who glory in the belittling of others while carving themselves up for pity. All for the illusion of mass culpability. When its a discernible band of Killers of a religious ideology that trumpets its beliefs in blood mixed with murder.
    One the Marxists have fallen in with.
    This is why the pubic is endlessly hounded. To mitigate the guilt of savages with Twitter, barbarians with MOney
    Meanwhile our courts become Infected with anti-democratic memes while our politicians play footsies with Saudi oil Barons pushing Sharia law faster than the bribes to our pols.
    JMO

  • http://twitter.com/Spike72AFA @Spike72AFA

    TSA is like those who say "Guns kill." It's people using guns and terrorist using bombs. Look for the bad guy not the tool. #hhrs

  • Guest

    Intelligent profiling means making probabilistic inferences from relevant data. As it happens, we have more than enough data to make legitimate inferences about those who pose the greatest threat to the civilized world.

    They are Muslim males of middle eastern or African extraction who come from wealthy families. They have been schooled in western institutions, mostly in technical, scientific, or vocational trades. They are frequent international travellers whose credit card transactions record certain spending patterns in foreign countries.

    Profiling does not make one a racist. Islam is an ideology, not a race. Profiling does, however, commit one to empricism, and making probabilistic inferences based on relevant factors, of which adherence to the Muslim faith is one.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/q602 q602

    It is the fact that the root cause of air terror is this: Muslims. Nobody can deny this.
    The solution is obvious and simple. Let the authorities create two classes of flights: "For Muslims Only" and "For Others Only".
    If the Muslim terrorists want to continue their suicidal business, let them take with them their brothers and sisters in faith.
    Let us (the others) have safe flights.

  • emet-veritas

    "…everybody died. Because in the end the state wasn’t up there with them."

    Valid observation. Instead of air marshals, perhaps making a congressperson (or other "valuable" pol (forgive the oxymoron)) sit on some flight daily would inspire a difference.

    Telling would be allowing the person to choose the airport and destination on which he/she will fly.

    With the risk of less than 1/435(+) per day (assuming one lucky "leader"/day and a rotating schedule), the work of government would (sadly) not be affected (that is not the point of this exercise) and the info + impetus for change could be valuable.

  • kaymad

    I don't know about anyone else, but when TSA tells my 80some year old in-laws, one with parkinson's, the other with parkinson's AND Alzheimer's, to take off their shoes with no offer of a chair, I feel comforted that everything is being done for our security. I feel extra virtuous in knowing everyone is being treated the same.

    It's nice the TSA employees watch my in-laws do a balancing act as they struggle to obediently take off their shoes while the young, healthy Muslim guy strolls on through.

    I think we should bring this fairness into all areas. If the police are hunting for a rapist who is white, I think everyone; whites, blacks and Asians, including woman, should have their DNA checked to make things even MORE fair.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/DanielShays DanielShays

    Steyn is absolutely correct. When 60 year old Irish nuns start carrying bombs and other weapons onto aircraft they should be profiled too.

  • zoda

    To Ed D We wernt in iraq or anywhere else on 9/11 whem Muslims blew up the planes!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

      Get a clue, or at least some facts.

  • talchess

    Profiling a la Israeli is necessary and overdue, should have been instituted when the Israelis did it and the hijackings of the 70's could have been reduced or prevented. The comment about bombing the waiting lines is pertinent, reference the Red Brigades and the Rome airport. Muslims and the citizens of Muslim nations should have the security perimeter moved far away from the rest of us. It might act as an incentive to change at home (not), it will render up real candidates for the No-Fly list and having to check the Muslim list first would save time!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/DonSharpe DonSharpe

    The evolution of my airplane mindset.
    1. young, happy, drunk, smoking – party!
    2. can't smoke, older, working, working, working..
    Then came 9/11.
    3. anxious, compliant, dependent, no free snacks?
    4. impatient, frustrated, really . . … no free snacks?
    5. eyeballin' all praying, sweating, shoe fidgeting believers.
    Now – angry, wary, ready to tackle the next panty-jihadi!

  • Tupelo Q

    Part two:

    2010.01.10 Kulgam, India
    Hizb-ul-Mujahideen gun down two former members who had renounced violence.
    2010.01.10 Narathiwat, Thailand
    Two men sitting in a tea shop are
    blown away by Muslim terrorists with automatic weapons.
    2010.01.07 Nag Hamadi, Egypt
    Six worshipers and one guard are gunned down by Muslim radicals as they leave mass at a Christian church. A 14-year-old is among the dead.
    2010.01.07 Yala, Thailand
    A man is ripped in two by a Religion of Peace nail bomb.
    2010.01.06 Srinagar, India
    Jamiat-ul-Mujahideen militants toss grenades and fire into a crowd at a shopping center, killing at least three people.
    2010.01.06 Makhachkala, Dagestan
    A suicide bomber murders six Russian police officers.
    2010.01.06 Egypt Rafah 1 0 Hamas snipers take down an Egyptian soldier.
    2010.01.02 Dhusamareb, Somalia
    al-Shabaab Islamists assault a small town. At least four dozen people are killed in the fighting.

From Macleans