Mansbridge says, 'Get over it'

CBC News’s swirly, shiny and frenetic new identity: how’s that working out?

by Jonathon Gatehouse on Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:25pm - 42 Comments

Over at CBC News Network, which has just over one per cent market share, about the same as the CTV News Channel (formerly known as CTV News Net), there is excitement about an uptick in viewers for the morning show, and The Lang & O’Leary Exchange has doubled its audience for the time slot. But other programs like Connect with Mark Kelley are struggling.

And some of the more in-your-face elements of the new CBC News have been dialled down in recent weeks. There are fewer moving graphics, and they’re not travelling quite so fast. The text that crawls across the bottom of the screen has been brightened, and the camera work looks a lot less shaky. “Peter’s still walking,” says The National’s Whitten. “We’re just better at shooting it now.”

Jennifer McGuire says the network will measure the success of the revamp three ways: the quality of the journalism produced in the new format, the engagement of the audience, and just who is watching. “We care about audience breadth, as well as tonnage.” And executives argue that they have little choice but to shake things up. In a fragmenting news market, audiences are demanding more information, in more interactive formats, with fewer filters than in the past. The National is offering its full broadcast online each night, as well as a stripped-down 10-minute early Web edition at 6 p.m., and a four-minute download for mobile devices. (There have been some technical problems with the latter, but the service now has 28,000 subscribers, up from 2,500 the first week.) “We want to try and make some inroads into a generation that’s not into TV,” says Mansbridge. “It’s been an issue for the last decade or two —the audience is getting older. And that’s a ticket to a problem.” Viewer research also revealed another troubling truth: news consumers no longer make much of a differentiation between the CBC and its competitors in terms of trust, or where they turn for the big stories or coverage of Canadian issues. “It’s fair to say that alarmed us,” says Whitten. “And generally, there’s the same level of dissatisfaction—everyone is getting a C+. That’s the sobering part.”

Reversing such long-term trends by an on-screen revamp and behind-the-scenes restructuring seems like a long shot. (Mansbridge delivered The National from a virtual set, sitting in front of a green screen for six weeks as the studios were renovated this fall. Not one viewer noticed.) But it’s hard to damn CBC for trying.

Sitting in his office, the veteran anchor says he figures people will soon forget the show ever looked any different. Having lived through so many past network experiments, he is philosophical. Nothing could be as bad, he says, as when they paired him with Pamela Wallin and moved the news to 9 p.m. back in 1992. “That one really smelled.”

Bookmark and Share
  • cold boy

    The new look is pure shite.

  • MARY

    The sey certainly needed an update. i like the CBC News but I find the moving backgrounds- on and on and on- somewhat distracting.

  • Kevin

    I like the new look. I’m a faithful CBC news watcher. I’m happy that someone is paying attention to what sells ! They have to sell their product or else go out of business like everything else.

    • old fogey

      What I don't like is the funding of this corporation by us (the poor taxpayer) why is it not funded as in the US by private donations ?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

        It should be like PBS! if you want it, and all the liberal gibberish, pay for it! I dont want my tax dollars going to it, and it's cheap/cheesy set

  • old fogey

    The CBC ratings will soar after they blame the Conservative Gov. for causing the disaster in Haiti.

    • global what???????

      They blame them for everything else why not HAITI? The liberals can do no wrong.

      • joe in ottawa

        Right on Bro!

  • Pamela

    I don't mind the set but I wish they would give the poor old guy a seat!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

      This is what I said, by the end of the hour, he looks sort of out of it. I thought at one point he was ill, he looked like he lost weight. I watch the at issue lot, thats about it.The rest is this horrible American type news, 24/7 .

    • rosemary

      I agree, and sometimes they are interviewing or the "At Issue" and the background keeps changing or moving.

  • sprite1949

    I am not impressed with many of the changes…can't stand Amanda Lang or Kevin O'Leary–they both come across as arrogant "know-it-alls"…hate it when Lang reports the news. The worst part of the change for me is how much time is wasted telling what's coming up (although, that does provide the opportunity to switch channels if what's coming is of no interest to me. I am still very grateful that I have a digital recorder…even the news gets recorded…that way, I don't have to suffer through commercials and can truly watch the what really interests me! It always disgusts me when I hear that Canadian government people use American companies for whatever they need. Pathetic!!!

    • Cpt. Awesome

      What! Amanda Lang is hawt. And she has a twin.

  • Larry

    If they are revamping the news set. Why keep Mansbridge. He is the reason I don't watch his biased view of the world. As a peoples news cast they should be trying to be as neutral as possible. Only 30% are Liberals

    • global what???????

      Yeah good for you.

      • Canadian Immigrant

        Oh, only 30% are Liberals. Perhaps it is to much.

  • Serge Fournier

    Peter is the best and does inspire respect and credibility he reminds me of Walter C. on CBS news. Merci.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

      Not even close to WC, not by an inch

      • Canadian Immigrant

        I like Peter Mansbridge, he seems a respectable man.

  • Chris

    I hope the screen becomes less busy once they settle in to their new format; it is somewhat distracting. I also hope they replace Solomon because I find his interviewing style annoying and obtrusive (not to mention his voice — sorry, but one of a broadcast journalists talents s/b a good speaking voice, especially if he/she is hosting a segment). No one anchors the news or election coverage, in particular, like Peter Mansbridge. He thinks fast on his feet — or in a chair. And you can talk about CBC being partisan all you want … have you listened to CTV? They're so blue and biased in their political coverage, they ooze conservatism. They didn't have the likes of Mike Duffy (now senator Duffy thanks to Mr. Harper) on their news staff for nothing. (And yes, he formerly worked at CBC; even then he was obviously a Conservative). So-called objective journalism often "isn't". It is disheartening that, with all of the talent that exists in Canada, an American 'specialist' was hired to help redesign our public broadcaster. Let's hope it remains more Canadian, than American. Time will tell.

  • http://armida.ca armida s mcdougall

    Too many graphics, too many colors, too much movement .Its all very distracting and looks like a cheap, tawdry cousin of CNN. We are not Americans, we like much more simplicity in our news presentations. And I agree, give the people chairs. How uncomfortable they all look, standing on one leg and then the other. I disagree in the choice of yellow. It looks amateurish and juvenile and belongs in children's books, not in serious newcast presentations. ( Look children. The sun is yellow! Now how does that make us feel?)

  • bettie

    CBC should have to stand on its own two feet financially as CTV does. I can't stand the spin and half-truths CBC spews about the Conservatives. It is rare that anything good is said about the government or the Prime Minister. (And, no, CTV is not biased toward the Conservatives…it just appears so in comparison to CBC). CBC appears frantic that the Conservatives may win a majority, and their financial bonanza come to an end.

  • marta

    I wish they would not make an orgy out of technical bravours I mean the swirly shiny part repetitive rapid montageous self promotion bringing the gals and guys face all the time back playing with the pPossibilities … It is Tiring and downright annoying to the point after afew minutes I reach For the remote … I don't care what they intend to tell me any more , it is like looking into a caleidoscope and try To figure what the hell is happening …

  • marta

    Also Solomon is just a big annoyment maybe he really thiks he is in the POWERHOUSE?

    • bettie

      His voice is intolerable.

  • Ed Tokarchik

    CBC news is fast moving from irelevant to annoying. Whats with the late weather report that says absolutely nothing. Just a nice dress filled with an Austrailian accent.

  • bert

    More wasted tax dollars by the CBC.

  • maggie

    I agree with Derek. I am sick of the anti-Conservative bias and proLiberal stance,

  • mad as hell

    If i wanted Fox I would watch fox. the Harper corruptions spreads everywhere. the only network now worh watching is BBC wor;d. We really do need a new governent so we can get real news

  • Marushka

    I personally hate frenetic. But then I'm old.
    Looks like somebody who's ADHD designed it.

  • Louisa

    To Derek: From what I hear and see on CBC they are scared shitless by the ominous threat that Mr Harper will shut them down if they don't behave nicely, and even Mr Mansbridge kowtows to him at every opportunity by letting him evade even the mildest questions. Were he not to do so, he'd be cut off as a media interviewer. The local CBC stations here in Calgary virtually coo every time they mention his name, and they dare not come across as critical of this government. The nations "at issue" panel on TV is every bit as accommodating and mealy-mouthed in their analysis. I used to work for the federal government during the days of the Liberals, and the media covered the government ruthlessly, being more critical than the other networks lest they be seen as government-friendly. This is not the case since the great dictator took over. Unfortunately media criticism of the current government ranges from minimal to fringe to nonexistent. The fact that there are reports about prorogation and the ensuing protests it provokes is seen by staunch Conservative "fans" such as yourself as “biased” when in fact it is sometimes unavoidable to report facts. Some news stories must be reported, even when you don’t like them.

  • joe in ottawa

    I personally like the old set up better, its just distracting with all the new scenes. I like the old music and background. But I guess I am old school lol

  • Hugh Corston

    I tend to agree with Mad as Hell. I willl watch C.B.C., but then hit up BBC World on PBS or on the web to find out what is going on in the rest of the world…and without the fanfare.

  • old fogey

    Mad as Hell must be from another planet ! The liberals were squeaky clean when they were in power and when did any party in power give us REAL news ? Get a life.

  • Bert

    Get rid of Mansbridge. While younger than Lloyd, the latter continues to be a classy newsman. The former has grown into a biased and irrelevant figure. The ratings drop tell the story.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

    I am awash in the wonderful news of the CBC.They hire an American company, not a Canadian, to revamp their set.They bleat on and on, about funding. They try and look like CNN lite, and end up with a grumpy smug Mansbridge, who always looks desperate for a seat. It doesn't work for me, but I am sure most liberals lap up the smugness of it all.

    How can we make Iggy work.This is national news.LOL

  • Derek

    I personally cant stand the CBC. It wants to cloak itself in the Red and White of the Canadian Flag, but it oozes Liberal Red. It longs for the warm fuzzy it gets from having the Liberal Party sitting to the right of the Speaker. If you dont think the CBC has gone from a News gathering/presenter to political agenda/policy pusher should watch Evan Solomon sometime. He hasnt had a guest or show segment in the past 3 weeks where the word prorogation hasnt surfaced a dozen times or more. There is nothing the current government can do to get a good word mentioned by the Mother Corps. But heh Im just an Alberta redneck. Heres a thought for the CBC ivory tower boys Fox is convinced its news service is even and unbiased but we all know different, right.

  • Ed A.

    Johnathon actually admits to watching CBC?

  • Tom

    Derek…..You have hit it on the head. Evan Solomon definitely appears as a "Liberal Hack". Don Newman in the past was like that for awhile and I complained to the CRTC. Not that it changed because of that complaint, but probably because of a number of complaints whereupon he became more fair in his commenting. As for the new format, I think re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, would not have stopped it from hitting the iceberg. CBC is CBC and always be "Liberal". They fear a Conservative majority as they will lose funding big time and actually have to have some decent programming.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

    The conservatives gave them more funding than the libs did

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/realitycheck/2…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/psiclone psiclone

    careful now – posts that support conservatives are frowned upon here and just might get you into trouble – double check you can still logon!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/frenchie101 frenchie101

    lol – isnt it fun though.

From Macleans