Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

The Commons: ‘I shouldn’t have to be here’

by Aaron Wherry on Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:58pm - 179 Comments

“If there’s a silver lining to the dark cloud of this political crisis in Ottawa, it’s an amazing, spontaneous degree of citizen engagement,” he said. “In a way, this manufactured crisis has woken Canadians up out of their so-called apathy.”

That was, to be fair, some 13 months ago and Jason Kenney, the immigration minister, had just witnessed 3,000 people gather in downtown Calgary to protest the possibility of a coalition government. “I don’t recall anything on such short notice with such a large crowd in this city,” Mr. Kenney gushed. One assumes the sentiment roughly holds for today’s events too.

Then John Baird was proudly declaring the government’s intent to “go over the heads” of the Members of Parliament and the Governor General, and go “right to the Canadian people.” Then it was Steven Fletcher, minister of state for democratic reform, encouraging all his fellow Manitobans to rally for no less than the nation we all hold dear.

Thirteen months later, a new political crisis. Then, the government side yelled “traitor!” Now, the other side yells “dictator!” Once more, our civic engagement runneth over.

Perhaps we should make political crisis an annual event.

Whatever the wisdom of crowds, and however exploited by partisan interest, it is difficult to judge the relevance of the public protest. Two years ago, 5,000 gathered on the front lawn of Parliament for a pro-China rally. There were no immediate calls for the country to consider communism. A year later, some 30,000 Tamils turned out to protest the conflict in Sri Lanka. Owing to some concerns about symbolism, only Jack Layton walked outside to address them.

Make what you will then of 3,500—a number equal to the crowd that rallied for Canada thirteen months ago—who gathered before Centre Block’s front steps this afternoon to denounce the prorogation of Parliament.

At its essence, the public protest is both charming and antiquated. A crowd gathers and chants and cheers and, when prompted, cries “shame” upon whatever shameful act has brought them there. Various individuals take the microphone to awkwardly and loudly air their grievances, almost all speaking roughly three times as long as they should. Periodically someone breaks into song.

This afternoon brought out the young and old, the peaceniks and socialists, the Nortel pensioners and autoworkers, the environmentalists and the electoral reformists. This being Ottawa, a place almost entirely unihabitable save for a two-week period each July, it was rather cold.

Chants involved various meditations on the theme of resuming one’s work and various rhymes for the word prorogation (nation, generation, investigation, television station, etc.). Jack Layton, beneath a wide-brimmed hat and dark sunglasses, wandered amongst the common men and women. A young lady read aloud from the list of legislation that perished in the great prorogation of New Year’s Eve 2009. The Raging Grannies, a group of elderly women who are somehow required at these sorts of events, performed a few of their self-penned tunes, somewhat dampening the fervour. A young man with a guitar singing a folk song entitled We Are The Beaver sufficiently revived the masses.

If there is some unimpeachably redeeming value in such demonstrations, beyond the physical and photographable display of public sentiment, it is the waved placard, one of the enduring mediums for political wit. Today’s signs included “I Prorogued The Dishes To Be Here,” “Your Sweater Vest Can’t Fool Us” and, perhaps most Canadian of all, “I Shouldn’t Have To Be Here.” Showing fine artistic skill for his age, a young boy traipsed around with a sign that read “I have to go to school, so why don’t you have to go to work?”

After a girl with a blue guitar sang a plaintive song, Mr. Layton was called on to speak. He reached immediately for his Reagan moment. “Mr. Harper,” he implored. “Un. Lock. These. Doors.”

The NDP leader was no doubt in his element, jabbing the air with his index finger and bellowing his syllables. He invoked King Charles I, the ultimately beheaded monarch who famously and fatefully clashed with the English Parliament. “I cannot advocate, nor will I advocate the decapitating of anyone,” Mr. Layton clarified. “We have elections to prosecute these things.”

Michael Ignatieff soon followed in his own meditative way. “You are a beautiful sight,” he said. “When the Prime Minister phoned the Governor General on New Year’s Eve, he had no idea you’d be here today.”

Mr. Ignatieff stepped away from the podium shortly thereafter and explained to reporters that, quite unlike last week, his side was interested in legislating limits upon a Prime Minister’s ability to request the House of Commons be prorogued.

While he did so, a band entertained the crowd with a song called Prorogation, sung to the tune of Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah.

Bookmark and Share
  • Fred – Brandon MB

    Protesting the prorogation of Parliament is one of the dumbest things I've seen in a long time. It's just a Parliamentary procedure. Do these people seriously think that the Liberals will vote to abolish the procedure? Do they think that Liberals will never prorogue Parliament in the future? The NDP will never form government, so they can say what they want, they'll never have to put their words into practice.

    • Joseph

      I don't think people are protesting the prorogation procedure itself, but rather what they see as Mr. Harper's abuse of a parliamentary procedure by using it for political purposes. Normally prorogation is done after a government has completed its agenda as set out by their last Throne Speech. Thus, having accomplished their official agenda, parliament is reasonably prorogued. In this way, a session of parliament operates by being opened with a Throne Speech, and closed by Prorogation (or occasionally by calling an election, in which case parliament is instead dissolved).

      This is not a written requirement however. Like many elements of law that are derived from the British system, the manner in which prorogation is used has always been according to precedent.

      Mr. Harper however has twice broken with, and set a new precedent by proroguing parliament while there were still matters of the agenda of the Throne Speech to be debated and passed.

      Thus, these people are protesting his reasons for proroguing parliament, rather than prorogation itself. It's an important distinction.

      • Fred – Brandon MB

        Unfortunately you're wrong. I think that most of the protesters have no idea what they are protesting. Chretien used prorogation in an identical manner when he was being battered over Somalia, so your insinuation is incorrect. even if it were true, what does it matter?

        To use an established procedure in a new manner is progressive, inventive, imaginative, innovative. I see nothing wrong with that.

        Government's end a session before their agenda is completed all the time. I am so disgusted at how Liberal & NDP supporters are palying fast and loose with history and facts.

        • Joseph

          The Chretien example isn't an identical one. For one thing, the Somalia inquiry was looking into alledged abuses by the Canadian Airborne Regiment, abuses that occurred during the Mulroney PC administration and ended well before the Chretien Liberals came to power. In fact, it was called by the Chretien Liberals. It was temporarily stopped when the first session of parliament, lasting from 1994 to 1996 came to an end by prorogation. It started up again in the second session of parliament, when it was finally killed by the 1997 general election call. Thus, the inquiry had been running for two years before it was stopped by prorogation.

          That particular prorogation was of a session of the 35th parliament that had been sitting for two years. In comparison, the 40th (current) parliament has been prorogued twice in a little over a year and a month.

          And besides, just because Chretien sort of did something similar, how does that make it alright for the current Harper government, which ran on being more accountable and less corrupt than the Chretien and Martinite Liberals, is repeating the same old tactics but with even less lip service to our democratic institutions? At least Chretien gave the inquiry two years (and according to some, the inquiry by then had already well exceeded its mandate and budget).

          In comparison, Harper has dismissed calls for an official inquiry and has so far refused to even call one. Rather, what was put on hold was the House of Commons Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan, which heard Colvin's testimony and was in the process of scrutinizing the government's handling of the Detainee issue.

          • Joseph

            I made a few grammatically errors in that last post. I apologize, it's kinda late in the day, and I can't edit the post.

        • kathryn c

          "To use an established procedure in a new manner is progressive, inventive, imaginative, innovative. I see nothing wrong with that."
          ===============

          How about when all that invention, imagination and innovation are employed strictly in the interest of avoiding debate and stifling dissent and avoiding consequences? This is the nub of the whole issue and was widely discussed on the Facebook board and at the rally that I attended.

          FYI Chretien was also wrong to try to prorogue in the same way but his career as PM was over then. Anyway, who cares what Chretien did except the CPC who are now sweating over the chess-master's latest blunder? It's not the opposition parties at these rallies – it's the people of Canada, really pissed off.

          Presumably you see nothing wrong with the people being progressive, inventive, imaginative and innovative in joining a protest group and then actually going out and protesting.

  • Tripper523

    True enough… NOBODY should have to attend these unnecessary proroguee parties… How can veteran reporters and even gallery member types like Craig Oliver state that Stephen Harper has “shut down Parliament for the ENTIRE WINTER”??? Is this not dishonest and irresponsible channeling to the Canadian voting public?? The TRUTH is, ALL PARTIES agreed for the HOC not to sit for the Olympics from Feb. 12 – 28. This means that Mr. Harper prorogued for Jan. 25 – 29, Feb. 1 – 5, 8 – 12, and March 1 – 2. That is a total of SEVENTEEN WORKING DAYS ONLY. So, all the hoopla and ensuing “mass protests” is just a big collaboration with the Coalition of Stooges in yet another wayward attempt at a “power grab”, because they’ve got ZERO else to work on. They forfeit an assemblance of anything constructive that might benefit their constituents, all in favour of this new scandal they’re trumping up on their own, this PROROGATE. LS/MS Media and their Lefty darlings have quite an arrangement going on…

    • excanuck

      Craig Oliver, whose age alone suggests he might have something to say worth the listen, should be ashamed of himself.

    • http://laurelrusswurm.wordpress.com/ Laurel L. Russwurm

      Actually with global warming, looking at the rain we're getting in the "snow belt", it may well be the whole winter.

  • Wallace Cleaver

    Not yet, the bill to scrap it was still in process when the session ended.
    As a PMB, it will restart at the same stage it was at before prorogation, though.

  • ChristopherW

    A public protest on its own isn't enough to effect real change. You can go back and forth with numbers and turnout, factoring in preparation time, amount of money and media coverage…

    I don't want to get bogged down in that. What is clear from Saturday and this past month is that prorogation is an issue that many Canadians care enough about to write, talk and march about. If we are serious about this, we need to keep working at the local level. Sure, another protest on March 3rd (when parliament resumes) might be good, but even just writing regularly to your MP, or sending letters to the editor will help keep the issue alive.

  • Peterb

    Oh Yeah there were 'protests also slated for London, England, and several U.S. cities." and how did that turn out after the lefty organizers told us this prorogation protest was sweeping internationally ( don't wait for the partisan political pundits to tell you after they have hyped this fiasco for weeks) – results are below and now can we hear the lefties spin this as a huge success – actually it is a farce when analyzed – is this the best the combined efforts of the opposition parties can come up with.

    "About 20 protesters, most expatriate Canadians now living in Britain, gathered across the street from Canada House – home of the Canadian High Commission in London – holding makeshift placards"

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/bureau-blog/…

  • Rob H

    The support against a Coaliton was huge compared with this pathetic prorogation "rally". What a joke!

    • kathryn c

      No, it just really wasn't – this was already discussed (see previous page).
      And certainly, the rallies in favour of prorogation were pretty much nonexistant.

      But you do have a Facebook page with some people signed up – why not have some rallies now and see how they go?

From Macleans