Will the prorogation of Parliament set off a populist revolt?

The people speak

by John Geddes on Monday, January 25, 2010 9:58am - 96 Comments

Stephen Harper If that’s true, what’s to be done about it? Some reformers call for updating how Canadians elect their representatives. But various electoral-reform ideas were rejected by voters in referendums held in British Columbia, Ontario and Prince Edward Island in recent years. Those bitter setbacks have left some advocates of change favouring more modest steps. White says he hopes his Facebook group doesn’t shift attention from prorogation to bigger ideas, such as proportional representation, that failed to pass in those provincial votes. Manning, who now heads his own Manning Centre for Building Democracy, sees little chance of progress toward what he regards as the most fundamental reform—MPs freed to vote as they choose. “There’s nobody,” he said, “who’s going to champion that.”

After seeming slow off the mark on the prorogation debate, Michael Ignatieff’s Liberals are trying to come to grips with the issue. Veteran MP Ralph Goodale, Ignatieff’s House leader, told Maclean’s that Liberals will spend the next three weeks discussing what to do with experts. “We don’t think prorogation should be used in the deceitful way that it has been,” Goodale said. He said the party is looking at three possible new rules: require that a session of Parliament run at least, say, a year before it can be prorogued; limit how long prorogations could last, perhaps to as little as two or three weeks; or require that a prime minister give notice to the House and Senate, with reasons, before going to the governor general to ask for prorogation.

Put like that, the solutions all seem a bit dry. They aren’t the stuff of big headlines, let alone populist revolts. Maybe that’s fine. “We don’t rely on being on the front page,” White says of his anti-prorogation group. They’d better not: some Conservative strategists are hinting that Harper’s fast, fulsome response to the Haitian earthquake is already burying the prorogation fuss. Experienced advocates of democratic reform, who’ve seen momentum fizzle out before, know it might be so again.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/PolJunkie PolJunkie

    I wasn't suggesting that you'd sit on your hands. I just think that this citizens engagement you are referring to isn't worth a damn if it spreads its vote on three parties against Harper.

    He will win again. Again, simple math.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/prescott prescott

    Note to John Geddes: Kindly omit picture of harper for your next article. I was unable to finish your most excellent piece as the picture on the second page made me lose my most excellent dinner.

  • Stan

    Enough already! The government IS working and the opposition parties (particularly Iffy et al) are trying to make hay out of smoke and mirrors. Would we want them in power? Heaven help us all!

  • Fred – Brandon MB

    Prorogation protests just reveal how many stupid and gullible people are out there. They may as well protest the law of gravity for how nonsensical it is.

    These nincompoops are being manipulated by the opposition parties, especially the Liberals. This whole "grassroots" protest smells distinctly like the work of Donolo & Kinsella. It's about as grassroots as astroturf!

    Every government in this country has taken extended breaks at one time or another. This is such a non-issue that I shake my head thinking about it. A lot of people in this country need to gain some common sense.

  • Chance

    The constant and continued attacks on Government watchdog groups by the Harper Government is a challenge to the very roots of democracy. They cannot be dismissed as irrelevant. The media in particular are guilty of this, however, the movement won't die. We have the internet!
    Consider. At least half the members are 45 years of age and older. Those most likely to vote.

  • fucklibrals

    fuck the libral bitches

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/sea_n_mountains sea_n_mountains

    Jack I concur with points.

    MHF is one of a small number of those I hold out hope for at this point. As you say it would be great to have a young, smart, female leader of the official opposition. Gerard Kennedy may be another.

    I think your CAPP point is really important, albeit a longer-term (just my opinion) influence. It really seems to have a great deal of momentum, and the opposition parties will be foolish to not try to harness this. Any attempt to do so without a serious effort at renewal will fail, and so will those parties. There is something afoot here and it is about time. This democracy needs better citizens and they appear to be getting the point!

From Macleans