Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

Please remain seated

by Aaron Wherry on Friday, January 29, 2010 3:47pm - 58 Comments

Stephen Harper, Nov. 21, 2009. We believe strongly that Canadians’ freedom is enhanced when journalists are free to pursue the truth, to shine light into dark corners and assist the process of holding government’s accountable.

CBC, today. Harper flew back from Switzerland today.  While in the air his office announced the appointment of five new Senators and the Supreme Court ruled he has the power to decide to ask if Omar Khadr could be repatriated. What does Harper have to say about these developments? Nothing. Journalists travelling with Harper are being kept on the plane to ensure the Prime Minister doesn’t face any questions in his short jaunt from the bottom of the staircase to his waiting limousine.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/tedbetts tedbetts

    Right up there with:

    Kory Teneycke, 2008: "Ministers are available in Question Period to answer questions of the elected opposition, that is the system that we have…If media have additional questions from time to time the primary way by which ministers are held to account is via an elected opposition through the House of Commons.”

    These guys will say anything, do anything, drop any principle, break any promise if there is the slimest partisan advantage to it.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Scott_Tribe Scott_Tribe

      Kory is out of control. He just went on CTV Power Play and called Omar Khadr "a little terrorist".

      Slightly actionable, isn't it, when Omar hasn't even had a trial yet? Khadr's Canadian lawyers should be issuing him some documents.

      • Dave

        Why, who did Omar Khadr pie now?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/sea_n_mountains sea_n_mountains

        the best part is he did it appearing opposite of Khadr's Canadian lawyers.

        they went on to so say that Khadr and his team never refute the charge, they just hedge.

        hopefully the paper work is being completed tonight.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/ChrisInKW ChrisInKW

      Slimmest or slimiest.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/tedbetts tedbetts

        Slimmest.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

        He's just pre-emptively shutting up Patels, don't worry about it. :)

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Geiseric Geiseric

    He doesn't look so clever once you figure out he's a woosie.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/LynnTO LynnTO

    I suppose the Prime Minister is just whisking off to find those journalists some CPC-branded flashlights.

    • Dave

      What, the water bottles weren't good enough for the ingrates?

  • common man

    If the reason the Ottawa press corp wanted to speak to Harper was in pursuit of the truth, then there would be a lot more communication between the two. But Harper is well aware that the Wherrys and the Solomons of the Ottawa press have their own motives.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/danby danby

      man, that is lame

    • Lord Kitchener's Own

      Ah, so in theory journalists should be free to pursue the truth unencumbered, but since the government has already unilaterally determined that that's not what their interested in, it's no big deal to encumber them a bit.

    • common man

      I`m sorry I don`t have more time to explain to you why Harper knows that the pursuit of truth and the motives of the Ottawa press are two vastly different things but I think you guys as well as most Canadians know that . Suffice to say Harper will continue to get the message out and you guys will continue to complain that the message should be filtered through your people.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Scott_Tribe Scott_Tribe

        And I'm sure you'd have said the same thing if Chretien had decided to prorogue during the Sponsorship scandal, right?

        • common man

          I must have missed something, Have you heard reports that our present gov`t are involved in siphoning public money back to themselves like the Chretien gov`t you mentioned ?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

            So.. reporting against liberals = true fact.

            reporting against conservatives = gotcha journalism.

            I think I understand. It's a convenient mindset.. means you don't ever have to think.
            Perhaps that's for the best, in your case.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/john_g2708 john g

          And I'm sure you'd have said the same thing if Chretien had decided to prorogue during the Sponsorship scandal, and prevented the media and Parliament from questioning him on that, right?

          He did prorogue during the sponsorship scandal. Twice. Bu I doubt he had to expend much effort to prevent the media from questioning him about it.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/OntarioTown OntarioTown

        You don't have time – how convenient.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/LynnTO LynnTO

    I hope the Wherrys and the Solomons of the world take this in the manner intended:

    If you give a dog a tasty bone to chew on, he'll choose that – and not your shoes.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Ricard_S_Argent Richard_S_Argent

    So on the day when his American counterpart wades into the lion's den and takes unscripted questions from his opponents, Stephen Harper decides to hide from the barest levels of accountability. Mr Harper, you're making it increasingly difficult for us Canadians to look down our noses on the Yanks!

    Has any else noticed than when his back is to the wall Harper really starts resembling Mike Harris?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/tedbetts tedbetts

      I wish he would start resembling Mike Harris. Then at least we'd be getting somewhere: Harris always told you what he thought, meant what he said, tried to follow through on the things he said he would do.

    • Steve M

      So on the day when his American counterpart does something Harper has regularly done hundreds of times in the past, Stephen Harper decides to postpone doing it again for a few weeks.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

    No, no, no.. you misunderstood. He wasn't talking about holding this government accountable. He means all the other governments.

    You see, as long as Canadians are looking at places like China, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, etc, then they'll see how enhanced their freedoms are under Harper in comparison.

  • Dee

    When you look up the word "hypocrite" in the dictionary, there is now a picture of Stephen Harper.

  • ChristopherW

    Journalists should take a vow not to give any politician press UNLESS they can ask questions. These recent "Photo-Op only" farces from the PMO are an affront to our free press, which has a duty to inform the citizens, not serve as the PR machine for politicians.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Ricard_S_Argent Richard_S_Argent

    Maybe I should've been clearer – When Harper's back is to the wall he seems to take on Harris' *worst* traits – he becomes combative and dismissive of competing viewpoints.

    cheers

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

    Unfortunately, the Press has realized it has no duty except to the shareholders, which it serves by gaining advertising and subscription dollars; not by holding government accountable.

  • Amateur Hour

    Okay, Harper's officially a creep.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

    Wherry please stop your whining. Harper already had to give up a big chuck of his prorogation vacation to the Davos thing and saving the woman and children of the world. Like all Canadians, he now needs some alone time to prepare to watch the Olympics.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    I believe he's actually participating in the "poll as luge" event.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

      I haven't heard of that one.. but then again, I tend not to follow the special olympics.

      • burlivespipe

        He could use all the 10percenters he's sent out over the past year to paper Whistler and the rest of the mountains. Don't dare challenge him on having to find five conservative-oids who could mime thought, read talking points convincingly, and sit on their asses with effort.
        Guess he thought no one was going to ask him where he stayed last night…

        • Greg

          Funny, I heard he was heading to Quebec City for a shift as Bonhomme de neige.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Where is it written that journalists must cover the PM's foreign trips, or indeed anything he says and does? If he's not interested in the media, cover something else. If it's a journalist's public duty to cover the PM instead of, say, Jay Leno, it's also a journalist's duty to refrain from covering him when he treats the media with contempt.

    • common man

      Change your last word to invisibility and you are brilliant.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/sea_n_mountains sea_n_mountains

      concur. the latest Akin bit is worth a read for how far the contempt goes including "veiled threats" for 'disobedience'.

      http://davidakin.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2010…

      I can;t say I agree with his take, though I consider him one of our best beat journalists.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

        Interesting post of Akin's, and I concur with your high opinion of him. But I still don't get why members of the media feel they're beholden to "access." Just stop covering him. Nobody really cares about this stuff except us political junkies. Politicians crave publicity, they can't live without it. If the media just decided they were through with Harper, or with any politician who bullied them like this, they could shuck off their shackles. We must have the most docile media of any free society, apart from the Americans of course.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

          Well said. Our docile media prefers irony to substance. Compared to other countries, our media is really quite lazy.

        • Sigh

          Good point. Perhaps members of the media who would be denied acces to the PM's photo ops for trying to ask questions could spend their new free time writing more articles about our elected government's refusal to answer questions. That information would be of far more use to the Canadian public than a photo of Harper and Clinton shaking hands.

    • Out There

      I fear that (some) journalists have no choice but to follow the PM around – for better or worse, what he says and does is news. And, if one news organization doesn't report on Harper's doings, it risks losing readers and/or viewers to one that does. Governments know this, and use the threat of denial of access as a weapon to keep journalists compliant.

      Worse than that: because many organizations have been forced to cut back on staff, there often aren't enough people around to do in-depth coverage of events. So we're left with nothing but photo-ops and sound bites for news.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

        I see you point, but is the news value of anything short of a hurricane or terrorist attack independent of the media's coverage of it? I wonder if viewers would really change channels in their thirst for coverage of, say, the PM's Davos speech. Maybe I'm underestimating the nation's TV viewers, and I know people like Paul Wells get annoyed when lost kittens lead the nightly news, but I don't think I'm too cynical when I say that American Idol is more important to most Canadians than Bob Runciman or the OLO's proposed tax incentives: doesn't the media cover those out of a sense of duty?

  • wilson

    Something else happened as Harper flew out of Switzerland,
    big surprise it is not being well reported:

    Swiss jets form wingtip 'honour guard' to escort Harper plane out of airspace

    '…The honour guard escort is rarely deployed, and is considered a heartfelt sign of close ties between Switzerland and Canada, the spokesman said.
    ..
    The jets were fully armed, carrying large air-to-air missiles on their wings….''

    http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100129/nationa…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/craigola craigola

      Just out of curiosity, did they accompany his plane all the way back to just off the east coast, and then fire the missiles?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

      You are right, the Canadian press should have asked about the fighter planes in the scrum getting off the plane, or the informal chit chat with the Prime Minister during the long flight home. What were they thinkin?

    • burlivespipe

      I bet if they were armed with tofu pie-filling, there'd have been a great photo op over Davos last night…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

      Were they really there as an honour guard, or were they just making sure he actually left?

      • Lord Kitchener's Own

        LOL

        That's exactly what I was thinking. "Escort out of our country" sounds a lot more diplomatic when you call it an "honour guard".

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

    Seems to me the bottom of a plane's stairway is not a "dark corner".

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Scott_Tribe Scott_Tribe

    Yea.. whats the point of having a Parliament and a free press, eh common man? Why dont we just cancel the whole concept of democracy and let Harper run the country unopposed eh?

    • Dave

      Cancel, no. Suspend, maybe?

  • biff

    Wilson,

    don't be silly. You expect "balance" from an increasingly hyperventilating leftist media.

    In other unimportant news Canada's economy continued its growth for the forth straight period.

    Don't expect more food on Canadians's tables coming off our worst recession in a generation to be anything close to important as Canada's 105th prorogation.

    • kcm

      I know, it's awful is'nt it? He's doing so well, and yet they keep on expecting him to follow all these silly little rules.

  • DianeG

    Thou shalt not question me, lest I smite thee

    Thou shalt read the press releases given unto thee

    and show they reverence before me

    so it is writteen and so so it shall be.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

      Reminds me of how Domitian, the 10th Roman emperor (or 9th, or 8th, depending on how you count it) took to signing all his correspondence "Your Lord and God" towards the end.

      • Sigh

        But given that most Roman emperors expected to be apotheosized after death, at least his choice of signature had some logic behind it.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/OntarioTown OntarioTown

    Harper doesn't mean what he says and doesn't say what he means.

    This could get very confusing for him down the road.

  • Cinderella

    People are saying, the NAU, is taking place in 2010. The press is, now controlled. The internet, is becoming controlled, web sites vanish, pages won't turn. Sites, are not open for comments, or, there was an error, on and on, the rebukes grow. Canadian and American citizens voices are, unheard, in both countries. Mexico is arming herself, buying tanks from Russia. There will be no borders between, Canada, the USA and Mexico. However, Mexico, will have to protect their border from, South America. Russia, would like to have, Canada, because, there are vast resources in the Arctic, and our country, owns a lot of the Arctic. With the Arctic, melting away, it would only be a stones throw away from Russia, to the, Canadian Arctic. Russia, has huge ice breaking ships, Canada does not. There will be, wars and rumors of wars, to come. Citizens of Canada, are wondering if, this was the reason, Harper shut parliament down, to make Canada ready for the NAU. I, guess, time will tell.

From Macleans