<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A week and a half in the public life of Michael Ignatieff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crit_Reasoning</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252923</link>
		<dc:creator>Crit_Reasoning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252923</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So this is most apros pos.&lt;/i&gt;

Apropos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So this is most apros pos.</i></p>
<p>Apropos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sea_n_mountains</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-2/#comment-252922</link>
		<dc:creator>sea_n_mountains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252922</guid>
		<description>Donolo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donolo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-2/#comment-252921</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252921</guid>
		<description>(If I may rip off Neil Diamond)

Joe was mine, til the time that I found him
Raising tax, getting attacked
Then Bri came along, led us strong for a while
The land he screwed, and that died too

Don&#039;t know if I will, but until I can find me
A tory man who can lead less insanely
I&#039;ll stay what I am
Conservative Man

Had to here, sticking up for the crazies
Bulding jails, Senate fails
Stockwell free, I could post with my real name
A winning plan, hot as Rand

Don&#039;t know if I will, but until I can find me
A big blue tent, with agendas aired plainly
I&#039;ll stay what I am
Conservative Man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(If I may rip off Neil Diamond)</p>
<p>Joe was mine, til the time that I found him<br />
Raising tax, getting attacked<br />
Then Bri came along, led us strong for a while<br />
The land he screwed, and that died too</p>
<p>Don&#039;t know if I will, but until I can find me<br />
A tory man who can lead less insanely<br />
I&#039;ll stay what I am<br />
Conservative Man</p>
<p>Had to here, sticking up for the crazies<br />
Bulding jails, Senate fails<br />
Stockwell free, I could post with my real name<br />
A winning plan, hot as Rand</p>
<p>Don&#039;t know if I will, but until I can find me<br />
A big blue tent, with agendas aired plainly<br />
I&#039;ll stay what I am<br />
Conservative Man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard_S_Argent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252920</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard_S_Argent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252920</guid>
		<description>Oh for the love of pete just change your name to &quot;conservative man&quot; already. Your posts indicate that you are anything but what you pretend to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh for the love of pete just change your name to &quot;conservative man&quot; already. Your posts indicate that you are anything but what you pretend to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedbetts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252892</link>
		<dc:creator>tedbetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252892</guid>
		<description>Like no taxing of income trusts, a &quot;made-in-Canada&quot; environmental policy, no tax increases, no deficit, no spending increases, an independent public appointments commission, 3000 day care spaces.... the problem for Conservatives criticizing Liberals about broken promises is that Harper has broken more promises in 4 years than the last 5 Prime Ministers put together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like no taxing of income trusts, a &quot;made-in-Canada&quot; environmental policy, no tax increases, no deficit, no spending increases, an independent public appointments commission, 3000 day care spaces&#8230;. the problem for Conservatives criticizing Liberals about broken promises is that Harper has broken more promises in 4 years than the last 5 Prime Ministers put together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteTong</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252919</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteTong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252919</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t why you assume that by criticizing Ignatieff that I&#039;m pro Harper and pro the conservatives.  My point is that I perceive these policy ideas as pie in the sky plans and that won&#039;t change unless there is a clear fiscal plan laid out that would support big spending initiatives.

I&#039;m not a member of either party and I won&#039;t be voting for either party so please don&#039;t get all &quot;you forgot to mention what the conservatives&quot;.

Your name is rude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t why you assume that by criticizing Ignatieff that I&#039;m pro Harper and pro the conservatives.  My point is that I perceive these policy ideas as pie in the sky plans and that won&#039;t change unless there is a clear fiscal plan laid out that would support big spending initiatives.</p>
<p>I&#039;m not a member of either party and I won&#039;t be voting for either party so please don&#039;t get all &quot;you forgot to mention what the conservatives&quot;.</p>
<p>Your name is rude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-2/#comment-252872</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252872</guid>
		<description>When Harper said he wanted to focus on women&#039;s health, I immediately wondered if Harper would adopt the same agenda regarding birth control and foreign aid as George W Bush did.  Will agencies be required to be against contraception and/or abortion to receive funding?  Who knows?  Perhaps Ignatieff&#039;s stand will get Harper to clarify his own position on this.

Too often, Canadians just don&#039;t know what our current government&#039;s agenda is.  Harper seems to operate under the assumption the less we know the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Harper said he wanted to focus on women&#39;s health, I immediately wondered if Harper would adopt the same agenda regarding birth control and foreign aid as George W Bush did.  Will agencies be required to be against contraception and/or abortion to receive funding?  Who knows?  Perhaps Ignatieff&#39;s stand will get Harper to clarify his own position on this.</p>
<p>Too often, Canadians just don&#39;t know what our current government&#39;s agenda is.  Harper seems to operate under the assumption the less we know the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252870</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252870</guid>
		<description>Now that you mention it, I would be perfectly happy with our abortion policies being set by women of childbearing years only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that you mention it, I would be perfectly happy with our abortion policies being set by women of childbearing years only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynnTO</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-2/#comment-252918</link>
		<dc:creator>LynnTO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252918</guid>
		<description>I think you may be on to something there, catherine.  Now that Iggy&#039;s articulated his position - albeit in that slightly restricted regard to foreign aid - on abortion, Harper may be asked to do the same.  In which case, his choice is to alienate a social conservative base...or garner stink-eye from a whole bunch of social moderates whose votes are up for grabs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may be on to something there, catherine.  Now that Iggy&#039;s articulated his position &#8211; albeit in that slightly restricted regard to foreign aid &#8211; on abortion, Harper may be asked to do the same.  In which case, his choice is to alienate a social conservative base&#8230;or garner stink-eye from a whole bunch of social moderates whose votes are up for grabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynnTO</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252917</link>
		<dc:creator>LynnTO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252917</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ve just spotted the Waldo of brokerage politics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#039;ve just spotted the Waldo of brokerage politics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisInKW</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252865</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisInKW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252865</guid>
		<description>Did Iggy become leader in May 2009?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Iggy become leader in May 2009?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigh</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252916</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252916</guid>
		<description>It would be difficult to place the blame largely on the acclaimation decision, since the previous election had been lost, badly, with a leader chosen by  conventional (in both senses of the word) means.

That&#039;s not to say it won&#039;t be tried, but there is an obvious comeback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be difficult to place the blame largely on the acclaimation decision, since the previous election had been lost, badly, with a leader chosen by  conventional (in both senses of the word) means.</p>
<p>That&#039;s not to say it won&#039;t be tried, but there is an obvious comeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sourstud</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252915</link>
		<dc:creator>sourstud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252915</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re probably up to the exact same thing right now.  Notice how Jack and Iggy are playing nice now?  Does anybody think that this is a coincidence?  Harper will be campaigning against a coalition during the next election, even though the Libs/Dips will deny it to high heaven.  The moment Harper wins another minority though, they&#039;ll be teaming up again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#039;re probably up to the exact same thing right now.  Notice how Jack and Iggy are playing nice now?  Does anybody think that this is a coincidence?  Harper will be campaigning against a coalition during the next election, even though the Libs/Dips will deny it to high heaven.  The moment Harper wins another minority though, they&#039;ll be teaming up again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedbetts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252914</link>
		<dc:creator>tedbetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252914</guid>
		<description>Surely it hasn&#039;t been more than 9 times so far. That and &quot;Harper Holiday&quot;.

If it takes, it takes. If it doesn&#039;t, well I&#039;m on to try to manufacture some other new phrase for posterity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely it hasn&#039;t been more than 9 times so far. That and &quot;Harper Holiday&quot;.</p>
<p>If it takes, it takes. If it doesn&#039;t, well I&#039;m on to try to manufacture some other new phrase for posterity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common man</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252913</link>
		<dc:creator>common man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252913</guid>
		<description>Actually I was referring to the secret negotiations that Iggy`s future coalition partners ( Jack and Gilles ) were having weeks before the vote-funding crisis that caused the formation of the coalition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I was referring to the secret negotiations that Iggy`s future coalition partners ( Jack and Gilles ) were having weeks before the vote-funding crisis that caused the formation of the coalition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crit_Reasoning</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252912</link>
		<dc:creator>Crit_Reasoning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252912</guid>
		<description>That &quot;can&#039;t walk down the hall&quot; line has become a favourite of yours, hasn&#039;t it?  I think I&#039;ve seen it ten times so far. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &quot;can&#039;t walk down the hall&quot; line has become a favourite of yours, hasn&#039;t it?  I think I&#039;ve seen it ten times so far. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252911</guid>
		<description>Oh, do you mean during the time Harper prorogued the first time?  So, that&#039;s when you guys noticed the economy was collapsing, was it?  Evidence that Conservatives really can&#039;t walk and chew gum at the same time.  Thanks, I hadn&#039;t known that before.

Also thanks for explaining how it is that Harper thought there were no Canadian flags at the press release announcing the coalition, since it was so secret.  I know you guys don&#039;t like the media, but sometimes it can turn secret things into wide-open public things, just by turning on a TV or picking up a newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, do you mean during the time Harper prorogued the first time?  So, that&#039;s when you guys noticed the economy was collapsing, was it?  Evidence that Conservatives really can&#039;t walk and chew gum at the same time.  Thanks, I hadn&#039;t known that before.</p>
<p>Also thanks for explaining how it is that Harper thought there were no Canadian flags at the press release announcing the coalition, since it was so secret.  I know you guys don&#039;t like the media, but sometimes it can turn secret things into wide-open public things, just by turning on a TV or picking up a newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common man</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252910</link>
		<dc:creator>common man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252910</guid>
		<description>You`re right, the coalition was in the works secretlly for some time prior to the Iggy`s first Policy Announcement. But by the time he made that proclamation of his willingness to be leader, the Global economy was collapsing and he was willing to toss us into constitutional turmoil just so he could be Jack and Gilles puppet. We shouldn`t forget that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You`re right, the coalition was in the works secretlly for some time prior to the Iggy`s first Policy Announcement. But by the time he made that proclamation of his willingness to be leader, the Global economy was collapsing and he was willing to toss us into constitutional turmoil just so he could be Jack and Gilles puppet. We shouldn`t forget that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thwim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-2/#comment-252909</link>
		<dc:creator>Thwim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252909</guid>
		<description>In that assumption, he&#039;s correct.. at least to his own personal situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that assumption, he&#039;s correct.. at least to his own personal situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common man</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252908</link>
		<dc:creator>common man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252908</guid>
		<description>That`s the last time I ever click on a link of yours ted.  All I read there was a profanity-laced rant from some ti-guy about stuff I don`t want to know or care about.
If there are cutbacks to Planned parenthood groups, the only people that will notice are those employed there. Sexual Health info is available at every local Health Unit, Libraries,  Doctor`s offices, Internet, Television,  and here`s a novel info source--Parents.

I know you`re trying to link present gov`t policies to Bush or Genghis Khan or whoever but the public won`t buy it.  And why is Iggy trying to score points by promoting abortion availibility in poor countries ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That`s the last time I ever click on a link of yours ted.  All I read there was a profanity-laced rant from some ti-guy about stuff I don`t want to know or care about.<br />
If there are cutbacks to Planned parenthood groups, the only people that will notice are those employed there. Sexual Health info is available at every local Health Unit, Libraries,  Doctor`s offices, Internet, Television,  and here`s a novel info source&#8211;Parents.</p>
<p>I know you`re trying to link present gov`t policies to Bush or Genghis Khan or whoever but the public won`t buy it.  And why is Iggy trying to score points by promoting abortion availibility in poor countries ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252907</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252907</guid>
		<description>&quot;he would lead a group of reckless opportunists to take over the gov`t when we were in the midst of the worst economic downturn in generations. &quot;

Actually, those reckless opportunists got together in the first place because our economy was fine, if we were going to have a recession we&#039;d have had it by now, and all that we needed was to remove the right of women to take legal action when being discriminated against, and political parties to lose their per vote funding.

But you know, rewrite history in order to get in some really juicy insults..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;he would lead a group of reckless opportunists to take over the gov`t when we were in the midst of the worst economic downturn in generations. &quot;</p>
<p>Actually, those reckless opportunists got together in the first place because our economy was fine, if we were going to have a recession we&#039;d have had it by now, and all that we needed was to remove the right of women to take legal action when being discriminated against, and political parties to lose their per vote funding.</p>
<p>But you know, rewrite history in order to get in some really juicy insults..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BCer in Mtl</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252904</link>
		<dc:creator>BCer in Mtl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252904</guid>
		<description>Ten percenters.    same old same old.

Harper is starting to remind me of when Ceaucescu, during the 1989 uprising, went out onto a balcony and waved his hands for the crowd to be quiet, which worked every time until then.  When  it didn&#039;t work that time the look of total befuddlement on his face was priceless.  Maybe its possible that Harper is undergoing a similar experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten percenters.    same old same old.</p>
<p>Harper is starting to remind me of when Ceaucescu, during the 1989 uprising, went out onto a balcony and waved his hands for the crowd to be quiet, which worked every time until then.  When  it didn&#8217;t work that time the look of total befuddlement on his face was priceless.  Maybe its possible that Harper is undergoing a similar experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252906</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252906</guid>
		<description>Attacking the Planned Parenthood cuts via Harper&#039;s recent foreign policy blathering is pretty frigging smart, I have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attacking the Planned Parenthood cuts via Harper&#039;s recent foreign policy blathering is pretty frigging smart, I have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252905</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252905</guid>
		<description>The election itself will be, to be sure.  I was (in far too obtuse a manner) suggesting that another lost election for the Libs would likely see the acclaimation decision judged as a bad move (hindsight being what it is).   If Iggy ends up being seen as &quot;the problem&quot;, then it&#039;s not a long walk to guess that making him leader without a contest will be judged as a bad idea.

I&#039;m probably making this even more convoluted by trying to explain, but I have no personal judgment on the matter, just to be clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The election itself will be, to be sure.  I was (in far too obtuse a manner) suggesting that another lost election for the Libs would likely see the acclaimation decision judged as a bad move (hindsight being what it is).   If Iggy ends up being seen as &quot;the problem&quot;, then it&#039;s not a long walk to guess that making him leader without a contest will be judged as a bad idea.</p>
<p>I&#039;m probably making this even more convoluted by trying to explain, but I have no personal judgment on the matter, just to be clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common man</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252903</link>
		<dc:creator>common man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252903</guid>
		<description>So you guys seem to excuse Iggy for not having any policies while he was interim leader but you are forgetting that he made a major policy announcement when he stepped up to a microphone and claimed he was ready to lead a 3 party group of misfits to replace a recently elected gov`t. That was his first Policy Announcement;  he would lead a group of reckless opportunists to take over the gov`t when we were in the midst of the worst economic downturn in generations.

I don`t think we should forget Iggy`s first experience in policy making. It will be helpful in judging his future efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you guys seem to excuse Iggy for not having any policies while he was interim leader but you are forgetting that he made a major policy announcement when he stepped up to a microphone and claimed he was ready to lead a 3 party group of misfits to replace a recently elected gov`t. That was his first Policy Announcement;  he would lead a group of reckless opportunists to take over the gov`t when we were in the midst of the worst economic downturn in generations.</p>
<p>I don`t think we should forget Iggy`s first experience in policy making. It will be helpful in judging his future efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott_Tribe</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252902</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott_Tribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252902</guid>
		<description>That 15 point drop in the polls in the past month is probably very disconcerting for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 15 point drop in the polls in the past month is probably very disconcerting for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252900</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252900</guid>
		<description>Ignatieff challenged Harper to include access to both contraception and safe abortion.  As to Harper not doing anything socially conservative, his cuts to the Status of Women and Planned Parenthood, are certainly lauded by social conservatives in Canada and might lead one to believe that his foreign aid could have a similar slant.

&lt;i&gt;And Michael Ignatieff&#039;s main interest in foreign aid is for it to increase the number of abortions.&lt;/i&gt;

What complete nonsense.  Read Ignatieff&#039;s statements.  Ignatieff clearly said that foreign aid meant to address women&#039;s health and childbirth in developing countries has to include the full spectrum of care, which includes access to contraception and safe abortions.

Now, tell me exactly what Harper&#039;s position is on money going to Planned Parenthood and similar organizations which promote contraception in developing countries?  Will his position be the same as he has employed in Canada or will it differ?  Ignatieff is trying to get answers to these questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignatieff challenged Harper to include access to both contraception and safe abortion.  As to Harper not doing anything socially conservative, his cuts to the Status of Women and Planned Parenthood, are certainly lauded by social conservatives in Canada and might lead one to believe that his foreign aid could have a similar slant.</p>
<p><i>And Michael Ignatieff&#039;s main interest in foreign aid is for it to increase the number of abortions.</i></p>
<p>What complete nonsense.  Read Ignatieff&#039;s statements.  Ignatieff clearly said that foreign aid meant to address women&#039;s health and childbirth in developing countries has to include the full spectrum of care, which includes access to contraception and safe abortions.</p>
<p>Now, tell me exactly what Harper&#039;s position is on money going to Planned Parenthood and similar organizations which promote contraception in developing countries?  Will his position be the same as he has employed in Canada or will it differ?  Ignatieff is trying to get answers to these questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott_Tribe</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252901</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott_Tribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252901</guid>
		<description>He didn&#039;t; that&#039;s another smear Conservatives like to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He didn&#039;t; that&#039;s another smear Conservatives like to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart_Smith</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252899</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart_Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252899</guid>
		<description>I am surprised by your last point.  I would more likely consider the next election to be more about Iggy, while the value of the cost-saving leadership selection process is evident in the financial state of the party.  Whether that value was worth &quot;most aggregious abscondment of democratic process in the entire history of our federation&quot; can of course be debated in perpetuity. (and purgatory after that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised by your last point.  I would more likely consider the next election to be more about Iggy, while the value of the cost-saving leadership selection process is evident in the financial state of the party.  Whether that value was worth &quot;most aggregious abscondment of democratic process in the entire history of our federation&quot; can of course be debated in perpetuity. (and purgatory after that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigcitylib</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252898</link>
		<dc:creator>bigcitylib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252898</guid>
		<description>As Ted points out, this announcement comes straight on the heels of news that the Tories have been defunding the Canadian Federation of Sexual Health (aka Planned Parenthood Canada) to the great joy of Canadian SoCons.  So this is most apros pos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Ted points out, this announcement comes straight on the heels of news that the Tories have been defunding the Canadian Federation of Sexual Health (aka Planned Parenthood Canada) to the great joy of Canadian SoCons.  So this is most apros pos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn_</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252897</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252897</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of that leaders debate in the last election when the media asked for an extra half hour to discuss the economy.  All the leaders agreed to it.  Dion showed up with an idea on the economy, and Harper&#039;s jaw literally dropped.  He spent the entire half hour saying how everything was fine.  But he agreed in advance to an extra half hour to discuss a subject in which everything was fine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of that leaders debate in the last election when the media asked for an extra half hour to discuss the economy.  All the leaders agreed to it.  Dion showed up with an idea on the economy, and Harper&#039;s jaw literally dropped.  He spent the entire half hour saying how everything was fine.  But he agreed in advance to an extra half hour to discuss a subject in which everything was fine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252896</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252896</guid>
		<description>He seems to have woken up and realized the only way he&#039;s going to get to be Prime Minister is if he acts like a Prime Minister, so that&#039;s what he&#039;s doing.  And his ideas are, more or less, good.

Except for the last issue.  He&#039;s very obviously playing politics with a very serious question there - the point of it is to make Harper look like a social conservative (despite the fact that he&#039;s done nothing socially conservative since he got into office).  I would think things like access to contraception, and safe and sanitary hospital facilities for delivery, would be far more important on the whole for third-world maternal health than funding abortion.  There&#039;s certainly absolutely no proof I&#039;ve seen that the Conservatives are at all opposed to contraception.

Over a third of the world doesn&#039;t have safe drinking water.  The greatest global causes of death are respiratory disease, AIDS, TB, and malaria.   Kids work on sugar plantations because their parents won&#039;t have enough money to survive if they send the kids to school instead.  And Michael Ignatieff&#039;s main interest in foreign aid is for it to increase the number of abortions.  This obsession, this refusal to recognize that abortion is a controversial issue that involves multiple living human beings and that people can, at minimum, honestly disagree on, is where I part ways with liberals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He seems to have woken up and realized the only way he&#039;s going to get to be Prime Minister is if he acts like a Prime Minister, so that&#039;s what he&#039;s doing.  And his ideas are, more or less, good.</p>
<p>Except for the last issue.  He&#039;s very obviously playing politics with a very serious question there &#8211; the point of it is to make Harper look like a social conservative (despite the fact that he&#039;s done nothing socially conservative since he got into office).  I would think things like access to contraception, and safe and sanitary hospital facilities for delivery, would be far more important on the whole for third-world maternal health than funding abortion.  There&#039;s certainly absolutely no proof I&#039;ve seen that the Conservatives are at all opposed to contraception.</p>
<p>Over a third of the world doesn&#039;t have safe drinking water.  The greatest global causes of death are respiratory disease, AIDS, TB, and malaria.   Kids work on sugar plantations because their parents won&#039;t have enough money to survive if they send the kids to school instead.  And Michael Ignatieff&#039;s main interest in foreign aid is for it to increase the number of abortions.  This obsession, this refusal to recognize that abortion is a controversial issue that involves multiple living human beings and that people can, at minimum, honestly disagree on, is where I part ways with liberals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Style</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252895</link>
		<dc:creator>Style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252895</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s changed is the poll numbers and Ignatieff no longer attempting to implement his policy ideas.  Last spring, Ignatieff announced three policy ideas for the Conservatives to implement to keep Liberal support (one of them was EI reform).  When the Liberals were down in the polls, the policy ideas looked desperate and partisan.  Now they&#039;re up in the polls, the ideas look substantive.  Even the idiotic pretense that the Liberals are valiant defenders of access to abortion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s changed is the poll numbers and Ignatieff no longer attempting to implement his policy ideas.  Last spring, Ignatieff announced three policy ideas for the Conservatives to implement to keep Liberal support (one of them was EI reform).  When the Liberals were down in the polls, the policy ideas looked desperate and partisan.  Now they&#039;re up in the polls, the ideas look substantive.  Even the idiotic pretense that the Liberals are valiant defenders of access to abortion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danby</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252894</link>
		<dc:creator>danby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252894</guid>
		<description>What is he trying to hide?

&lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/news\/politics\/pattern-of-delay-ottawas-kafkaesque-information-denial\/article1454204\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Access to information &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is he trying to hide?</p>
<p><a href="http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/news\/politics\/pattern-of-delay-ottawas-kafkaesque-information-denial\/article1454204\/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Access to information </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmtejunkie</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252891</link>
		<dc:creator>cmtejunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252891</guid>
		<description>Wilson,

You are really off the mark today...no conbot speaking points out yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilson,</p>
<p>You are really off the mark today&#8230;no conbot speaking points out yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wascally Wabbit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252893</link>
		<dc:creator>Wascally Wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252893</guid>
		<description>I love the way wilson keeps rolling out the random old saws while he marks time awaiting the next batch of talking points from the PMO.
Like ChrisKW - I am favourably impressed.
Someone in the OLO has got it right. they have sent out Bob Rae on the road to do the smooching...while Mr. Ignatieff does what he SHOULD have done since May - if not before - start to put flesh on the bones of where he would like to take the Liberal Party and Canada.
What I find particlarly fascinating (as do other observers like Chantal Hebert) is that the course seems to be significantly more left leaning than heretofore - maybe indicating that having got rid of his original handlers and being forced to listen more to other senior members of the party - like Rae and others - he has been jerked into a direction that - among other things - will ensure he is clearly differentiated from Harper and his government&#039;s policies. Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the way wilson keeps rolling out the random old saws while he marks time awaiting the next batch of talking points from the PMO.<br />
Like ChrisKW &#8211; I am favourably impressed.<br />
Someone in the OLO has got it right. they have sent out Bob Rae on the road to do the smooching&#8230;while Mr. Ignatieff does what he SHOULD have done since May &#8211; if not before &#8211; start to put flesh on the bones of where he would like to take the Liberal Party and Canada.<br />
What I find particlarly fascinating (as do other observers like Chantal Hebert) is that the course seems to be significantly more left leaning than heretofore &#8211; maybe indicating that having got rid of his original handlers and being forced to listen more to other senior members of the party &#8211; like Rae and others &#8211; he has been jerked into a direction that &#8211; among other things &#8211; will ensure he is clearly differentiated from Harper and his government&#039;s policies. Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmtejunkie</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252890</link>
		<dc:creator>cmtejunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252890</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t forget wait times guarantees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#039;t forget wait times guarantees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252888</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252888</guid>
		<description>Probably.  But that would never be the means of Harper&#039;s exit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably.  But that would never be the means of Harper&#039;s exit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisInKW</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252887</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisInKW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252887</guid>
		<description>Good point.

On that note, when are the CPC bound by their constitution to conduct a review of the council and leader? Every 4 years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.</p>
<p>On that note, when are the CPC bound by their constitution to conduct a review of the council and leader? Every 4 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252889</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252889</guid>
		<description>It had a lot to do with money (or the lack therof), a political crisis with no historical precedent, and a profoundly derailed party.

I expect the wisdom of their decision (not so much Iggy, as the acclaimation) will be judged by their showing in the next election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It had a lot to do with money (or the lack therof), a political crisis with no historical precedent, and a profoundly derailed party.</p>
<p>I expect the wisdom of their decision (not so much Iggy, as the acclaimation) will be judged by their showing in the next election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisInKW</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252885</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisInKW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252885</guid>
		<description>This is true. A confidence vote delayed by prorogation is not a good thing to come upon without a &#039;permanent&#039; leader, one can understand this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true. A confidence vote delayed by prorogation is not a good thing to come upon without a &#039;permanent&#039; leader, one can understand this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisInKW</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252886</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisInKW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252886</guid>
		<description>This is true. A confidence vote delayed by prorogation is not a good thing to come upon without a &#039;permanent&#039; leader, one can understand this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true. A confidence vote delayed by prorogation is not a good thing to come upon without a &#039;permanent&#039; leader, one can understand this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252884</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252884</guid>
		<description>More 10 percenters coming out. Why is Harper attacking the troops?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More 10 percenters coming out. Why is Harper attacking the troops?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedupwithpetetongtoo</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252883</link>
		<dc:creator>fedupwithpetetongtoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252883</guid>
		<description>&quot;when there&#039;s a structural deficit&quot; created by whom, exactly? When the government that enabled that &quot;structural deficit&quot; through profligate spending refuses to reduce that vote buying, er um, spending itself? When the government whose spending ran up huge deficits and drove up debt and interest payments? Land of Oz indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;when there&#039;s a structural deficit&quot; created by whom, exactly? When the government that enabled that &quot;structural deficit&quot; through profligate spending refuses to reduce that vote buying, er um, spending itself? When the government whose spending ran up huge deficits and drove up debt and interest payments? Land of Oz indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danby</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/03/a-week-and-a-half-in-the-public-life-of-michael-ignatieff/comment-page-1/#comment-252882</link>
		<dc:creator>danby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=105207#comment-252882</guid>
		<description>But the notion that he prorogued parliament to shelve this issue is still there. Why all the 10 percenters? What is he trying to hide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the notion that he prorogued parliament to shelve this issue is still there. Why all the 10 percenters? What is he trying to hide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

