<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alberta Kremlinology bite of the week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedTylerEzro</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256944</link>
		<dc:creator>TedTylerEzro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256944</guid>
		<description>If he is painting himself as a red Tory, why is he distancing himself from Harper&#039;s pro-abortion, pro-deficit government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he is painting himself as a red Tory, why is he distancing himself from Harper&#39;s pro-abortion, pro-deficit government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256941</link>
		<dc:creator>John D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256941</guid>
		<description>Smith is not very impressive.  But if you&#039;ve heard Stelmach give an interview you can understand how &quot;not very impressive&quot; is more than enough to take him on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smith is not very impressive.  But if you&#39;ve heard Stelmach give an interview you can understand how &quot;not very impressive&quot; is more than enough to take him on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inkless</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256947</link>
		<dc:creator>Inkless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256947</guid>
		<description>I finally decided this wasn&#039;t worth belabouring onstage, but Danielle Smith&#039;s staff confirmed four different times that she would attend &#8212;&#160;including when we started to hear rumours that she wouldn&#039;t &#8212;&#160;before finally &quot;discovering&quot; that she was &quot;double booked,&quot; less than a week before the event. We were happy with the MLA they sent in her place, but for a while I was quite miffed. Tell us you can&#039;t come, but don&#039;t tell us you can and then change your mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally decided this wasn&#039;t worth belabouring onstage, but Danielle Smith&#039;s staff confirmed four different times that she would attend &mdash;&nbsp;including when we started to hear rumours that she wouldn&#039;t &mdash;&nbsp;before finally &quot;discovering&quot; that she was &quot;double booked,&quot; less than a week before the event. We were happy with the MLA they sent in her place, but for a while I was quite miffed. Tell us you can&#039;t come, but don&#039;t tell us you can and then change your mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrueGrit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256937</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueGrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256937</guid>
		<description>Smith is being given a free ride by the media here in Alberta. Both The Calgary Herald and Global seem to be her chief cheerleaders. Could it be that her past as an editorial board member at The Herald and the fact that her current husband is an executive producer at Global have anything to do with her favourable coverage? There seems to be conflicts of interest at play here. She keeps bashing the Progressive Conservatives, but does not tell us how she would do things differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smith is being given a free ride by the media here in Alberta. Both The Calgary Herald and Global seem to be her chief cheerleaders. Could it be that her past as an editorial board member at The Herald and the fact that her current husband is an executive producer at Global have anything to do with her favourable coverage? There seems to be conflicts of interest at play here. She keeps bashing the Progressive Conservatives, but does not tell us how she would do things differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: western thought</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256946</link>
		<dc:creator>western thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256946</guid>
		<description>Abort-o-crats? Boy are you dudes stuck in the 80s. Pining for Roseanne Skoke are we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abort-o-crats? Boy are you dudes stuck in the 80s. Pining for Roseanne Skoke are we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffM</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256945</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256945</guid>
		<description>I can only imagine it&#039;s because he&#039;s been duped by Harper&#039;s nefarious spendiac Abort-o-crats, TedTylerEzro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only imagine it&#039;s because he&#039;s been duped by Harper&#039;s nefarious spendiac Abort-o-crats, TedTylerEzro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffM</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256943</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256943</guid>
		<description>Kyle Fawcett knocked on my door during the last election. I seem to recall him distancing himself from Harper and going out of his way to paint himself as a red Tory (&quot;emphasis on &#039;Progressive&#039;&quot;). It could be that he was just feeding my (correctly) perceived leftishness, but anyway, it worked. Not to the degree that I voted for him or anything crazy like that, but in a kinda-like-the-guy, not-a-total-clown kind of way.

This has been GeoffM reporting from Calgary North Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle Fawcett knocked on my door during the last election. I seem to recall him distancing himself from Harper and going out of his way to paint himself as a red Tory (&quot;emphasis on &#039;Progressive&#039;&quot;). It could be that he was just feeding my (correctly) perceived leftishness, but anyway, it worked. Not to the degree that I voted for him or anything crazy like that, but in a kinda-like-the-guy, not-a-total-clown kind of way.</p>
<p>This has been GeoffM reporting from Calgary North Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colbycosh</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256942</link>
		<dc:creator>colbycosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256942</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot of material on Wildrose policies around, but I would not discourage you from believing that Smith enjoys advantageous treatment because of her media background. It would be strange if it WEREN&#039;T the case, wouldn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s a lot of material on Wildrose policies around, but I would not discourage you from believing that Smith enjoys advantageous treatment because of her media background. It would be strange if it WEREN&#039;T the case, wouldn&#039;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256939</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256939</guid>
		<description>To Game Theory adherents, one might look at Smith as being the Calgary backed counterweight to pull Stelmach (and by extension Harper) rightward. Similar to how the Reform laid the groundwork for Paul Martin. The uncritical hype and message management helps (hence avoiding anything but safe friendly environments in the short term).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Game Theory adherents, one might look at Smith as being the Calgary backed counterweight to pull Stelmach (and by extension Harper) rightward. Similar to how the Reform laid the groundwork for Paul Martin. The uncritical hype and message management helps (hence avoiding anything but safe friendly environments in the short term).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crit_Reasoning</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256940</link>
		<dc:creator>Crit_Reasoning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256940</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty sad that Stelmach can&#039;t even muster up a stand-in who can stand up to Danielle Smith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s pretty sad that Stelmach can&#039;t even muster up a stand-in who can stand up to Danielle Smith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256938</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256938</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s part of a pattern?  She could have run in last fall&#039;s byelection in Calgary-Glenmor and be in the legislature right now--but it seemed too risky and she played it safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#039;s part of a pattern?  She could have run in last fall&#039;s byelection in Calgary-Glenmor and be in the legislature right now&#8211;but it seemed too risky and she played it safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynnTO</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256936</link>
		<dc:creator>LynnTO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256936</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an Ontarian and I&#039;m quite pleased to see that western Canadian politics are receiving a little more attention on the Maclean&#039;s blogosphere.  It&#039;s nice to know that the entire country&#039;s off its rocker, politically.

And, I&#039;d like to hear more about the emergence of Danielle Smith as a political contender in AB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m an Ontarian and I&#039;m quite pleased to see that western Canadian politics are receiving a little more attention on the Maclean&#039;s blogosphere.  It&#039;s nice to know that the entire country&#039;s off its rocker, politically.</p>
<p>And, I&#039;d like to hear more about the emergence of Danielle Smith as a political contender in AB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256935</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256935</guid>
		<description>Well, I did see her in a one-on-one with Peter van Dusen (the moderator of the debate) on CPAC filmed around the same time. Seemed like a safe environment. Couldn&#039;t quite figure out why she was making Ontario&#039;s case for the inequities of equalization, however.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/#idc-container&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremli...&lt;/a&gt;

Perhaps Wells will drop by your blog and explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I did see her in a one-on-one with Peter van Dusen (the moderator of the debate) on CPAC filmed around the same time. Seemed like a safe environment. Couldn&#039;t quite figure out why she was making Ontario&#039;s case for the inequities of equalization, however.</p>
<p><a href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/#idc-container" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremli&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Perhaps Wells will drop by your blog and explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colbycosh</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256934</link>
		<dc:creator>colbycosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256934</guid>
		<description>Beats me. I don&#039;t know anything about it but that sounds like a question for Wells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beats me. I don&#039;t know anything about it but that sounds like a question for Wells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/alberta-kremlinology-bite-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-256933</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106157#comment-256933</guid>
		<description>Say Colby - perhaps as a Macleans &quot;Colleague&quot; you can enlighten us further on the day to day strategies of Danielle.

She was scheduled for quite some time to appear on the Macleans gabfest in Calgary last month on the topic &lt;i&gt;The west is in - now what?&lt;/i&gt; Then, with little or no fanfare her name was quietly dropped from the roster, and replaced by Rob Anderson who had been one of the PC floor crossers (too afraid to resign and run as an Wildrose Alliance candidate) and a member of WA for only a number of weeks.

So, why did she withdraw at the last minute? Wells suggested he would inform us at the start of the Calgary debate, but I didn&#039;t see any explanation on the CPAC broadcast. Was she afraid of Lloyd Axworthy? What&#039;s the deal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say Colby &#8211; perhaps as a Macleans &quot;Colleague&quot; you can enlighten us further on the day to day strategies of Danielle.</p>
<p>She was scheduled for quite some time to appear on the Macleans gabfest in Calgary last month on the topic <i>The west is in &#8211; now what?</i> Then, with little or no fanfare her name was quietly dropped from the roster, and replaced by Rob Anderson who had been one of the PC floor crossers (too afraid to resign and run as an Wildrose Alliance candidate) and a member of WA for only a number of weeks.</p>
<p>So, why did she withdraw at the last minute? Wells suggested he would inform us at the start of the Calgary debate, but I didn&#039;t see any explanation on the CPAC broadcast. Was she afraid of Lloyd Axworthy? What&#039;s the deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

