Out of Control

How arrogance and bungled recalls sent the once flawless Toyota careening into crisis

by Chris Sorensen, Kate Lunau on Monday, February 15, 2010 9:00am - 9 Comments

Out of control

When Akio Toyoda, the chief executive of Toyota and grandson of the company’s founder, stepped in front of a microphone last October at the Japan National Press Club in Tokyo, many observers were shocked and a bit perplexed to hear him say Toyota was “grasping for salvation,” and just steps away from “capitulation to irrelevance or death.” It hardly mattered that he was trying to shake the company’s executives from their complacency by referencing a popular management book, How The Mighty Fall. The peculiarities of Japanese business culture aside, this is not how leaders of global companies are supposed to talk, and Toyota—despite its US$4.4-billion loss in 2008 and a similar forecast for last year, a brutal year for the entire industry—was still widely considered the world’s most successful automaker.

Four months later, Toyoda’s comments sound eerily prophetic, causing some to wonder whether he knew more than he was letting on. Once praised for its manufacturing prowess and relentless efforts to improve quality control, the automaker has suddenly found itself in the midst of a crisis following its biggest-ever vehicle recalls, totalling some 8.5 million of its cars, trucks and SUVs—almost as many vehicles as all carmakers sold in the United States last year. Toyota is facing lawsuits from drivers who allege it knowingly covered up defects, and government officials are accusing the company of foot-dragging when it comes to acknowledging potential safety issues. It’s a far cry from just a few years ago, when Toyota’s ascension seemed unstoppable, and people walked into dealerships ready to pay the full sticker price because they believed Toyotas were the best-made cars on the road.

Though few Toyota vehicles sold to customers have experienced problems, the stories of those affected have been terrifying: some drivers say they experienced “sudden unintended acceleration,” a polite way of describing a car or truck careening down the highway with the throttle stuck open. Last August, in the most high-profile example—which marked the start of Toyota’s very public downhill slide—off-duty highway patrol officer Mark Saylor was driving a 2009 Lexus near San Diego when it suddenly sped out of control. In a 911 call, a passenger is heard frantically relaying the doomed car’s final seconds: “Our accelerator is stuck…we’re in trouble…there’s no brakes…we’re approaching the intersection…hold on.” The car struck another vehicle, tumbled down an embankment and caught fire, killing Saylor, his wife, her brother and his daughter.

It’s still not clear exactly what caused the crash, although a preliminary sheriff’s report blamed incompatible floor mats, which caused the gas pedal to become jammed. Toyota has since recalled millions of vehicles because of floor mats and millions more because of sticky gas pedals. With Toyota’s brand built on quality, such harrowing incidents, coupled with persistent speculation about what could have caused them, are hammering the company’s reputation with each passing day. The fact that separate problems have emerged with the brake systems of Toyota’s Prius hybrid, a flagship vehicle for the automaker’s technological prowess, has only stoked the fire.

How did the world’s most beloved automaker suddenly find itself lurching from one crisis to the next? Observers say it’s no coincidence the recent rash of recalls follows Toyota’s decision in 2002 to overtake General Motors as the world’s biggest car company, setting in motion a period of rapid global expansion that caused the company to stray from its roots, and put a strain on its oft-admired manufacturing system. Others say a culture of arrogance and infallibility has added to Toyota’s problems.

The immediate cost of the recalls are estimated to be US$2-billion in repairs and lost sales, but it’s the potential for long-term damage to Toyota’s painstakingly built brand that executives need to worry about. Not surprisingly, Toyota is desperately trying to limit the fallout before it’s too late. Exposed as just another big, out-of-touch automaker, it’s now more a question of whether Toyota’s vehicles, already described as “boring” even by their fans, will be given the taint of being unreliable too, a poisonous label that can take years—even a decade—to shake. Just ask General Motors, Ford and Chrysler.

One Friday morning last September, George Jusdanis was returning home in his new Toyota Tacoma, purchased just three weeks before. With a load of produce in his pickup truck—Jusdanis and his wife, Jane, ran a fruit and vegetable stand outside their Hamilton home—the 78-year-old reversed into the garage while Jane, 77, waved him in. It was a routine they’d been through countless times, but this day, something went horribly wrong. The truck sped up, crashing into Jusdanis’s wife of 52 years. She later died.

The Tacoma was included in a Canadian “safety improvement campaign” last November that focused on floor mats. The campaign followed the U.S. recall of 4.2 million vehicles because of concerns that accelerator pedals could become jammed in their floor mats, causing a loss of control. But no vehicle defects could be determined in the Jusdanis case and the collision investigator’s findings were inconclusive. Jusdanis and his family remain convinced there was “something electronically or mechanically wrong” with the truck, says Jim Scarfone, their lawyer, and will pursue legal action against Toyota.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    Your point is a good one, but if the problem is lack of "fault tolerant computing" then why are the other car vendors not encountering similar problems?

    This may be a hardware problem, an electrical problem, or a software problem, but it seems indisputable that it's a design error in Toyota's vehicles rather than a general problem with the auto industry as a whole.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/JohnCal JohnCal

      I feel it is a yes and no. We are where we are and benefit tremendously from our IT and the ElectroGiGa era. But there, as always, is a cost, and losses deaths etc. None of us are immune.
      I personally hope the engineering and industrial institutions will begin a modified approach and implement 99.9% failsafe and simple systems into critical control functions in our electro mechanical lifestyles. In Aircraft this is exactly the issue Airbus, Boeing, and all, is now facing. I wish them the humility and strength of character to revamp their approach and hand the ultimate command back to the humans. Boeing has had this as a override capability to the PIC for many years, but may be leaving that behind.
      I think we emotionally accept human error better than a fritzing computer in charge of 400 seat A/C @ FL42. Same here with Toyota. We have had an era of fabulous 'Comfynous' but need no to get our feet back on the ground. Accelerator =a cable please. Brakes=Hydraulic. No wires attached please.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JohnCal JohnCal

    Toyota did not get where they are by luck alone, but a mix of luck and very intelligent engineers dedicated to the craft. My hunch is that when the Lexus accident in Cal occurred they peered deeply and right away into the computer management software and found a data chain which could lead to a misinterpretation of sensor data and an erroneous command. I saw a story recently of a similar situ in Oz w/ a '02 or so Ford Explorer barely coming to a semi-stop after many km and burned up brakes. Says to me 'puter probs. IMO they have done the best they can with a terribly difficult situation. And have needed time to determine, fabricate and issue new software. Thats my guess. Personally I prefer simple all-mechanical systems for these functions. May that return to the throttle.

  • Andre

    It's not every Toyota that has drive by wire throttle. You're referring to the isolated case of the cruise control programming on the 2010 Prius. Don't evaluate ALL of Toyota's recall practices based on this case alone.

    And frankly, that woman had an accident because of bad driving. Toyota is refusing to address the problem because it's not a design fault; it's a widely used cruise control design. Hold the 'accelerate' long enough and it will keep acelerating even after you let go of it. It's impossible for the Prius to accelerate fast enough for her not being to cancel the 'accelerate' command before having an accident.

  • Ryan

    Just put it in neutral…. so simple.

  • Sajid

    Not surprised. I raised serious safety issues after buying new 99 Corolla; it had major suspension flaw which Toyota Canada refused to acknowledge; it is a feature I was told. Finally in Aug 2000, on a clam sunny day, a gentle curve at 40km/h the vehicle did a full 360 without any given notice. I just narrowly missed bunch of kids whose school bus had just picked them up.
    I had earlier raised alarm to Transport Canada about this yet they told me this is not an issue. Finally, I wrote to them that I took no responsibility if anyone in the vehicle or outside was either killed or injured as this vehicle was defective.
    This was my 4th Corolla and I just immigrated from South Africa where Corollas are built to extremely great performance and durable standards. I also reported the matter straight to Toyota Japan and took Toyota Canada to Camvap. Everyone including the adjudicator was saying Toyota cannot be wrong. But I as a die hard Toyota loyalist was telling them that there was a issue and since I was not an engineer.
    I won the battle and my car was the first to be fixed in entire North America for this issue.
    The manager of Dixie Toyota told me that because of my persistence, others have benefited. His mechanics were lined up as well to get their vehicles fixed. BUT till today I did not see a recall ordered for this serious violation but only customers that complained got it addressed.
    Will I buy a Toyota again. You bet as the 99 Corolla is still with me.

  • Larry

    It would be simple to solve this issue by changing the software so the accelerator input was deactivated the minute you brake. Of course it would be better to teach new drivers how to handle such an issue (like Ryan said – "Just put it in neutral…").

    If putting it into neutral doesn't work then turn it off. Sure the hydraulics stop working but its not impossible to steer or break without it.

  • http://www.premieretreeservices.com/ tree removal service

    I saw this on the news. It was a very sad tragedy. Their car was speeding up to 120 kph and they can't do anything.

  • http://www.geniemove.com/ Chicago movers

    Very shocked to see this.

    One Friday morning last September, George Jusdanis was returning home in his new Toyota Tacoma, purchased just three weeks before. With a load of produce in his pickup truck—Jusdanis and his wife, Jane, ran a fruit and vegetable stand outside their Hamilton home—the 78-year-old reversed into the garage while Jane, 77, waved him in. It was a routine they’d been through countless times, but this day, something went horribly wrong. The truck sped up, crashing into Jusdanis’s wife of 52 years. She later died.

    And I have not concluded that the problem is with the software or with any other else………

From Macleans