James Cameron has no clothes

On almost every level, says this critic, ‘Avatar’ is a sub-prime performance

by Robert Fulford on Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:50am - 18 Comments

At the beginning, as Cameron takes us through a murky and mysterious rainforest, his most ingenious images are genuinely surprising. But the film runs 163 minutes, getting on for three hours, which means many special effects are repeated so often they cease to be special. There are moments when we look down a cliff into a valley that seems impossibly deep. It’s breathtaking the first time but routine the fourth.

The 3-D version has been so well promoted that we’re ready for a spectacular experience when we put on the special glasses. But 3-D proves, as it has often before, a disappointment. We seem to be looking at two different pictures, one in two dimensions, the other pasted on top. This technique has been elaborately refined over more than half a century but it remains limited in the same way that Bwana Devil (1952) was limited when a Kenyan tribesman threw a spear into the audience. The audience ducked but found the 3-D effects otherwise boring.

It’s clear that Cameron stoutly opposes war (nothing on earth or Pandora could be more obvious), but it’s hard to imagine how a film like this could possibly get along without it. A battle between the natives of Pandora and the American soldiers fills the last third of the film. It’s the hardest part to watch, an eye-straining, ear-abusing ordeal, complete with aerial dogfights that recall Top Gun and every other fighter-pilot movie. In this case, 3-D confuses more than it excites. Cameron’s inspiration fails him with his tanks and helicopters, awkward-looking contraptions. Perhaps Cameron wants to express the ugliness of American war-making, but these sequences feel more like a computer game.

Avatar has been cited as a possible winner of the Academy Award for best picture, but it’s not even the best of James Cameron’s films. On almost every level, Avatar is a sub-prime performance. His Terminator 2: Judgment Day looks like a masterpiece by comparison with Avatar. Titanic, a weepy puddle of bathos, at least offers some attractive and interesting actors, of whom Avatar has none. James Cameron exhibits remarkable talents in Avatar, but the greatest by far is his spectacular knack for generating publicity.

Bookmark and Share
  • Nono

    blah blah blah blah

  • Warren

    Yes, yes, yes, the "Dances with Wolves" critical trope has been issued dozens of times. When i saw the film with my son I asked him halfway through if he remembered seeing Kevin Costner's epic. You couldn't miss it. But all stories echo if not replicate previous stories, a fact that Fulford knows all too well. As a critical approach to the film that has no traction. So the rest of Fulford's critique resides in a "National Post" ideological display. And in as much as I was duly unimpressed with the Avatar plot and its terrible dialogue (though George Lucas makes him sound like Paddy Chayevfsky) Fulford's description of the internal contradictions in the movie is as tired as Cameron's plot. Really, do you think people can't critique corporations at the sane time that they're employed by and benefit from them? If so, he doesn't get out much. And then he thinks the obvious parallels between the U.S. today and the corporate/military organization in Avatar is too what, obvious? Pointed? Unfair?

  • Who

    I'm glad I don't have to pay to read this tripe.

    • L Chaput

      So why do you read it anyways? Unless its the case of the answer to the old question "what kind of reader do you think I am!" We seem to have already established that, we're just haggling over the price.

  • JimD

    This comes across as jealousy almost. Cameron is the most successful film maker of all time, so he can't be doing much wrong.

  • Guest

    Why is this being published now? Avatar has kind of been out for a while now…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Canuckguy Canuckguy

    I saw the movie, it was impressive at the beginning then it got predictable. I agree with the critics about the stilted dialogue and tired plot. I would have enjoyed a spear chucked at me.

  • KCinQC

    2 months?! You waited 2 months to write a review about one of the most widely watched movies of all time? Who's left that you are trying to inform? Or are you hoping to generate your own publicity with a scathing review of an immensely popular film?

    FYI, the general consensus is that the story was intentionally watered down to help ensure a wider international audience. In the original script life on Pandora was extremely violent at times, and had such lovely images as a love-lost Avatar committing suicide by being eaten alive which in turn caused the Avatar's "driver" to go insane. Having experienced being devoured will do that to a fella.
    Would you have enjoyed that script more? Perhaps. But I suspect 20th Century Fox would not. Investing nearly half a billion (adding in advertising) on a film that could give people nightmares, and guarantee no sequels, is probably not a terribly smart thing to do.

  • Brian

    I have zero interest in seeing Avatar. That said, anyone who implies that Terminator 2 isn't a masterpiece on its own merits, not just on relative merits, shouldn't be allowed to publish movie reviews. :-)

  • Nicked

    I propose a poll – sequels that were as good or better than the original. I cannot think of many, but two come to mind. Aliens and Terminator2. That makes the odds good for an improvement in Av2. If our correspondent is to be believed, it can only go up from here. There WILL be a sequel however, as sure as gravity.

  • BJB

    "It’s clear that Cameron stoutly opposes war …" Right. That's why there is a Pandora warrior class, and why the Pandora clan, obvious tree huggers, never given to the archer's hunt, simply folded when it came time to defend their interests. Fulford has produced a screed is so jaundiced and cynical, so bereft of compassion, insight or understanding, he brings a new low to the long discredited attitudes of the neo-conservative.

  • Darden Cavalcade

    I saw Avatar on the day it opened. I was disappointed with the plot, character development, and dialogue. Yes. The animation was spectacular for the first 90 minutes and afterward I kept looking at my watch and wishing I hadn't drunk so much Coke.

  • Geoff P

    Reveiwing Cameron's films as you would do with "high art" is just silliness. Did you really expect anything else?? Cameron's films are purely for entertainment, spectacle and to make money. That being said I really enjoyed Avatar and my kids LOVED it.

    Cameron made this film for a target audience an it's obvious he succeeded in a massive way. People have voted with their wallets and anyone who critiques this film as "art" should really not be wasting their time sounding like a pompous buffoon.

    As they say in sports…"It is what it is."

  • Fred – Brandon MB

    I went to see Avatar with an open mind, something this reviewer should consider.

    I could see both its triumphs and its shortcomings. Visually, it is stunning, and I can't wait to see it again. The special effects are state of the art, and the 3D is used effectively, not gratuitously. The most astonishing triumph is that Cameron quickly had me believing that the blue-skinned Na'avi were real living beings.

    The script was predictable, and the dialogue corny. Some of the casting was questionable as well. But it was no worse than a Star Wars or Indiana Jones flick. It's a sci-fi action movie after all.

    Make the same movie with a better script writer and you would have a masterpiece. As it is, it is an exceptional movie, as long as you aren't a cynical, self-absorbed movie critic.

  • PiWi

    Zoe Saldana and Sam Worthington, less "attractive and interesting"? I know skinny boys and Naomi Klein-reading 'womyn' will bitch-slap me silly for saying this, but–blue, or not–the 'Avatar' leads don't look like either weenie, or doughie… And you could've spared everyone the bad photoshop of 'the Quaker Oats guy' in undies.

  • Thomas S

    I haven't seen the movie, and I have no desire to. Everyone tells me, 'The graphics are spectacular!' and 'The animation is incredible!' but no one comments on the story, characters or acting. Which tells me that those aspects are not worth talking about. I can tell that, yes, it is a great success in computer graphics and animation, but for me, I need more than simple eye candy. I need something to engage me. And clearly this isn't what I'm looking for. If I want something that visually impresses me while enjoying a lovely story with interesting characters and good acting, I'll watch UP.

    Clearly, Avatar is a movie I will rent for a date. Something I don't have to pay attention to… so I can lavish it on something I really care about.

  • http://www.matthewbproman.com/ John Proman

    I don't like his film Avatar. Sorry Mr. Cameron. Thank you for sharing this article Robert.

  • http://www.geniemove.com/ Chicago movers

    Avatar – My dream movie and I have seen it more than 100 times. And James Cameroon my favorite.

From Macleans